Article contents
Labour, Society and the Drink Question in Britain, 1918–1939
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
The historiography of leisure has made considerable advances since the pioneering years of the early 1970s. Research into Victorian leisure has shown that some of the ruling elite attempted to fashion the life-style of working people in order to create a disciplined and reliable labour force which suited the needs of a maturing industrial and urban society, although it must be added that sections of the British public remained immune to attempts at moral reform and improvement. Professional labour leaders were also eager to control and regulate the amusements of the poor. According to trade union bosses like John Doherty, only a sober, industrious and thrifty working class could hope to achieve progressive reforms and some form of political and economic emancipation: workers who were intemperate would apparently stifle the opportunities and aspirations of the emerging Labour movement. Nowhere is this more true than in the Labour leadership's perception of and policy towards working-class drinking.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987
References
1 Vamplew, W., The turf: a social and economic history of horse racing (London, 1976)Google Scholar; Mason, T., Association football and English society 1863–1915 (Brighton, 1980)Google Scholar; Walton, J. K., The English seaside resort: a social history 1750–1914 (Leicester, 1983)Google Scholar.
2 See Bailey, P., Leisure and class in Victorian England: rational recreation and the contest for control (London, 1978)Google Scholar; Cunningham, H., Leisure in the Industrial Revolution, 1780–1880 (London, 1980)Google Scholar; Golby, J. M. and Purdue, A. W., The civilisation of the crowd: popular culture in England 1750–1900 (London, 1984)Google Scholar.
3 Kirby, R. G. and Musson, A. E., The voice of the people: John Doherty 1798–1854. Trade unionist, radical and factory reformer (Manchester, 1975), p. 336Google Scholar. See also Delves, A., ‘Popular recreation and social conflict in Derby 1800–1850’, in , E. and Yeo, S. (eds.), Popular culture and class conflict 1590–1914: explorations in the history of Labour and leisure (Brighton, 1981), pp. 104–6Google Scholar; Storch, R., ‘Persistence and change in nineteenth-century popular culture’, in Storch, R. (ed.), Popular culture and custom in nineteenth-century England (London, 1982), pp. 5–10Google Scholar; Waters, C., ‘Social reformers, socialists, and the opposition to the commercialisation of leisure in late Victorian England’, in Vamplew, W. (ed.), The economic history of leisure (papers presented to the Eighth International Economic History Congress, Budapest, 08 1982), pp. 117–18Google Scholar.
4 Brown, J. B., ‘The pig or the stye: drink and poverty in late Victorian England’, International Review of Social History, XVII (1973), 380–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 For drink in the Victorian period see Harrison, B., Drink and the Victorians: the temperance question in England 1815–1872 (London, 1971)Google Scholar; Lambert, W. R., Drink and sobriety in Victorian Wales, c. 1820–95 (Cardiff, 1983)Google Scholar.
6 Hayler, G., Labour and temperance reform: a brief historical survey of Labour's attitude to the drink problem (London, 1927), pp. 4–7Google Scholar.
7 Taylor, J., From self-help to glamour: the working man's club, 1860–1972 (Oxford, 1972)Google Scholar; Marlow, L., ‘The working men's club movement, 1862–1912: a study of the evolution of a working class institution’ unpublished Warwick University Ph.D. thesis (1980)Google Scholar.
8 See Harrison, B., ‘Teetotal Chartism’, History, LVIII (1973)Google Scholar; Wood, I., ‘Drink, temperance and the Labour movement’, Scottish Labour History Society Journal, v (1972), 23–33Google Scholar.
9 Licensing statistics 1932 (Parl. papers, 1937–8), xxvm, 3.
10 Longmate, N., The waterdrinkers: a history of temperance (London, 1968), pp. 279–80Google Scholar;Williams, G. Prys and Brake, G. Thompson, Drink in Great Britain 1900 to 1979 (London, 1980), pp. 253–71Google Scholar.
11 Harrison, , Drink and the Victorians, pp. 387, 397–405Google Scholar.
12 For inter-war leisure see Jones, S. G., ‘The leisure industry in Britain, 1918–39’, The Service Industries Journal, v, 1 (1985), 90–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Workers at play: a social and economic history of leisure, 1918–1939 (London, 1986).
