Article contents
Making the Millennium: the Mid-Nineteenth Century Peace Movement1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
On 22 August 1849 a privately sponsored peace congress opened in the Salle de Sainte Cécile in Paris. In the chair was Victor Hugo, assisted as vice presidents and secretaries by a team of men from Britain, the United States, France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany. Several of these men, such as Richard Cobden, were members of the legislatures of their respective countries: others were prominent clergymen and philanthropists. Seated before them were delegates from a slightly wider range of countries which in that blissfully Eurocentric era were deemed to represent the world. They had been brought together by an invitation sent by the London-based Peace Congress Committee to well-known individual sympathizers, peace societies, religious bodies, philanthropic and other civic groups. The business before them consisted of a series of propositions advocating international arbitration, general and simultaneous disarmament, a congress of nations, an international court, and various measures designed to facilitate international communication. This peace congress was the second in a series of four convened between 1848 and 1851 in Brussels, Paris, Frankfort and London to co-ordinate and develop various pressure-group activities which had gained momentum during the late 1840s in Britain and the United States.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978
References
2 Reports of the peace congresses at Brussels, Paris, Frankfort, London, and Edinburgh, in the years 1848, 1849, 1850, 1851, and 1853 (London, 1861), Paris Report.Google Scholar
3 Isichei, Elizabeth, Victorian Quakers (London, 1970), pp. 223–4.Google Scholar
4 Taylor, A. J. P., The trouble-makers. Dissent over foreign policy 1792–1939 (London, 1969), pp. 47, 49Google Scholar. See also Beales, A. C. F., The history of peace: a short account of the organised movements for international peace (London, 1931)Google Scholar; Phelps, Christina, The Anglo-American peace movement in the mid-nineteenth century (New York, 1930)Google Scholar; Hobson, J. A., Richard Cobden. The international man (London, 1918)Google Scholar; Henderson, G. B., ‘The pacifists of the fifties’ in his Crimean War diplomacy and other historical essays (Glasgow, 1947)Google Scholar; Frick, Stephen, ‘Joseph Sturge and the Crimean War. I. The search for a cause’, Journal of the Friends' Historical Society, liii (1974).Google Scholar
5 See below, pp. 12–13.
6 Lament, W. M., Godly rule, politics and religion, 1603–60 (London, 1969), p. 13Google Scholar. See also Thrupp, Sylvia L. (ed.), Millennial dreams in action. Studies in revolutionary religious movements (New York, 1970), pp. 12, 16.Google Scholar
7 I wish to acknowledge my indebtedness to various American scholars whose works I have found helpful, especially Miller, Perry, The life of the mind in America (London, 1966)Google Scholar; Smith, T. L., Revivalism and social reform, American protestantism on the eve of the civil war (New York, 1965)Google Scholar; and Cross, Whitney R., The burned-over district (New York, 1950)Google Scholar. For these and various other references I am indebted to my colleague Dr T. Dunning.
8 Lamont, p. 18.
9 Simpson, David, A key to the prophecies or a concise view of the predictions contained in the old and new testaments, which have been fulfilled, are now fulfilling, or are yet to be fulfilled in the latter ages of the world (Macclesfield, 1795), pp. 305, 401Google Scholar. See also Garrett, Clarke, Respectable folly: millennarians and the French revolution in France and England (Baltimore, 1975).Google Scholar
10 Winter, Robert, Reflections on the present state of popery compared with it's [sic] former state (London, 1800), p. 26Google Scholar. The interpretation of prophecy has been described as the only important contribution to scriptural exegesis offered by the evangelicals. Storr, Vernon F., The development of English theology in the nineteenth century (London, 1913), p. 179.Google Scholar
11 Thompson, E. P., The making of the English working class (London, 1965), chap, XI, part ii.Google Scholar
12 Best, G. F. A., Shaftesbury (London, 1975), pp. 71–2Google Scholar; Battiscombe, Georgina, Shaftesbury: A biography of the seventh earl (London, 1974), pp. 100–3Google Scholar. Church of Scotland ministers took a similar interest in the Jews. See Bonar, Andrew A. and McCheyne, Robert M., Narrative of a mission of inquiry to the Jews from the Church of Scotland in 1839 (Edinburgh, 1842).Google Scholar
13 British Quarterly Review, x, 20 (08 and 11 1849), p. 529Google Scholar. An earlier article in this journal, IX, 17 (February and May 1849), 137–200, reviewed ten books on the millennial prophecies.
14 Bonar, Andrew A., Redemption drawing nigh: a defence on the pre-millennial advent (London, 1847), p. 339.Google Scholar
15 Shepperson, George, ‘The comparative study of millenarian movements’ in , Thrupp (ed.), Millennial dreams in action, pp. 44–5.Google Scholar
16 Stock, , Church missionary society, 1, 498–9, 503–4.Google Scholar
17 Sandeen, E. R., The roots of fundamentalism: British and American millenarianism 1800–1930 (Chicago, 1970), pp. 13, 41Google Scholar. This book is a useful study of pre-millennial beliefs.
