¹ SirSmith, Thomas, De Republica Anglorum, ed. Alston, L. (Cambridge, 1906), p. 62Google Scholar.

² Wormald, J., ‘James VI & I: two kings or one?’ History, LXVIII (1983), 187–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fincham, K. and Lake, P., ‘The ecclesiastical policy of James I’, Journal of British Studies, XXIV (1985), 169–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³ Morrill, J., ‘What was the English Revolution?’, History Today, XXXIV (03 1984)Google Scholar; Russell, C., Parliaments and English politics 1621–1629 (Oxford, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, ‘Why did Charles I fight the Civil War?’, History Today, XXXIV June 1984).

⁴ Collinson, P., The religion of protestants (Oxford, 1982), p. 90Google Scholar; Ashton, R., The English Civil War: conservatism and reaction 1603–1649 (1983), p. 110Google Scholar.

⁵ Barnes, T. G., Somerset 1625–1640: a county's government during the ‘Personal Rule’ (Cambridge, Mass., 1961), pp. 303–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁶ Bodleian MS Eng. Hist. e. 28, fos. 549–68. Written in an anonymous later seventeenth-century hand, the document is headed ‘The King of Great Britaines Confession of his faith dedicated to all Christian princes and divided:to three and twenty Articles’ and is dated ‘3 Non Jan 1625’. The views it contains could well be those of James I rather than of Charles I.

⁷ Hyde, Edward, The history of the Rebellion and Civil Wars in England, I (Oxford, 1702), 72Google Scholar; Heylin, Peter, Cyprianus Anglicus (1668), pp. 244, 540Google Scholar; SirDering, Edward, A Collection of Speeches…in matter of Religion (1642), p. 4Google Scholar.

⁸ Barnes, Somerset 1625–1640; Hembry, P. M., The bishops of Bath & Wells 1540–1640: social and economic problems (1967)Google Scholar; Underdown, D., Somerset in the Civil War and Interregnum (1973)Google Scholar.

⁹ Barratt, D. M., ‘The condition of the parish clergy between the Reformation and 1660, with special reference to the dioceses of Oxford, Worcester and Gloucester’ (Oxford D.Phil. thesis, 1949)Google Scholar; O'Day, R., The English clergy: the emergence and consolidation of a profession 1558–1642 (Leicester, 1979)Google Scholar.

¹⁰ Marchant, R. A., The Church under the law: justice, administration and discipline in the diocese of York 1360–1640 (Cambridge, 1969)Google Scholar.

¹¹ Although no manuscript bibliography is provided, it can be deduced from the footnotes that for the period 1600–26, for example, Stieg has inspected about thirty-five of the seventy extant and undamaged office jurisdiction books.

¹² For evidence of Francis James and Arthur Duck presiding regularly in court, see Somerset Record Office (hereafter cited as S.R.O.), D/D/Ca 138, 141, 142, 149, 204, 206, 220, 241.

¹³ My own calculations are that the failure to catechize was the second most frequent presentment against the Somerset clergy in episcopal visitations between 1600 and 1626.

¹⁴ Namely Buckland, Mady, Martin and Sturtevant. Stieg omits the deprivation of Thomas Jones in 1609/10 (S.R.O. D/D/B Reg. 43 fo. 18r); Sturtevant was removed for nonresidence, as is clear from a source that the author herself uses elsewhere (S.R.O. D/D/Ca 134 fos. 43r,144r,174r, 309 V); the charges that led to Mady's ejection can be found in Public Record Office, SP 14/92/38.

¹⁵ Peake, T. H., ‘The Somerset clergy and the church courts in the diocese of Bath & Wells, 1625–1642’ (Bristol M.Litt. thesis, 1978)Google Scholar.

¹⁶ See, for example, S.R.O. D/D/Ca 232; Hampshire Record Office, Winchester Diocesan Records C 94, 96; West Sussex Record Office, Chichester Diocesan Records Ep. 1/17/22.

¹⁷ Cust, R. and Lake, P. G., ‘Sir Richard Grosvenor and the rhetoric of magistracy’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, LIV (1981), 40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.