13 Selley, E., The English public house as it is (London, 1927)Google Scholar; Mass Observation, The pub and the people: a worktown study (London, 1943)Google Scholar.
14 Snowden, P., Labour and the new world (London, 1921), p. 244Google Scholar.
15 Barnsley Chronicle, 3 February 1923, Labour Party archives (L.P.A.)/LIQ/22/409. For similar statements see The Labour Woman, Aug. 1920; The Observer, 20 Aug. 1922; The Typographical Circular, Nov. 1922; Record, Sept–Oct. 1925; Mallon, J. J., ‘Labour and the drink problem’, in Tracey, H. (ed.), The book of the Labour Party: its history, growth, policy and leaders (30 vols., London, n.d. [1925?]), III, 25–9Google Scholar.
16 Rose, M. E., ‘The success of social reform? The central control board (liquor traffic) 1915—21’, in Foot, M. R. D. (ed.), War and society: historical essays in honour and memory of J. R. Western 1928–1971 (London, 1973), pp. 71–84Google Scholar; Aldcroft, D. H., ‘Control of the liquor trade in Great Britain 1914–21’, in Chaloner, W. H. and Ratcliffe, B. M. (eds.), Trade and transport: essays in economic history in honour of T. S. Willan (Manchester, 1977), pp. 242–57Google Scholar; Turner, J., ‘State purchase of the liquor trade in the First World War’, Historical Journal, XXIII, 3 (1980), 589–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Prys Williams and Thompson Brake, Drink, pp. 45–61, 99–113.
17 The Spectator, 23, 30 Aug., 13, 27 Sept. 1919; Durbin, E., New Jerusalems: The Labour Party and the economics of democratic socialism (London, 1985), p. 101Google Scholar.
18 The Times, 18 Nov. 1919.
19 Greenwood, A., Public ownership of the liquor trade (London, 1920), p. 56Google Scholar. Though Greenwood could talk about the evil of drink, he has been described as a ‘heavy and near compulsive drinker’. Pimlott, , Labour and the left in the 1930s (Cambridge, 1977), p. 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 Mallon, , ‘Labour and drink’, pp. 22–5Google Scholar.
21 R. Dennison to J. S. Middleton, 10 Feb. 1923, L.P.A./LIQ/22/65.
22 See Thomas, J. H., When Labour rules (London, 1920), pp. 98–9Google Scholar; Daily Herald, 8 Mar. 1920; Record, Mar.–Apr. 1925, Jan.–Feb. 1926; Charles Stitch, a member of the Campaign Committee, and his fellow Labour M. P.John Davison, after visiting the U.S.A. also published a report entitled Found wanting, exposing the claims of prohibition. Methodist Times, 10 Nov. 1921; Labour party executive committee minutes, 4 Jan. 1922, L.P.A.
23 Minutes of evidence taken before the Royal Commission on Licensing (England and Wales) (Non Part., 1930–1932)Google Scholar, Q. 35, 920.
24 Profiteering in the liquor trade and abolition of private ownership: evidence submitted by the Tailors and Garment Workers' Union to the Labour party special sub-committee on the liquor traffic, 1923, p. 1, L.P.A./LIQ/22/74.
25 Royal Commission on Licensing, Q, 35, 858.
26 See Thomas, , When Labour rules, p. 112Google Scholar; Daily Herald, 25 Sept. 1919, 2 Apr. 1923; The Railway Review, 8 July 1921; Record, Sept.–Oct. 1926, Mar.–Apr. 1927.
27 See Greenwood, A., Publicans and politics (London, 1919?)Google Scholar; idem, The brewers repentant (London, 1919?); Investigator, The liquor trade in politics (Socialist Review Investigations No. 2, London, 1926); Record, Nov.–Dec. 1925. Not all Labour men and women were arch-enemies of the trade. Ben Tillett, for instance, spoke at meetings of the Glasgow Licensed Trade Local Veto Defence Association and the True Temperance Association, and acquired a reputation as a heavy drinker. See Forward, 23 Oct. 1920; Glasgow Herald, 26 Oct. 1920; The Morning Advertiser, 27 Mar. 1925; Schneer, J., Ben Tillett: portrait of a Labour leader (London, 1982), p. 219Google Scholar.
