Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:41:45.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PLURALISM, THE PEOPLE, AND TIME IN LABOUR PARTY HISTORY, 1931–1964*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2013

JEREMY NUTTALL*
Affiliation:
Kingston University
*
Kingston University, Faculty of Arts and Social Science, Penrhyn Road, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, KT1 2EE[email protected]

Abstract

Observing the increasing, yet still partial exploration of pluralism, complexity and multiplicity in recent Labour party historiography, this article pursues a pluralist approach to Labour on two central, related themes of its middle-century evolution. First, it probes the plurality of Labour's different conceptions of time, specifically how it lived with the ambiguity of simultaneously viewing social progress as both immediate and rapidly achievable, yet also long term and strewn with constraints. This co-existence of multiple time-frames highlights the party's uncertainty and ideological multi-dimensionality, especially in its focus both on relatively rapid economic or structural transformation, and on much more slow-moving cultural, ethical, and educational change. It also complicates neat characterizations of particular phases in the party's history, challenging straightforwardly declinist views of the post-1945–51 period. Secondly, time connects to Labour's view of the people. Whilst historians have debated between positive and negative perceptions of the people, here the plural, split mind of Labour about the progressive potential of the citizenry is stressed, one closely intertwined with its multiple outlook on how long socialism would take. Contrasts are also suggested between the time-frames and expectations under which Labour and the Conservatives operated.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author would like to thank the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions on the article.

References

1 See, respectively: Jackson, B., Equality and the British left: a study in progressive political thought, 1900–1964 (Manchester, 2007)Google Scholar; Black, L., The political culture of the left in affluent Britain, 1951–1964: old Labour, new Britain? (Basingstoke, 2003)Google Scholar; Beers, L., Your Britain: media and the making of the Labour party (London, 2010)Google Scholar; Francis, M., ‘Economics and ethics: the nature of Labour's socialism, 1945–1951’, Twentieth Century British History, 6 (1995), pp. 220–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Nuttall, J., Psychological socialism: the Labour party and qualities of mind and character, 1931 to the present (Manchester, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Black, L., Redefining British politics: culture, consumerism and participation, 1954–1970 (Basingstoke, 2010), p. 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Worley, M., ‘Introduction’, in Worley, M., ed., The foundations of the British Labour party: identities, cultures and perspectives, 1900–1939 (Farnham, 2009), pp. 13Google Scholar.

4 Beers, L., ‘Labour's Britain, fight for it now!’, Historical Journal, 52 (2009), pp. 667–95, at p. 695CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 See, especially, Nuttall, Psychological socialism; Jackson, Equality; Black, Political culture.

6 Just a few examples are: Shaw, E., Losing Labour's soul? New Labour and the Blair government, 1997–2007 (London, 2007)Google Scholar; Fielding, S., The Labour governments, 1964–1970 (Manchester, 2003)Google Scholar; Francis, M., Ideas and policies under Labour, 1945–1951 (Manchester, 1997)Google Scholar; and Morgan, K. O., Labour in power, 1945–1951 (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar.

7 See, for instance, Hobsbawm, E., ‘The forward march of Labour halted?’, Marxism Today, Sept. 1978, pp. 284–5Google Scholar; Howell, D., British social democracy: a study in development and decay (London, 1976), p. 10Google Scholar; Shaw, E., The Labour party since 1945 (Oxford, 1996), p. 46Google Scholar; and Hennessy, P., Never again: Britain, 1945–1951 (London, 1993), p. 454Google Scholar.

8 Jones, G. Stedman, Languages of class: studies in English working-class history, 1832–1982 (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 242–3Google Scholar.

9 Black, Political culture, p. 191.

10 Tomlinson, J., ‘Thrice denied: “declinism” as a recurrent theme in British history in the long twentieth century’, Twentieth Century British History, 20 (2009), pp. 227–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 227, 249; idem, ‘A “failed experiment”? Public ownership and the narratives of post-war Britain’, Labour History Review, 73 (2008), pp. 228–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 On this, see Nuttall, Psychological socialism, pp. 141–4.

12 Fielding, S., Thompson, P. and Tiratsoo, N., ‘England arise!’ The Labour party and popular politics in 1940s Britain (Manchester, 1995)Google Scholar; Fielding, S., ‘What did “the people” want? The meaning of the 1945 general election’, Historical Journal, 35 (1992), pp. 623–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McKibbin, R., Parties and people: England, 1914–1951 (Oxford, 2010), p. 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Brooke, S., ‘Labour and the “nation” after 1945’, in Lawrence, J. and Taylor, M., eds., Party, state and society: electoral behaviour in Britain since 1820 (Aldershot, 1997), p. 171Google Scholar; Black, Political culture, pp. 126, 193. See also Fielding, S., ‘To make men and women better than they are’: Labour and the building of socialism’, in Fyrth, J., ed., Labour's promised land? Culture and society in Labour Britain, 1945–1951 (London, 1995), p. 24Google Scholar; and Macintyre, S., ‘British Labour, Marxism and working-class apathy in the nineteen twenties’, Historical Journal, 20 (1977), pp. 479–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 484.

