Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:58:29.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DEFYING MERCANTILISM: ILLICIT TRADE, TRUST, AND THE JAMAICAN SEPHARDIM, 1660–1730

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

NUALA ZAHEDIEH
NUALA ZAHEDIEH*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent historians have highlighted the importance of the web of illicit commercial transactions which connected competing imperial networks to create an integrated Atlantic economy but have paid little attention to how co-operation worked across borders. Of necessity, participants acted without the legal institutions which are often afforded a central role in narratives of modernization. In the case of Jamaica, a hub of illicit trade, most merchants found it difficult to survive in this high-risk environment but members of the Sephardic diaspora, a traditional, communitarian group, had competitive advantages which they exploited with vigour. They did not rely on innate attributes of kinship, ethnicity, or religion. They closed entry and built on a favourable historical and geographical legacy to cultivate attributes which maintained high levels of social discipline with credible rewards and punishments which were reinforced by their outsider status. Their competitive advantages did stimulate retaliation but also allowed the Sephardim to combine with the Christian elite to capture rent-seeking opportunities. Far from falling away as modernization gained pace, the Sephardic diaspora survived and flourished by constructing the strong private-order institutions needed in large swathes of the economy where neither impersonal corporations, nor state enforcement mechanisms, were able to manage risk.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 77 - 102
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Earlier versions of the article were given at seminars at the Huntington Library, CA, the Institute of Historical Research, London, the University of Edinburgh, and the British Group of Early American Historians. The author is grateful for helpful discussion on each occasion. The author is also grateful to Christian Koot and the anonymous referees for their constructive comments.

References

1 Greene, Jack P. and Morgan, Philip, eds., Atlantic history: a critical appraisal (New York, NY, 2009)Google Scholar; Bender, Thomas, ‘Foreword’, in Canizam-Esquerra, Jorge and Seeman, Erik R., eds., The Atlantic in global history: 1500–2000 (Upper Saddle River, NY, 2007), p. xviiGoogle Scholar.

2 ‘An estimate of what value is shipt every year from Jamaica to England’, 24 July 1700, The National Archives (TNA) CO 138/10, fo. 76; TNA Cust 3/3–5; Zahedieh, Nuala, ‘The merchants of Port Royal, Jamaica, and the Spanish contraband trade, 1655–1692’, William and Mary Quarterly, 63 (1986), pp. 570–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Bailyn, Bernard, Atlantic history: concepts and contours (Cambridge, MA, 2005), p. 88CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Andreas, P., Smuggler nation: how illicit trade made America (New York, NY, 2011)Google Scholar; Klooster, Wim, ‘Inter-imperial smuggling in the Americas, 1600–1800’, in Bailyn, Bernard and Denault, Patricia L., eds., Soundings in Atlantic history: latent structures and intellectual currents, 1500–1830 (Cambridge, MA, 2009), pp. 141–80Google Scholar; Koot, Christian J., Empire at the periphery: British colonists, Anglo-Dutch trade and the development of the British Atlantic (New York, NY, 2011)Google Scholar.

4 North, Douglass C. and Thomas, Robert P., The rise of the Western world: a new economic history (Cambridge, 1973)Google Scholar; North, Douglass C., ‘Institutions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1991), pp. 97–112 Google Scholar. Although the work of Avner Greif, and others, has stimulated debates about the role of rules, beliefs, and norms in long-distance trade, most economists consider that they were outperformed by impersonal, individualistic institutions in a process of ‘modernization’. For example, in Grief's work, the modern Genoese institutions outperformed the Maghribis. For a summary of his arguments developed over two decades, see Greif, Avner, Institutions and the path to the modern economy: lessons from medieval trade (Cambridge, 2006)Google Scholar.

5 Josiah Child expressed the common view that religious toleration and an open policy towards aliens and ‘even Jews’ had contributed to Dutch commercial success. Child, Josiah, A new discourse of trade (London, 1698), p. 103Google Scholar. Social capital is here understood as ‘features of social organization such as trust, norms, and networks that can improve the efficiency of society by facilitating coordinated actions’, Putnam, Robert D., Making democracy work (Princeton, NJ, 1993), p. 167Google Scholar.

6 Trivellato, Francesca, ‘Sephardic merchants in the early modern Atlantic and beyond: toward a comparative historical approach to business’, in Kagan, Richard and Morgan, Philip, eds., Atlantic diaporsas: Jews, Conversos, and Crypto-Jews in the age of mercantilism, 1550–1800 (Baltimore, MD, 2009), pp. 99–122 Google Scholar.

7 Janet Landa drew on field work in south-east Asia to argue that in an environment with a weak legal infrastructure and positive transaction costs, a ‘rational’ trader will choose trading partners with shared and easily identifiable kinship and ethnic characteristics. Landa, Janet, ‘A theory of the ethnically homogeneous middleman group: an institutional alternative to contract law’, Journal of Legal Studies, 10 (1981), pp. 349–62Google Scholar.