28 See Greenwood, , Public ownership, pp. 20–4Google Scholar; Labour and the liquor trade: report of a visit of trade unionists and members of the Labour party to Carlisle (Manchester, 1920)Google Scholar; Selley, , English public house, pp. 76–108Google Scholar; Bentham, E., ‘The drink traffic in Carlisle’, The Labour Woman, 03 1920Google Scholar; Potts, J. R., ‘State ownership of the liquor trade: The Carlisle experiment’, The Locomotive Journal, 07 1925Google Scholar; Traherne, T., ‘State pubs: what the Carlisle experiment has accomplished’, Leeds Weekly Citizen, 12 02 1926Google Scholar; Record, July–Aug. 1925, Apr. 1928; Notes of evidence of the Labour Campaign to the Labour party special sub-committee on the liquor traffic, pp. 1–5, L.P.A./LIQ/22/333/2; Royal Commission on Licensing, Q. 35, 858.
29 Daily Herald, 2 Mar. 1920; Labour party executive committee minutes, 9 Mar. 1920. For wider Labour movement support, see The Labour Woman, Aug. 1919; The Amalgamated Engineers' Monthly Journal and Report, Sept. 1919; The Railway Review, 5 Sept. 1919; T.U.C., Annual Report, 1920, pp. 301–4Google Scholar; I.L.P., Annual Conference Report, 1923, pp. 123–5Google Scholar; Sheffield Trades and Labour Council minutes, 16 Sept. 1919; Cambridge Trades Council and Labour party minutes, 1 Oct. 1919; Pontypridd Trades and Labour Council minutes, 5 Dec. 1919; South Shields Labour party and Trades Council minutes, 16 Dec. 1919, 22 Mar. 1921, 11 July 1922, 19 Jan. 1926.
30 Quoted in Rose, , ‘Central Control Board’, p. 82Google Scholar. Cf. Aldcroft, , ‘Control of liquor’, p. 250Google Scholar.
31 Batley News, 29 Sept. 1923; rorkshire Post, 1 July 1922.
32 Jones, J., My lively life (London, 1929), pp. 61–2, 150Google Scholar.
33 Quoted in Jack Jones M.P., his book (London, 1924), p. 21Google Scholar.
34 Labour party, Annual Conference Report, 1928, p. 262. See also his contributions to Forward, 23 Apr. 1932, 7 May 1932.
35 The Times, 12 July 1919.
36 Ibid.
37 Scottish, T.U.C., Annual Report, 1921, p. 93Google Scholar.
38 Daily Herald, 22 Mar. 1920; The Times, 9 Jan. 1922; The licensing question: to the delegates attending the London Labour Conference, 1923, L.P.A./LIQ/22/90.
39 Daily Herald, 17, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27 Feb. 1922. For an interesting parallel see Roberts, J. S., ‘Drink and the Labour movement: the schnapps boycott of 1909’, in Evans, R. J. (ed.), The German working class 1888–1933: the politics of everyday life (London, 1982), pp. 80–107Google Scholar.
40 Royal Commission on Licensing, QQ. 33, 307–477.
41 Clinton, A., The trade union rank and file: trade councils in Britain 1900–40 (Manchester, 1977), p. 22Google Scholar.
42 See The Labour Tear Book (London, 1919), pp. 296–8Google Scholar; Hall, B. T., ‘Workmen's clubs: an organ of democratic reform’, The Labour Magazine, 06 1922Google Scholar; Daily Herald, 21 July 1927; Royal Commission on Licensing, QQ. 23, 506–24, 013.
43 B. T. Hall to J. S. Middleton, 5 March 1923, L.P.A./LIQ/22/154.
44 Resolution submitted by various working men's clubs to the Labour party special sub-committee on the liquor traffic, L.P.A./LIQ/22/168–217.