14 Note, for example, the relatively limited cross-over between two of the most notable recent interventions in their respective spheres: Jackson, Equality, and Black, Redefining.

15 Defending Labour's performance, see, for instance, Tanner, D., Thane, P., and Tiratsoo, N., ‘Introduction’, in Tanner, D.Thane, , P. and Tiratsoo, N., eds., Labour's first century (Cambridge, 2000), pp. 2, 45Google Scholar; Tiratsoo, N., ‘“You've never had it so bad”? Britain in the 1970s’, in Tiratsoo, N., ed., From Blitz to Blair: a new history of Britain since 1939 (London, 1998), p. 164Google Scholar. Pointing to the party's limitations are Marquand, D., The progressive dilemma (2nd edn, London, 1992)Google Scholar; Bogdanor, V., ‘The crisis of old Labour’, in Seldon, A. and Hickson, K., eds., New Labour, old Labour: the Wilson and Callaghan governments, 1974–1979 (London, 2004)Google Scholar.

16 McKibbin, R., Classes and cultures: England, 1918–1951 (Oxford, 1998), p. 535CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Black, Political culture, p. 21.

18 Tawney, R. H., Equality (4th edn, London, 1952), p. 26Google Scholar.

19 Ibid., pp. 127, 232.

20 Ibid., p. 232.

21 Attlee, C. R., The Labour party in perspective – and twelve years later (London, 1949), p. 40Google Scholar.

22 Ibid., pp. 97, 101, 198.

23 Cole, G. D. H., The next ten years in British social and economic policy (London, 1930)Google Scholar (orig. publ. 1929), pp. viii, 414.

24 Ibid., p. 415.

25 Tawney, Equality, pp. 127, 232.

26 Macintyre, ‘British Labour’, p. 496. See also Harris, J., ‘Labour's political and social thought’, in Tanner, , Thane, and Tiratsoo, eds., Labour's first, p. 39Google Scholar.

27 Tawney, Equality, p. 26.

28 Attlee, Labour party, p. 198.

29 E. Durbin's notes on ‘[The] future of the English Labour party’, n.d., London, British Library of Political and Economic Science (BLPES), Evan Durbin papers, 1/3, fos. 17, 19.

30 Jay, D., The socialist case (London, 1937), p. ixGoogle Scholar.

31 Cole, Ten years, p. 414.

32 Tawney, Equality, p. 232.

33 Laski, H. J., The state in theory and practice (London, 1935), p. 74Google Scholar.

34 Ibid., pp. 138–9, 143.

35 Attlee, Labour party, pp. 101, 112, 194, 198.

36 Cole, Ten years, p. 423.

37 Durbin, E. F. M., The politics of democratic socialism: an essay on social policy (London, 1940), pp. 292, 300Google Scholar.

38 Jay, Socialist case, p. 2.

39 Idem, Change and fortune: a political record (London, 1980), p. 56.

40 Durbin's notes on ‘Limits of intellectual education’, n.d., probably 1944–8, BLPES, Durbin papers, 4/7.

41 Cole, G. D. H., The Fabian society: past and present, Fabian Tract, 258 (Nov. 1942), pp. 56Google Scholar.

42 On these latter points, see Beers, Your Britain, pp. 199–202.

43 Jay, Socialist case, p. 318.

44 Ibid., p. 317; idem, Change, p. 106.

45 Attlee, Labour party, pp. 89–90, 118.

46 Ibid., pp. 195–6.

47 Terrill, R., R. H. Tawney and his times: socialism as fellowship (London, 1974), p. 50Google Scholar; Tawney, Equality, p. 27.

48 Though this was in specific reference to the last three decades of the twentieth century. Thompson, N., ‘From The future of socialism (1956) to a future without socialism? The crisis of British social democratic political economy’, in Callaghan, J.Fishman, , N.Jackson, , B., and McIvor, M., eds., In search of social democracy: responses to crisis and modernization (Manchester, 2009)Google Scholar, p. 67. See also Foote, G., The Labour party's political thought: a history (3rd edn, London, 1997), p. 267CrossRefGoogle Scholar, on Bevan's ‘romantic view’ of the working class.

