Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:22:43.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III. A Great Electioneer and his Motives: The Fourth Duke of Newcastle1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2010

John Golby
Affiliation:
Department of Adult Education, University of Southampton

Extract

Despite intensive research into the history of parliamentary electioneering, especially in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, several questions, particularly concerning the electioneer himself, remain partly unanswered. Although the extent of patronage in various constituencies and the actual electioneering techniques used have been closely studied it has been more difficult to answer such questions as why certain men participated in electioneering and why they were prepared to spend so much money on it. There has been a tendency to describe these men, and to estimate their motives, in a rather stereotyped and oversimplified way. It has been the characteristic of these stereotyped generalizations to account for the activities of the electioneer in terms of purely material motives: he ‘electioneered’, it is suggested, because he was trying to promote the interests of a certain political group; or because he wanted political office; or because he wanted a peerage; or because he wanted to ensure a handsome share of patronage or income for himself and his dependants. No doubt some electioneers were swayed, even exclusively, by motives of this kind. But such motivation sounds suspicious in its brutal simplicity; if we had more individual studies of this type of politician, we might find that many of the famous electioneers were prompted just as strongly by motives of a less directly material kind, which reflected their personal characters, their personal problems in life, and even their personal idealism.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 B.M. Catalogue of Prints and Drawings, xi, 15530.

3 Nottingham Review, 1 06 1832Google Scholar. This is part of a poem entitled ‘Lament of the Reformers’.

4 Memoirs and Letters of the Rev. Sydney Smith, ed. Mrs Austin, (1855), n, 214Google Scholar. A letter from Smith to Mrs Meynell, 12 Feb. 1821.

5 Greville Memoirs, ed. Strachey, L. and Fulford, R., in, 118Google Scholar.

6 Greville Diary, ed. Wilson, P. W., 1, 423Google Scholar.

7 Memorials by Roundel, 1st Earl of Selborne, 11, 256.

8 Twiss, H., Life of Lord Chancellor Eldon (1844), III, 58Google Scholar.

9 The Times, 15 01 1851Google Scholar.

10 Nottingham Review, 29 01 1851Google Scholar.

11 B.M. Add. MSS. 44777 (Gladstone Papers), fo. 19.

12 From Newcastle's , pamphlet, Thoughts in Times Past Tested by Subsequent Events (1837), p. xxxiGoogle Scholar.

13 Nottingham Review, 9 10 1829Google Scholar. The letter was dated 28 Sept. 1829.

14 B.M. Add. MSS. 44777 (Gladstone Papers), fo. 8.

15 He did this against the advice of his brother-in-law, Lord Combermere. See Newcastle MSS. NeC 8564, Combermere to Newcastle, 22 July 1844.

16 Martineau, J., The Life of the 5th Duke of Newcastle, p. 69Google Scholar.

17 Parl. Deb. new series, xxil, 707.

18 Parl. Deb. new series, XIX, 1275-84.

19 Oldfield, T. H. B., Representative History of Great Britain & Ireland, vi, 285–96Google Scholar. Cited in English Historical Documents 1783-1832, ed. Aspinall, A. and Smith, J., p. 224Google Scholar. Oldfield states that Newcastle returned 4 M.P.s for Aldborough and Boroughbridge and 1 for Newark. This appears correct, but he is wrong in asserting that Newcastle had power to return 2 M.P.s for East Retford. In 1812 Newcastle refrained from interfering in the East Retford election.

20 Letter from Daniel O'Connell to Dwyer, Edward. Cited in the Nottingham Review, 10 10 1828Google Scholar.

21 Priestley, C., The Life and Career of the 2nd Duke of Newcastle, p. 383Google Scholar. An unpublished M.A. thesis at Nottingham University.

22 Newcastle MSS. NeC 6624, R. Scruton to Newcastle, 2 Oct. 1831. Aldborough was a scot and lot borough, but the area covered by the borough charter was restricted so that although, the population of the town in 1831 numbered 484, the electorate only amounted to approximately 60.

