Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:27:19.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Recent Historiography of the English Reformation*

Part of: Historiographical Reviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Christopher Haigh
Christopher Haigh
Affiliation:
Christ Church, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The English Reformation was not a specific event which may be given a precise date; it was a long and complex process. ‘The Reformation’ is a colligatory concept, a historians’ label which relates several lesser changes into an overall movement: it embraces a break from the Roman obedience; an assertion of secular control over the Church; a suppression of Catholic institutions such as monasteries and chantries; a prohibition of Catholic worship; and a protestantization of services, clergy and laity. Though the political decision to introduce each phase of change and the legislative alteration of statutes and canons may be dated easily enough, it is much harder to ascribe responsibility and motive for such measures. Moreover, as the interest of historians has in recent years moved on from such political issues towards the administrative enforcement of new rules and popular acceptance of new ideas, so the identification and explanation of change have become even more difficult: the pace is likely to have varied from area to area, and the criteria by which progress should be measured are far from clear. It is therefore not surprising that there has been much dispute over the causes and chronology of developments in religion, and recent interpretations of the Reformation in England can, with some simplification, be grouped in relation to two matrices. One matrix relates to the motive force behind the progress of Protestantism: at one extreme, it could be suggested that Protestant advance was entirely the result of official coercion, while at the other it could be said that the new religion spread horizontally by conversions among the people. The second matrix relates to the pace of religious change: on the one hand, it could be suggested that Protestantism made real progress at an early date and had become a powerful force by the death of Edward VI, while on the other it could be said that little had been achieved in the first half of the century and the main task of protestantizing the people had to be undertaken in the reign of Elizabeth. These two matrices provide us with four main clusters of interpretations.

Type
Historiographical Review
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 1982 , pp. 995 - 1007
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Elton, G. R., Reform and Reformation: England 1509–1558 (London, 1977), especially pp. 157–200, 273–95, 353–71Google Scholar, with the passage quoted at p. 371; Policy and police: the enforcement of the Reformation in the age of Thomas Cromwell (Cambridge, 1972).Google Scholar

2 Clark, P., English provincial society from the Reformation to the Revolution: religion, politics and society in Kent, 1500–1640 (Hassocks, 1977), pp. 34–68.Google Scholar

3 Trimble, W. R., The Catholic laity in Elizabethan England (Cambridge, Mass., 1964), pp. 25–6, 52–3Google Scholar; Manning, R. B., ‘Catholics and local office holding in Elizabethan Sussex’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historial Research, xxxv (1962), 47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gleason, J. H., The Justices of the Peace in England, 1558–1640 (Oxford, 1969), pp. 68–72Google Scholar; Haigh, C., Reformation and resistance in Tudor Lancashire (Cambridge, 1975), pp. 213, 284–6Google Scholar; MacCulloch, D., ‘Catholic and puritan in Elizabethan Suffolk’, Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte, LXXII (1981), 232–5.Google Scholar

4 Heal, F., Of prelates and princes: a study of the economic and social position of the Tudor episcopate (Cambridge, 1980), pp. 101–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Houlbrooke, R., Church courts and the people during the English Reformation, 1520–1570 (Oxford, 1979), pp. 24–5Google Scholar; Haigh, , Reformation and resistance, pp. 210, 212Google Scholar; Price, F. D., ‘An Elizabethan Church official: Thomas Powell, chancellor of the Gloucester diocese’, Church Quarterly Review, cxxviii (1939), 94–112.Google Scholar

5 Elton, , Policy and police, pp. 85–9Google Scholar; Haigh, , Reformation and resistance, pp. 102–7, 140–2 213, 284–90Google Scholar; Manning, R. B., Religion and society in Elizabethan Sussex (Leicester, 1969), pp. 61–125Google Scholar; Palliser, D. M., ‘ Popular reactions to the Reformation during the years of uncertainty, 1530–70’, in Heal, F. and O’Day, R. (eds.), Church and society in England: Henry VIII to James I (London, 1977). pp. 51–3.Google Scholar

6 Dickens, A. G., The English Reformation (London, 1964)Google Scholar; ‘Heresy and the origins of English Protestantism’, in Bromley, J. S. and Kossman, E. H. (eds.), Britain and the Netherlands, II (London, 1964), 47–66Google Scholar; Cross, C., Church and people, 1450–1660 (London, 1976).Google Scholar

