Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:36:35.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CHURCHILL'S DEFEAT IN DUNDEE, 1922, AND THE DECLINE OF LIBERAL POLITICAL ECONOMY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2019

JIM TOMLINSON Open the ORCID record for JIM TOMLINSON [Opens in a new window]
JIM TOMLINSON*
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
*
Economic and Social History, University of Glasgow, Lilybank House, Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RT [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article uses Churchill's defeat in Dundee in 1922 to examine the challenges to liberal political economy in Britain posed by the First World War. In particular, the focus is on the impact of the war on reshaping the global division of labour and the difficulties in responding to the domestic consequences of this reshaping. Dundee provides an ideal basis for examining the links between local politics and global economic changes in this period because of the traumatic effects of the war on the city. Dundee depended to an extraordinary extent on one, extremely ‘globalized’, industry – jute – for its employment. All raw jute brought to Dundee came from Bengal, and the markets for its product were scattered all over the world. Moreover, the main competitive threat to the industry came from a much poorer economy (India), so that jute manufacturing was the first major British industry to be significantly affected by low-wage competition. Before 1914, the Liberals combined advocacy of free trade with a significant set of interventions in the labour market and in social welfare, including trade boards. The Dundee case allows us to examine in detail the responses to post-war challenges to these Liberal orthodoxies.

Type
Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , September 2020 , pp. 980 - 1006
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For the Scottish context, see Dyer, M., Capable citizens and improvident democrats: the Scottish electoral system 1884–1929 (Aberdeen, 1996), pp. 135–40Google Scholar.

2 He stood and lost as a Liberal in West Leicester in 1923.

3 Walker, W., ‘Dundee's disenchantment with Churchill’, Scottish Historical Review, 49 (1970), pp. 85–108Google Scholar; Paterson, T., A seat for life (Dundee, 1980)Google Scholar; Southgate, D., ‘Politics and representation in Dundee 1832–1963’, in Jackson, J., ed., The third statistical account of Scotland: the city of Dundee (Arbroath, 1979), pp. 287–328Google Scholar; Gilbert, M., Winston S. Churchill vol. iv 1917–1922 (London, 1975), pp. 863–92Google Scholar. For local politics, see Kemp, J., ‘Red Tayside? Political change in early twentieth-century Dundee’, in Whatley, C., Harris, B., and Miskell, L., eds., Victorian Dundee: image and realities (2nd edn, Dundee, 2011), pp. 217–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Baxter, K. and Kenefick, W., ‘Labour politics and the Dundee working class c.1895–1936’, in Tomlinson, J. and Whatley, C., eds., Jute no more: transforming Dundee (Dundee, 2011), pp. 191–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 The relationship between the war and the decline of liberalism as a political force has been debated since the publication of the classic treatment by Trevor Wilson: The downfall of the Liberal party 1914–1935 (London, 1966)Google Scholar. The debate, very summarily, is between those who see the war as crucial to that downfall, and those who see it only as an accelerator of longer-term socio-economic trends. A recent survey of the debate is in Searle, G., The Liberal party: triumph and disintegration, 1886–1929 (2nd edn, Basingstoke, 2001), pp. 124–41Google Scholar. For the survival of liberalism more generally, see Green, E. and Tanner, D., eds., The strange survival of liberal England (Cambridge, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 The imperial dimension is explored in depth from different angles in Stewart, G., Jute and empire: the Calcutta jute wallahs and the landscapes of empire (Manchester, 1998)Google Scholar; Cox, A., Empire, industry and class: the imperial nexus of jute, 1840–1940 (Abingdon, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Tomlinson, J., Dundee and the empire: ‘juteopolis’ 1850–1939 (Edinburgh, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Tomlinson, J., ‘Responding to globalization? Churchill and Dundee in 1908’, Twentieth Century British History, 21 (2010), pp. 257–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The Lib–Lab pact did not apply in Scotland, but Wilkie seems to have retained membership of the Liberal party until at least 1910.

