Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:05:09.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE MISKITU, MILITARY LABOUR, AND THE SAN JUAN EXPEDITION OF 1780

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2017

MATTHEW P. DZIENNIK
MATTHEW P. DZIENNIK*
Affiliation:
United States Naval Academy
*
Sampson Hall, United States Naval Academy, 121 Blake Rd, Annapolis, MD 21012, USA[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the contributions of the Miskitu people of colonial Nicaragua and Honduras to Britain's largest military intervention in interior Central America – the invasion of Spanish Nicaragua in 1780. Lacking the local skills and knowledge essential to offensive operations in the region, the expedition relied on an existing alliance with the Miskitu. Charting the evolution of this alliance, this article reveals not only the importance of indigenous manpower to colonial endeavours but also how intercultural campaigns generated powerful assumptions about martial skills and racial categorizations. These assumptions were highly vulnerable to misunderstandings that, in turn, had a profound effect on supposedly rigid European concepts of national policy, military planning, and strategic interests. The failure of British officials to appreciate the needs of their allies ended hopes of defeating the Spanish empire. But the failure also shaped understandings of the Miskitu and broader British interests in Central America. The raising of military labour was much more than the process of hiring soldiers. It was a broader process of negotiation, understanding, and misunderstanding that helped define the expansion of European empires in the new world.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 155 - 179
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author would like to express his sincere thanks to Damian Clavel, Sharika Crawford, Jim Handy, Benjamin Hoy, Kathryn Magee Labelle, Sarah McCaslin, Karl Offen, and Andrew O'Shaughnessy for their most generous comments on drafts of this article. He would also like to extend his gratitude to the anonymous readers for their invaluable insights and suggestions.

References

1 The Kemble papers: collections of the New York Historical Society for the year 1884 (New York, NY, 1885), pp. 387–8Google Scholar.

2 For British objectives, see Brown, Alan S., ‘The British expedition to the St. John's river and the lake of Nicaragua, 1779–1780’, Caribbean Historical Review, 2 (1951), pp. 26–46 Google Scholar.

3 O'Shaughnessy, Andrew, The men who lost America: British leadership, the American Revolution, and the fate of the empire (New Haven, CT, 2013), pp. 178–85Google Scholar.

4 Kolff, Dirk, Naukar, Rajput and sepoy: the ethnohistory of the military labour market in Hindustan, 1450–1850 (Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar; Zürcher, Erik-Jan, ed., Fighting for a living: a comparative history of military labour, 1500–2000 (Amsterdam, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 For South America, see Stern, Steve J., ‘The rise and fall of Indian–White alliances: a regional view of “conquest” history’, Hispanic American Historical Review, 61 (1981), pp. 461–91Google Scholar; Restall, Matthew, Seven myths of the Spanish conquest (Oxford, 2003), pp. 44–63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Matthew, Laura E. and Oudijk, Michel R., eds., Indian conquistadors: indigenous allies in the conquest of Mesoamerica (Norman, OK, 2008)Google Scholar. For North America, see Allen, Robert S., His majesty's Indian allies: Indians and the defence of Canada, 1774–1815 (Toronto, ON, 1992)Google Scholar; Parmenter, Jon, ‘After the mourning wars: the Iroquois as allies in colonial North American campaigns, 1676–1760’, William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd ser., 64 (2007), pp. 39–82;Google Scholar Ward, Matthew, ‘Understanding Native American alliances’, in Danley, Mark H. and Speelman, Patrick J., eds., The Seven Years’ War: global views (Leiden, 2012), pp. 47–72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Lee, Wayne E., ‘Projecting power in the early modern world: the Spanish model?’, in Lee, Wayne E., ed., Empires and indigenes: intercultural alliance, imperial expansion, and warfare in the early modern world (New York, NY, 2011), p. 1Google Scholar.