23 Dickinson, W., History of Newark, p. 141Google Scholar.

24 Tallents MSS., E. Tallents to Newcastle, 2 Oct. 1831. See also Newcastle MSS. NeC 4505, which is a list of the 330 tenants of the second duke of Newcastle who polled at the election of 1790.

25 Newcastle MSS. NeC 6277, E. S. Godfrey to Newcastle, 13 March 1820. It was esti-mated that on this occasion Newcastle would have to pay about £500 towards the Christmas coals.

26 Nottingham Journal, 22 01 1831Google Scholar.

27 Newcastle MSS. NeC 6616, Gilbert Jones to Newcastle, 26 Aug. 1818.

28 Nottingham Review, 13 12 1833Google Scholar. Newcastle held the living of Newark parish church, and his enemies claimed that between 1821 and 1831 the churchwardens donated £11,000 towards helping people who were supporters of Newcastle, while under £150 was given to those who had different political loyalties.

29 Priestley, C., The Life and Career of the 2nd Duke of Newcastle, p. 383Google Scholar.

30 Portland MSS., duke of Portland to the marquis of Titchfield, 15 July 1806.

31 See Newcastle MSS. NeC 5125, 6201, 6202, 6203 and 6122.

31 His stepfather, Sir Charles Gregan Craufurd (M.P. for East Retford 1806-12). His brother-in-law Sir Stapleton Cotton, later Lord Combermere (M.P. for Newark 1806-14). Two cousins, Captain W. H. Clinton (M.P. for Boroughbridge 1806-18, and Newark 1818-29) and Henry Fynes, later known as Clinton (M.P. for Aldborough 1806-26).

33 H. of L.J. 10 May 1830, p. 352.

34 Newcastle MSS. NeC 6581, William Green to Newcastle, 3 Oct. 1812.

35 Newcastle MSS. NeC 6595, Henry Dawkins to Newcastle, n.d.

36 Tallents MSS., Newcastle to E. Tallents, 29 Sept. 1832.

37 Sir Lawson-Tancred, T., Records of a Yorkshire Manor, p. 317Google Scholar.

38 Newcastle MSS., J. Wilkinson to (probably) J. G. Knight, 5 May 1796.

39 Newcastle MSS. NeC 6914, copy letter, Newcastle to M. Lawson, 25 March 1823. See also the views of Sir Lawson-Tancred, T. in Records of a Yorkshire Manor, p. 317Google Scholar.

40 Sir Lawson-Tancred, T., Records of a Yorkshire Manor, pp. 313–14Google Scholar.

41 However, Lawso n left his canvass until the last possible momen t s o that Newcastle woul d not have time to organize an effective opposition.

42 In 1830 election expenses, including litigation costs, amounted to well over £3000. See Newcastle MSS. NeC 6809, G. Hirst to Newcastle, 22 Jan. 1830. This compares most unfavourably with the £466 spent by Newcastle at the Aldborough and Borough-bridge elections in 1812 before the Newcastle-Lawson feud. See Newcastle MSS. NeC 6597.

43 Yorkshire Gazette. Cited in the Nottingham Journal, 18 June 1831.

44 Newcastle MSS. NeC 5128, T. Coutts to Newcastle, 31 Jan. 1820.

45 Tallents MSS., Tallents to Newcastle, n May 1831. Newcastle MSS. NeC 6971, G. Hirst to Newcastle, 25 June 1826. Eventually Grant paid well over half of the election costs at Aldborough in 1826. See Newcastle MSS. NeC 6977, G. Hirst to Newcastle, 3 Aug. 1826.

46 Soon after it was known that Wellington would introduce a Roman Catholic Relief Bill, Greville wrote, ‘Grant [M.P. for Aldborough 1826-30] was in a great fright, for the D. of Newcastle brings him in, and he will probably insist upon his voting against the bill or going out’ (see Greville Memoirs, ed. Strachey, L. and Fulford, R., I, 251)Google Scholar. In the following month Grant voted against the readings of the government's measure, but whether he did so because he was afraid of losing his seat is doubtful. Grant had always opposed concessions to Roman Catholics.

