Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:20:18.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Last Tudor Great Councils*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

P. J. Holmes
P. J. Holmes
Affiliation:
Hills Road Sixth Form College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Henry VII called a number of Great Councils, as his predecessors had for at least two centuries before. Evidence has survived for five such Councils, held in 1487, 1488, 1491, 1496 and 1502. They advised the king on important matters of foreign policy and internal security, with the result that diplomatic and military action was taken and taxes were levied. They each lasted for perhaps two or three weeks, and were attended by lords spiritual and temporal, royal officials, and – on two occasions – by the elected representatives of boroughs. In three cases they coincided with meetings of the clergy in Convocation. Henry VII also held major sessions of his ‘ordinary’ council, lasting for several days at a time, sometimes for over two weeks, and attended by between twenty and sixty people; such large assemblies had been named ‘Great Councils’ in previous reigns, although under Henry VII this does not seem to have been the case. By the end of the Tudor period, by 1603, there is little question that both types of political assembly had disappeared; both the quasi-parliamentary Great Councils and the conciliar ‘Great Councils’. The purpose of this paper is to attempt to determine when this disappearance occurred and to offer some tentative suggestions as to how it happened and with what political consequences.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Holmes, P. J., ‘The Great Council in the reign of Henry VII’, English Historical Review, CI (1986), 30–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar. I have used capitals for the Great Council (which I also refer to as Council) to avoid confusion with the ‘ordinary’ council. In quotation I have modernized spelling and punctuation except where is seemed useful not to do so.

2 Storey, R. L., The reign of Henry VII (London, 1968), pp. 208–10, 216–18Google Scholar; Starkey, D., The reign of Henry VIII (London, 1985), pp. 41, 49Google Scholar.

3 Guy, J. A., The public career of Sir Thomas More (Brighton, 1980), pp. 129–30Google Scholar; Bernard, G. W., The power of the early Tudor Nobility (Brighton, 1985), p. 184Google Scholar; Miller, H., Henry VIII and the English Nobility (Oxford, 1986), pp. 130–1Google Scholar.

4 Loach, J., Parliament and the crown in the reign of Mary Tudor (Oxford, 1987), pp. 203–4Google Scholar; Williams, P. H., The Tudor regime (Oxford, 1981), p. 27Google Scholar.

5 Hay, D. (ed.), The Anglica Historia of Polydore Vergil (Camden Society, 1950), pp. 149–52Google Scholar.

6 Vergil also describes Edward IV and Richard III as having been crowned in councils: Vergil, P., Anglica Historia (Basel, 1555), pp. 512, 543Google Scholar. Cf. Legg, L. G. Wickham, English coronation records (Westminster, 1901), p. 47Google Scholar.

7 Elton, G. R., ‘Henry VII: rapacity and remorse’, ‘Henry VII: a restatement’, Studies in Tudor and Stuart politics and government (Cambridge, 1974), I, 45–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cooper, J. P., Henry VII's last years reconsidered', Historical Journal, II (1959), 103–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Storey, , Henry VII, pp. 209–10Google Scholar; Chrimes, S. B., Henry VII (London, 1972), p. 316Google Scholar.

9 Hay, , Anglica Historia, p. 150Google Scholar.

10 P[ublic] R[ecord] O[ffice], KB 9/453/9V, 69 (1); 8/4/fo. 51.

11 [Henry E.] H[untington] L[ibrary, San Marino, California], MS Ellesmere 2655, fo. 7V. I must thank the librarian for sending me photocopies of these documents, which I have been unable to examine on the spot.

12 Cf. Vergil's description of the announcement of Edward V's coronation; Anglica Historia (Basel, 1555), p. 541Google Scholar.

13 Holmes, ‘The Great Council’, 39–49Google Scholar.

14 Hay, , Anglica Historia, pp. xviii ffGoogle Scholar.; idem, Polydore Vergil, Renaissance Historian (Oxford, 1952), P. 125

15 Ibid. pp. 123–6, 137.

16 Hay, , Anglica Historia, pp. 4–5Google Scholar; Holmes, , ‘The Great Council’, 33–4Google Scholar.

17 Hay, , Anglica Historia, pp. 222, 232, 302–8Google Scholar.

18 Ibid. pp. 332–4. For the use of concilium and senatus to describe Yorkist and Lancastrian parliaments, see Vergil, P., Anglica Historia (Basel, 1555), pp. 460, 466, 474, 480, 488, 493, 509, 510, 513 521 533. 544Google Scholar.