49 Laski, H. J., Parliamentary government in England (London, 1938), p. 17Google Scholar.

50 Ibid., pp. 17–20.

51 Tawney, Equality, p. 127; Attlee, Labour party, pp. 102, 140.

52 Jay, Socialist case, p. 2.

53 Laski, State, p. 121.

54 Ibid., p. 449.

55 Woolf, L., After the deluge: a study in communal psychology (Harmondsworth, 1937)Google Scholar; orig. publ. 1931), pp. 209, 213–15.

56 Ibid., p. 217.

57 Durbin, Politics, pp. 69–70.

58 Durbin's ‘Open air’ campaign, summer 1946, BLPES, Durbin papers, 4/7; Jay, Socialist case, p. 318.

59 Attlee, Labour party, pp. 113, 197.

60 Tawney, Equality, p. 127.

61 A. Greenwood, radio interview, 7 Jan. 1943, Oxford, Bodleian Library (BLO), Arthur Greenwood papers, MS 6246, fo. 46.

62 R. Acland, Unser kampf (Harmondsworth, 1940), p. vii.

63 E. Bevin, broadcast, 30 Jan. 1934, in E. Bevin, The job to be done (London, 1942), p. 136.

64 Cole, Ten years, p. 21.

65 Greenwood speech, late 1932, BLO, Greenwood papers, MS 6246, fos. 8–9.

66 Mandler, P., The English national character: the history of an idea from Edmund Burke to Tony Blair (London, 2006), pp. 143, 164–5Google Scholar.

67 Beers, Your Britain, p. 7.

68 Lawrence, J., ‘The transformation of British public politics after the First World War’, Past and Present, 190 (2006), pp. 185216CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 215–16.

69 Cole, Ten years, p. 415; Greenwood speech, late 1932, BLO, Greenwood papers, MS 6246, fos. 8–9.

70 Labour party general election manifesto, 1945.

72 Greenwood's speech to TUC conference, 1953, BLO, Greenwood papers, MS 6246, fo. 144.

73 Gaitskell, H., Recent developments in British socialist thinking (London, 1956), pp. 33–4Google Scholar.

74 Morgan, Labour, p. 503; K. Jefferys, The Labour party since 1945 (Basingstoke, 1993), p. 10Google Scholar.

75 R. Crossman, New Statesman, 28 Nov. 1959, privately held, John Strachey papers, contracts box 1.

76 See S. Fielding, ‘“The people”’; and Fielding, Thompson, and Tiratsoo, ‘England arise!’.

77 Morrison, H., Herbert Morrison: an autobiography (London, 1960), pp. 285–6, 290Google Scholar.

78 Laski, H., Faith, reason and civilization (London, 1944)Google Scholar.

79 Young, M., Labour's plan for plenty (London, 1947), pp. 1011Google Scholar.

80 T. Crosland's notes, n.d., c. 1945–51, BLPES, Tony Crosland papers, 13/21, fo. 78.

81 Gaitskell, Recent developments, p. 15.

82 Jenkins, R., Pursuit of progress: a critical analysis of the achievement and prospect of the Labour party (London, 1953), p. 49Google Scholar.

83 H. Gaitskell, Socialism and nationalization, Fabian Tract, 300 (July 1956), p. 4; Roy Jenkins, Forward, 5 Oct. 1956.

84 Crosland, ‘The way towards more socialist equality’, Tribune, 19 Aug. 1949, BLPES, Crosland papers, 13/20, fo. 57.

85 Crosland, C. A. R. in Crossman, R. H. S., ed., New Fabian essays (London, 1952), p. 68Google Scholar.

86 Healey, D., The time of my life (London, 1990), p. 472Google Scholar. A quotation by Healey of a Polish acquaintance, Lesjek Kolakowski.

87 Jackson, Equality, p. 222.

88 Bevan, A., Why not trust the tories? (London, 1944), p. 82Google Scholar.

89 Ibid., pp. 82–3.

90 Idem, Democratic values, Fabian Tract, 282 (Jan. 1951), pp. 11–12.

91 Idem, In place of fear (London, 1978; orig. publ. 1952), p. 28.

92 Idem, Democratic values, pp. 13–14.

93 Idem, Tories, p. 83.

94 Idem, Fear, pp. 78–9.

95 Cited in Campbell, J., Nye Bevan and the mirage of British socialism (London, 1987), p. 364Google Scholar.

96 Marshall, T. H., Citizenship and social class (London, 1950)Google Scholar, contained in Marshall, T. H. and Bottomore, T., Citizenship and social class (London, 1992), pp. 710Google Scholar.

97 Ibid., pp. 7, 38–40.

98 Ibid., pp. 7, 49.

99 Morrison, H., Our parliament and how it works (London, 1953), p. 31Google Scholar, in Oxford, Nuffield College (NC), Herbert Morrison papers, box D.