45 The Club and Institute Journal, Jan. 1922; Daily Herald, 7, 9, 10 Jan. 1922.
46 Daily Herald, 19 May 1924.
47 The Observer, 17 May 1925; The Times, 3 Jan. 1927, 20 May 1930, 18 May 1931; Daily Herald, 14 May 1928. For general information see Tremlett, G., The first century (London, 1962), pp. 73–110Google Scholar.
48 N.T.L. Annual Report, 1906, pp. 14–15Google Scholar; Hayler, , Labour and Temperance, pp. 16–17Google Scholar; Martin, D. E., ‘The instruments of the people?: the parliamentary Labour party in 1906’, in Martin, D. E. and Rubinstein, D. (eds.), Ideology and the Labour movement: essays presented to John Saville (London, 1979), pp. 132–3Google Scholar.
49 See N.T.L. Annual Reports, 1919–1939Google Scholar.
50 Labour party, Annual Conference Report, 1920, pp. 180–1.
51 The Observer, 9 Mar. 1930.
52 Jarman, F. A., ‘What, not where, we drink’, Daily Herald, 4 04 1923Google Scholar.
53 I.L.P. Annual Conference Report, 1920, p. 93Google Scholar.
54 Scottish, T.U.C. Annual Report, 1921, p. 94Google Scholar.
55 Manchester Guardian, 12 Mar. 1920; Daily Herald, 15 Mar. 1920; Forward, 20 Mar. 1920.
56 Scottish, T.U.C. Annual Report, 1920, pp. 87–90Google Scholar; , I.L.P.Annual Conference Report, 1920, pp. 93–5Google Scholar.
57 Greenwood, A., ‘Will Scotland go dry?’, Daily News, 26 10 1920Google Scholar.
58 King, E., Scotland sober and free: the temperance movement 1829–1979 (Glasgow, 1979), p. 23Google Scholar.
59 For the various resolutions see Forward, 13 Oct. 1923.
60 Stewart, B., Breaking the fetters (London, 1967), pp. 85–8, 100–1Google Scholar; Official Report of the Communist Unity Convention, 1920, pp. 60–1. According to James Klugmann, the executive had not taken action on prohibiton by 1967 –Klugmann, J., History of the Communist party of Great Britain (2 vols., London, 1980), I, 48Google Scholar.
61 Forward, Apr.–June 1920, passim.
62 Forward, 10 Jan., 7 Feb. 1920.
63 , I.L.P.Annual Conference Report, 1922, p. 78Google Scholar.
64 Ibid. pp. 77–8.
65 Johnston, T., ‘Why socialists should vote no license’, Forward, 3 04 1920Google Scholar.
66 H. of C. debates, 5th series, 162 (20 Apr. 1923), 2451–532; Datly Herald, 21 Apr. 1923. See alsoMcLean, I., The legend of red Clydeside (Edinburgh, 1983), pp. 182–4Google Scholar.
67 Garrett, V. W., Labour and the liquor traffic (London, n.d [1923?]), pp 18–9Google Scholar.
68 For details see Manchester Guardian, 18 Aug. 1932; The Labour Abstainer (journal of the W.T.L.), first quarter 1933; Forward, 25 Feb. 1933;, N.T.L.Annual Report, 1933, p. 15Google Scholar.
69 Brockway, F., Bermondsey story: the life of Alfred Salter (London, 1949), pp. I, 6–7, 15, 32Google Scholar.
70 199 H. of C. debates, 5th series (26 Oct. 1926), 561–6; Daily Express, 27 Oct. 1926;Brockway, , Bermondsey story, pp. 131–4Google Scholar.
71 Daily Mirror, 15 May 1933, Evening Mews, 16 May 1933, Salter Collection, Southwark Local Studies Library. See also Forward, 20 May 1933.
72 Southwark Recorder, 4 May 1928, Salter Collection.
73 SeeBrockway, , Bermondsey Story, pp. 51–2, 131Google Scholar; 162 H. of C. debates, 5th series (20 Apr. 1923), 2472–83; The Labour Abstainer, third quarter 1933, June 1939;Salter, A., A challenge to the nation (Glasgow, n.d. [1937?]), pp. 2–4Google Scholar; idem, Strong drink hits the strong man: the grave danger of habitual use (London, n.d.), Salter Collection.