19 Hay, , Anglica Historia, pp. 79, 270–1Google Scholar.

20 Ibid. pp. 16–19.

21 Ibid. pp. 34–5.

22 Ibid. pp. 48–9.

23 Ibid. pp. 90–1.

24 Ibid. pp. 160–3.

25 H[ouse of Lords] J[ournal], I, 10; P.R.O., C 65/132, III. 1; [Brewer, J. S. and Brodie, R. H., ] L[etters and] P[apers of Henry VIII] (London, 1920) I, 1046Google Scholar.

26 H.J. I, 12–13.

27 Ibid; L.P. 1, 1065.

28 H. J. I, 13; 3 Henry VIII, c. 4, c. 5, c. 22.

29 Spont, A., Letters and papers relating to the war with France 1512–13 (Navy Records Society, 1897), p. 1Google Scholar; C[alendar of] S[tate] P[apers, ] S[pain], II, nos. 62, 63, 64.

30 L.P. 1, 850, 854, 880.

31 Ibid. 196–9.

32 4 Henry VIII, c. 19; Hughes, P. L. and Larkin, J. F., Tudor royal proclamations (London, 1967), I, 94–99Google Scholar.

33 4 Henry VIII, c. 1.

34 Stefani, F., Berchet, G., Barozzi, N. (eds.), Idiarii di Marino Sanuto (Venice, 1886), XV, 529–30, 533Google Scholar; cf. xvi, 7.

35 Trevelyan, W. C. (ed.), Trevelyan papers, III (Camden Society, 1872), p. 8Google Scholar.

36 Hall, E., Chronicle (ed. SirEllis, H., London, 1809), pp. 700–1Google Scholar. Referred to also as a Great Council in Pollard, A. F.. ‘Council, Star Chamber and privy council under the Tudors’;, English Historical Review, XXXVII (1922), 341Google Scholar; idem, Wolsey (London, I953), p. I47; Parry, C. H., Parliaments and councils of England (London, 1839), p. 201Google Scholar, referring to Stow, J., The Annals of England (London, 1592), pp. 883–4Google Scholar.

37 L.P. IV, i, 1329.

38 Ibid. IV, i, 1343.

39 Ibid. IV, i, 1332; B[ritish] L[ibrary], MS Cotton, Cleopatra FBI, 273V.

40 Hall, , Chronicle, pp. 701–2Google Scholar; B. L., MS Lansdowne 639, fo. 58; H.L., MS Ellesmere 2655, fo. 18; Guy, , The Cardinal's Court (London, 1977), pp. 74–5Google Scholar; Dunham, W. H. jr, ‘Wolsey's Rule of the King's Whole Council’, American Historical Review, XLIX (1944), 647Google Scholar.

41 H.L., MS Ellesmere 2655, fos. 7–18V and MS Ellesmere 2654, fos. 22V–25; Guy, , Cardinal's Court, chaps. 1, 2, esp. pp. 27ffGoogle Scholar.; idem, ‘Wolsey, the council and the council courts’, English Historical Review, XCI (1976), 481–505; Dunham, ‘The members of Henry VIII's Whole Council’, ibid. LIX (1944), 195–204; idem, ‘Henr y VIII's Whole Council and its parts’, Huntington Library Quarterly, VII (1943–4), 13.

42 Hall, , Chronicle, pp. 759—60Google Scholar. Referred to also as a Great Council in Pollard, ‘Council, Star Chamber and privy council’, 341; idemWolsey, p. 354.

43 L.P. III, iii, 5982.

44 Ibid. IV, iii, 5983, 6002, 6003, 6011, 6018, 6019, 6025, 6026, 6030.

45 B.L., MS Lansdowne 1, fo. 108v; Dunham, , ‘The members of Henry VIII's Whole Council’, pp. 205–10Google Scholar; cf.Miller, , Henry VIII and the English nobility, pp. 102 ffGoogle Scholar.

46 Bradford, W. (ed), Correspondence of the Emperor Charles V (London, 1805), p. 297Google Scholar; C.S.P.S., IV, i, 305–6

47 L.P., iv, iii, 6035; Pollard, , Wolsey, p. 245Google Scholar. Doubts about Chapuys' ability to report English institutions accurately at this stage in his mission are increased when we read that the ‘estates’ (i.e. the Reformation Parliament) met and ‘elected at the first the Archbishop of Canterbury to be their Speaker’, C.S.P.S., IV, I, 324, cited in Pollard, , Wolsey, p. 255Google Scholar.