7 For the problems posed by differing military cultures in the new world, see Hirsch, Adam J., ‘The collision of military cultures in seventeenth-century New England’, Journal of American History, 74 (1988), pp. 1187–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Karr, Ronald Dale, ‘“Why should you be so furious?” The violence of the Pequot war’, Journal of American History, 85 (1998), pp. 876–909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Oliphant, John, Peace and war on the Anglo-Cherokee frontier, 1756–1763 (Baton Rouge, LA, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For conflicting interpretations of how successfully Europeans adapted to warfare in the new world, see Chet, Guy, Conquering the American wilderness: the triumph of European warfare in the colonial northeast (Amherst, MA, 2003)Google Scholar; and Grenier, John, The first way of war: American war making on the frontier, 1607–1814 (Cambridge, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 White, Richard, The middle ground: Indians, empires, and republics in the Great Lakes region, 1650–1815 (Cambridge, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Taylor, Alan, The divided ground: Indians, settlers, and the northern borderland of the American Revolution (New York, NY, 2006)Google Scholar; DuVal, Kathleen, The native ground: Indians and colonists in the heart of the continent (Philadelphia, PA, 2011)Google Scholar.

9 Pulsipher, Jenny Hale, Subjects unto the same king: Indians, English, and the contest for authority in colonial New England (Philadelphia, PA, 2006)Google Scholar; Witgen, Michael, An infinity of nations: how the native new world shaped early North America (Philadelphia, PA, 2012)Google Scholar; Warren, Stephen, The worlds the Shawnees made: migration and violence in early America (Chapel Hill, NC, 2014)Google Scholar; McDonnell, Michael A., Masters of empire: Great Lakes Indians and the making of America (New York, NY, 2015)Google Scholar.

10 Richter, Daniel K., The ordeal of the longhouse: the peoples of the Iroquois league in the era of European colonization (Chapel Hill, NC, 1992)Google Scholar; Merrell, James H., Into the American woods: negotiators on the Pennsylvania frontier (New York, NY, 1999)Google Scholar; Lakomäki, Sami, Gathering together: the Shawnee people through diaspora and nationhood, 1600–1870 (New Haven, CT, 2014)Google Scholar.

11 Johnson, Richard R., ‘The search for a usable Indian: an aspect of the defence of colonial New England’, Journal of American History, 64 (1977), pp. 623–51Google Scholar; Lee, Wayne E., ‘Subjects, clients, allies, or mercenaries? The British use of Irish and Amerindian military power, 1500–1800’, in Bowen, H. V., Mancke, Elizabeth, and Reid, John G., eds., Britain's oceanic empire: Atlantic and Indian Ocean worlds, c. 1550–1850 (Cambridge, 2012), pp. 179–217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Carroll, Brian D., ‘“Savages” in the service of empire: Native American soldiers in Gorham's rangers, 1744–1762’, New England Quarterly, 85 (2012), pp. 383–427 Google Scholar.

12 See, for example, the neglect of indigenous peoples in Bassi, Ernesto, ‘Turning south before swinging east: geopolitics and geopolitical imagination in the Caribbean after the American Revolution’, Itinerario, 36 (2012), pp. 107–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Offen, Karl H., ‘British logwood extraction from the Mosquitia: the origin of a myth’, Hispanic American Historical Review, 80 (2000), pp. 128–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Offen, Karl H., ‘Puritan bioprospecting in Central America and the West Indies’, Itinerario, 35 (2011), pp. 15–48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Dozier, Craig L., Nicaragua's Mosquito shore: the years of British and American presence (Tuscaloosa, AL, 1985), p. 15Google Scholar; Vilas, Carlos María, State, class and ethnicity in Nicaragua: capitalist modernization and revolutionary change on the Atlantic coast, trans. Norwood, Susan (Boulder, CO, 1989), p. 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Sloane, Sir Hans, A voyage to the islands Madera, Barbados, Nevis, S. Christophers and Jamaica (2 vols., London, 1707), i, pp. lxxvi–lxxvii Google Scholar.