8 Daviken Studnicki-Gizbert, ‘La Nación among the nations: Portuguese and other trading diasporas in the Atlantic, sixteenth to eighteenth centuries’, in Kagan and Morgan, eds., Atlantic diasporas, pp. 75–98.

9 Hickeringill, Edward, Jamaica view'd (London, 1661), p. 46Google Scholar.

10 Francis Barrington to Sir John Barrington, 14 July 1655, Barrington papers, vol. v, British Library (BL) Egerton MS 2648, fo. 249; Zahedieh, Nuala, ‘Trade, plunder and economic development in early English Jamaica, 1655–1689’, Economic History Review, 39 (1986), pp. 205–22Google Scholar.

11 Stein, Stanley J. and Stein, Barbara H., Silver, trade and war: Spain and America in the making of early modern Europe (Baltimore, MD, 2000), p. 24Google Scholar; Deerr, Noel, History of sugar (2 vols., London, 1949–50), i, p. 24Google Scholar.

12 McCusker, John J. and Menard, Russell R., The economy of British America, 1607–1789 (Chapel Hill, NC, 1985), p. 54Google Scholar.

13 Haring, Clarence H., Trade and navigation between Spain and the Indies in the time of the Habsburgs (Cambridge, MA, 1918), pp. 201–30Google Scholar; Stevens, John, The Spanish rule of trade in the West Indies (London, 1702)Google Scholar.

14 McLachlan, Jean O., Trade and peace with Old Spain, 1667–1750: a study of the influence of commerce on Anglo-Spanish diplomacy in the first half of the eighteenth century (Cambridge, 1940), pp. 1–30 Google Scholar; Walker, Geoffrey J., Spanish politics and imperial trade, 1700–1789 (London, 1979), p. 227Google Scholar.

15 Goslinga, C. H., The Dutch in the Caribbean and on the Wild Coast, 1580–1680 (Assen, 1971)Google Scholar; Emmer, P. C., ‘“Jesus Christ was good, but trade was better”: an overview of the transit trade of the Dutch Antilles, 1634–1795’, in Paquette, Robert L. and Engerman, Stanley L., eds., The Lesser Antilles in the age of European expansion (Gainsville, FL, 1996), pp. 206–22Google Scholar; Wim Klooster, ‘Networks of colonial entrepreneurs: the founders of Jewish settlements in Dutch America, 1650s and 1660s’, in Kagan and Morgan, eds., Atlantic diasporas, pp. 33–49.

16 The treaty of Tordesillas of 1494 divided the globe between Spain and Portugal with Africa in Portugal's sphere and so Spain held back from the Atlantic slave trade. Foreign merchants obtained crown licences, or asientos, to fill the gap and supply African labour to the Spanish colonies. For a detailed account of the slave asiento, see Scelle, George, La traité négrière aux Indes de Castille (2 vols., Paris, 1906)Google Scholar.

17 Harper, L. A., The English Navigation Laws: a seventeenth-century experiment in social engineering (New York, NY, 1939)Google Scholar.

18 Davenport, F. G., European treaties bearing on the history of the United States and its dependencies, ii (Washington, DC, 1929), pp. 187–96Google Scholar.

19 Davies, K. G., The Royal African Company (London, 1957)Google Scholar; approval of contract made with Srs Domingo Grillo and Ambrosio Lomelin, minutes of General Court of African Company, 20 June 1664, TNA T 70/75, fos. 11–12.

20 Sir Joseph Williamson to Lord Vaughan, 12 May 1677, TNA CO 1/138/2, fo. 150; Osborne, J. F., ‘James Castillo – asiento agent’, Jamaican Historical Review, 8 (1971), pp. 9–18 Google Scholar; Zahedieh, ‘Merchants of Port Royal’, p. 590; Zahedieh, Nuala, ‘Regulation, rent-seeking and the Glorious Revolution in the British Atlantic economy’, Economic History Review, 63 (2010), pp. 865–90Google Scholar.

21 Zahedieh, Nuala, ‘Monopoly and free trade: changes in the organization of the British slave trade, 1660–1720’, Proceedings of the Instituto di Storia Economica, 44 (2014), pp. 651–62Google Scholar.

22 In 1715, the South Sea Company (SSC) was allowed six staff at each of its factories in Panama, Portobello, Cartagena, Vera Cruz, and Buenos Aires. Memorandum to Committee of Correspondence, 1715, BL Add. MS 25,562, fo. 56.