7 Dickens, , English Reformation, p. 34Google Scholar; Aston, M., ‘Lollardy and the Reformation: survival or revival’, History, XLIX (1964), 161–3.Google Scholar

8 Dickens, A.G., Lollards and Protestants in the diocese of York, 1509–1558 (Oxford, 1959)Google Scholar; Oxley, J. E., The Reformation in Essex to the death of Mary (Manchester, 1965)Google Scholar; Powell, K. G., The Marian martyrs and Reformation in Bristol (Bristol, 1972)Google Scholar; ‘The beginnings of Protestantism in Gloucestershire’, Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, xc (1971), 145–8.Google Scholar

9 Bowker, M., The Secular clergy in the diocese of Lincoln, 1495–1520 (Cambridge, 1963)Google Scholar; Heath, P., The English parish clergy on the eve of the Reformation (London, 1969)Google Scholar; Houlbrooke, , Church courts and the people, pp. 177–9.Google Scholar

10 Ibid. pp. 10–11; Lander, S., ‘Church courts and the Reformation in the diocese of Chichester, 1500–58’, in O’Day, R. and Heal, F. (eds.), Continuity and change: personnel and administration of the Church in England, 1500–1642 (Leicester, 1976), pp. 219–28, 235–6Google Scholar; Heal, F., ‘The Parish clergy and the Reformation in the diocese of Ely’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society, LXVI (1975), 147–50Google Scholar; Bowker, , Secular clergy, pp. 18–20, 33, 36, 90.Google Scholar

11 Bowker, M., ‘The Commons Supplication against the ordinaries in the light of some archidiaconal acta’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, xxi (1971), 61–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; The Henrician Reformation: the diocese of Lincoln under John Longland, 1521–1547 (Cambridge, 1981), pp. 51–7Google Scholar; Houlbrooke, , Church courts and the people, pp. 42,50–1,95–6, 114–15, 263, 271–2.Google Scholar

12 Bowker, , Henrician Reformation, pp. 48, 93, 147–8, 176–9Google Scholar; Kreider, A., English chantries: the road to dissolution (Cambridge, Mass., 1979), pp. 89–92Google Scholar; Jordan, W. K., The charities of rural England, 1480–1660 (London, 1961), pp. 438–40Google Scholar; Bennett, H. S., English books and readers, 1475–1557 (London, 1952), pp. 57–8, 65–70, 74–5Google Scholar; Rhodes, J., ‘Private devotion in England on the eve of the Reformation’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Durham, 1974), 1, 6–7, 181, 194; 11, 98–9.Google Scholar

13 Brigden, S., ‘The early Reformation in London, 1520–1547: the conflict in the parishes’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge 1979), pp. 23–86Google Scholar; Heath, , English parish clergy, p. 152Google Scholar; Houlbrooke, , Church courts and the people, pp. 146–7, 273–4Google Scholar; Bowker, , Henrician Reformation, pp. 135–6Google Scholar; Secular clergy, pp. 3, 110–11, 114, 152; Haigh, , Reformation and resistance, pp. 14, 56–62.Google Scholar

14 Cressy, D., Literacy and the social order: reading and writing in Tudor and Stuart England (Cambridge, 1980), pp. 146, 152CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Seaver, P., The puritan lectureships (Stanford, 1970), pp. 77–117, 121, 297–300.Google Scholar

15 Palliser, , ‘Popular reactions to the Reformation’, pp. 37, 39, 41–2, 46Google Scholar; Sheils, W. J., ‘Religion in provincial towns: innovation and tradition’, in Heal, and O’Day, (eds.), Church and society, pp. 156–76.Google Scholar