16 Mihok, Lorena D. and Wells, E. Christian, ‘Miskitu labor and English royalization at Augusta, Roatán Island, Honduras’, International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 18 (2014), pp. 100–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Lawrie to Cairns, 5 Dec. 1779, Edinburgh, National Records of Scotland (NRS), GD461/43; Lawrie to Robertson, 10 Nov. 1774, Edinburgh, National Library of Scotland, MS 3942, fo. 173.

18 Olien, Michael D., ‘The Miskito kings and the line of succession’, Journal of Anthropological Research, 39 (1983), pp. 198–241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Offen, Karl H., ‘The Sambo and Tawira Miskitu: the colonial origins and geography of intra-Miskitu differentiation in eastern Nicaragua and Honduras’, Ethnohistory, 49 (2002), pp. 319–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Offen, Karl H., ‘Race and place in colonial Mosquitia, 1600–1787’, in Gudmundson, Lowell and Wolfe, Justin, eds., Blacks and blackness in Central America: between race and place (Durham, NC, 2010), pp. 96–7Google Scholar.

20 Hodgson, Robert, Some account of the Mosquito territory (Edinburgh, 1822 (orig. edn 1757)), p. 46Google Scholar. See also Bell, C. Napier, Tangweera: life and adventures among gentle savages, introduction by Dennis, Philip A. (Austin, TX, 1989), p. 4Google Scholar.

21 Rogers, Nicholas, ‘Caribbean borderland: empire, ethnicity, and the exotic on the Mosquito coast’, Eighteenth Century Life, 26 (2002), pp. 117–38Google Scholar; Williams, Caroline A., ‘Living between empires: diplomacy and politics in the late eighteenth-century Mosquitia’, The Americas, 70 (2013), pp. 237–68Google Scholar.

22 Hodgson, Some account of the Mosquito territory, pp. 15, 49.

23 Offen, Karl H., ‘Creating Mosquitia: mapping Amerindian spatial practices in eastern Central America, 1629–1779’, Journal of Historical Geography, 33 (2007), pp. 268–9Google Scholar.

24 Offen, ‘Creating Mosquitia’, pp. 254–82; Offen, ‘Sambo and Tawira Miskitu’, p. 345.

25 Williams, Caroline A., ‘“If you want slaves go to Guinea”: civilisation and savagery in the “Spanish” Mosquitia, 1787–1800’, Slavery and Abolition, 35 (2014), pp. 121–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 NRS, GD461/40, Expenses, 1776–80; Offen, ‘Creating Mosquitia’, p. 265. This figure was equivalent to a third of what Britain spent on supplying gifts to all North American indigenous peoples during the first five years of the War for American Independence; see ‘Précis of orders for Indian presents’, Apr. 1780, Ann Arbor, William L. Clements Library (WLCL), William Knox papers, box 10.

27 ‘Estimate for articles to Mosquito Indians’, n.d., London, The National Archives (TNA), CO137/75, fos. 110–11; TNA, CO137/76, fos. 200–7, Lawrie to Dalling, 19 Nov. 1779.

28 Ethnographers are divided on the extent to which British trade influenced the emergence of a centralized Miskitu kingdom; see Dennis, Philip A. and Olien, Michael D., ‘Kingship among the Miskito’, American Ethnologist, 11 (1984), pp. 718–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Helms, Mary, ‘Of kings and contexts: ethnohistorical interpretations of Miskito political structure and function’, American Ethnologist, 13 (1986), pp. 506–23Google Scholar; Noveck, Daniel, ‘Class, culture, and the Miskito Indians: a historical perspective’, Dialectical Anthropology, 13 (1988), pp. 17–29 Google Scholar.

29 Offen, ‘Creating Mosquitia’, p. 270.

30 Vilas, State, class and ethnicity in Nicaragua, p. 22.

31 Kemble papers, p. 257.

32 It was also a means by which disgruntled settlers could force the recall of Hodgson as superintendent on the grounds that he was selling indigenous slaves; see Hodgson, Robert, The defence of Robert Hodgson (London, 1779)Google Scholar; William Shuman Sorsby, ‘The British superintendency of the Mosquito shore, 1749–1787’ (Ph.D. thesis, University College London, 1969), pp. 202–3.

