Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T12:17:54.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REPUBLICANISM AND CIVIC VIRTUE IN TREATYITE POLITICAL THOUGHT, 1921–3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2020

SEÁN DONNELLY Open the ORCID record for SEÁN DONNELLY [Opens in a new window]
SEÁN DONNELLY*
Affiliation:
Teesside University
*
Teesside University, Victoria Rd, Middlesbrough, TS3 6DR[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Republicanism has been one of the most influential political ideologies in modern Irish history; however, it remains conspicuously undertheorized by historians of the revolutionary period. While recent historiography has challenged representations of anti-Treaty Sinn Féin as a mindlessly destructive, anti-democratic force, the extent of ideological and rhetorical continuity linking the Provisional Government formed to assume control of the Free State on 7 January 1922 with the pre-Treaty republican tradition has not been understood. This article rejects the historiographical thesis that the Provisional Government abandoned republican ideas. Drawing from the Cambridge School's contextualist account of republicanism as a polysemic and contingent political language, it highlights the vigorously contested nature of republican thought in the intellectual firmament of revolutionary Sinn Féin and argues that the Free State leadership articulated its vision of politics and society through classical republican concepts of ‘civic virtue’ and the ‘common good’. It is suggested additionally that the colonial dynamics of the Anglo-Irish relationship helped to shape the vision of republican citizenship promoted by an administration possessed of a deep-seated determination to refute historical perceptions of the Irish people as congenitally ‘unfit’ for sovereignty.

Type
Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 63 , Issue 5 , December 2020 , pp. 1257 - 1280
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

In addition to the Historical Journal's three anonymous referees and its editors, I wish to thank those who read, commented upon, and thus improved previous incarnations of this article, notably Dr Roisín Higgins, Dr Ultán Gillen, Professor Michael Laffan, Dr Owen McGee, Dr Thomas Dolan, and Dr Andrew Phemister. The research on which this article is based was funded by Teesside University. I also benefited from a travel bursary from the British Association of Irish Studies.

References

1 Garvin, Tom, ‘An Irish republican tradition?’, in Honohan, Iseult, ed., Republicanism in Ireland: confronting theories and traditions (Manchester, 2008), pp. 23–30Google Scholar, at p. 24.

2 Foster, R. F., Modern Ireland, 1600–1972 (London, 1988), p. 669Google Scholar.

3 Andrews, C. S., A man of no property (Dublin, 2001), p. 8Google Scholar.

4 Bourke, Richard, ‘Reflections on the political thought of the Irish revolution’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 27 (2017), pp. 175–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 185.

5 This statement was included in the Provisional IRA's 1986 ‘Easter Declaration’, cited in Smith, M. L. R., Fighting for Ireland? The military strategy of the Irish republican movement (London, 1995), p. 30Google Scholar.

6 Bourke, Richard, ‘Revising the Cambridge School: republicanism revisited’, Political Theory, 46 (2018), pp. 467–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 See, for example, Bourke, Richard, Peace in Ireland: the war of ideas (London, 2003)Google Scholar; McGarry, Fearghal, ed., Republicanism in modern Ireland (Dublin, 2004)Google Scholar.

8 See Brady, Ciaran, ed., Interpreting Irish history: the debate on historical revisionism (Dublin, 1994)Google Scholar; Boyce, George R. and O'Day, Alan, eds., The making of modern Irish history (London, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Bourke, Richard, ‘Introduction’, in Bourke, Richard and MacBride, Ian, eds., The Princeton history of modern Ireland (Princeton, NJ, 2016), pp. 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Foster, Gavin M., ‘Res publica na hÉireann? Republican liberty and the Irish Civil War’, New Hibernia Review, 16 (2012), pp. 20–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 41.

11 Foster, Gavin M., The Irish Civil War and society: politics, class, and conflict (London, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Regan, John M., ‘The politics of reaction: the dynamics of Treatyite government and policy, 1922–33’, Irish Historical Studies, 30 (1997), pp. 542–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 553.