7 Freeden, M., The New Liberalism (Oxford, 1978)Google Scholar; Clarke, P., Lancashire and the New Liberalism (Cambridge, 1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 On the Conservatives, see Green, E., The crisis of conservatism: the politics, economics and ideology of the British Conservative party, 1880–1914 (London, 1996)Google Scholar; on Labour, see Tanner, D., Political change and the Labour party (Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar.

9 Searle, Liberal party.

10 Lenman, B., Lythe, C., and Gauldie, E., Dundee and its textile industry 1850–1914 (Dundee, 1969)Google Scholar.

11 Conversely, very little jute production took place elsewhere in Britain: Dundee and jute were largely synonymous.

12 Daunton, M., ‘Britain and globalization since 1850: I. Creating a global order’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 16 (2006), pp. 1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; O'Rourke, K., ‘From empire to Europe: Britain in the world economy’, in Floud, R., Humphries, J., and Johnson, P., eds., The Cambridge economic history of modern Britain (Cambridge, 2014), pp. 60–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 S. K. Masrani, ‘International competition and strategic response in the Dundee jute industry during the inter-war and post war: the case of Jute Industries, Buist Spinning, Craiks and Scott and Fyfe’ (Ph.D. thesis, St Andrews, 2010). Jute was clearly very different from cotton, where the protectionist debate in Lancashire largely focused upon the Indian market.

14 Tomlinson, J., ‘Orientalism at work? Dundee's response to competition from Calcutta, circa 1870–1914’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 43 (2015), pp. 807–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Marrison, A., British business and protection 1905–1932 (Oxford, 1996)Google Scholar.

16 Pollard, S., Britain's prime and Britain's decline: the British economy 1870–1914 (London, 1989)Google Scholar.

17 Churchill, ‘For liberalism and free trade’, Dundee, n.d., Churchill Archive, Churchill College, University of Cambridge (CACCUC), CHAR 9/31/66, pp. 7, 8, 29.

18 There was a Labour candidate for the by-election, Stuart, who was also strongly pro-free trade, and who argued for the strengthening of the Indian factory acts as the right response to Indian competition. Churchill objected to this, arguing that factory legislation should not be pursued as a means of reducing imports, but only as genuine social protection: Tomlinson, ‘Churchill and Dundee’, pp. 274–6.

19 Addison, P., Churchill on the home front 1900–1955 (London, 1992), p. 66Google Scholar.

20 Just before the Dundee election he had fought and lost a by-election in Manchester North West.

21 Addison, Churchill on the home front, pp. 51–81.

22 Trade boards were not universally welcomed on the left: see J. Thompson, ‘Political economy, the labour movement, and the minimum wage 1880–1914’, in Green and Tanner, eds., Strange survival of liberal England, pp. 62–88.

23 Quoted in Addison, Churchill on the home front, p. 78.

24 Dundee year book (hereafter DYB) 1915 (Dundee, 1916), p. 21.

25 DYB 1916 (Dundee, 1917), p. 16.

26 Lloyd, E. M. H., Experiments in state control (Oxford, 1924), pp. 36, 66Google Scholar.

27 Board of Trade, Jute working party (London, 1948)Google Scholar, table vii; Day, J., ‘The jute industry in Scotland’, in Jones, D. et al. , Rural Scotland during the war (Oxford, 1926), pp. 267–305Google Scholar.

28 Controls in jute were easier to operate than in industries such as linen, given the limited range of outputs and the single source of supply of the raw material: Ollerenshaw, P., ‘Textile business in Europe during the First World War: the linen industry, 1914–18’, Business History, 41 (1999), pp. 63–87, at p. 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 N. Glen, ‘Of myth and men: Dundee women's experiences working and organising for change in juteopolis in the Great War and after’ (M.A. thesis, Dundee, 1997).