33 Vassa, Gustavus, The interesting narrative and other writings, ed. Carretta, Vincent (London, 2003), p. 198Google Scholar.

34 TNA, CO137/76, fo. 200, Lawrie to Dalling, 18 Nov. 1779; Kemble papers, p. 258.

35 Duke Isaac to Dartmouth, Stafford, Staffordshire Record Office (SRO), Dartmouth papers, D(W)1778-V-308; TNA, CO137/70, fo. 67, Dartmouth to Keith, 2 Aug. 1775.

36 Kemble papers, pp. 246–7.

37 Wilson, Kathleen, ‘Empire, trade and popular politics in mid-Hanoverian Britain’, Past and Present, 121 (1988), pp. 74–109 Google Scholar; Harding, Richard, Amphibious warfare in the eighteenth century: the British expedition to the West Indies, 1740–1742 (London, 1991)Google Scholar.

38 Karl Offen, ‘Isthmus designs’, www.brown.edu/Facilities/John_Carter_Brown_Library/exhibitions/cartographic/pages/offen.html; Squier, E. G., ed., The states of Central America (New York, NY, 1858), pp. 747–8Google Scholar.

39 Frost, Alan, ‘The Spanish yoke: British schemes to revolutionize Spanish America, 1739–1807’, in Samson, Jane and Frost, Alan, eds., Pacific empires: essays in honour of Glyndwr Williams (Vancouver, BC, 1999), pp. 34, 45–6Google Scholar. For the 1762 expedition, see Floyd, Troy S., The Anglo-Spanish struggle for Mosquitia (Albuquerque, NM, 1967), pp. 115–16Google Scholar.

40 Frost, ‘The Spanish yoke’, pp. 45–6; Walter, Richard, Voyage round the world in the years 1740–1744 by George Anson (London, 1748)Google Scholar.

41 Long, Edward, The history of Jamaica (3 vols., London, 1774), i, pp. 316–20Google Scholar.

42 Edwards, Bryan, The history, civil and commercial, of the British colonies in the West Indies (5 vols., London, 1819), v, pp. 206–12Google Scholar. See also Wright, John, Memoir of the Mosquito territory as respecting the voluntary cession of it to the crown of Great Britain (London, 1808), pp. 21, 27Google Scholar.

43 TNA, CO137/75, fos. 4–11, White to Germain, 9 Dec. 1776.

44 Long, History of Jamaica, i, p. 320. For Speer, see Offen, ‘British logwood extraction from the Mosquitia’, p. 131.

45 Maltby, William S., The black legend in England: the development of anti-Spanish sentiment, 1558–1660 (Durham, NC, 1971)Google Scholar. It should be noted that the eighteenth century saw a shift toward a ‘more balanced, and less virulent, critique of the Spanish empire’ in British writing based on the perceived economic advantages of trade with South America; see Paquette, Gabriel, ‘The image of imperial Spain in British political thought, 1750–1800’, Bulletin of Spanish Studies, 18 (2004), pp. 191–7, 202–3Google Scholar. For the role of Amerindians in this less virulent critique, see Smitten, Jeffrey, ‘Impartiality in Robertson's History of America ’, Eighteenth Century Studies, 19 (1985), pp. 56–77 Google Scholar.

46 Moseley, Benjamin, A treatise on tropical diseases; on military operations; and on the climate of the West Indies (London, 1795), p. 150Google Scholar.

47 ‘The Mosquito shore’, British Magazine, Sept. 1762, p. 472.

48 TNA, CO137/75, fo. 1, ‘Memorial of Mosquito shore inhabitants’, 22 June 1779, and fos. 4–11, White to Germain, 9 Dec. 1776; TNA, CO137/78, fos. 64–6, Dalling to Germain, 23 June 1780.