18 The works of the Rev. Andrew Fuller (London, 1824), vi, 346–7.Google Scholar
19 Harrison, J. F. C., Quest for a new moral world: Robert Owen and the Owenites in Britain and America (New York, 1969), pp. 92–139Google Scholar. See also Saville, John, ‘J. E. Smith and the Owenite movement, 1833–4’Google Scholar, and Oliver, W. H., ‘Owen in 1817: the millennialist moment’ in Pollard, S. (ed.), Robert Owen: prophet of the poor (London, 1971).Google Scholar
20 Hanham, H., ‘Liberal organizations for working men, 1860–1914’, Bulletin of the Society for the Study of Labour History, 7 (Autumn 1963), 5.Google Scholar
21 Morris, J. W., Memoirs of the life and writings of the Rev. Andrew Fuller, pastor of the Baptist church at Kettering, and secretary to the Baptist missionary society (London, 1826), pp. 340–1.Google Scholar
22 Fuller, , Works, vi, 388.Google Scholar
23 See, for example, Missionary Herald, cxxxix (07 1830)Google Scholar; CLII (August 1831); XXXVII (June 1842); N.S. XXX (June 1859).
24 Missionary Herald, xlix (06 1843)Google Scholar. See also Stock, Eugene, The history of the church missionary society: its environment, its men and its work (London, 1899), 1, 284Google Scholar for a similar statement. Lord Ashley's opinion was totally different. See Best, p. 72, and Battiscombe, p. 102.
25 Chalmers, Thomas, D.D., , Thoughts on universal peace: a sermon delivered on Thursday, January 18, 1816, the day of national thanksgiving for the restoration of peace (Edinburgh, 1816)Google Scholar. The indented quotation, with one unimportant alteration, was used by the Peace Society as a foreword to Reports of the peace congresses. A very similar statement may be found in Bogue, David, D.D., , On universal peace; being extracts from a discourse delivered in October 1813 (London, 1838), pp 21–2Google Scholar. Bogue, who is best known as a founder of the London Missionary Society, was also a member of the Peace Society.
26 The American experience was similar. ‘The campaigns for Sabbath reform, temperance, and anti-slavery were all part of the program to prepare the nation for the advent of the great millennial age.’ Marsden, G. M., The evangelical mind and the new school presbyterian experience (New Haven, U.S.A., 1970), p. 186.Google Scholar
27 Rev. Noel, Baptist W., Essay on the union of church and state (London, 1848), p. 108Google Scholar. See also, for example, Missionary Herald, clxxxvii (07 1834), p. 51Google Scholar, where the Rev. T. Price was reported as telling the annual meeting of the Baptist Missionary Society that the ‘third obstacle to the progress of the Redeemer's kingdom was to be found in the connexion existing between religion and state polities’. According to Tuveson, E. L., Redeemer nation: The idea of America's millennial role (Chicago, 1968), p. 69Google Scholar, ‘the general American conviction’ then was ‘that the separation of religious from civil matters is a key action in the preparation for the millennium’.
28 Tuveson, E. L., Millennium and utopia: a study in the background of the idea of progress (Berkeley, 1949), p. 137Google Scholar. See also Tuveson, , Redeemer nation, p. 68.Google Scholar
29 Reports of the peace congresses, Frankfort report, p. 31. The close relationship between secular and missionary progress was emphasised at the 1835 annual meeting of the Baptist Missionary Society, Missionary Herald, cxcix (07 1835), 50.Google Scholar
30 The similar characteristics of the American peace movement are discussed by Brock, Peter, Radical pacifists in antebellum America (Princeton University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
31 Isichei, , Victorian Quakers, p. 214.Google Scholar
32 Herald of Peace (04–06 1825), p. 65.Google Scholar
33 Ibid. (October-December 1832), p. 465.
34 Ibid. (July 1838), p. 98.
35 The quotations in the previous two paragraphs are taken from SirStephen, George, Anti-slavery recollections: in a series of letters, addressed to Mrs Beecher Stowe (London, 1854), p. 213Google Scholar, and Froser's Magazine for Town and Country (09 1841), p. 361Google Scholar. See also Harrison, Brian, Drink and the Victorians (London, 1971), chap. 7.Google Scholar
36 The London offices of the Anti-Slavery and Peace Societies were in the same street.
37 Richard, H., Memoirs of Joseph Sturge (London, 1864).Google Scholar
38 Public Record Office, H.O. 45 OS/260, fos. 35, 67; H.O. 45/261, fos. 17, 39, 45, 47, 48; H.O. 65/10 Police Letter Book (Birmingham) 20 May and 23 May 1842. Sturge's part in this provoked The Times (23 May 1842) to denounce ‘an organized conspiracy amongst the Chartists, assisted by certain “Friends”, to prevent the enlistment of recruits’.