23 ‘Notes on illicit trade carried on by sloops from Jamaica with the Spanish’, undated, National Library of Jamaica (NLJ) MS 1049; Nathaniel Uring, A history of the voyages and travels of Capt. Nathaniel Uring (1726), pp. 164–6. For a detailed description of Monkey Island, see Thomas Ekines to Hans Sloane, n.d., BL Sloane MS 4047, fo. 170.

24 Carlisle to governor of Santiago in Cuba, 21 Sept. 1680, TNA CO 138/3, fo. 432. The English authorities did not disapprove of trade in manufactured goods but refrained from official sanction which would have caused offence to the Spanish crown. Report about Jamaica, 28 May 1679, TNA CO 138/3, fo. 310.

25 Jamaican advocates of clandestine trade provided optimistic estimates that costs would be half those in the Cadiz trade, Peter Beckford to Williamson, 6 Dec. 1675, W. Noel Sainsbury, ed., Calendar of State Papers, Colonial Series, America and the West Indies, 1675–1676 (1893), no. 735.

26 On competitive conditions, see James Houston, Dr Houston's memoirs of his own life time (London, 1747), pp. 222–4; Abraham and Diego Gonzalez to Nathan Simson, 9 Mar. 1724, Isaac v. Defriez (hereafter Simson papers), TNA C 104/13; Tho. Erkines to Sir Hans Sloane, n.d., BL Sloane MS 4047, fo. 170; Sardi's memorandum to the SSC, 10 Sept. 1714, BL Add. MS 25,562, fo. 28; Halls to Brailsford, 10 Sept. 1688, 11 Mar. 1688/9, Peers and Tooke v. Brailsford (hereafter Brailsford papers), TNA C 110/152; naval officer's shipping returns, TNA CO 142/14.

27 A report of 1725 claimed that ‘on their return [supercargoes] ordered the persons concerned their proportions without giving them any account of sales’. Journals of the Assembly of Jamaica (JAJ), ii, p. 483.

28 Houston, Memoirs, p. 224.

29 Harold Bensusan, ‘The Spanish struggle against foreign encroachment in the Caribbean’ (Ph.D. thesis, California, 1974), pp. 96–100, 153, 155. On informers, see Lawes to Lords of Trade, 1 Sept. 1718, TNA CO 137/13, pt 1, no. 16. Copy of the Spaniards commission translated, TNA CO 1/54, no. 101.

30 Draft of a memorial to be delivered to Don Pedro Ronquillo touching injuries done to the English in America, Nov. 1681, TNA CO 1/47, no. 97.

31 Sir Nicholas Lawes to Lords of Trade, 3 May 1718, TNA CO 137/13, pt 1, no. 10.

32 Abraham and Diego Gonzalez to Nathan Simson, 1 Dec. 1722, 17 July 1723, Simson papers, TNA C 104/14, box 1.

33 Halls to Aylward, 21 Nov. 1688, Brailsford papers, TNA C 110/152; Mr Kent and Mr Thornton to SSC, 5 June 1714, Committee of Correspondence, BL Add. MS 25,550, fo. 9.

34 ‘The present state of the government of Jamaica’, 20 Aug. 1671, TNA CO 138/2, fo. 96; ‘Memorandum given in by the naval officer’, 25 Mar. 1679, TNA CO 1/43, fo. 59; Lynch to Jenkins, 6 Nov. 1682, National Maritime Museum; ‘An account of the ships and vessels that were lost or received damage in the late hurricane, 1726’, TNA CO 137/16, fo. 172b; Zahedieh, ‘Merchants of Port Royal’, p. 581.

35 Lawes to Lords of Trade, 21 June 1718, TNA CO 137/13, pt 1, no. 13; JAJ, ii, pp. 338, 482–3.

36 The term is used by Benton, Lauren, Law and colonial cultures: legal regimes in world history, 1400–1900 (Cambridge, 2002), p. 26Google Scholar.

37 El Gov. de Yucatan contra Alonso Matheos sobre et tratos commercios con el enemigo Ingles, Archivo General de Indias, Seville (AGI) Mexico, 48, R. 1, no. 42; Virrey de Nova Espana a V Magd, 22 Feb. 1678, AGI Mexico, 50, no. 27.

38 Uring, History, pp. 164–6.

39 Lynch to Arlington, 2 Mar. 1672, TNA CO 1/28, fo. 46–46b; Molesworth to Williamson, 28 Sept. 1672, TNA CO 1/29, fo. 7b.

40 Halls to Brailsford, 11 Mar. 1688/9, 14 Mar. 1688/9, Brailsford papers, TNA C 110/152.

41 By his death in 1696, William Hall had refocused his business away from contraband commerce with only £243 tied up in two small ventures on the coast and £2,763 in island trade, inventory of William Hall, Oct. 1699, National Archives of Jamaica, Spanish Town (NAJ), Inv. 1B/ii/3, vol. 5, fos. 35–8.