13 Regan, John M., The Irish counter-revolution, 1921–36: Treatyite politics and settlement in independent Ireland (Dublin, 2001), pp. 75–101Google Scholar.

14 Kissane, Bill, The politics of the Irish Civil War (Oxford, 2005), p. 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Dolan, Anne, Commemorating the Irish Civil War: history and memory, 1923–2000 (Cambridge, 2006), pp. 124, 184Google Scholar.

16 Hanley, Brian, ‘Change and continuity: republican thought since 1922’, Republic, 1 (2001), pp. 92–103Google Scholar, at p. 92.

17 See, for example, Curran, Joseph, The birth of the Irish Free State (Tuscaloosa, AL, 1980)Google Scholar; Prager, Jeffrey, Building democracy in Ireland: political order and cultural integration in a newly independent nation (Cambridge, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Garvin, Tom, 1922: the birth of Irish democracy (Dublin, 1996)Google Scholar; Laffan, Michael, Judging W.T. Cosgrave: the foundation of the Irish state (Dublin, 2014)Google Scholar.

18 Foster, Gavin M., ‘In the shadow of the split: writing the Irish Civil War’, Field Day Review, 2 (2006), pp. 294–303Google Scholar, at p. 296.

19 Pettit, Philip, ‘Foreword’, in Daly, Eoin and Hickey, Tom, eds., The political theory of the Irish constitution: republicanism and the basic law (Manchester, 2015), p. viiiGoogle Scholar.

20 Skinner, Quentin, ‘The republican ideal of political liberty’, in Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio, eds., Machiavelli and republicanism (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 293–309Google Scholar, at p. 302.

21 Pocock, J. G. A., ‘Oceana: its ideological context’, in Pocock, J. G. A., ed., The political works of James Harrington (Cambridge, 1977), pp. 15–42Google Scholar, at p. 15.

22 Goldie, Mark, ‘The ancient constitution and the languages of political thought’, Historical Journal, 62 (2019), pp. 3–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 4.

23 Dwan, David, The great community: culture and nationalism in Ireland (Dublin, 2008), p. 52Google Scholar.

24 Regan, ‘Politics of reaction’, p. 560.

25 Knirck, Jason, Imagining Ireland's independence: the debates over the Anglo-Irish treaty of 1921 (Lanham, MD, 2006), p. 141Google Scholar.

26 See, for example, McCarthy, John P., Kevin O'Higgins: builder of the Irish state (Dublin, 2006)Google Scholar; Meehan, Ciara, The Cosgrave party: a history of Cumann na nGaedheal, 1923–33 (Dublin, 2010)Google Scholar; Knirck, Jason, Afterimage of the revolution: Cumann na nGaedheal and Irish politics, 1922–1932 (Madison, WI, 2014)Google Scholar; Farrell, Mel, Party politics in a new democracy: the Irish Free State, 1922–37 (New York, NY, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Richard Mulcahy, ‘New year message to the nation’, 30 Dec. 1923, University College Dublin Archive (UCDA), Richard Mulcahy papers, P7/B/183.

28 An Saorstát (The Free State), 5 July 1922.

29 Alfred O'Rahilly, ‘The case for the treaty’, UCDA, George Gavan Duffy papers, P152/220.

30 Collins, Michael, The path to freedom (Cork, 1996), p. 35Google Scholar.

31 Boyd, Ernest, ‘Ireland: resurgent and insurgent’, Foreign Affairs, 1 (1922), pp. 86–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 90–1.

32 Kevin O'Higgins, address to the electors of Laois/Offaly, June 1922, UCDA, Kevin O'Higgins papers, P197/139.

33 Kissane, Politics of the Irish Civil War, p. 175; see also Regan, Irish counter-revolution, p. 138.

34 Cosgrave, W. T., ‘The lesson of Arthur Griffith's life’, in Arthur Griffith/Michael Collins (Dublin, 1923), p. 30Google Scholar.

