¹ Hexter, J. H., The Reign of King Pym (Cambridge, Mass., 1941).Google Scholar

² Pearl, Valerie, ‘Oliver St. John and the “middle group” in the Long Parliament’, Eng. Hist.Rev., LXXXI (1966), 490–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and ‘The “Royal Independents” in the English Civil War’, Roy.Hist.Soc.Trans., 5th ser., xviii (1968), 69–Google Scholar; Underdown, D., Pride's Purge. Politics in the Puritan Revolution (hereafter Pride's Purge) (Oxford, 1971)Google Scholar, passim, and ‘The Independents Reconsidered’, J. of British Studies, III (1964), 57–84Google Scholar, and ‘The Independents again’, ibid, viii (1968), 83–93, and ‘Party Management in the Recruiter Elections’, Eng.Hist.Rev., LXXXIII (1968), 235–64Google Scholar

³ Not all historians of the period have been so convinced as the writer of this article is, however. Professor MacCormack is one dissentient from this view. Another is Glow, Lotte, ‘Political Affiliations in the House of Commons after Pym's Death’, Bull.Inst.Hist.Res., xxxviii (1965), 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴ MacCormack, , op. cit. p. 1.Google Scholar

⁵ Harleian Miscellany, v, 216–7.

⁶ See, for example, A Declaration of the Lords and Commons … in answer to His Majesties Declaration (1642) [Wing 1442], espec. pp. 9–10.

⁷ MacCormack, , op. cit. p. 307.Google Scholar

⁸ Ibid. p. 6 and note.

⁹ Some M.P.s whom it is now customary to consider as middle-groupers are, in fact, assigned to the core rather than the fringes of the two parties. Of the six ‘royal independents’ whose careers as members of the successor to Pym's middle-group have been analysed by Dr Pearl (Roy Hist.Soc.Trans., loc. cit.), five are classified by Professor MacCormack as ‘Core Radicals’, and the other (Pierrepont) converted from the fringe to the core before the end of the year.

¹⁰ MacCormack, , op. cit. p. 43.Google Scholar

¹¹ Worden, B., The Rump Parliament, p. 5.Google Scholar

¹² Maseres, F. (ed.), Select Tracts relating to the Civil Wars in England in the Reign of King Charles the First (1815), 1, 228–32.Google Scholar

¹³ MacCormack, , op. cit. pp. 161–2.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Ibid. p. 236.

¹⁵ Woodhouse, A. S. P. (ed.), Puritanism and Liberty (1938), pp. 106–7.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Sexby's analogy, ibid. p. 103.

¹⁷ MacCormack, , op. cit. p. 286.Google Scholar

¹⁸ ‘The outcome was certainly far from inevitable.’ (Underdown, Pride's Purge, p. 107).

¹⁹ Ibid. pp. 128–42, 148–50.

²⁰ MacCormack, , op. cit. p. 294.Google Scholar

²¹ Ibid. pp. 300–1.

²² Ibid. p. 299.

²³ Underdown, , Pride's Purge, pp. 140–1.Google Scholar

²⁴ The evidence for this is carefully summed up in ibid. pp. 164–72.

²⁵ Bodleian, Clarendon MS 34, fos. 17–18 (b).

²⁶ Underdown, , Pride's Purge, espec. pp. 208–96.Google Scholar

²⁷ Milton, John, Works (New York 1932) VII, 29.Google Scholar

²⁸ Worden, , op. cit. p. 384.Google Scholar

²⁹ Underdown, , Pride's Purge, pp. 336–7.Google Scholar

³⁰ Worden, , op. cit. p. 139.Google Scholar

³¹ Ibid. p. 188.

³² B. Whitelock, Memorials of the Englirh Affairs … (1684), pp. 380–0 (b).

³³ Worden, , op. cit. pp. 48–53.Google Scholar

³⁴ Ibid. p. 377.