48 Blatcher, M., The Court of King's Bench 1450–1550 London, 1978), p. 2Google Scholar, note.

49 Frederichs, J., ‘Le Grand Counseil Ambulatoire des Dues de Bourgogne’, Comte Rendu des Sciences de la Commission Royal d'Histoire ou Recueil de ses Bulletins, IV, xvii (Brussels, 1890), 466–9Google Scholar; Baelde, M., ‘Les Counseils Collatéraux des Anciens Pays-Bas’, Revue du Nord, L (1968), 203 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar. I owe this suggestion to Professor Sir Geoffrey Elton.

50 Guy, , Thomas More, pp. 129–30Google Scholar. Cf. Scarisbrick, J. J., Henry VIII (London, 1976), pp. 339—40Google Scholar; Knowles, D., The religious orders in England, III (Cambridge, 1971), 174—5Google Scholar; Miller, , Henry VIII and the English nobility, pp. 139–1Google Scholar.

51 C.S.P.S. iv, i, 589–9.

52 Ibid. iv, i, 616 ff.

53 P.R.O., E30/1012A (the signatures and the intriguing heading ‘milites et doctores in Parl.’ are now almost illegible); L.P. iv, iii, 6513; Rymer, T., Foedera (1967), VI, ii, 160–1Google Scholar; Cobbett, W., The parliamentary history of England, I (London, 1806), 507–10Google Scholar.

54 Roskell, J. S., ‘The problem of the attendance of the lords in medieval parliaments’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, XXIX (1956), 153–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Miller, H., ‘Attendance in the House of Lords during the reign of Henry VIII’, Historical Journal, X (1967), 325–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 L.P. iv, iii, 6489; Guy, , Thomas More, pp. 129–30Google Scholar.

56 Cavendish, G., The life and death of Cardinal Wolsey (ed. Sylvester, R. S. and Harding, D. P., New Haven, 1962), pp. 142–4Google Scholar. Cavendish's account does not agree exactly with that of Chapuys since the former places the arrival of the royal messengers on 15 June, twelve days before they left London according to Chapuys.

57 C.S.P.S. iv, i, 616.

58 Miller, , Henry VIII and the English nobility, pp. 130–1Google Scholar.

59 L.P. v, 805; C.S.P.S. iv, iii, 899.

60 C.S.P.S. iv, ii, 1153; Neame, A., The Holy Maid of Kent (London, 1971), pp. 263 ffGoogle Scholar.; Miller, , Henry VIII and the English nobility, 131Google Scholar. It is possible that a similar sort of assembly met the following January (1534), C.S.P.S. v, 8.

61 Whatmore, L. E., ‘The sermon against the Holy Maid of Kent’, English Historical Review, LVIII (1943), 473Google Scholar; Merriman, R. B., Life and Letters of Thomas Cromwell (Oxford, 1902), I, 377–8Google Scholar.

62 Byrne, M. St. Clare, The letters of King Henry VIII (London, 1968), p. 112Google Scholar.

63 P.R.O., SP 1/113/80V.

64 P.R.O., SP 1/113/88; M H, . and Dodds, R., The Pilgrimage of Grace (Cambridge, 1915), II, 32–3Google Scholar, 36–7, 50–2; L.P. XI, 1306, 1363; ibid. XII, 22, 26, 66, 67, 71, 84, 97, 136, 139, 148, 155, 171, 173, 184, 439.

65 Byrne, M. St. C., The Lisle letters, IV (London, 1981), no. 910Google Scholar.

66 Ibid. no. 915.

67 L.P. XII, i, p. 463.

68 Byrne, M. St C., The Lisle letters, IV no. 923Google Scholar.

69 Ibid. pp. 268–9 and note.

70 Of the Auctorite of the Word of God agaynst the Bishop of London, n.p., n.d., esp. Aiii-Bviiv.

71 L.P. XII, i, no. 789.

72 Cox, J. E., Miscellaneous writings and letters of Thomas Cranmer (Parker Society, Cambridge, 1846) pp. 79Google Scholar, 80, 337–8, 556, 562, 563–4.

73 Loach, , Parliament and the croum, p. 203–4Google Scholar; Williams, , Tudor regime, p. 27Google Scholar; Bernard, , Power of the early Tudor nobility, p. 184Google Scholar.