39 Minute book of the general committee of the London Peace Society (1847–52), 13 June 1849. Working-class support was courted with some success in the 1840s. At a Birmingham Town Hall meeting called in opposition to the government militia scheme ‘the great gallery and floor were crowded chiefly by working-men.’ Pilot (24 January 1846). Henry Vincent introduced 15 Paris workmen to the 1851 peace congress (Reports of the peace congresses, London report, p. 55). The lib-lab alliance is described in Harrison, Brian and Hollis, Patricia, ‘Chartism, liberalism and the life of Robert Lowery’, English Historical Review, lxxxii (1967), 503–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 Tolis, Peter, Elihu Burritt: crusader for brotherhood (Hamden, Connecticut, 1968)Google Scholar is the most recent study of Burritt's career.
41 Fletcher, R. S., A history of Oberlin College from its foundation through the civil war (Oberlin, 1943), picture of subscription list opposite page 468.Google Scholar
42 Elihu Burritt to Joseph Crosfield, Peter B. Allen and W. P. Cunningham, 25 February 1846, printed in Advocate of peace and universal brotherhood, 1, no. 3 (March 1846), p. 79.
43 Tolis, , Elihu Burritt, p. 160Google Scholar. Lawrence Heyworth, Samuel Bowly, Robert Charleton and the Rev. Henry Solly who had supported Sturge in other ‘good causes’ such as complete suffrage, anti-slavery and temperance joined the League. Sturge also urged Daniel O'Connell and Father Mathew to join (Friends' House Library, Elihu Burritt papers, MS Box 8–5, fos. 3 and 4, Joseph Sturge to his cousin, 18 August 1846).
44 The Olive Leaf Circles, their constitution and operations (London, n.d.).
45 Herald of Peace (09 1846), pp. 139–41Google Scholar; Friend (1 10 1852), pp. 193–6Google Scholar, and (1 November 1852), pp. 212–14. Burritt also agitated for an ocean penny post. The antienlistment campaign continued. For example, a tract entitled Military flogging was circulated, which contained an engraving over the accuracy of which ‘great pains’ were taken. Herald of Peace (01 1845), p. 219Google Scholar; (July 1847), pp. 317–18. According to the latter report this helped to rout the recruiting parties sent to Rochdale.
46 Friends' House Library, Elihu Burritt papers, MS vol. S 101, fos. 259–60, Elihu Burritt to A. M. Southall, 17 September 1853. ‘It was on a short ride to Bolton, that George Bradshaw and myself planned the idea of the first Peace Congress.’
47 This proposal was advocated by Judge William Jay of New York and subsequently pressed on the London Peace Society by Sturge, Joseph, Herald of Peace (08 1843), pp. 366–9, 382.Google Scholar
48 Burritt, Elihu, ‘The fraternization of the peoples’, Illustrierte Zeitung (26 10 1850)Google Scholar, translation held in Central Connecticut State College Library.
49 Reports of the peace congresses, Paris report, p. 79, and London report, p. 50. ‘If you wish to see liberal ideas spread, pray for peace – twenty years of peace will revolutionise Russia – 20 years of war would leave the serfs of that country where they are.’ Richard Cobden to Charles Sturge, 29 December 1849 (in private hands). The discussion of such issues at the congresses seems to have given rise to more controversy than Henry Richard's official minutes would suggest. See Congrès des amis de la paix universelle, réuni a Bruxelles en 1848 (Bruxelles, 1849), pp. 34–5.Google Scholar
50 New Britain Public Library, Connecticut, Elihu Burritt papers, MS journal, 8 July 1851.
51 Burritt, Elihu, Olive leaves for the people (Worcester, Mass., 1850), pp. 33–4Google Scholar. Herald of Peace (10 1851), pp. 199–201Google Scholar, published a letter from a ‘Peace-Totaler’.
52 The 1853 addresses from Edinburgh and Glasgow, for example, were signed by the lord provosts, magistrates and councillors. Friend (1 10 1852), pp. 193–6Google Scholar. Indian corn-meal recipes from an ‘Olive Leaf’ were printed in the New Monthly Belle Assemblée (09 1846), pp. 188–99.Google Scholar
53 The public good; devoted to the advocacy of great principles, the advancement of useful institutions, and the elevation of man, 1 (1850), Supplement.