35 Kissane, Politics of the Irish Civil War, p. 36.

36 See, for example, McDonough, Terrence, ed., Was Ireland a colony? Economics, politics and culture in nineteenth-century Ireland (Dublin, 2005)Google Scholar; Kenny, Kevin, ed., Ireland and the British empire (Oxford, 2004)Google Scholar.

37 Beatty, Aidan, Masculinity and power in Irish nationalism, 1884–1938 (London, 2016), p. 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 See, for example, Curtis, L. P., Apes and angels: the Irishman in Victorian caricature (Washington, DC, 1971)Google Scholar.

39 Hopkinson, Michael, Green against green: the Irish Civil War (Dublin, 1988), p. 273Google Scholar.

40 Garvin, 1922, pp. 60–2.

41 MacWhite to Department of Foreign Affairs, 1 Mar. 1922, UCDA, Michael MacWhite papers, P194/202.

42 See Foster, Irish Civil War and society, p. 37.

43 See the editors’ introduction in Boyce, D. G., Eccleshall, Robert, and Geoghegan, Vincent, eds., Political thought in Ireland since the seventeenth century (New York, NY, 1993), pp. 1–6Google Scholar, at p. 5.

44 Fanon, Frantz, The wretched of the earth, trans. Farrington, Constance (Harmondsworth, 1967), p. 210Google Scholar.

45 William Davin, Dáil debates (hereafter DD), 22 Sept. 1922, available at https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/find/?debateType=dail.

46 O'Hegarty, P. S., The victory of Sinn Féin: how it won it and how it used it (Dublin, 1924), p. 125Google Scholar.

47 Darrell Figgis, DD, 27 Sept. 1922.

48 O'Higgins commenting on Mulcahy's statement to the Army Enquiry Commission, 12 May 1924, UCDA, Mulcahy papers, P7/C/21, emphasis in original.

49 Gerald FitzGibbon, DD, 29 Sept. 1922.

50 See, for example, Bell, Duncan, ‘What is liberalism?’, Political Theory, 42 (2014), pp. 682–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bourke, Richard, ‘What is conservatism? History, ideology and party’, European Journal of Political Theory, 17 (2018), pp. 449–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 See, for example, Cécile Laborde, Critical republicanism: the hijab controversy and political philosophy (Oxford, 2008).

52 See, for example, Patten, Alan, ‘The republican critique of liberalism’, British Journal of Political Science, 26 (1996), pp. 25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Worden, Blair, ‘Marchamont Nedham and English republicanism’, in Wootton, David, ed., Republicanism, liberty, and commercial society, 1649–1776 (Stanford, CA, 1994), p. 46Google Scholar.

54 Pettit, Philip, Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government (Oxford, 1997)Google Scholar; Skinner, Quentin, Liberty before liberalism (Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar.

55 Foster, ‘Res publica na hÉireann?’, p. 24.

56 The treaty was the first official document in which the term ‘British commonwealth of nations’ was used, a circumstance emphasized by Collins and O'Higgins when advocating ratification in the Dáil. See DD, 19 Dec. 1921.

57 See Cahillane, Laura, Drafting the Irish Free State constitution (Manchester, 2016), pp. 47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 DD, 14 Dec. 1921.

59 Michael Collins, DD, 19 Dec. 1921; see also Kevin O’ Higgins, Civil war and the events which led to it (Dublin, 1922), p. 10.

60 Collins, Path to freedom, pp. 90–1, 131.

61 Pettit, Republicanism, p. 2.

62 Ibid., p. 20; Skinner, ‘Republican ideal of political liberty’, p. 303.

63 Aristotle, , The politics, trans. Sinclair, T. A. (London, 1981), p. 196Google Scholar.

64 Pettit, Republicanism, p. 6.

65 Agresto, John T., ‘Liberty, virtue, and republicanism: 1776–1787’, Review of Politics, 39 (1977), pp. 473–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 474–5.

66 Honohan, Iseult, Civic republicanism (London, 2002), p. 57Google Scholar.

67 Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de, The spirit of the laws, ed. trans., and Cohler, Anne, Miller, Basia, and Stone, Harold (Cambridge, 1989), p. xliGoogle Scholar.