16 Clarke, S., A general martyrology (London, 1677 edition), pp. 12–15Google Scholar; Harrison, W., The difference of hearers (London, 1625 edition)Google Scholar, Sig. A3. On the ineffectiveness of evangelism in some areas, sec my ‘Puritan evangelism in the reign of Elizabeth I’, English Historical Review, xcii (1977), 30–58, and the chorus of complaints from Elizabethan preachers too numerous to note here.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Thomas, K., Religion and the decline of magic (London, 1971), pp. 27–188,252–332Google Scholar; Bossy, J., ‘Blood and baptism: kinship, community and Christianity in western Europe from the fourteenth to the seventeenth centuries’, in Studies in Church History, x (1973), pp. 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 J. Nichols, The plea of the innocent (n.p., 1602), pp. 212–13; Yorkshire diaries and autobiographies (Surtees Society, LXV, 1877), p. 137. See also Clark, English provincial society, pp. 155–7.Google Scholar

19 Ibid. pp. 36, 40, 47, 60, 74.

20 Powell, K. G., ‘The social background to the Reformation in Gloucestershire’, Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, XCII (1973), 96–120Google Scholar; Price, F. D., ‘Gloucester diocese under Bishop Hooper’, Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, LX (1939), 51–151.Google Scholar

21 Houlbrooke, , Church courts and the people, pp. 227, 237–8Google Scholar; Paul, J. E., ‘The Hampshire recusants in the reign of Elizabeth I’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Southampton 1958), pp. 128–30, 391Google Scholar; Lander, S.J., ‘The diocese of Chichester, 1508–1558’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge 1974), passim; Manning, Religion and society in Elizabethan Sussex, pp. 37–8.Google Scholar

22 Brigden, , ‘Early Reformation in London’, pp. 127–34, 141–5, 227–61Google Scholar; Oxley, , Reformation in Essex, pp. 210–37Google Scholar; O’Dwyer, M., ‘Catholic recusants in Essex, c. 1580 to c. 1600’ (unpublished M.A. thesis, London 1960), pp. 27–40.Google Scholar

23 Williams, P., The Tudor regime (Oxford, 1979), pp. 253-92Google Scholar; Rowse, A. L., Tudor Cornwall (London, 1941), pp. 184, 253–4, 257–8, 263–89, 320, 345–65.Google Scholar

24 Manning, R. B., ‘The spread of the popular Reformation in England’, in Meyer, C. S. (ed.), Sixteenth century essays and studies (St Louis, Ohio, 1970), pp. 36–8; Religion and society in Elizabethan Sussex, pp. 63–4, 154, 256–60.Google Scholar

25 ‘Letters from the bishops to the Privy Council, 1564’, ed. Bateson, M., in Camden Miscellany, ix (1895), 65–7Google Scholar; James, M. E., Family, lineage and civil society (Oxford, 1974), pp. 51, 67–70, 78–9, 147; Haigh, Reformation and resistance, pp. 209–46; 295–315.Google Scholar

26 Collinson, P., The Elizabethan puritan movement (London, 1967), especially pp. 14–15Google Scholar; ‘Towards a broader understanding of the early dissenting tradition’, in Cole, C. R. and Moody, M. E. (eds.), The dissenting tradition: essays for Leland H. Carlson (Athens, Ohio, 1975), pp. 10–13Google Scholar; Spufford, M., Contrasting communities (Cambridge, 1974), pp. 239–65, 320–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sheils, W. J., The puritans in the diocese of Peterborough, 1558–1610 (Northamptonshire Record Society, xxx, 1979), pp. 14–24.Google Scholar

27 For example Elton, Reform and Reformation, pp. 367- 71; Haigh, Reformation and resistance, pp. 183–5, 190.

28 For example Dickens, Lollards and Protestants, pp. 240–6; Haigh, Reformation and resistance, pp. 269–78.

29 Bowker, Henrician Reformation, especially pp. 181–5.

30 Walker, R. B., ‘Reformation and reaction in the county of Lincoln, 1547–58’, Lincolnshire Archaeological and Architectural Society, ix (1961), 50, 58–9Google Scholar; ‘The growth of puritanism in the county of Lincoln in the reign of Queen Elizabeth I’, Journal of Religious History, I (1961), 148–9, 150.Google Scholar