42 Beeston to Lords of Trade, 1700, TNA CO 138/10; Houston, Memoirs, pp. 222–8.

43 Zahedieh, ‘Merchants of Port Royal’, pp. 578–80; ‘Memorandum given in by the naval officer’, 25 Mar. 1679, TNA CO 1/43, fo. 59.

44 Zahedieh, ‘Merchants of Port Royal’, pp. 590–1.

45 According to a report of 1709, in 1706/7, Jamaica re-exported slaves to the value of £56,000; woollens at £149,000, hats, linens at £66,500, and sundries at £3,500, Cambridge University Library, C(h) H Pa. 122/162.

46 Inchiquin to Lords of Trade, 12 Aug. 1691, TNA CO 138/7, fo. 19; ‘An estimate of what value is shipt every year from Jamaica to England’, 24 July 1700, TNA CO 138/10, fo. 76; Handasyd to Lords of Trade, 19 Nov. 1706, TNA CO 137/7, no. 35.

47 Introduction, Hanson, Francis, ed., The laws of Jamaica (London, 1683)Google Scholar.

48 Lynch to Arlington, 17 Dec. 1671, TNA CO 1/27, fo. 167.

49 New Christianization meant profoundly different things in different families. Some maintained their Jewish culture in the secrecy of their homes. Others embraced Catholicism. The divide between Old and New Christians was porous with much inter-marriage. Studnicki-Gizbert, Daviken, A nation upon the ocean sea: Portugal's Atlantic diaspora and the crisis of the Spanish empire, 1492–1640 (Oxford, 2007)Google Scholar.

50 On the importance of decentralized, self-organized networks in Atlantic commerce, see Hancock, David, Oceans of wine: Madeira and the emergence of American trade and taste (New Haven, CT, 2009)Google Scholar.

51 Studnicki-Gizbert, ‘La Nación among the nations’, pp. 75–6. Discussion of Antonio Rodrigues Robles, a resident of mid-seventeenth-century London, highlights fluid identities. Selwood, Jacob, Diversity and difference in early modern London (Farnham, 2010), pp. 141–8Google Scholar.

52 Roth, Cecil, A history of the Jews in England (3rd edn, London, 1964), pp. 154–72Google Scholar; Fortune, Stephen A., Merchants and Jews: the struggle for British West India commerce, 1650–1750 (Gainesville, FL, 1984)Google Scholar; Israel, Jonathan, European Jewry in the age of mercantilism, 1550–1750 (Oxford, 1985)Google Scholar.

53 ‘Now in this dispersion…[the Jews] credit one another; and by that means they draw the Navigation where-ever they are, where with all of them merchandizing and having perfect knowledge of all the kinds of Moneys, Diamants, Cochinil, Indigo, Wines, Oyle, and other Commodities, that serve from place to place; especially holding correspondence with their friends and kinds-folk, whose language they understand; they do abundantly enrich the Lands and Country's of Strangers, where they live’, quoted in Mendes-Flohr, Paul and Reinharz, Jehuda, The Jew in the modern world: a documentary history (2nd edn, New York, NY, 1995), p. 11Google Scholar.

54 Calvin's case, 1608, laid down the English law of nationality. Those born in England, or in countries under the king's dominion, were subjects. All others were aliens and lay under disabilities: they could not own, lease, or inherit real property in England or bring legal action that related to real property; they had no political rights and could not hold office; they were subject to customs duties imposed upon aliens and could not qualify as English under the Navigation Acts. Aliens could apply for naturalization by a private Act of Parliament which granted virtually all the privileges of a subject but petitioners had to take a sacramental oath which excluded Jews. A grant of denization from the crown, as an exercise of its prerogative power, in the form of a Letter Patent, provided Jews with an alternative and removed the inability to hold real property, but not always the liability to pay aliens’ customs duties, as rights varied with the wording of the particular instrument. Statt, Daniel, Foreigners and Englishmen: the controversy over immigration and population, 1660–1760 (Newark, DE, 1995), pp. 32–7Google Scholar.

55 Between 1660 and 1700, approximately 190 Jewish aliens were endenizened in British dominions. Marcus, Jacob R., The colonial American Jew, 1492–1776 (3 vols., Detroit, MI, 1970), p. 101Google Scholar. There were 853 Jews listed in London in 1695. Most were Sephardi although 203 were certainly Ashkenazi. A. P. Arnold, ‘A list of the Jews and their households in London’, Miscellanies of the Jewish Historical Society of England, part vi (1962), pp. 73–141.

56 Samuel, Wilfred S., ‘Sir William Davidson, royalist (1616–1689) and the Jews’, Transactions of the Jewish Historical Society of England, 14 (1942), pp. 66–7Google Scholar. For the same ploy in Dutch territories, see Klooster, ‘Networks of colonial entrepreneurs’, p. 40.