68 Pocock, J. G. A., The Machiavellian moment: Florentine political thought and the Atlantic republican tradition (Princeton, NJ, 1975), pp. 49–80Google Scholar.

69 Foster, ‘Res publica na hÉireann?’, p. 23.

70 Pocock, Machiavellian moment, p. 37.

71 Skinner, Quentin, The foundations of modern political thought, volume one: the Renaissance (Cambridge, 1978), pp. 152–80Google Scholar; see also Nelson, Eric, The Greek tradition in republican thought (Cambridge, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 Dwan, David, ‘Civic virtue in the modern world: the politics of Young Ireland’, Irish Political Studies, 22 (2007), pp. 35–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 36–7.

73 Kelly, Matthew, The Fenian ideal and Irish nationalism, 1882–1916 (Woodbridge, 2006), p. 239Google Scholar.

74 McGee, Owen, The IRB: the Irish Republican Brotherhood, from the Land League to Sinn Féin (Dublin, 2005), pp. 11, 15, 26Google Scholar.

75 See, for example, Maume, Patrick, ‘Young Ireland, Arthur Griffith, and republican ideology: the question of continuity’, Éire-Ireland, 34 (1999), pp. 155–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also idem, The long gestation: Irish nationalist life, 1891–1918 (Dublin, 1999), pp. 6–7.

76 See, for example, Pearse, Patrick, ‘Ghosts’, in Collected works of Pádraic H. Pearse: political writings and speeches, vol. 5 (Dublin, Cork, and Belfast, 1920–5), pp. 223–55Google Scholar.

77 Kelly, Matthew, ‘Languages of radicalism, race, and religion in Irish nationalism: the French affinity, 1848–1871’, Journal of British Studies, 49 (2010), pp. 801–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 See, for example, Grant, Adrian, Irish socialist republicanism, 1906–36 (Dublin, 2012)Google Scholar.

79 Griffith, Arthur, The resurrection of Hungary: a parallel for Ireland (Dublin, 1918), p. 9Google Scholar; Montesquieu, Spirit of the laws, p. 286.

80 Griffith, Resurrection of Hungary, pp. 139–40.

81 Ibid., p. 163.

82 Patrick Pearse, ‘The murder machine’, in Collected works, pp. 5–50, at pp. 8, 41.

83 Foxley, Rachel, ‘Gender and intellectual history’, in Whatmore, Richard and Young, Brian, eds., Palgrave advances in intellectual history (New York, NY, 2006), pp. 189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 203–4.

84 Pearse, ‘Murder machine’, p. 31; Patrick Pearse ‘How does she stand?’, in Collected works, pp. 53–87, at p. 87.

85 Dwan, David, ‘Romantic nationalism: history and illusion in Ireland’, Modern Intellectual History, 14 (2017), pp. 717–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bourke, ‘Reflections on the political thought of the Irish revolution’, pp. 189–91.

86 Moran, Seán Farrell, ‘Patrick Pearse and the European revolt against reason’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 50 (1989), pp. 625–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 637–9. Ruth Dudley Edwards suggests similarly that Pearse was driven by a ‘mystical yearning for martyrdom’: see Patrick Pearse: the triumph of failure (London, 1977), p. 173.

87 Patrick Pearse, ‘The sovereign people’, in Collected works, pp. 331–71, at p. 336.

88 Patrick Pearse, ‘The coming revolution’, in Collected works, pp. 91–9, at p. 99.

89 Pearse, ‘Sovereign people’, p. 350.

90 Collins, Path to freedom, pp. 53, 126–7. See also O'Hegarty, P. S., Sinn Féin: an illumination (Dublin, 1919), p. 21Google Scholar; Terence MacSwiney, Principles of freedom (New York, NY, 1921), p. 225; Hobson, Bulmer, A short history of the Irish Volunteers (Dublin, 1918), pp. 21–3Google Scholar; FitzGerald, Desmond, Desmond's rising: memoirs, 1913 to Easter 1916 (Dublin, 2006), pp. 37, 43, 48, 52Google Scholar.