100 Greenwood's speech to Labour party conference, 1953, BLO, Greenwood papers, MS 6246, fo. 160.

101 Ibid., MS 6246, fo. 156.

102 C. R. Attlee, As it happened (London, 1954), p. 106.

103 H. Morrison, News Chronicle, 8 Dec. 1959, NC, Morrison papers, box B/1, fo. 28.

104 Attlee, Happened, p. 203.

105 H. Gaitskell speaking at a dinner in honour of Earl and Countess Attlee, 10 Feb. 1956, London, University College (UCL), Hugh Gaitskell papers, A117.

106 Gaitskell's diary entry, 12 Aug. 1947, in Williams, P. M., ed., The diary of Hugh Gaitskell, 1945–1956 (London, 1983), p. 27Google Scholar.

107 Fielding, Thompson, and Tiratsoo, England arise!, p. 125.

108 Citrine, Lord, Two careers: volume two of the autobiography of Lord Citrine (London, 1967), pp. 24, 329–30Google Scholar.

109 Lawther, W., Can industrial democracy survive? (London, 1952), pp. 1214Google Scholar.

110 Jones, J., Union man: the autobiography of Jack Jones (London, 1986), pp. 173, 175, 229Google Scholar.

111 On the complex layers within Conservative attitudes to social change and modernity see Jarvis, M., Conservative governments, morality and social change in affluent Britain, 1957–1964 (Manchester, 2005), pp. 160–1, 167Google Scholar.

112 Jenkins, R., A life at the center (New York, NY, 1991), p. 562Google Scholar.

113 Proof copy of Gaitskell's foreword (Dec. 1953) for reprint of Evan Durbin's The politics of democratic socialism (London, 1954), p. 9Google Scholar, UCL, Gaitskell papers, A124. See also Gaitskell, Recent, p. 40.

114 For a sense of decline from 1945 to 1951, see, for instance, Hennessy, Never again, p. 454; Foote, Labour, p. 235.

115 Crossman, in Crossman, ed., Fabian essays, p. 28. See also Crossman's introduction to Bagehot, W., The English constitution (Glasgow, 1963), pp. 56–7Google Scholar.

116 Wilson, H., Purpose in power (London, 1966), p. xiGoogle Scholar.

117 Crosland, C. A. R., The conservative enemy (London, 1962), p. 173Google Scholar.

118 Summerskill, E., ‘The citizen of tomorrow’, in Tracey, H., ed., The British Labour party: its history, growth, policy and leaders (London, 1948), p. 170Google Scholar.

119 B. Castle, New Statesman, 24 Sept. 1960.

120 Black, Political culture, p. 193.

121 Jay, D., Socialism in the new society (London, 1962), pp. 350–1Google Scholar.

122 Jenkins, R., The Labour case (Harmondsworth, 1959), p. 55Google Scholar.

123 Feather, V., The essence of trade unionism: a background book (London, 1963), p. 124Google Scholar.

124 Attlee, Happened, p. 141.

125 H. Morrison, BBC Home Service interview, 1962, NC, Morrison papers, D.

126 Crossman, in Crossman, ed., Fabian essays, pp. 8–9; Crossman to Crosland, 23 Oct. 1956, BLPES, Crosland papers, 13/10, fo. 3.

127 B. Castle, New Statesman, 24 Sept. 1960.

128 Benn, A., The new politics: a socialist reconnaissance, Fabian Tract, 402 (Sept. 1970), pp. 1, 9–10, 16, 28Google Scholar.

129 Lawrence, J., Electing our masters: the hustings in British politics from Hogarth to Blair (Oxford, 2009), p. 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, ‘Transformation’, pp. 185–6, 208–9, 216; see also Hilton, M., ‘Politics is ordinary: non-governmental organizations and political participation in contemporary Britain’, Twentieth Century British History, 22 (2011), pp. 230–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 232, 268.

130 Pimlott, B., Harold Wilson (London, 1992), p. 338Google Scholar.

131 Ibid., pp. 312–13.

132 Harrison, B., The transformation of British politics, 1860–1995 (Oxford, 1996), p. 414CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

133 Harold Wilson, News Chronicle, Oct. 1955, BLO, Harold Wilson papers, MS 1723; Callaghan, J., Time and chance (London, 1987), pp. 150, 161Google Scholar.

134 Wilson, H., The relevance of British socialism (London, 1964), p. 2Google Scholar.

135 Labour party manifesto, 1964.

136 Ibid.

137 Harris, ‘Labour's political and social thought’, p. 37.

138 Lawrence, J., Speaking for the people: party, language and popular politics in England, 1867–1914 (Cambridge, 1998), p. 263CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

139 Blair, T., A journey (London, 2010), pp. 28–9, 658–60Google Scholar.