Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T21:13:19.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current Thinking about Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Political Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

James H. Tully
James H. Tully
Affiliation:
McGill UNIVERSITY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1981 , pp. 475 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Richard Tuck, Natural rights theories, p. 1.

2 Tuck, Rights, p. 7.

3 Quentin, Skinner, ‘“Social meaning” and the explanation of social action’,Philosophy, politics and society, series iv, ed. Peter, Laslett, Runciman, W. G. and Quentin, Skinner (Oxford, 1972), pp. 136–57.Google Scholar

4 Tuck, Rights, p. 2.

5 Tuck, Rights, p. 13.

6 Tuck, Rights, p. 43.

7 Quentin, Skinner, The foundations of modern political thought (Cambridge, 1978), II, 339.Google Scholar

8 Skinner, Foundations, p. 239.

9 Skinner, Foundations, p. 338 n. 2.

10 Skinner, Foundations, p. 138.

11 Tuck, Rights, p. 80.

12 Skinner, Foundations, p. 119.

13 Tuck, Rights, p. 82.

14 Tuck, Rights, p. 171.

15 Tuck, Rights, p. 173.

16 Julian Franklin, John Locke and the theory of sovereignty, p. 89.

17 Franklin, Locke, p. 123.

18 Franklin, Locke, p. 124.

19 Franklin, Locke, p. 1.

20 Franklin, Locke, p. 64.

21 Franklin, Locke, p. 3.

22 Franklin, Locke, pp. 125–6.

23 See Richard, Ashcraft, ‘Revolutionary politics and Locke's Two treatises of government’, Political Theory (November 1980).Google Scholar

24 George, Lawson, Politica sacra et civilis (London, 1660), p. 10, cited in Tuck, Rights, p. 145.Google Scholar

25 Lawson, Politica, p. 371, cited in Franklin, Locke, p. 80.

26 Lawson, Politica, pp. 15, 147–8, cited in Franklin, Locke, p. 74.

27 Franklin, Locke, p. x.

28 Tuck, Rights, pp. 144–5; Franklin, Locke, pp. 69–70.

29 Tuck, Rights, p. 144.

30 John, Locke, Two treatises of government, ed. Peter, Laslett (Cambridge, 1967),Google Scholar section II, 168, 232; cf. Skinner, Foundations, p. 338; Tuck, Rights, p. 173; John, Dunn, The political thought of John Locke (Cambridge, 1969), pp. 181–6.Google Scholar

31 Franklin, Locke, pp. 97–8 (the Locke quotation is from Two treatises, section II, 220). My italics.

32 Dunn, Locke, p. 44.

33 Peter, Laslett, ed., Patriarcha and other political works of Sir Robert Filmer (Blackwell, 1949), introduction.Google Scholar