91 Michael Tierney, Education in a free Ireland (Dublin, 1920), pp. iv–vi, 33.

92 Ibid., pp. 15–16, 22, 86.

93 Ibid., pp. 15, 32.

94 Martin, Peter, ‘The political career of Michael Tierney, 1920–44’, Irish Historical Studies, 37 (2011), pp. 412–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 See, for example, Daniel T. Rodgers, ‘Republicanism: the career of a concept’, Journal of American History, 79 (1992), pp. 11–38.

96 MacSwiney, Principles of freedom, p. 218.

97 Poblacht na hÉireann: proclamation of the Irish Republic, Easter 1916.

98 Murray, Patrick, Oracles of God: the Roman Catholic church and Irish politics, 1922–37 (Dublin, 2000), pp. 19–23Google Scholar.

99 For Collins, see his references to the American Civil War and Chief Justice John Marshall's (1755–1835) influential history of the American Revolution in Irish Bulletin, 6 Sept. 1922; Poblacht na hÉireann, 18 May 1922. For Cosgrave, see Cosgrave, W. T., ‘Speech delivered at a banquet given by the Friendly Sons of St Patrick at Philadelphia’, in With the president in America: the authorised record of President Cosgrave's tour in the United States and Canada (Dublin, 1928), pp. 78–9Google Scholar. FitzGerald described the attempt made by some of his comrades in the General Post Office ‘to associate the Rising with the French Revolution’ as ‘repugnant’; however, his private papers contain several extracts from James Bryce's The American commonwealth (London, 1888) and numerous speeches by Abraham Lincoln. See FitzGerald, Desmond's rising, p. 145; UCDA, Desmond and Mabel FitzGerald papers, P80/324–5. Addressing the Irish Society at the University of Oxford, O'Higgins quoted approvingly from Hilaire Belloc's account of the life of the French revolutionary Georges Danton and invoked Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg address: see O'Higgins, Kevin, Three years hard labour: an address delivered to the Irish Society of Oxford University on the 31st October, 1924 (Dublin, 1924), pp. 5–8Google Scholar; Belloc, Hilaire, Danton: a study by Hilaire Belloc (New York, NY, 1899), p. 1Google Scholar. For O'Shiel, see O'Shiel, Kevin, The making of a republic (Dublin, 1920)Google Scholar; O'Shiel acted as a legal advisor to the Free State government.

100 J. M. O'Sullivan, Phases of revolution: lecture delivered before the Ard-Chumann of Cumann na nGaedheal on 21 November 1923 (Dublin, n.d.), pp. 10, 22. O'Sullivan would serve as minister for education from 1926 to 1932.

101 See, for example, Foster, R. F., Vivid faces: the revolutionary generation in Ireland, 1890–1923 (London, 2014)Google Scholar.

102 McGee, IRB, p. 349; McGee, Owen, Arthur Griffith (Dublin, 2015), pp. 53–72Google Scholar.

103 Sunday Independent, 28 Nov. 1948.

104 McGee, IRB, p. 363.

105 Ibid., p. 364.

106 W. T. Cosgrave, DD, 17 Nov. 1922.

107 O'Higgins commenting on the statement of Mulcahy to the Army Enquiry Commission, UCDA, Mulcahy papers, P7/C/21, emphasis in original.

108 ‘Civic virtue’, UCDA, FitzGerald papers, P80/318 (5).

109 See, for example, Irish Examiner, 18 Jan. 1924; 30 Aug. 1924.

110 Walter L. Cole, DD, 1 Dec. 1922; see also William Magennis, DD, 4 Jan. 1923.

111 DD, 11 Sept. 1922.

112 See, for example, O'Sullivan, John Marcus and Siebeck, Herman, Aristoteles (Stuttgart, 1902)Google Scholar; UCDA, John Marcus O'Sullivan papers, LA60/41.