57 Davidson was involved in illegal Dutch trade with Barbados in the 1650s and the beginnings of the African Company set up in 1662–3. Samuel, ‘Sir William Davidson’.

58 ‘The gold finding Jew went home a month since in Capt. Capps bound for London’, Lynch to Bennet, 23 May 1664, TNA CO 1/18, fo. 153b. Zahedieh, Nuala, ‘The capture of the Blue Dove, 1664: policy, profits, and protection in early English Jamaica’, in McDonald, Roderick A., ed., West Indies accounts: essays on the history of the British Caribbean and the Atlantic economy (Kingston, Jamaica, 1996), pp. 29–47 Google Scholar.

59 Petition of the merchants of Port Royal to Sir Thomas Lynch concerning the Jews, 11 June 1672, TNA CO 1/28, no. 63.

60 Lynch to Council of Plantations, 10 Mar. 1671/2, TNA CO 1/28, fo. 57.

61 Selwood, Jacob, ‘Left behind: subjecthood, nationality, and the status of Jews after the loss of Surinam’, Journal of British Studies, 54 (2015), pp. 578–601 Google Scholar.

62 ‘Inhabitants both masters and servants of Port Royal parish’, TNA CO 1/45, fos. 96–107. Six of those in Table 1 appear: Abraham Alvarez; Joseph da Costa Alvaringa; Moses Jesuran Cardosa; Solomon Gabay; Abraham Lucena; Jacob Mendez Gutterez. David Gomez had died by this time and David Alvarez lived with his father.

63 ‘List of the several regiments of foot and troops of horse in Jamaica’, TNA CO 1/45, fos. 1–25. Not all Jews can be identified by name. Most had Spanish or Portuguese names but some were anglicized. In 1718, Abraham Martin, ‘of the Jewish nation’, gave evidence in court and swore on the 5 Books of David. TNA CO 137/13, no. 19.

64 Memorandum from the Jews about tax, 1700, TNA CO 138/10, fo. 82.

65 Benjamin Bravo to William Wood, 17 Feb. 1736, TNA CO 137/22, fo. 34.

66 ‘A journal kept by Coll. William Beeston from his first coming to Jamaica’, BL Add. MS 12,430, fo. 28.

67 In 1692, a list of twelve Jewish plantation owners was submitted to the Lords of Trade to counter claims that they neglected planting. It included five of the nine Jews in Table 1 (David Alvarez, Moses Jesuran Cardosa, Joseph da Costa Alveringa, Jacob Mendez Gutterez, the widow of Solomon Gabay). TNA CO 390. In Dec. 1706, a group of so-called ‘planting Jews’ petitioned for an exemption from the separate tax imposed on their community ‘in the lump’. 10 Dec. 1706, JAJ, i, p. 405.

68 Inventory of Abraham Alvarez, Oct. 1693, NAJ, Inv. 1B/ii/3, vol. 3, fo. 507; tombstone, 4 Mar. 1693, Barnett, R. D. and Wright, P., The Jews of Jamaica and Jewish tombstone inscriptions, 1663–1882 (Jerusalem, 1997), 62Google Scholar.

69 Houston, Memoirs, p. 277. The series of recopied inventories in the Jamaica Archives is unfortunately not complete. Volumes 4, 6, 7, and 8 are missing from the period 1686–1721. For a discussion of the inventories, see Meyers who used a different sample. Meyers, Allan D., ‘Ethnic distinctions and wealth among colonial Jamaican merchants, 1685–1716’, Social Science History, 22 (1998), pp. 47–81 Google Scholar.

70 For the period 1686–1721, Abraham Alvarez, Moses Gabay Faro, David Gabay, and Abraham Azavedo are listed as planters, NAJ, Inv. 1B/ii/3, vols. 3, 5, 9, and 11.

71 Over half the Jewish merchant inventories suggest an involvement in Spanish trade compared with 25 per cent of all the Port Royal inventories; Zahedieh, ‘Merchants of Port Royal’, p. 579.

72 ‘Memoria of what goods may be fit for Sta Marta, the rest of the Tierre Firma’, 11 May 1668, Westminster Abbey Muniments 11,940. On the importance of foreign goods, see the South Sea Company's cargoes, BL Add. MS 25,562, no. 15.

73 On direct trade, see Zahedieh, ‘Capture of the Blue Dove’; Hayne, Samuel, An abstract of all the statutes made concerning aliens trading in England (London, 1685), pp. 10, 29Google Scholar. For Jewish expertise in smuggling in the Thames, see a report to the SSC, BL Add. MS 25,562, no. 15. On the Jews’ low prices, see Francis Hall to Thomas Brailsford, 11 Mar. 1688/9, 20 Jan. 1689/90, Brailsford papers, TNA C 110/152. William Wood claimed that, by the 1720s, ‘the Jews [are] the only persons almost that have any large quantities of all kinds of goods lying in their houses, warehouses, or shops for…making proper sortments of goods for the Spaniards’. William Wood to Lords of Trade, 18 Feb. 1735, TNA CO 137/22, fos. 35–6. Brown, V. L., ‘The South Sea Company and contraband trade’, American Historical Review, 31 (1926), p. 671CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 On the smuggling activities of Isaac Lamego and Isaac Lopez Nunez in collusion with the marquis du Quesne (captain of Port Royal) in the 1720s, see JAJ, ii, pp. 325, 482–3, 539.

75 Nathan Simson left eighty-eight bills of lading from 1719 until 1724 which show the importance of the Jamaican entrepot to his New York provision business although it had not yet outstripped Curacao with 38 per cent of his cargoes consigned to Curacao, 29 per cent to Jamaica, 22 per cent to London, and the remaining 11 per cent for lesser Caribbean ports and Amsterdam. Simson papers, TNA C 104/13. On Jews and the provision trade in New York, see Gelfand, Noah L., ‘A transatlantic approach to understanding the formation of a Jewish community in New Netherland and New York’, New York History, 89 (2008), pp. 375–95Google Scholar.

76 Burnard, Trevor, ‘Who bought slaves in early America? Purchasers of slaves from the Royal African Company in Jamaica, 1674–1708’, Slavery and Abolition, 17 (1996), p. 74Google Scholar.

77 Richard Brown v. Andrew Lopez and Co., TNA HCA 13/82. The SSC examined Mr Dennis's conduct as chief of the Panama and Portobello factory where he was accused of illegal trading in negroes with Benjamin Bravo, Committee of Correspondence, SSC, 9 Oct. 1728, BL Add. MS 25,552, fos. 84–5; Bravo purchased 176 slaves from the Royal African Company in 1723, TNA T 70/958, fos. 37–8, 41–2, 43–5. Also see Tyndall and Assheton to Isaac Hobhouse, 8 June 1729, 25 Apr. 1729, 20 July 1729, Bristol Central Library, Jeffries Collection, vol. xiii, fos. 100, 103–5, 107.

78 ‘Memorandum given in by the naval officer’, 25 Mar. 1679, TNA CO 1/43, fo. 59.

79 ‘List of the regiments’, TNA CO 1/45, fos. 1–25; naval officers returns, 2 Apr. 1703–25 Apr. 1705, TNA CO 142/13; petition of Jacob Rodriguez, Deleon, and Jacob Lopes Torres, overseers of the synagogue, Journal of Assembly of Jamaica, 23 Mar. 1688, TNA CO 140/2, fo. 114.

80 Moses Cardosa acted for the Halls in the 1680s. Brailsford papers, TNA C 110/152.

81 Houston, Memoirs, p. 309.

82 Diego and Abraham Gonzalez to Nathan Simson, 17 July 1723, Simson papers, TNA C 104/14, pt 1; Marcus, Colonial American Jew, pp. 42–66; Brown, ‘South Sea Company’, p. 671; El Gov. de Yucatan contra Alonso Matheos sobre el tratos commercios con el enemigo Ingles, AGI Mexico 48, R. 1, no. 42; Selwood, Diversity and difference, p. 143.

83 Long, Edward, A history of Jamaica (3 vols., 1774)Google Scholar, ii, p. 116.

84 Inventory of Jacob Baruch Alvarez, 10 June 1724, NAJ, Inv. 1B/ii/3, vol. 14, fos. 60–1.

85 Copy of a letter of credit, 17 Jan. 1694/5, TNA CO 138/7, fo. 358.

86 ‘Book belonging to Thomas Stubbs’, TNA HCA 30/664; Yogev, Gedalia, Diamonds and coral: Anglo-Dutch Jews and eighteenth-century trade (Leicester, 1978)Google Scholar.

87 Dummer's contract with the Post Office in 1704 allowed him to carry cargoes which allowed him to move into Spanish American trade via Jamaica in partnership with his brother and the Mears brothers, Jacob and Sampson. Jacob Mears had spent sixteen years trading in Jamaica and claimed knowledge of the trade and contacts with co-religionists in Spanish America. Steele, Ian K., The English Atlantic, 1675–1740: an exploration of communication and community (Oxford, 1986), pp. 176–7Google Scholar.

88 For example, David Gomez owned the Betty ketch included in a list of ships trading for logwood, TNA CO 138/1, fo. 105.

89 ‘Memo given in by the naval officer’, 25 Mar. 1679, TNA CO 1/43, fo. 59; Woolf, Maurice, ‘Foreign trade of London Jews in the seventeenth century’, Transactions of the Jewish Historical Society of England, 24 (1974), pp. 38–58 Google Scholar.

90 Perara and Gomezsera v. Calloway, Sept. 1672, TNA HCA 13/77.

91 London Port Books, 1717; West Yorkshire Record Office, Sheepscar Branch, Leeds; JAJ, vol. ii, pp. 325, 348, 525, 527.

92 John Taylor, ‘Taylor's history of his life and travels in Jamaica’, 1688, NLJ MS 105, fo. 499; Houston, Memoirs, p. 277.

93 Meyers, ‘Ethnic distinctions and wealth’, p. 75.

94 Petition of the merchants of Port Royal to Sir Thomas Lynch concerning the Jews, 11 June 1672, TNA CO 1/28, no. 63.

95 Erikson, Emily, Between monopoly and free trade: the East India Company, 1600–1757 (Princeton, NJ, 2014)Google Scholar.

96 Perara and Gomezsera v. Calloway, Sept. 1672, TNA HCA 13/77.

97 Studnicki-Gizbert, ‘La Nación among the nations’, pp. 77–8.

98 117 tombstone inscriptions in the Port Royal burial ground are from between 1680 and 1730. The majority (75 per cent) are in Portuguese and almost all the remainder in Spanish with one in English. Barnett and Wright, Tombstone inscriptions. Deposition of Abraham Perara Delgado, 1672, TNA HCA 13/77.

99 The construction of a synagogue is not required for religious services, or practising a proper Jewish life. The necessity for worship is to have a Mingan (ten Jewish males) while the space can be anywhere. John Peeke sold a plot measuring 63 feet by 36 feet to the Jewish community represented by Abraham David Gabay, Moses Jesuran Cordosa, Asperius, and a further Gabay. Deed, 29 Jan. 1677, Island Record Office, Spanish Town, Jamaica, Deeds OS, vol. viii, p. 87.

100 The importance of the synagogue is reflected in wills: it was the custom to leave bequests to the synagogue. Andrade, Jacob A. P. M., A record of the Jews in Jamaica from the English conquest to the present times (Kingston, Jamaica, 1941)Google Scholar.

101 Cooter, R. and Landa, Janet, ‘Personal versus impersonal trade: the size of trading firms and contract law’, International Review of Law and Economics, 4 (1984), pp. 15–22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

102 Barry, Jonathan, ‘Bourgeois collectivism? Urban association and the middling sort’, in Barry, Jonathan and Brooks, Christopher, eds., The middling sort of people: culture, society and politics in England, 1550–1800 (London, 1994), pp. 84–112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

103 ‘By their parsimonious living which I do not charge as a fault in them they have the means of underselling the English’, Beeston to Lords of Trade, TNA CO 138/10, fo. 85. Similar quotes abound.

104 Knight, James, Natural, moral, and political history of Jamaica (1742), fo. 74bGoogle Scholar.

105 In 1732, Judith Baruch Alvarez left £100 ‘for making a convenient causeway or walk from the usual place of landing of corpses…to the burial place of the Jewish Nation’. Will of Judith Baruch Alvarez, 12 Sept. 1732, Andrade, Record.

106 Memo from Baron de Belmonte, 1 Jan. 1700, TNA CO 138/10, fos. 2–3.

107 Receipts of sale for New York provisions, 1719–23, Simson papers, TNA C 104/14, pt 1.

108 The Yeshibah is mentioned in wills. Moses Cardosa left it £5, will of Moses Cardosa, 9 Dec. 1725, Andrade, Record.

109 Carr, J. and Landa, Janet, ‘The economics of symbols, clan names and religion’, Journal of Legal Studies, 13 (1983), pp. 135–56Google Scholar; Iannaccone, Laurence, ‘Why strict churches are strong’, American Journal of Sociology, 99 (1994), pp. 1180–211Google Scholar.

110 Barry and Brooks, eds., Middling sorts, pp. 84–112; Withington, Phil, Society in early modern England: the vernacular origins of some powerful ideas (Cambridge, 2010), pp. 102–33, 171–201Google Scholar.

111 Articles of Agreement between Solomon Gabay and David Lopez Narbona, 9 July 1674, Island Record Office, Spanish Town, Deeds, OS i, vol. 1, fos. 215–16.

112 Petition to Thomas Lynch, 1672, TNA CO 1/28, no. 63; Zahedieh, ‘Capture of the Blue Dove’; Perara and Gomezsera v. Calloway, 25 Sept. 1672, TNA HCA 13/77.

113 Gelfand, ‘Transatlantic approach’, pp. 379, 381; Andrade, Record.

114 Inventory of Joseph da Costa Alveringa, 1 Aug. 1700, NAJ, Inv. 1B/ii/3, vol. 5, fos. 44–5; Richard Brown v. Andrew Lopez and Co., HCA 13/82; Yogev, Diamonds and coral, p. 36.