30 DYB 1914 (Dundee, 1915), pp. 16–24Google Scholar; DYB 1915, pp. 17–27; DYB 1916, pp. 16–27.

31 Walker, W., Juteopolis: Dundee and its textile workers 1885–1923 (Edinburgh, 1979), pp. 394–5Google Scholar.

32 John Sime to F. McLeod, 11 Jan. 1918, London, The National Archives, Public Records Office (TNA: PRO), NATS 1/1178; W. Henderson to F. McLeod, 28 Feb. 1918, TNA: PRO, NATS 1/1179; Association of Jute Spinners and Manufacturers (AJSM), meetings of 17 Jan., 24 Jan., 15 Feb., and 15 Mar. 1918, Dundee University Archives (DUA), MS 84/3/1.

33 Though a more informal employers' body seems to have had a longer history: there is reference to a ‘Dundee Spinners and Manufacturers Association’ in the Advertiser (Dundee), 8 Jan. 1913 (cutting in CACCUC, CHAR 5/15/1).

34 In line with the conventions of the time, and as in 1908 when he was appointed president of the Board of Trade, Churchill had to resign his parliamentary seat on being given a new ministerial job.

35 Courier (Dundee), 4 Aug. 1917.

36 Courier, 13 July 1917. During the campaign, Churchill expressed support for temperance ideas, and emphasized that the election was not about Scrymgeour's prohibitionism: Courier, 28 July 1917. For Churchill's 1917 election address, 26 July 1917 (which made no mention of Scrymgeour), see CACCUC, CHAR 5/19/18–21.

37 Courier, 25 July 1917; Courier, 28 July 1917; acceptance speech by Clementine Churchill, Courier, 4 Aug. 1917.

38 J. Sime, letter to Courier, 23 July 1917.

39 Dundee Chamber of Commerce (DCC) minutes, 20 Jan. 1916, Dundee City Archives (DCA), GD/CC/4/9.

40 Courier, 14 June 1918; see also Scotsman, 14 June 1918; ‘Report of the departmental committee appointed by the Board of Trade to consider the position of the textile trades after the war’, Cd 9070, BPP 1918, vol. iii.

41 Boyce, R., British capitalism at the crossroads, 1919–1932 (Cambridge, 1987), pp. 82–90Google Scholar.

42 Courier, 20 Aug. 1918. For Sime's call for an industrial council, see DUA, MS 84/3(2), 26 Sep. 1918.

43 Courier, 2 Oct. 1918; DUA, MS 84/3/1(3), 11 Oct. 1918. But the problem of hours of work dogged discussion between employers and unions, with employers wishing to revert to a fifty-five-hour week as more raw jute became available.

44 Churchill to George Ritchie, president of the Liberal Association, 5 Nov. 1918, CACCUC, CHAR 5/20/13–15. Churchill writes that he hopes that the Tories will support him, and that Labour will not put anyone up against Wilkie, so that the two will be easily returned.

45 W. Churchill, ‘Draft election address’, CACCUC, CHAR 5/20/36.

46 Clarke, P., ‘Churchill's economic ideas, 1900–1930’, in Blake, R. and Louis, W., eds., Churchill (Oxford, 1993), pp. 79–95Google Scholar.

47 Courier, 19 Nov. 1918; Churchill to Ritchie, 9 May 1919, CACCUC, CHAR 5/21/6.

48 Churchill to Ritchie, 18 Apr. 1922, CACCUC, CHAR 5/26/66; see also CHAR 27/57/101–25.

49 Address to DCC, Courier, 11 Dec. 1918.

50 Courier, 30 Dec. 1918. The local Unionists endorsed Wilkie: see Baxter and Kenefick, ‘Labour politics and the Dundee working class’, p. 205.

51 Scrymgeour styled himself the ‘real labour candidate’ whatever the label: Courier, 23 Nov. 1918.

52 AJSM joint meeting with unions, 4 Mar. 1919, DUA, MS 84/5/1(7); though at first they had thought of making an approach on their own: meeting of 13 Jan. 1919, MS 84/3/1(3).

53 AJSM association meeting, 13 Feb. 1919, DUA, MS 84/3/1(2); AJSM general committee meetings, 3 Feb., 4 Feb., 25 Feb., 6 Mar., 7 Mar., 10 Mar. 1919, MS 84/3/1(3).