49 Moseley, Treatise on tropical diseases, p. 136; TNA, CO137/75, fos. 4–11, White to Germain, 9 Dec. 1776.

50 WLCL, Richard Oswald collection, vol. 2, ‘Plan for an alliance with Russia to carry on the American war’, 12 Apr. 1781; Frost, ‘The Spanish yoke’, pp. 42–3.

51 Offen, ‘Creating Mosquitia’, pp. 277–8. For the wider importance of indigenous peoples in cartographic representations of the new world, see Short, John Rennie, Cartographic encounters: indigenous peoples and the exploration of the new world (London, 2009)Google Scholar.

52 Linebaugh, Peter and Rediker, Marcus, Many-headed hydra: sailors, slaves, commoners, and the hidden history of the revolutionary Atlantic (Boston, MA, 2000), p. 261Google Scholar.

53 Sloane, Voyage to the islands, i, pp. lxxvi–lxxvii.

54 TNA, ADM7/837, ‘An account of the Mosquito shore’, 1765; Long, History of Jamaica, i, p. 317. Much of this information – particularly the writings of Edwards – came via the Reverend Thomas Warren, an official of the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts and the personal secretary to superintendent Robert Hodgson Jr; see Offen, ‘Race and place’, pp. 100–1.

55 Weber, David J., Bárbaros: Spaniards and their savages in the age of Enlightenment (New Haven, CT, 2005), pp. 163–4, 203, 330n171Google Scholar.

56 NRS, GD461/43, Lawrie to Cairns, 5 Dec. 1779; NRS, GD461/46, Briton to Lawrie, 3 July 1782.

57 Squier, ed., The states of Central America, pp. 744–5.

58 Henderson, George, An account of the British settlement of Honduras (London, 1811), pp. 180–1, 217Google Scholar.

59 Kingston, National Library of Jamaica (NLJ), MS1583, ‘Stores sent to the Spanish Main’, n.d. For similar uses of cultural appropriation in a very different context, see Reese, Ty M., ‘Controlling the company: the structures of Fante–British relations on the Gold Coast, 1750–1821’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 41 (2013), pp. 114–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Squier, ed., The states of Central America, p. 746. See also ‘The Mosquito shore’, Literary Gazette, 15 Oct. 1842, p. 709.

61 Sorsby, ‘The British superintendency’, p. 203. Other Spanish sources suggested 3,000 indigenous fighting men in Mosquitia; see Dawson, Frank Griffith, ‘William Pitt's settlement at Black River on the Mosquito shore: a challenge to Spain in Central America, 1732–1787’, Hispanic American Historical Review, 63 (1983), p. 688Google Scholar.

62 TNA, CO137/75, fos. 153–9, Dalling to Germain, 3 Sept. 1779. This figure was probably based on Hodgson, Some account of the Mosquito territory, p. 49. In 1783, Lawrie estimated a Miskitu population of 2,550 males; see Lawrie and Despard to Campbell, 16 June 1783, Chelsea, National Army Museum, Nugent papers. For much higher estimates, see Edwards, History…of the British colonies, v, p. 210; Long, History of Jamaica, i, p. 316.

63 TNA, CO137/79, fos. 164–6, ‘Proceedings of a general congress held at Tebuppy’, 1 Oct. 1780.

64 Ibid.

65 Kemble papers, p. 212.

66 TNA, CO137/75, fos. 31–7, Dalling to Germain, 25 May 1779.

67 TNA, CO137/75, fos. 153–9, Dalling to Germain, 3 Sept. 1779; Kemble papers, pp. 188–9; TNA, CO137/76, fos. 69–72, Dalling to Lawrie, 6 Sept. 1779.

68 Offen, ‘Race and place’, p. 114.

69 Anderson, Jennifer L., Mahogany: the costs of luxury in early America (Cambridge, MA, 2012), pp. 83–4, 89–124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; NRS, GD461/25, William Reid to father, 12 July 1775.