74 Salter, A., Startling drink figures of Bermondsey: a flood of beer (London, 1926)Google Scholar. See also Bermondsey Labour Magazine, Jan. 1926; Southwark Recorder, 2 Nov. 1928, 4 Oct. 1929, Salter Collection.
75 Royal Commission on Licensing, QQ. 26, 035–245; Forward, 5 July 1930; Brockway, , Bermondsey story, p. 180Google Scholar.
76 Ernest Winterton, a Labour M.P. and temperance reformer, argued that drink was a primary cause of bad housing conditions in Leicester, Nottingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Birkenhead, Birmingham and the East End of Liverpool – Royal Commission on Licensing, QQ, 33, 728–34, 113. And for slightly different interpetations see The Yordshire Factory Times, 19 Oct. 1922; The Clarion, Apr. 1930.
77 Daily Herald, 30 July 1927.
78 Salter, A., A Message to Labour (Ashford, Kent, 1927), p. 1Google Scholar, Salter Collection.
79 Ibid, pp. 2–3; Daily Herald, 12 July 1927; The Labour Abstainer, first quarter 1933, first quarter 1935; Forward, 3 June 1933.
80 The Labour Abstainer, Dec. 1937.
81 For instance, in November 1934 Hudson organized seven meetings in Aberdeen alone – The Labour Abstainer, first quarter 1935. Hudson was a life-long temperance socialist, and aside from his work for the W.T.L. was secretary of the National Temperance Federation – seeRoyle, C., An architect for temperance: James H. Hudson (London, 1959)Google Scholar.
82 Daily Herald, 15 Mar. 1923; The Times, 13 Dec. 1935.
83 Forward, 21 Dec. 1935.
84 Daily Herald, 7 Feb. 1922.
85 Sussex Daily News, 25 June 1921 (cutting in Labour party executive committee minutes).
86 J. Nicholson to J. S. Middleton, 13 Feb. 1923, L.P.A./LIQ/22/69.
87 Labour party, Annual Conference Report, 1922, p. 204; Labour party executive committee minutes, 19 July 1922.
88 Labour and the liquor trade: report of the special committee appointed by the Labour party to inquire into the question of the liquor trade (London, 1923), p. 20Google Scholar.
89 Sherwell, A., ‘Labour and drink policy: a notable report’, The Temperance Legislation League Monthly Notes, 07–08 1923Google Scholar.
90 Labour party, Annual Conference Report, 1923, pp. 86, 224.
91 The Workers' Union Record, Feb. 1926.
92 Labour party, Labour and the nation (London, 1928), p. 32Google Scholar; Labour party executive committee minutes, 26 Mar. 1929.
93 Labour party, Annual Conference Report, 1928, p. 261.
94 Mallon, J. J., ‘The future of the drink trade’, The Spectator, 20 10 1933Google Scholar; idem, ‘The Carlisle way with drink’, The Spectator, 12 Nov. 1937.
95 Salter, A., The prospect before the temperance movement of this country (London, 1939)Google Scholar, Salter Collection.
96 Sheffield Trades and Labour Council minutes, 13 Feb. 1934.
97 Circulated letter by J. H. Hudson, 6 Feb. 1938, J. H. Hudson papers, Library of the Christian Economic and Social Research Foundation; Eric Jones, interview with the author, 27 May 1982.
98 The Labour Pioneer, 4, 11 Mar. 1920; Daily Herald, 27 July 1927; The Co-operative News, 8 Dec. 1934.
99 Suthers, R. B., Let the people decide – what: The Labour programme and the liquor problem (London, 1928), p. 9Google Scholar.
100 See Forward, 26 Apr. 1930, 15 Aug. 1931, 9 Jan. 1932.
101 J. H. Hudson General Election leaflet, 6 Dec. 1923; A letter from Mrs James H. Hudson to the women of Huddersfield, 8 Nov. 1922, Hudson papers.
- 5
- Cited by