Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2015
Michael Mann's last two volumes of The sources of social power are acknowledged to be a milestone in historical sociology. They have not quite reached undergraduate history reading lists, at least in the UK. This is perhaps because his approach does not fit neatly into our common categories. He proclaims himself both an incurable empiricist and a purveyor of ‘macro sociology’. He sees history as a pattern of disrupted equilibria, but this puts him much closer to the ‘historian of events’ than he would perhaps like to be. He is concerned with class, but is no dedicated Marxist, saying that his approach steers ‘somewhere between a Marxian and Weberian position’. He focuses on the nation-state, but is devoid of nationalist commitment of any sort, differing from the position of Jeremi Suri, for instance, whose recent work Liberty's surest guardian broadly promotes a more positive view of America's world role. Indeed, Mann sometimes appears to be rather more hostile to what he sees as the counterproductive ‘imperialism’ of his adopted country than, say, Messrs Chavez and Putin. He wants to inflect history with theory, but has little time for post-modernism. Neither Derrida nor Foucault, let alone Deleuze and Guattari or Zizek, figure significantly in his books, an offence almost worthy of burning at the stake in today's academy. Yet his analysis of key elements of twentieth-century historiography is consistently perceptive and his treatment of the history of the USA and the fall of communism, in particular, outclasses that of any historian I have read.
1 The first two volumes of The Sources of social power were given searching, but generally laudatory reviews in Hall, John A. and Shroeder, Ralph, eds., An anatomy of power: the social theory of Michael Mann (Cambridge, 2005)Google Scholar, to which Mann responded with characteristic intellectual vigour. My remarks here take forward some of those themes but add new ones in view of the radical departures of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.
2 Suri, Jeremy, Liberty's surest guardian: America's nation building from the founders to Obama (New York, NY, 2011)Google Scholar.
3 Geuss, Raymond, Philosophy and real politics (Princeton, NJ, 2008), pp. 59–70Google Scholar.
4 Hobsbawm, Eric, The age of extremes: the short history of the twentieth century, 1914–1991 (London, 2014)Google Scholar.
5 Mann, Michael, ‘As the twentieth century ages: the age of extremes’, New Left Review, 1 (1995), pp. 1–14Google Scholar.
6 Mann, Michael, The sources of social power: ii: The rise of classes and nation-states, 1760–1914 (Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar.
7 Bayly, C. A., The birth of the modern world 1780–1914: global connections and comparisons (Oxford, 2004)Google Scholar, pp. 325–65.
8 Sen, Amiya P., ed., The indispensable Vivekananda: an anthology for our times (Delhi, 2006)Google Scholar.
9 Jaffrelot, Christophe, The Hindu nationalist movement and Indian politics 1925 to the 1990s (London, 1993)Google Scholar.
10 For a general view, see Ruthven, Malise, Islam in the modern world (Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar.
11 Lapidus, Ira, A history of Islamic societies (Cambridge, 2013)Google Scholar.
12 Rogan, Eugene L. and Shlaim, Avi, eds., The war for Palestine: rewriting the history of 1948 (Cambridge, 2001)Google Scholar.
13 Schafer, Axel R., Countercultural conservatives: American evangelicalism from the postwar revival to the new Christian right (Madison, WI, 2011)Google Scholar; Williams, Daniel K., God's own party: the making of the Christian right (New York, NY, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 Michael Slachman,‘In Algeria: a tug of war for young minds’, New York Times, 23 June 2008.
15 ‘Why they shot Malala’, Daily Telegraph, 22 July 2013.
16 I am grateful to Dr Sujit Sivasundaram for this point.
17 Deterding, David, Singapore English (Edinburgh, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18 Interview with Lee Kuan Yew, 5 May 2001, www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/leekuanyew.html, accessed Aug. 2012.
19 Frank, Andre Gunder, On capitalist underdevelopment (Bombay, 1875)Google Scholar; Popkin, Samuel L., The rational peasant: rural society in Vietnam (Berkeley, CA, 1979)Google Scholar; Scott, James. C., The moral economy of the peasant: subsistence and rebellion in Southeast Asia (New Haven, CT, 1976)Google Scholar.
20 Mann, Michael, The dark side of democracy: explaining ethnic cleansing (Cambridge, 2005)Google Scholar
21 Kapila, Shruti, ‘Global intellectual history and the Indian political’, in McMahon, Darrin M. and Moyn, Samuel, eds., Rethinking modern intellectual history (New York, NY, 2013)Google Scholar, pp. 437–57.
22 Grove, Richard, Green imperialism: colonial expansion, tropical island Edens and the origins of environmentalism (Cambridge, 1995)Google Scholar; Rangarajan, Mahesh, The Raj and the natural world (Delhi, 1999)Google Scholar.