54 AJSM joint meeting with unions, 4 Mar. 1919, DUA, MS 84/5/1(7); Tomlinson, Dundee and the empire, pp. 112–15.

55 AJSM, meeting with DFMOU, 11 Apr. 1919, DUA, MS 84/5/1(7).

56 DCC, minutes, 25 Nov. 1919, DCA, DCC GD/CC/4/10.

57 DCC, minutes, 5 Feb. 1920, DCA DCC GD/CC/4/10.

58 AJSM, ‘Report of deputation to London’, 15 Apr. 1919, DUA, MS 84/3/1(2).

59 Courier, 18 Apr. 1919.

60 AJSM general committee meeting, 20 May 1919, DUA, MS 84/3/1(3).

61 Courier, 23 Dec. 1919.

62 Courier, 23 Dec. 1919.

63 Courier, 31 Dec. 1919.

64 Courier, 24 Dec. 1919.

65 S. Blackburn, A fair day's wage for a fair day's work? Sweated labour and the origins of minimum wage legislation in Britain (Aldershot, 2007).

66 Cited in Blackburn, S., ‘Ideology and social policy: the origins of the Trade Boards Act’, Historical Journal, 34 (1991), pp. 43–64, at p. 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Green, E., The ideologies of conservatism (Oxford, 2002), pp. 86, 268CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Blackburn, Fair day's wage, pp. 113–17. There was only one speech against at second reading: HC Deb., 28 April 1909, vol. 4, cols. 342–411.

69 W. S. Churchill, ‘Sweated industries’, 27 Jan. 1909, TNA: PRO, CAB 37/97/13; W. S. Churchill, ‘Draft of Trade Boards Bill’, 12 Mar. 1909, TNA: PRO, CAB 37/98/42. This memo is in CACCUC, CHAR 11/16/251. See also his contribution to the second reading of the Bill, HC Deb., 28 April 1909, vol. 4, cols. 387–405, where he cited John Stuart Mill in support of the proposition that ‘General low wages never caused any country to undersell its rivals; nor did general high wages ever hinder it’ (col. 387). But he also stressed that it was not applicable to staple trades (cols. 388–9) and ‘I am strongly opposed to the extension of this Bill to the organised trades of the country’ (col. 405).

70 Churchill, W., Liberalism and the social problem (London, 1909), p. 32Google Scholar.

71 ‘List of trades from Miss Black, Miss Macarthur and Mr. Mallon’, CACCUC, CHAR 11/16/187–92. Jute and linen were described in this list as a ‘very badly paid factory trade in which women rapidly displacing men. Many women earning 8s and 9s a week, and men in the trade as low in some cases as 11s3d. Centralised and easily dealt with’. See also Courier, 6 Feb. 1909.

72 Walker, Juteopolis, p. 420.

73 W. S. Churchill, covering note to draft bill, 12 Mar. 1909, CACCUC, CHAR 11/16/251–2.

74 ‘Comment by C.E.C.’, 2 Feb. 1909, CACCUC, CHAR 11/16/202.

75 Courier, 14 June 1909; this idea never got as far as the House of Commons.

76 Sells, D., The British trade boards system (London, 1923), pp. 4–5Google Scholar.

77 Advertiser, 20 Aug. 1918 (these figures are probably exaggerated).

78 See Walker, Juteopolis, p. 419.

79 AJSM meetings, 25 Nov., 9 Dec. 1918, 28 Aug. 1919, DUA, MS 84/3(2).

80 Sells, British trade boards system; the wages set by the board are detailed in AJSM, ‘Annual report 1939’, DUA, MS 84/2, appendix H.

81 Sells, British trade boards system, pp. 243–5; Tawney, R. H., ‘The abolition of economic controls 1918–1921’, Economic History Review, 13 (1943), pp. 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

82 AJSM, ‘Annual report 1939’, appendix H.

83 Ibid.; AJSM meetings, 1 Feb. 1921, 15 Apr. 1921, 17 June 1921, DUA, MS 84/3(2); Walker, Juteopolis, pp. 423–4.

84 F. Cathro, secretary of the AJSM, to minister of Labour, 3 Feb. 1921, TNA: PRO, LAB2/842/TBM114/18/1921.

85 Humbert Wolfe to secretary of state, 10 Feb. 1921, TNA: PRO, LAB2/842/TBM114/18/1921.

86 Letter on behalf of the minister to AJSM, 14 Apr. 1921, TNA: PRO, LAB2/842/TBM114/18/1921.

87 T. J. Macnamara to Churchill, 25 Aug. 1921, TNA: PRO, LAB 2/248/TBM114/18/1921, covering ‘trade board for the jute industry’.