31 Dickens, Lollards and Protestants, pp. 1–7 and passim.

32 Professor Elton has summarized much of this work in Reform and Reformation, pp. 250–310, 328–52, 376–81.

33 Elton, Policy and police, pp. 1–170.

34 Ibid. pp. 393–6; Reform and Reformation, pp. 198, 294–5. See the remarks by Davies, C. S. L. in English Historical Review, XCIII (1978), 873–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 Davies, C. S. L., Peace, print and Protestantism, 1450–1558 (London, 1977). The ‘slow Reformation’ view has, however, received ultimate endorsement as the them of Ford Lectures at Oxford, given by J. J. Scarisbrick on ‘Religious attitudes in Reformation England’, Hilary term 1982.Google Scholar

36 Guy, J. A., The public career of Sir Thomas More (Brighton, 1980)Google Scholar; Starkey, D. R., ‘The King's Privy Chamber, 1485 1547’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge 1973)Google Scholar; Ives, E. W., ‘Faction at the Court of Henry VIII: the fall of Anne Boleyn’, History, XLVII (1972), 169–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Elton, G. R., ‘Thomas Cromwell's decline and fall’, in his Studies in Tudor and Stuart politics and government (Cambridge, 1974), I, 189–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Tudor government: the points of contact. III. The Court’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, xxvi (1976), 211–28Google Scholar; Smith, L. B., ‘Henry VIII and the Protestant triumph’, American Historical Review, LXXI (1966), 1237–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Slavin, A. J., ‘The fall of Lord Chancellor Wriothesley’ Albion, vii (1975), 265–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hoak, D. E., The King's Council in the reign of Edward VI (Cambridge, 1976).Google Scholar

37 Jones, N. L., Parliament and the settlement of religion (London, 1982).Google Scholar

38 MacCaffrey, W., The shaping of the Elizabethan regime (London, 1969), 77–8, 108, 211–12, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39 C. Haigh, ‘The continuity of Catholicism in the English Reformation’, Past and Present, XCIII (1981), 44–5; K. R. Wark, Elizabethan recusancy in Cheshire (Chetham Society, 1971), p. 16.

40 Elton, Policy and police, pp. 85–90,93–100,112–23; Clark, English provincial society, pp. 63–4, 84; Brigden, ‘Early Reformation in London’, pp. 235–61, 322–7; Narratives of the days of the Reformation, ed. Nichols, J. G. (Camden Society, 1859), pp. 71–84Google Scholar; Rowse, Tudor Cornwall, pp. 262, 264, 276; Cornwall, J., Revolt of the peasantry, 1549 (London, 1977), pp. 57–8, IOO-I, 110–11; ‘Letters from the bishops’, ed. Bateson, pp. 14–15, 19–23Google Scholar; Aveling, J. C. H., Catholic recusancy in the city of York (Catholic Record Society, 1970), pp. 25, 26, 27–8, 31–2, 33–4, 39.Google Scholar

41 Rowse, Tudor Cornwall, pp. 345–65; Smith, A. Hassell, County and court: government and politics in Norfolk, 1558–1603 (Oxford, 1974), pp. 181, 201–3, 211–28; MacCulloch, ‘Catholic and puritan in Elizabethan Suffolk’, pp. 236–47Google Scholar; Haigh, , Reformation and resistance, pp. 285–90, 313 15.Google Scholar

42 Haigh, ‘Continuity of Catholicism’, pp. 39–45.

43 Pogson, R. H., ‘ Revival and reform in Mary Tudor's Church: a question of money’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, xxv (1974), 249–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Reginald Pole and the priorities of government in Mary Tudor's Church’, Historical Journal, xviii (1975), 3–20Google Scholar; Haigh, , Reformation and resistance, pp. 195–207Google Scholar; Heal, , Of prelates and princes, pp. 156–61Google Scholar; Alexander, G., ’ Bonner and the Marian persecutions’, History, LX (1975), 386–8.Google Scholar

44 Bartholomew, A., ‘Lay piety in the reign of Mary Tudor’ (unpublished M.A. thesis, Manchester 1979), especially pp. 1–42; Alexander, ‘Bonner and the Marian persecutions’, pp. 386–7.Google Scholar

45 Ibid. pp. 384–5; Houlbrooke, Church courts and the people, p. 238; Walker, ‘Reformation and reaction in the county of Lincoln’, pp. 58–9.

46 Haigh, C., ‘From monopoly to minority: Catholicism in early modern England’, Transactions of the Royal Historial Society, 5th series, xxxi (1981), 129–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar