Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:54:55.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Money and the real impact of the Fourth Reform Act*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

Michael Dawson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The real significance ofthe Representation of the People Act, 1918, for the Liberal and Labour parties lay in its mundane and little discussed financial provisions, not in its extension of the franchise. Despite the electoral reforms of 1883–5, election contests before 1914 were still expensive enough effectively to exclude the Labour party from politics outside the industrial centres. In 1918 the politicians of the older parties took the opportunity to relieve their pockets of a substantial part of the expense of elections. However, Labour was the main beneficiary: its new strategy of contesting seats nationwide was only made possible by the changes in and underlying the Fourth Reform Act. These changes, in turn, enabled Labour to benefit from being a ‘national’ party and ‘alternative government’, during a period when the established leading ‘progressive’ party was divided and weakened. The Fourth Reform Act also assisted Labour's strategy of eliminating the Liberal party as a parliamentary force: Liberals could be denied election victories in the countryside and the suburbs by hopeless but inexpensive Labour interventions.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 369 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tanner, D. M., Political change and the Labour party, 1900–1918 (Cambridge, 1990), esp. pp. 99–129 and p. 411CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Quoted in Hanham, H.J., Elections and party management: politics in the time of Gladstone and Disraeli (Brighton, 1978 edn), p. 243; sec alsoGoogle ScholarGwyn, W. B., Democracy and the cost of politics in Britain (London, 1962), p. 51Google Scholar.

3 ‘The parliamentary papers containing information on candidates’ expenditure at general elections were known by a series of very long, frequently changing titles. For simplicity they are referred to here as Return of parliamentary election expenses; ibid.1880 and 1885 (Part. Papers, 1880, LVII, 1 and 1886, LII, 401Google Scholar.

4 Gwyn, , Cost ofdemocracy, p. 55Google Scholar; Hanham, , Elections, p. 251Google Scholar; O'Leary, C., The elimination of corrupt practices in British elections 1868–1911 (Oxford, 1962), pp. 176 and 206Google Scholar; Seymour, C., Electoral reform in England and Wales (Newton Abbot, 1970; first published, 1915), p. 448Google Scholar.

5 Figures in Pinto-Duschinsky, M., British political finance, 1830–1980 (London, 1981), p. 27Google Scholar; Hanham, , Elections, p. 251Google Scholar; O'Leary, , Corrupt practices, esp. pp. 206–7Google Scholar.

6 See Pelling, H., Social geography of British elections, 1885–1910 (London, 1967), p. 11 for a change of emphasis to financial considerations from the political and social ones given in his earlierCrossRefGoogle ScholarThe origins of the Labour party, 1880–1900 (Oxford, 1965 edn), pp. 222–4.Google ScholarLowell, A. L., The government of England (2 vols., New York, 1908), II, 49–50Google Scholar.

7 Lansdowne to Durand, 21 Sept. 1908, School of Oriental and African Studies, Durand papers, MS 257, 247 (25) Box IX.

8 Return of parliamentary election expenses, Jan. 1910, (Parl. Papers, 1910, LXXIII, 705).Google ScholarSykes, Sir P., Sir Mortimer Durand (London, 1926), p. 336Google Scholar.

9 Bunsen, V. De, Charles Roden Buxton (London, 1948), p. 51Google Scholar.

10 Pinto-Duschinsky, , British political finance, p. 49Google Scholar; Ramsden, J., The age of Balfour and Baldwin, 1902–1940 (London, 1978), pp. 72 and 103Google Scholar.

11 Return of parliamentary election expenses, 1906 (Parl. Papers, 1906, XCVI, 19)Google Scholar.

12 Note of interview by one of the Liberal whip's assistants, n.d. but probably late 1903, Viscount Gladstone papers, B.L. Add. MS 46,106 fo. 94.

13 Sir Kekewich, G., The education department and after (London, 1920), pp. 244–52Google Scholar.

14 Western Morning News, 12 Apr. 1911. Helmore, L. M., Corrupt and illegal practices (London, 1967), is a simple account of the case and its backgroundGoogle Scholar.

15 Gash, N., Politics in the age of Peel (London, 1953), P. 124; Gladstone to Campbell. Bannerman, 22 Oct. 1900, Campbell-Bannerman papers, B.L. Add. MS 41,216 fos. 23–4Google Scholar.

16 Western Daily Mercury, 17 Jan. 1910.

17 Wist Briton, 17 Jan. 1910.

18 Western Daily Mercury, 17 Jan. 1910.

19 The Times, 19 May 1906.

20 Ibid. 19 June 1906.

21 Western Times, 30 Dec. 1905; Western Morning News, 20 Feb. 1912.

22 Sir T. D. Acland to F. D. Acland, n.d. but probably late 1903, Devon C.R.O., F. D. Acland papers, 1,148 M. add. 14/Series II, 46, underlined in original.

23 Walling, R. A. J., ‘The “Western Daily Mercury”’, in Cornish Magazine, Jan. 1899, p. 16Google Scholar.

24 Western Times, 1 June 1923.

25 The Times, 18 June 1906; Cornish Guardian, 5 Oct. 1939.

26 Devon and Exeter Daily Gazette, 7 March 191 o; Newspaper World, 9 Sept. 1939.

27 The Cornishman, 19 July 1928 and 8 Dec. 1920.

28 Ibid. 19 July 1928.

29 Western Morning News, 18 June 1906.

30 Balance sheet and subscription list, 1910, Devon C.R.O., Honiton division Unionist association papers, I, O37M./S.S.I/5.

31 Conservative association minute book, 1886–1902, passim (with the present party agent); Western Daily Mercury, 17 Sept. 1900 and 6 Dec. 1905.

32 See, for example, Ramsden, , Age of Balfour and Baldwin, pp. 53–4Google Scholar.

33 Matthew, H. C. G., McKibbin, R. I. and Kay, J. A., ‘The franchise factor in the rise of the Labour party’, English Historical Review, XCI, 4 (1976), 723–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar. But this argument has been attacked by: Clarke, P. F., ‘Liberals, Labour and the franchise’, ibid, XCII, 3 (1977), 582–90;Google ScholarHart, M., ‘The Liberals, the war and the franchise’, ibid, XCVII, 4 (1982), 820–32;Google ScholarTurner, J., ‘The Labour vote and the franchise after 1918: an investigation of the English evidence’, in Denley, P. and Hopkin, D. (eds.), History and computing (Manchester, 1987), pp. 136–43;Google ScholarTanner, D. M., ‘The Fourth Reform Act and the rise of Labour’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, LVI (1983), 205–19, and Political change, esp. pp. 99–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarButler, D. E., The electoral system in Britain since 1918 (Oxford, 1963 edn) explicitly does not consider how the electoral system affected constituency politics, p. xivGoogle Scholar.

34 See, for example, Parliamentary debates, house of commons, fifth series, XCIX, cols. 2330–46 (29 Nov. 1917).

35 Return of parliamentary election expenses, 1924 (Par. Papers, 1926, XXII, 523)Google Scholar; Pinto-Duschinsky, , British political finance, p. 27Google Scholar.

36 Bodleian Library, Asquith papers, MS 141, fos. 204–6.

37 Western Morning News, 19 Nov. 1923; Return of parliamentary election expenses, 1924; and Asquith papers, MS 141, fos. 49, 146 and 206.

38 A. C. Morrison-Bell, ‘A journey with maps’, unpublished manuscript autobiography, ch. XVIII, 3–4, house of lords record office, historical collection 193.

39 Political diaries of Lady Mary Peto, 15 Dec. 1923.

40 Sale agreement, Reading University Library, Lord Astor papers, MS I,066/1/1294. Although undated and unsigned this appears to have been a draft of the final agreement. Lady Astor succeeded her husband as member for Plymouth, Sutton in 1919.

41 This is a conservative estimate of losses based on those from 1924 to 1930 of £27,900, but which were much higher in the earlier years, Whitfeld to Lord Astor, 14 Jan. 1930 and to P.S./Lord Astor, 26 Nov. 1931, Lord Astor papers, 1,300.

42 Whitfeld to P.S./Lord Astor, 21 May 1926, Lord Astor papers, 1,299.

43 Peto diary, 15 Dec. 1923 and 33 Oct. 1922.

44 Ibid. 24 Oct. 1922, 23 and 26 Oct. 1924.

45 Wignall, T. C., The life 0/commander Sir Edward Nicholl (London, 1921), pp. 210–24Google Scholar.

46 West Briton, 4 Dec. 1919.

47 Sec Western Morning News, 18–26 Oct. 1929.

48 Mid-Devon and Newton Times, 8 Dec. 1923.

49 Western Times, 17 Nov. 1922.

50 Ranuden, , Age of Balfour and Baldwin, pp. 244–5 - expenditure doubled only if inflation is ignoredGoogle Scholar.

51 Honiton Conservative association minute book, 23 July 1926 (with present agent); Maclean to Gladstone, 30 Nov. 1928, Viscount Gladstone papers, B.L. Add. MS 46,474, fo. 207; memorandum by P. G. H. Broadhurst, 6 Apr, 1936, Newcastle University Library, W. Runciman papers, W.R. 262.

52 See Tanner, , Political change, esp. pp. 317–48. Dr Tanner makes no reference to the cost of politics before 1914 and concentrates on the industrial regions where Labour had its best chance of challenging the Liberal partyGoogle Scholar.

53 Tactical voting might explain why Liberals could beat Labour candidates at elections in mining seats where the miners had voted by a decisive majority to affiliate to the Labour party. See Gregory, R., The miners m British politics (London, 1968), pp. 85–7 and 99-100 (Lancashire); 114–17 (Yorkshire); and 131–3 (South Wales)Google Scholar.

54 Return 0/parliamentary election expenses, 1906 and 1929 (Parl. Papers, 1906, XCVI, 19 and 1929–30, XXIV, 755). The significance of these changes was not appreciated by M.P.s at the time, see Parliamentary debates, XCVII, cols. 1,251–1,301, passim (15 Aug. 1917) and XCIX, cols. 1,748–53 (26 Nov. 1917).

55 Cook, C., The age of alignment: electoral polities in Britain, 1922–1929 (London, 1975), esp. pp. 294 and 339CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 The change in Labour's electoral strategy in 1917–18 is analysed convincingly by Dr Tanner, , Political change, esp. pp. 395–404, although he ignores the reduced cost of politics caused by the Representation of the People ActGoogle Scholar.

57 Wilson, T. (ed.), The political diaries of C. P. Scott, 1911–1928 (London, 1970), p. 317Google Scholar (11–12 Dec. 1917). This entry is cited in Pugh, M., Electoral reform in war and peace, 1906–18 (London, 1978), p. 124, but for the ‘alternative vote’, not the cost of politics. Indeed, Pugh ignores inflation, and therefore misses the point, in stating that election expenditure stayed at roughly the pre-war level after 1918, p.175Google Scholar.

58 McKibbin, R. I., The evolution of the Labour party, 1910–1024 (Oxford, 1975), pp. 147–55; C. Howard, ‘Expectations born to death: local Labour party expansion in the 1920s’, inGoogle ScholarWinter, J., The working class in modern British history (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 65–81, esp. pp. 69–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Labour party conference report, 1928, pp. 282–94; see also Tanner, , Political change, pp. 313 and 403–4Google Scholar.

60 See Cook, Age of alignment, passim.