88 DDUJFW to minister of Labour, 21 Feb. 1921, and Deputation of Dundee jute workers to the minister of Labour, 1 Mar. 1921, TNA: PRO, LAB2/842/TBM114/18/1921. The opposing positions of the employers and unions were set out in detail at the trade board meeting in Feb. 1921: see ‘Report on the discussion, at the meeting of the jute trade board on February 16th and 17th’, TNA: PRO, LAB2/842/TBM114/18/1921.

89 Churchill to D. Lloyd George, 23 Sep. 1921, CACCUC, CHAR 5/24/94–9.

90 This was part of a nationwide employer and Conservative campaign against the boards, which was also strongly supported by the Treasury in the context of public spending cuts: Lowe, R., Adjusting to democracy: the role of the Ministry of Labour in British politics, 1916–1939 (Oxford, 1986), pp. 60–1, 99–100, 102–4Google Scholar.

91 For union support for the boards, see Courier, 26 Feb. 1921, 19 Jan. 1922, 21 Jan. 1922; for protests at Sime's dismissal, see Telegraph, 3 May 1922; for the Board of Trade's refusal to accept Sime's re-nomination, see Courier, 18 July 1922.

92 This exaggerated the Cave Committee's recommendations, though these were highly restrictive: see Sells, British trade boards system, pp. 248–57. For the subsequent development, see Sells, D., British wage boards: a study in industrial democracy (Washington, DC, 1939), pp. 251–65Google Scholar.

93 Precise reliable data is not available for the industry or city for these years, but the numbers reported in the local press (Courier, 19 Dec. 1921) broadly match those identified in national studies: Hilton, J., ‘Statistics of unemployment derived from the working of the unemployment insurance acts’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 86 (1923), pp. 154–205, at appendix 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

94 Petrie, M., ‘Public politics and traditions of popular protest: demonstrations of the unemployed in Dundee and Edinburgh, c.1921–1939’, Contemporary British History, 27 (2013), pp. 490–513, at p. 493CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 Lawrence, J., ‘The transformation of public politics after the First World War’, Past & Present, 190 (2006), pp. 185–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Petrie, ‘Public politics’, p. 496.

96 Levitt, I., Poverty and welfare in Scotland 1890–1948 (Edinburgh, 1988), pp. 104–51Google Scholar.

97 Town clerk to Churchill, 18 Aug. 1920, CACCUC, CHAR 5/22/20–2; Churchill to Ritchie, 9 Sep. and 25 Sep. 1920, CHAR 5/21/11 and 21; Churchill to Ritchie, 29 Aug. 1920, CHAR 5/22/25.

98 M. Barlow, ‘Dundee’, CACCUC, CHAR 5/22/62–3, which argues that a big obstacle to employment of disabled ex-servicemen is the trade board's wage of 50 shillings per week for men, as opposed to 35 shillings for women. Barlow's report is at CHAR 5/22/64–7.

99 Ritchie to Churchill, 15 Apr. 1921, CACCUC, CHAR 5/24/26–50; Churchill to Ritchie, 11 Sep. 1921, CHAR 5/24/76–100.

100 Churchill to Lloyd George, 23 Sep. 1921, CACCUC, CHAR 5/24/94–9.

101 Ibid., CHAR 5/24/98.

102 The party had been making significant gains in local elections from 1919: Baxter and Kenefick, ‘Labour politics and the Dundee working class’, pp. 205–6.