113 Transcript of a speech on citizenship in modern life, n.d. [c. 1923], UCDA, O'Sullivan papers, LA60/24.

114 Ernest H. Alton, DD, 4 Jan. 1923.

115 Notes for John Marcus O'Sullivan's speech at the 1931 Cumann na nGaedheal convention, UCDA, O'Sullivan papers, LA60/113.

116 Cosgrave, W. T., Policy of the Cumann na nGaedheal party (Dublin, 1927), p. 1Google Scholar.

117 Richard Mulcahy, DD, 12 April 1923; see also ‘General Mulcahy's oration at the graveside’, in Arthur Griffith/Michael Collins, p. 34.

118 Kelly, Matthew, ‘The Irish Volunteers: a Machiavellian moment?’, in Boyce, D. George and O'Day, Alan, eds., The Ulster crisis: 1885–1921 (Basingstoke, 2006), pp. 64–85Google Scholar.

119 Irish Volunteer, 7 Feb. 1914, in UCDA, Éamon de Valera papers, P150/449.

120 An t-Óglach (The Volunteers), 21 April 1923.

121 An t-Óglach, 3 Feb. 1922.

122 ‘His neighbour's pay’, UCDA, FitzGerald papers, P80/318(7).

123 See, for example, Kevin O'Higgins, ‘The Catholic layman in Irish public life’, speech delivered to the Catholic Truth Society, 1923, UCDA, Kevin O'Higgins papers, P197/146.

124 Keogh, Dermot, The Vatican, the bishops and Irish politics, 1919–39 (Cambridge, 1986), pp. 77–122Google Scholar.

125 Kevin O'Higgins, DD, 8 Dec. 1922; Eoin MacNeil, DD, 14 Sept. 1922; Desmond Fitzgerald, DD, 27 Sept. 1922. This motto, drawn from chapter 3 of Cicero's De Legibus, is commonly translated as ‘The safety of the state/republic is the supreme law.’ See Dyck, Andrew Roy, A commentary on Cicero, De Legibus (Ann Arbor, MI, 2004), pp. 458–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

126 Chappel, James, Catholic modern: the challenge of totalitarianism and the remaking of the church (Cambridge, MA, 2018), pp. 1–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

127 Skinner, Quentin, Thinking about liberty: an historian's approach (Florence, 2016)Google Scholar.

128 Coakley, John and Gallagher, Michael, Politics in the Republic of Ireland (New York, NY, 2009), pp. 142–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

129 Kevin O'Higgins, DD, 17 Jan. 1923.

130 Weber, Eugen, ‘Revolution? Counterrevolution? What revolution?’, Journal of Contemporary History, 9 (1974), pp. 3–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 10.

131 Pearse, ‘Murder machine’, p. 36; see also MacSwiney, Principles of freedom, pp. 27, 62–8; Blácam, Aodh de, What Sinn Fein stands for: the Irish republican movement; its history, aims and ideals, examined as to their significance to the world (Dublin, 1921), pp. 133–4Google Scholar.

132 O'Higgins, ‘Catholic layman in Irish public life’.

133 ‘Address to the Nation’, n.d. [c. 1922–3], UCDA, Ernest Blythe papers, P24/614.

134 An Saorstát, 7 Oct. 1922.

135 ‘The return to normality’, UCDA, FitzGerald papers, P80/318(4).

136 W. T. Cosgrave, DD, 20 Oct. 1922.

137 Tilly, Charles, ‘The analysis of a counter-revolution’, History and Theory, 3 (1963), pp. 30–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

138 Kevin O'Higgins, DD, 29 Sept. 1922.

139 Interview with W. T. Cosgrave, Sunday Chronicle, 15 Feb. 1931, quoted in Regan, Irish counter-revolution, p. 310.

140 Flanagan, Frances, Remembering the Irish revolution: dissent, culture, and nationalism in the Irish Free State (Oxford, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

141 McGee, IRB, pp. 28–9, 292–3.

142 Serge, Victor, Memoirs of a revolutionary, trans. Sedgwick, Peter (Iowa City, IA, 2002), p. xvGoogle Scholar.