Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:20:36.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I. The Committee-Men in the Long Parliament, August 1642–December 1643

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2010

Lotte Glow
Lotte Glow
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been said that the Civil War was won by committees. Recent writers on this subject have begun to show how parliamentary policy and its execution was forged in the committee chambers rather than on the crowded floor of the House of Commons. This article is concerned with the personnel of these committees, in particular with those men who were not famous for their political activities and attitudes. Obviously, a core of leaders was needed in order to direct the business of the committees, to give continuity to their proceedings and to ensure that their work was in accord with the policy of the Commons. But the political ‘parties’ were relatively small, and with all the enthusiasm in the world their members could not attend personally to all aspects of government, civil and military. This study is concerned with the men who had no known political views but who contributed a great deal of time and effort to the running of parliamentary affairs. Because of their relative obscurity in the House it will be useful to ask why they were chosen to serve on certain committees, how their background and activity compared with that of their more ‘political’ colleagues, and how they reacted to situations where they were required to take a political stand. Above all, it will be possible to judge whether these men formed a coherent group rather than a random collection of individuals. These men owed their positions to their administrative skill rather than to their political affiliations. As administrators they were responsible to the legislature, and during a time of intensified state intervention, they became analogous to a non-political civil service, ready to execute the policy decisions of the party leaders.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , 1965 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For example, Pennington, D. H., ‘The Accounts of the Kingdom’, Essays in the Economic and Social History of Tudor and Stuart England, ed. Fisher, F. J. (Cambridge University Press, 1961), pp. 182 ff.Google Scholar; Pennington, D. H., ‘The Cost of the English Civil War’, History Today (02 1958)Google Scholar; Keeler, M. F., ‘Some Opposition Committees, 1640’, Conflict in Stuart England, ed. Aiken, W. A. and Henning, B. D. (London, 1960)Google Scholar; Mitchell, W. M., Rise of the Revolutionary Party in the English House of Commons, 1603-1629 (Columbia University Press, 1957)Google Scholar.

2 Appendix.

3 Keeler, M. F., The Long Parliament (Philadelphia, 1954), p. 322Google Scholar.

4 He sat on more than 50 committees between 1640 and July 1642.

5 D[ictionary of] N[ational] B[iography]; Gardiner, S. R., History of the Great Civil War, 1, 119Google Scholar.

6 Harley MSS. (British Museum), 163 f. 372.

7 Cited by , Holies, ‘Memoirs’, in Maseres, Francis, Tracts on the Civil War, I, 308Google Scholar.

8 , Keeler, op. cit. 322Google Scholar.

9 D.N.B.

10 Keeler, loc. cit.

11 Yule, G., The Independents in the English Civil War (Cambridge University Press, 1958), p. 115Google Scholar.

12 Keeler, loc. cit.

13 He had been named to 36 committees between 1640 and July 1642.

14 Keeler, op. cit. p. 394.

15 Coates, W. H., The Journal of Sir Simonds D'Ewes (Yale University Press, 1942)Google Scholar, passim. There are over 50 mentions of his committee work.

16 , Yule, op. cit. p. 126Google Scholar.

17 Harl. 164 f. 307.

18 Keeler, , op. cit. p. 394.Google Scholar

19 D.N.B.

20 Pearl, V., London and the Outbreak of the Puritan Revolution (Oxford University Press, 1961), pp. 190–1Google Scholar.

21 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 371Google Scholar.

22 Harl. 165 f. 169.

23 Loc. cit.

24 Harl. 165 f. 169.

25 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 371Google Scholar.

26 Ibid. p. 124.

27 Ibid.

28 He had been on 47 committees between 1640 and July 1642.

29 , Keeler, op. cit. pp. 386–7Google Scholar.

30 , Pennington, loc. cit., p. 186Google Scholar.

31 Ibid. pp. 215, 364.

32 , Yule, op. cit. pp. 102, 121Google Scholar.

33 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 364Google Scholar.

34 Harl. 165 f. 233.

35 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 352Google Scholar.

36 , Yule, op. cit. p. 106Google Scholar.

37 L.J. iv, 25.

38 D.N.B.

39 In 1641 he subscribed £600 (Ibid.).

40 Aylmer, G. E., The King's Servants (London, 1961), p. 373Google Scholar.

41 Ibid. p. 378.

42 Ibid. p. 377.

43 Gardiner, S. R., History of the English Civil War, 1, 132Google Scholar.

44 D.N.B.

45 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 203Google Scholar.

46 He sat on 27 committees between 1640 and July 1642.

47 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 317Google Scholar.

48 Ibid.

49 , Aylmer, op. cit. p. 308Google Scholar.

50 Ibid. pp. 311-12.

51 Ibid. pp. 195-6.

52 Ibid. p. 338.

53 Ibid.

54 , Keeler, loc. citGoogle Scholar.

55 D.N.B.

56 Harl. 164 f. 277. D'Ewes comments sarcastically on the leniency of Parliament to Pye's overtures to the king, inspired by their deference to Hampden.

57 Op. cit. p. 380.

58 , Coates, op. cit. p. 147Google Scholar.

59 , Coates, op. cit. p. 352Google Scholar.

60 Ibid.

61 Harl. 164 f. 275.

62 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 327Google Scholar.

63 His case was submitted to the Committee for Trade in May 1641 (CJ. 11, 154, 907). In May 1644 he was awarded heavy damages (ibid, in, 483).

64 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 327Google Scholar.

65 Harl. 165 f. 194.

66 He had attended 57 committees between 1640 and July 1642.

67 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 285Google Scholar.

68 , Yule, op. cit. p. IIIGoogle Scholar.

69 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 357Google Scholar.

70 Harl. 164 f. 293.

71 Harl. 165 f. 141.

72 Ibid. f. 213.

73 , Keeler, op. cit. pp. 193–4Google Scholar.

74 , Pennington, loc. cit. p. 186Google Scholar.

75 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 194Google Scholar.

76 Ibid. pp. 390-1.

77 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 277Google Scholar.

78 , Yule, op. cit. p. 110Google Scholar.

79 Harl. 165 f. 141.

80 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 169Google Scholar; Harl. 164 f. 315, 352; Harl. 165 f. 141.

81 Harl. 165 f. 141; 178, Harl. 164 f. 300, 321.

82 D.N.B.

83 , Keeler, op. cit. p. 393Google Scholar.

84 Ibid. p. 264.

85 Ibid. p. 147. He may also have lost some of his fervour for the parliamentary cause for a time ( , Clarendon, History of the Great Rebellion, ed. MacKray, , VIII, 248)Google Scholar.

86 For these abbreviations see below, p. 13.