103 Cline, C., E.D. Morel, 1873–1924: strategy of protest (Belfast, 1980)Google Scholar; Mitchell, D., The politics of dissent: a biography of E.D. Morel (London, 2014)Google Scholar; Cline, C., Recruits to Labour: the British Labour party 1914–1931 (Syracuse, 1963)Google Scholar.

104 J. Kemp, ‘Drink and the labour movement in early twentieth-century Scotland with particular reference to Edwin Scrymgeour and the Scottish Prohibition party’ (Ph.D. thesis, Dundee, 2000); Baxter and Kenefick, ‘Labour politics and the Dundee working class’, p. 207.

105 Prohibitionist, 18 Nov. 1922. Prior to the election, he had used the paper to conduct his feud with local Labour figures, while attacking them for not supporting him as a second Labour candidate in the election. See, for example, Prohibitionist, 11 Mar. 1922, 6 May 1922, 21 June 1922, 22 July 1922, 28 Oct. 1922, 4 Nov. 1922.

106 Southgate, ‘Politics and representation’, p. 303. This tactic was urged by Scymgeour: Prohibitionist, 11 Nov. 1922, 18 Nov. 1922.

107 Walker, ‘Dundee's disenchantment with Churchill’, p. 91.

108 Kemp, ‘Drink and the labour movement’.

109 Searle, Liberal party, p. 118.

110 For Dundee's politics after 1922, see Petrie, M., ‘“Contests of vital importance”: by-elections, the Labour party, and the reshaping of British radicalism, 1924–1929’, Historical Journal, 60 (2017), pp. 121–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

111 Walker, Juteopolis, p. 440.

112 Southgate, ‘Politics and representation’, p. 312.

113 Churchill to Ritchie, 9 May 1919, CACCUC, CHAR 5/21/5–6.

114 Hood, C. and Himaz, R., A century of fiscal squeeze politics: 100 years of austerity, politics and bureaucracy in Britain (Oxford, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

115 Churchill to Ritchie, 23 Sep. 1920, CACCUC, CHAR 5/22/91–2.

116 Churchill to Ritchie, 22 June 1921, CACCUC, CHAR 5/24/31.

117 W. S. Churchill, ‘Current political points’, n.d. (but Apr. 1922), CACCUC, CHAR 5/26/64.

118 Joseph Philip to Churchill, 25 Apr. 1922, CACCUC, CHAR 5/26/76.

119 W. S. Churchill, ‘Speech’, 13 June 1921, DUA, MS 93/1/8/2/9/1/3; D. MacDonald to Churchill, 30 May 1922, MS 93/1/8/2/9/1/1.

120 Advertiser, 8 Apr. 1922.

121 J. Robertson to Churchill, 13 June 1922, CACCUC, CHAR 5/27/53–4; Southgate, ‘Politics and representation’, p. 314. Some of the difficulties in Dundee liberalism at this time are nicely indicated by the fact that Professor Steggall, in proposing the amendment in support of Churchill and Robertson, said he ‘loathed the Coalition’: W. Macdonald, notes on Liberal Association meeting, 12 June 1922, CACCUC, CHAR 5/27/40.

122 Southgate, ‘Politics and representation’, p. 315. Much of the course of the campaign can be tracked through the two main local newspapers, both of which carried extensive verbatim reports. Paterson, Seat for life, also conveys the flavour well. For the Communist view, see Stewart, B., Breaking the fetters (London, 1967), p. 127Google Scholar; Gallacher, W., Last memoirs (London, 1966), p. 170Google Scholar. See also James, R. Rhodes, Churchill: a study in failure 1900–1939 (Harmondsworth, 1973), pp. 191–2Google Scholar.

123 Gilbert, Churchill, p. 878.

124 Lenin, V. I., ‘British pacifism and the British dislike of theory’, in Collected works vol. 21 (Moscow, 1974), p. 261Google Scholar.