74 C.S.P.S. xi, 414; Vertot, L'Abbe de, Ambassades de Messieurs de Noailles en Angleterre (Leyden, 1763). I. 317–20Google Scholar

75 C.S.P.S. xi, 428; Renard himself does not refer to the meeting as a ‘Great Council’, as Loach says.

76 C.S.P.S. xi, 415.

77 Nichols, J. G. (ed.), The Chronicle of Queen Jane and of two years of Queen Mary (Camden Society, 1850), pp. 34–5Google Scholar; idem, The diary of Henry Machyn (Camden Society, 1848), p. 52.

78 Lemasters, G. E., ‘The privy council in the reign of Queen Mary I’ (Cambridge Ph.D. thesis, 1972), pp. 24–38Google Scholar, 303–4; Weikel, A., ‘The Marian council revisited’, in Loach, J. and Titder, R., The Mid-Tudor Polity (London 1980), pp. 52–73Google Scholar. Loach, (Parliament and crown, pp. 203–4)Google Scholar gives very interesting evidence for other large assemblies in Mary's reign, or rather for rumours that they might be called. Most interesting is the Venetian ambassador's reference to ‘un mezzo parlamento’ proposed for January 1557 to discuss war with France (Calendar state papers Venetian, VI, ii, 848). Note also the Spanish ambassador's reference in August 1553 to the idea of calling a non-parliamentary assembly according to the usage of the duke of Northumberland (C.S.P.S. xi, 171). This prompts the thought: Was it through such an assembly that Northumberland secured agreement to his Device for altering the succession?

79 Holmes, , ‘Great Council’, pp. 30–52Google Scholar.

80 P.R.O., E 101/253/20; E 101/253/22; L.P., 1, ii, 2587; cited in Pickthorn, K., Early Tudor government: Henry VIII (Cambridge, 1934), p. 12Google Scholar note.

81 Holmes, , ‘Great Council’, pp. 31, 49–50Google Scholar.

82 Nichols, J. G. (ed.), The Chronicle of Calais (Camden Society, 1846), pp. 30–1Google Scholar.

83 Above, n. 41.

84 H.L., MS Ellesmere 2655, fo. 15–15V; 2654. fos. 24V–5.

85 Dunham, , ‘The members of Henry VIII's Whole Council’, pp. 205–7Google Scholar; Guy, , ‘Wolsey, the Council and the Council Courts’, pp. 482Google Scholar.

86 H.L., MS Ellesmere 2655, fo. 10–10v; 2654, fos. 22V–3. It is not clear whether a single; meeting or (more likely) a series of meetings is recorded in these documents.

87 B.L., MS Lansdowne 160, fo. 312V.

88 B.L., MS Lansdowne 160, fo. 312.

89 Holmes, , ‘Great Council’, pp. 51–2Google Scholar.

90 Roskell, , The Commons and their Speakers in English Parliaments (Manchester, 1965), p. 310Google Scholar.

91 Sturge, C., Cuthbert Tunstall (London, 1938), pp. 83–4Google Scholar; it is possible that by Councils, Tunstall meant Convocations of the clergy, such as coincided with the parliament of 1523. Elton, , ‘The political creed of Thomas Cromwell’, Studies, II, 215–35Google Scholar.

92 H.L., MS Ellesmere 2655, fos. 10–10V, 15; MS 2654, fos. 22V–5.

93 Hay, , Anglica Historia, pp. 262–3Google Scholar.

94 Elton, , ‘Tudor Government: the points of contact. II: The Council’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, xxv (1975), 195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, The Tudor revolution in government B (Cambridge, 1974), pp. 316 ff.; Guy, J. A., ‘The privy council: revolution or evolution?’, in Coleman, C. and Starkey, D. (eds.), Revolution reassessed (Oxford, 1986), pp. 59–85Google Scholar.

95 31 Henry VIII, c. 10.

96 M. H., and Dodds, R., Pilgrimage of Grace, 1, 308 ffGoogle Scholar.

97 Bayne, C. G. and Dunham, W. H. Jr, Select Cases in the Council of Henry VII (Seldon Society, 1558), p. xlviiiGoogle Scholar.

98 Roskell, , ‘Perspectives in English parliamentary history’, in Fryde, E. B. and Miller, E. (eds.), Historical studies of the English parliament, II (Cambridge, 1970), 296–323Google Scholar.

