Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-25T03:09:13.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE POLITICS OF SENTIMENTALITY AND THE GERMAN FÜRSTENBUND, 1779–1785

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1998

MAIKEN UMBACH
Affiliation:
Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article examines the history of the German Fürstenbund prior to the Prussian take-over of the scheme in 1785. In charting the union's initial conception as a small-state alliance designed to resist both Prussian and Austrian expansionism, the article reveals the cultural dimension of imperial diplomacy. Exclusive concentration on the straightforward diplomatic sources produced by Prussian-style bureaucracies has led historians to underrate the contribution of smaller German principalities, which typically employed more indirect, metaphorical means of political communication. A prominent example of such ‘cultural politics’ is the process by which Prince Franz of Anhalt-Dessau drew on English precedents in shaping the Fürstenbund. Its participants were to be united not just by formal agreements, but by a shared spirit. Under the leadership of a ‘Patriot king’, they were to act as champions of ancient regional liberties, thus resembling the English aristocrats of the anti-Walpole opposition whom Franz admired. At the same time, an English-inspired rhetoric of sentimentalism was employed to suggest that this political union would function in analogy with sentimental friendships, creating a firmer bond whilst preserving that small-state ‘individualism’ which was the source of so many reform initiatives in the late eighteenth-century German Empire.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

I would like to thank Tim Blanning and Joachim Whaley for many valuable criticisms and suggestions.