115 Will of Isaac Rodriquez Marques, 5 Oct. 1707, in Herschowitz, Leo, Wills of early New York Jews, 1704–1799 (New York, NY, 1967), pp. 8–10 Google Scholar; Rock, Howard B., New York Jews in the New World, 1654–1865 (New York, NY, 2013), p. 129Google Scholar.

116 Herschowitz, Wills.

117 Hancock, Oceans of wine. Abraham and Diego Gonzalez's correspondence with the New York merchant Nathan Simson shows that they also had strong links with Amsterdam, Barbados, Bayonne, Bordeaux, Curacao, St Eustatius, St Thomas, and the Iberian empires as well as London. Simson papers, TNA C 104/14.

118 On effects of itineracy in managing opportunism in long-distance trade, Costa, Leonor Freire, Rocha, Maria Manuela, and Araujo, Tanya, ‘Social capital and economic performance: trust and distrust in eighteenth-century gold shipments from Brazil’, European Review of Economic History, 15 (2010), pp. 1–27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

119 Simson papers, TNA C 104/14; Cohen, Robert, ‘Sampson and Jacob Mears, merchants’, Jewish Historical Quarterly, 67 (1978), pp. 233–45Google Scholar. The inscription on the tomb of Solomon Levy of 5 Aug. 1690 noted that Levy was born in Germany. Barnett and Wright, Tombstone inscriptions.

120 Jessica Roitman, ‘Us and them: inter-cultural trade and the Sephardim, 1595–1640’ (Ph.D. thesis, Leiden, 2009).

121 Memorial of the Jews enclosed with letter from Beeston to Lords of Trade, 3 May 1700, TNA CO 138/10, fo. 80; response of the Council to the Petition of the Jews, 1700, TNA CO 138/10, fo. 86; JAJ, i, p. 257, ii, pp. 392, 541.

122 Long, History, i, pp. 79–100.

123 Houston, Memoirs, pp. 79–100.

124 Abraham and Diego Gonzalez to Simson, 1725, Simson papers, TNA C 104/14.

125 Cohen, ‘Sampson and Jacob Mears’, p. 234. A sample of thirty Admiralty cases relating to Jamaica between 1674 and 1696 includes four involving Jews but no cases of Jews suing Jews. TNA HCA 13/77–82.

126 Fifteen Jewish wills provide an insight into family discipline. Island Record Office, Spanish Town, Wills, Liber 17, 18.

127 Richman, Barak, ‘How community institutions create economic advantage: Jewish diamond merchants in New York’, Law and Social Inquiry, 31 (2006), pp. 383–420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

128 The Halls traded with Cardoza, Gomez, Gonzalez, de Leon, Narbona, Nunez, and da Silva Solis. Brailsford papers, TNA C 110/152.

129 Houston, Memoirs, p. 277.

130 Council of Jamaica, 1700, TNA CO 138/10, fos. 80–6.

131 Kaplan, Yosef, ‘The place of the Herem in the Sefardic community of Hamburg during the seventeenth century’, in Seudemund-Halevy, Michael and Koj, Peter, eds., Die Sefarden in Hamburg: Zur geschichte einer meinheit (Hamburg, 1994)Google Scholar; Swetschinski, Daniel, Reluctant cosmopolitans: the Portuguese Jews of seventeenth-century Amsterdam (London, 2000)Google Scholar.

132 Francis Hall to Thomas Brailsford, 11 Mar. 1688/9, 20 Jan. 1689/90, Brailsford papers, TNA C 110/152.

133 Brailsford papers, TNA C 110/152; Simson papers, TNA C 104/14.

134 Beeston to Lords of Trade, TNA CO 138/10, fo. 85; petition to Sir Thomas Lynch, 1672, TNA CO 1/28, no. 65.

135 ‘Act declaring what persons shall be qualified to sit in Assemblies’, 1711, JAJ, ii, p. 38.

136 Memo of Jews about taxes, 3 May 1700, TNA CO 138/10, fo. 80.

137 Samuel, ‘Sir William Davidson’; Lynch to Arlington, 17 Dec. 1671, TNA 1/27, fo. 167; Zahedieh, ‘Regulation, rent-seeking’. Lawes to Lords of Trade, 21 June 1718, TNA CO 137/13, pt 1, no. 14. In the 1720s, the Assembly claimed that the trade on the coast had been engrossed by the men-of-war in association with the leading Jewish supercargoes. Isaac Lamego had been concerned in about ten voyages with Captain Lawes and three or four with Captain Dent. This had been to the detriment of smaller traders who had been excluded. JAJ, ii, pp. 338, 482–3.

138 Wood put forward a petition in support of the Jews with ninety-two signatures of which fifty were from Christians. William Wood to Lords of Trade, 18 Feb. 1736, TNA CO 137/22, fo. 35.