99 Russell, C., ‘Parliamentary history in perspective’, History, LXI (1976), 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Elton, ‘Parliament in the sixteenth century’, Historical Journal, XXII (1979), 255–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

100 Vowell, J., The Description of the Citie of Excester (ed. Harte, W. J., Schopp, J. W. and Tapley-Soper, H., Devon and Cornwall Record Society, 1919), III, 544Google Scholar. Cf. Thorne, S. E. (ed.), A Discourse upon the exposition and understandinge of statutes (San Marino, Ca., 1942), p. 109Google Scholar; Hooker, R., cited in Elton, , Tudor constitution (Cambridge, 1982), p. 241Google Scholar.

101 ‘Non minus esse necessarium quam salubre ac utile regnorum et potentium Imperiorum (instante saltern et gravi causa urgente) subditos ad Parliamenta, seu publica Concilia, sepius convenire debere’, L.J., 1, 10. I take ‘seu’ to mean ‘or in other words’ if it means ‘or alternatively’, this is further evidence that the Great Council was not yet forgotten, see Tunstall, quoted above, p. 17.

102 Fletcher, A., Tudor Rebellions (London, 1968), p.126Google Scholar.

103 Marius, R., Thomas More (London, 1984), p. 463Google Scholar.

104 D'Ewes, S., The Journals of all the Parliaments (London, 1682), p. 434Google Scholar.

105 Smith, T., De Republica Anglorum (ed. Dewar, M., Cambridge, 1982), pp. 79Google Scholar, 89.

106 Neale, J. E., Elizabeth I and her parliaments, I (London, 1953), 331Google Scholar; II (London, 1957), 73, 122, 365; idem, ‘Peter Wentworth’, in Fryde and Miller, Studies, II, 262. Cf. Elton, The parliament of England 1559–1581 (Cambridge, 1986), pp. 24–5, 32. Note also parliament (or House of Lords) described as ‘Councell’ and ‘the highest and supreme Councell of this realm’ by Viscount Montague in 1559; McCann, T.J., ‘The parliamentary speech of Viscount Montague’, Sussex Archaeological Collections, CVIII (1970), 52–5Google Scholar.

107 McIlwain, C. H., The High Court of Parliament (New Haven, 1910), pp. 33Google Scholar, 122, 149, 155, 158, 330; Yale, D. E. C. (ed.), Sir Matthew Hole's The Prerogatives of the king (Selden Society, 1976), PP 133Google Scholar, 135, 136; Hale, M., The jurisdiction of the Lords House (London, 1796), chap, iiiGoogle Scholar; Dugdale, W., A perfect copy of all summons (London, 1685), sig. A3Google Scholar; d'Ewes, Journals, preface; cf. Snow, V. F. (ed.), Parliament in Elizabethan England (London, 1977), pp. 107Google Scholar, 108, 145, 146; Cobbett, , Parliamentary history, II, 640–3Google Scholar, cited in Kenyon, J. P., The Stuart constitution (Cambridge, 1980), p. 202Google Scholar.

108 Scofield, C. L., A study ofthe Court of Star Chamber (Chicago, 1900), pp. 1–13Google Scholar, 55–52; Pollard, , ‘Council, Star Chamber and privy council’, 534–9Google Scholar; Hawarde, J., Les reportes del cases in Camera Sullata (ed. Baildon, W. P., London, 1894), pp. 19–21Google Scholar, 56–8, 101–2, 106, 161–2, 186–92, 326–7, 367–9

109 Smith, , De Republica Anglorum, p. 125Google Scholar; cf. Bacon, F., Henry VII (Cambridge, 1902), p. 62Google Scholar.

110 piucknett, T. F. T., ‘The place of the council in the fifteenth century’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 4th series, I (1918), 188Google Scholar.

111 Cobbett, , Parliamentary history, 11, 640–3Google Scholar.

112 Read, C., Mr Secretary Walsingham (Oxford, 1925), 1, 424–5Google Scholar.

113 Lambarde, W., Archeion (ed. McIlwainC, H. C, H. and Ward, P. L., Cambridge, Mass., 1957), pp. 59–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

114 Cotton, R., Cotton Posthuma (London, 1651), pp. 12Google Scholar, 34, 40, 44; Coke, E., The first part of the Institutes (London, 1629), p. 110Google Scholar; Foster, E. R., ‘The painful labour of Mr Elsyng’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, N.S. 62, VII (1972), 36Google Scholar, 47, 51, 62. Coke was responsible for the notion that the Magnum Concilium was the ‘upper house of parliament, and sometimes out of parliament the peers of the realm’; this makes some sense, but on the whole is unhistorical and has misled generations of historians.

115 Storey, , Henry VII, p. 218Google Scholar.