70 NLJ, Nugent papers, box 3, Cooke to Nugent, 6 June 1804.

71 Kemble papers, p. 211; TNA, CO137/78, fos. 166–71, Dalling to Germain, 2 July 1780; Hunter, John, Observations on the diseases of the army in Jamaica; and on the best means of preserving the health of Europeans in that climate (London, 1788), pp. 42–7Google Scholar.

72 TNA, CO137/78, fos. 179–81, ‘Intended plan of operations’, n.d.

73 Sorsby, ‘The British superintendency’, p. 260.

74 NLJ, Nugent papers, box 1, answers of David Lamb to Dalling, n.d.

75 Dancer, Thomas, A brief history of the expedition against Fort San Juan so far as it relates to the diseases of the troops (Kingston, 1781), pp. 11–12 Google Scholar; Moseley, Treatise on tropical diseases, pp. 142, 150.

76 Dawson, ‘William Pitt's settlement’, p. 682; Offen, ‘Race and place’, pp. 102–3.

77 Long, History of Jamaica, i, p. 315; Edwards, History…of the British colonies, i, pp. 529–30.

78 TNA, CO137/75, fos. 196–203, Dalrymple to Germain, 21 Oct. 1779; St James Chronicle or the British Evening Post, 18–21 Dec. 1779, p. 1.

79 Kemble papers, p. 218.

80 Dalling to Germain, 14 Apr. 1780, New York, New York Public Library, T. B. Myers collection, fo. 1511; NLJ, MS1583, ‘Stores sent to the Spanish Main’, n.d.

81 NLJ, Nugent papers, box 1, answers of David Lamb to Dalling, n.d.; Kemble papers, pp. 22, 285.

82 The Rio San Juan can receive as much as 225 inches of rainfall annually; see Vilas, State, class and ethnicity in Nicaragua, p. 2; Dancer, A brief history of the expedition, pp. 11–13, 19–22; Kemble papers, pp. 14, 36, 107.

83 NLJ, Vaughn papers, Garth to Vaughn, 3 Sept. 1780; Hunter, Observations on the diseases of the army in Jamaica, pp. 58, 193.

84 McNeill, John R., Mosquito empires: ecology and war in the greater Caribbean, 1620–1914 (New York, NY, 2010), p. 190Google Scholar; Kemble papers, pp. 7, 246 (emphasis mine).

85 TNA, CO137/79, fos. 164–6, ‘Proceedings of a general congress held at Tebuppy’, 1 Oct. 1780; Kemble papers, p. 246.

86 It should be noted that there was a total of sixty-one free people of colour taken prisoner at the fort, a fact which suggests that the Miskitu did not demand all the non-European prisoners as suggested by Polson; see TNA, CO137/77, fo. 154, list of prisoners, 29 Apr. 1780. For Miskitu attitudes to captives, see Offen, ‘Sambo and Tawira Miskitu’, p. 345.

87 Morrison, Kenneth M., The embattled northeast: the elusive ideal of alliance in Abenaki–Euramerican relations (Berkeley, CA, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Steele, Ian K., Betrayals: Fort William Henry and the massacre (Oxford, 1993)Google Scholar. More recent scholarship has suggested that ritual violence also provided a means of binding indigenous and European allies together; see Lipman, Andrew, ‘“A meanes to knitt them together”: the exchange of body parts in the Pequot war’, William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd ser., 65 (2008), pp. 1–28 Google Scholar.

88 Acts of the privy council of England: colonial series, ed. Grant, W. L. (6 vols., London, 1912), v, pp. 480–2Google Scholar; TNA, CO137/77, fos. 110–11, Harrison to Germain, 6 Apr. 1780.