Lord Ellenborough also claimed that Newcastle had forced Sir William Clinton (M.P. for Newark 1818-29) to resign over the same question. See A Political Diary of Lord Ellenborough 1828-30, ed. Colchester, Lord, 1, 355Google Scholar. However, there is little evidence to support this claim. A probable explanation is that Clinton was basically opposed to the Emancipation Bill but, not wishing to offend either Newcastle or his military chief, he took the easy way out and resigned.

47 Tallents MSS., Newcastle to Tallents, 17 Sept. 1826.

48 Tallents MSS., Tallents to Newcastle, 25 Sept. 1829, and Tallents to Fynes Clinton, 24 Feb. 1830.

49 Newcastle MSS. Ne C 7652, Newcastle t o J. E. Denison, 6 July 1830.

50 Tallents MSS., Tallents to Newcastle, 11 March 1831; and Tallents to Newcastle, 2 Oct. 1831.

51 The Reform Bill increased the number of seats in Nottinghamshire from 8 to 10. This was done b y dividing the county into two and giving each division the right to elect two members.

52 Tallents MSS., Newcastle to Tallents, 4 June 1831.

53 Nottingham Journal, 30 07 1831Google Scholar.

54 Tallents MSS., E. S. Godfrey to Newcastle, 22 Sept. 1832.

55 Tallents MSS., Tallents to Newcastle, 12 Feb. 1832.

56 In 1832 the Club hoped that Newcastle would allow his son, Lord Lincoln, to stanc’ for Newark. See B.M. Add. MSS. 44261, fo. 2, E. S. Godfrey to Newcastle, 31 July 1832

57 Newcastle MSS. Ne C 5380, Joh n Gladstone t o Newcastle, 26 June 1832.

58 B.M. Add. MSS. 44261, fo. 22, Newcastle t o W. E. Gladstone, 13 Nov. 1832.

59 Lord Lincoln (M.P. for Sout h Nottinghamshire) was th e eldest son of Newcastle Viscount Duncanno n (M.P. for Nottingham ) was th e son of the third earl of Bessborough; Viscount Lumley (M.P. for North Nottinghamshire) was the eldest son of th e earl of Scarborough; Viscount Newark (M.P. for East Retford) was the son of Earl Manvers. J. E. Denison, the other M.P. for South Nottinghamshire, was the son-in-law of the duke of Portland.

60 Newcastle MSS. Ne C 6430, E. Tallents to Newcastle, 23 April 1832.

61 Portland MSS., Lord George Bentinck to the duke of Portland, 26 Feb. 1836.

62 In Jan. 1836 it was rumoured that Serjeant Wilde (M.P. for Newark) was to be appointed attorney-general. Bonham wrote to Newcastle asking him if he could find a suitable candidate to oppose Wilde when he stood for re-election. See Newcastle's reply, Newcastle MSS. NeC 11845, ‘4 Jan. 1836.

63 Newcastle MSS. NeC 7142, Courts and Co. to Newcastle, 17 Oct. 1836.

64 B.M. Add. MSS. 44261, fo. 92, Newcastle to W. E. Gladstone, 4 Sept. 1841; and Gladstone's acknowledgement of this letter, Newcastle MSS. NeC 5424, W. E. Gladstone to Newcastle, 6 Sept. 1841.

65 Newcastle MSS. NeC 7894b. The resolution of Mr Gladstone's committee held at the Conservative News Room on Monday, 5 Jan. 1846.

66 Portland MSS., 28 Dec. 1845.

67 Newcastle MSS. NeC 11679, Lord Lincoln to W. E. Gladstone, 27 Dec. 1845.

68 Parker, C. S., Sir Robert Peel, III, 338Google Scholar.

69 Newcastle MSS. NeC 12110, Lord Lincoln to Peel, 9 Feb. 1846.

70 Nottingham Journal, 20 Feb. 1846. The letter was dated, 17 Feb. 1846.

71 The Times, 21 Feb. 1846.

72 Tallents MSS., Lord Lincoln to Tallents, 7 Feb. 1851.