125 Walker, Juteopolis, pp. 451–63; Baxter and Kenefick, ‘Labour politics and the Dundee working class’, pp. 205–7.

126 Clark, G., ‘Why isn't the whole world developed? Lessons from the cotton mills’, Journal of Economic History, 47 (1987), pp. 141–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

127 The other big gainer in Asia was Japan: see Dickinson, F., War and national re-invention: Japan in the Great War 1913–1919 (Cambridge, MA, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The growth of textile production and exports was a large part of the economic aspect of Japan's ‘re-invention’: Rose, M., ed., International competition and strategic responses in the European textile industries after 1870 (London, 1992)Google Scholar.

128 Tomlinson, J., ‘The First World War and British cotton piece exports to India’, Economic History Review, 32 (1979), pp. 494–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tomlinson, B., The political economy of the Raj 1914–1947 (Cambridge, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

129 Lenman et al., Dundee and its textile industry.

130 Boyce, British capitalism at the crossroads.

131 Garside, W., British unemployment, 1919–1939: a study in public policy (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 203–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

132 Churchill, W., Thoughts and adventures (London, 1932)Google Scholar, cited in Southgate, ‘Politics and representation’, p. 316.

133 Advertiser, 8 Apr. 1922.

134 There was a similar brief moment in Lancashire in 1921 when employers and unions came together to protest at Indian import tariffs on British cotton goods: see Chatterji, B., Trade, tariffs and empire: Lancashire and British policy in India (Oxford, 1992), p. 209Google Scholar. In general, the cotton unions seem to have been passive on the issue of Indian competition: Fowler, A., Lancashire cotton operatives and work, 1900–1950 (Aldershot, 2003), pp. 74–107Google Scholar.

135 Cline, E.D. Morel; Mitchell, Politics of dissent, pp. 21, 30; Morel believed that opening up international markets to African farmers was the key to their prosperity.

136 Trentmann, F., ‘The strange death of free trade: the erosion of “liberal consensus” in Great Britain, c.1906–1932’, in Biagini, E., ed., Citizenship and community: liberals, radicals and collective identity in the British Isles 1865–1931 (Cambridge, 1996), pp. 219–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Trentmann, F., Free trade nation (Oxford, 2008), pp. 251, 258Google Scholar.

137 Trentmann, F., ‘Wealth versus welfare: the British left between free trade and national political economy before the First World War’, Historical Research, 70 (1997), pp. 70–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

138 Trentmann, F., ‘Bread, milk and democracy: consumption and citizenship in twentieth-century Britain’, in Daunton, M. and Hilton, M., eds., The politics of consumption (London, 2001), pp. 129–63Google Scholar; Hilton, M., ‘The female consumer and the politics of consumption in twentieth-century Britain’, Historical Journal, 45 (2002), pp. 103–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hunt, K., ‘The politics of food and women's neighbourhood activism in First World War Britain’, International Labour and Working-Class History, 77 (2010), pp. 8–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

139 For example, discussion of municipalization of the milk trade: Courier, 10 Dec. 1918; milk prices: Courier, 3 Aug. 1918 and 17 Sep. 1919; security of supply: Courier, 7 June 1918; costs of distribution: Telegraph, 16 May 1919.

140 Courier, 14 Aug. 1917; Telegraph, 6 Sep. 1917; Courier, 3 Sep. 1918. Scrymgeour was highly active on this issue, being a council member with responsibilities for regulation of the grocery trade.

141 Tomlinson, Dundee and the empire, pp. 103–20.

142 E. Morel to D. Watt, 12 May 1920, LSE Archive, Morel papers, F2 1/7; R. Smillie to E. Morel, 22 Aug. 1920, LSE Archive, Morel papers, F2 1/7.

143 Cline, Strategy of protest, pp. 132, 135.

144 The previous year, Churchill had defended ‘dumping’ of imports in the British market as having a welcome effect on ‘the uneconomic demands of labour’: cited in Trentmann, Free Trade Nation, p. 303.

145 Churchill to Montagu, 19 Dec. 1919, CACCUC, CHAR 2/106/16.

146 AJSM, ‘Report of deputation to London’, 15 Apr. 1919, DUA, MS 84/3/1(2).

147 Clarke, ‘Churchill's economic ideas’, pp. 85–6.

148 Ibid., pp. 93–4.

149 Trentmann, ‘Wealth versus welfare’.