89 TNA, CO137/77, fo. 120, White to Germain, 1 June 1780.

90 Squier, ed., The states of Central America, p. 746.

91 Sorsby, ‘The British superintendency’, p. 27; Offen, Karl H., ‘Mapping Amerindian captivity in colonial Mosquitia’, Journal of Latin American Geography, 14 (2015), pp. 35–65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

92 Kemble papers, pp. 77–8, 195–6, 235; TNA, CO137/78, fos. 129–33, Germain to Dalling, 6 Sept. 1780.

93 NLJ, Nugent papers, box 1, answers of David Lamb to Dalling, n.d.

94 TNA, CO137/79, fos. 164–6, ‘Proceedings of a general congress held at Tebuppy’, 1 Oct. 1780; Kemble papers, pp. 383–6. The original orders for the San Juan expedition had suggested that, if anything went wrong, the force might turn south into Costa Rica; see Kemble papers, pp. 191–204.

95 Qu. in Linebaugh and Rediker, Many-headed hydra, p. 266.

96 For ‘projectors of imperial power’, see Lee, ed., Empires and indigenes, p. 11.

97 Hodgson, Some account of the Mosquito territory, p. 45.

98 Squier, ed., The states of Central America, pp. 753–4.

99 Henderson, An account of the British settlement of Honduras, p. 225.

100 Bickham, Troy, Savages within the empire: representations of American Indians in eighteenth-century Britain (Oxford, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

101 Offen, ‘Race and place’, pp. 93, 101, 105.

102 Moseley, Treatise on tropical diseases, pp. 58, 139.

103 Parliamentary papers [457], ‘Correspondence relative to the condition and treatment of slaves at Honduras, 1820–1823’ (1823), pp. 386–91.

104 NLJ, Nugent papers, box 3, Barrow to Nugent, 27 Mar. 1804.

105 TNA, WO1/31, fo. 54, Vaughn to Portland, 22 Dec. 1794.

106 Buckley, Roger Norman, Slaves in red coats: the British West India regiments, 1795–1815 (New Haven, CT, 1979)Google Scholar.

107 WLCL, Richard Oswald collection, vol. 2, ‘Plan for an alliance with Russia to carry on the American war’, 12 Apr. 1781; NRS, GD51/1/520, fo. 1, ‘Note relative to our present means of attacking South America’, 18 Feb. 1796.

108 Dawson, ‘William Pitt's settlement’, p. 704; Sorsby, ‘The British superintendency’, pp. 308–21.

109 Kinnaird, Lucia Burk, ‘Creasy's plan for seizing Panama with an introductory account of British designs on Panama’, Hispanic American Historical Review, 13 (1933), pp. 46–78 Google Scholar.

110 NRS, GD51/1/520, fo. 9, Dundas to Chatham, 26 May 1808.

111 Darwin, John, ‘Imperialism and the Victorians’, English Historical Review, 112 (1997), p. 619Google Scholar; Brown, Matthew et al. ., ‘Special issue: informal empire in Latin America: culture, commerce and capital’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 27 (2008), pp. 1–207 Google Scholar.

112 Naylor, Robert A., Penny ante imperialism: the Mosquito shore and the bay of Honduras, 1660–1914 (Toronto, ON, 1989), pp. 64–6Google Scholar.

113 Sir Burton, John Alder, ed., Archives of British Honduras: being extracts and précis from records (London, 1931), pp. 276, 280Google Scholar; Henderson, An account of the British settlement of Honduras, p. 180.

114 For the Poyais Scheme, see Sinclair, David, The land that never was: Sir Gregor MacGregor and the most audacious fraud in history (Cambridge, MA, 2004)Google Scholar; Brown, Matthew, ‘Inca, sailor, soldier, king: Gregor MacGregor and the early nineteenth-century Caribbean’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 24 (2005), pp. 44–70 Google Scholar.

115 Hale, Charles R., Resistance and contradiction: Miskitu Indians and the Nicaraguan state, 1894–1987 (Stanford, CA, 1994)Google Scholar.

116 TNA, CO137/78, fos. 335–8, Germain to Dalling, 7 Dec. 1780.