54 Herald of Peace (02 1848), p. 24.Google Scholar
55 Richard, , Memoirs of Joseph Sturge, p. 426Google Scholar. This disclaimer was written during the disillusioning 1860s. Earlier Richard had included the excerpt from Chalmers's peace sermon in the minutes of the Frankfort congress. ‘Acting on the consideration so glowingly expressed by this eminent man’ he continued, ‘the friends of Peace have for many years been seeking…to influence public opinion…on the subject of international war’. Reports of the peace congresses, Frankfort report, p. vii. See above, footnote 25.
56 Dymond attached ‘peculiar importance’ to ‘the prophecies of the Old Testament respecting the arrival of a period of universal peace’. This would be effected, he insisted, ‘by Christianity, by the influence of its present Principles’. Dymond, Jonathan, Essays on the principles of morality, and on the private and political rights and obligations of mankind (London, 1830), pp. 436, 466.Google Scholar
57 Reports of the peace congresses, Brussels report, pp. 29–30.
58 A. G. O'Neill to [?] Charles Sturge, 3 February 1844. (In private hands.)
59 Rawtenstall Public Library, MS diaries of David Whitehead, pp. 161, 209.Google Scholar
60 British Friend (29 September 1849).
61 New Britain Public Library, Burritt papers, MS journal, 18 03 1848.Google Scholar
62 Herald of Peace (07 1842), p. 118Google Scholar. See also West Sussex Record Office, Cobden Papers 30, Richard Cobden to H. Ashworth, 12 April 1842.
63 MS diaries of David Whitehead, 11, 167.
64 Burritt to Crosfield, Allen and Cunningham, 25 February 1846. See above, footnote 42.
65 Quoted by Richard, , Memoirs of Joseph Sturge, p. 421.Google Scholar
66 Reports of the peace congresses, Paris report, p. 95.
67 British Museum, Cobden papers, Add. MSS 43656, fos. 90–1, Richard Cobden to Joseph Sturge, 19 January 1849.
68 Thrupp, (ed.), Millennial dreams in action, p. 12.Google Scholar
69 Peace conference committee minutes (1848–55), 31 October 1848.
70 Peace conference committee minutes, 12 June 1850. See also Hansard, 12 June 1849.
71 The Times (27 August 1850).
72 Reports of the peace congresses, Paris and London reports. Businessmen, manufacturers, shopkeepers and ministers overwhelmingly predominated at the London congress. See also Frick, Stephen, ‘Joseph Sturge and the Crimean War. 1. The search for a cause’, Journal of the Friends’ Historical Society, liii (1974), 239Google Scholar. This contains a table of occupations derived from the London report.
73 The Times (38 August 1850). See also Reports of the peace congresses, passim.
74 La République (3 August; 22 August; 23 August; 24 August; 25 August; 29 August; 2 September; 7 September 1849). I am indebted to my colleague Mr Peter McPhee for permission to consult his microfilm of this newspaper.
75 Friends' Historical Library, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania, Joseph Sturge to [?], 2 February 1849.
76 Herald of Peace (April 1851), pp. 110–12, and (July 1851), pp. 152–3.
77 Friend (1 March 1850), p. 52. See also Herald of Peace (07 1851), pp. 154–7Google Scholar. Cobden was one of the commissioners of the Great Exhibition.
78 The Society of Arts, Addresses delivered on public occasions by his royal highness the Prince Albert, president of the society for the encouragement of arts, manufactures, and commerce (London, 1857). pp. 60–1.Google Scholar
79 Reports of the peace congresses, London report, passim.
80 The most recent account of this is by Frick, Stephen, ‘The Quaker deputation to Russia: January-February 1854’, Journal of the Friends' Historical Society, lii (1968), 78–96Google Scholar. See also Fox, Anna F., Memoir of Roben Charleton: Compiled chiefly from his letters (London, 1873).Google Scholar
81 ‘The peace movement of the fifties was destroyed: there had been no international peace gathering since the year of the Great Exhibition. Even so this 23rd Protocol was its greatest triumph.’ Henderson, G. B., ‘The pacifists of the fifties’, p. 150.Google Scholar
82 See, for example, British Museum, Sturge papers, Add. MSS 43722, fos. 163–4, Richard Cobden to Joseph Sturge, 29 October 1856.
83 British Museum, Cobden papers, Add. MSS 43657, fos. 209–11, Richard Cobden to Henry Richard, 20 August 1853. See also British Museum Cobden papers, Add. MSS 43659, fos. 3–4, Richard Cobden to Henry Richard, 8 January 1858.
84 London Peace Society, peace conference committee minutes, 27 11 1857Google Scholar. The committee resolved to maintain a nominal existence. The last entry in the minutes is dated 14 October 1859.
85 The Peace Society's financial predicament was described in these terms in Herald of Peace (02 1861), p. 2.Google Scholar
86 Brock, , Radical pacifists, p. 241.Google Scholar
87 Henry Richard to Charles Sturge, 18 December 1862. (In private hands.)
- 12
- Cited by