Article contents
Bluff, Bluster and brinkmanship: Andrew Bonar Law and the Third Home Rule Bill*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Abstract
The article attempts to show that Bonar Law had an effective and coherent strategy towards home rule. Previous interpretations have stressed his weakness and inexperience, either his ‘pandering’ to the extremists in the Tory party or his readiness to seek a compromise, when civil war began to loom large, in the autumn of 1913. Much of the blame for the political stalemate from 1912 until 1914 is directly, or implicitly, laid upon Bonar Law. Yet the tory leader was a more consummate politician. He sought to use the home rule crisis not only to reinforce his own fragile leadership but to return the Conservatives to office. This he proposed to do by allowing the political system to reach an impasse over home rule, by not helping the Liberals reach a compromise and yet inciting Ulster to resist the bill on its implementation. This left Asquith, the Liberal prime minister, with the impossible choice of imposing the bill onto Ulster (so provoking civil war) or of holding a general election when his government was perceived as unpopular. Bonar Law counted on Asquith preferring to hold an election though Asquith was saved from such a decision by the outbreak of war. It was, then, a ‘high-risk’ strategy to win office for the party he led.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993
References
1 Walter Long papers (W.L.P.) 62418 Long to H. Samuel, July 1914.
2 Dangerfield, G., The strange death of Liberal England (London, 1936)Google Scholar.
3 Pugh, M., The making of modem British politics 1867–1939 (London, 1982)Google Scholar; Murphy, R., ‘Faction and the Conservative party and the Home Rule Bill’, History, LXXI (1986)Google Scholar; Jalland, P., The Liberals and Ireland: The Ulster question in British politics to 1914 (Brighton, 1980)Google Scholar.
4 Bonar Law's speech at Blenheim Palace, 29 July 1912, in The Times 30 July 1912; Ramsden, J., The history of the Conservative party: The age of Balfour and Baldwin (London, 1978), p. 86Google Scholar.
5 Blake, R., The unknown prime minister: the life and times of Andrew Bonar Law 1858–1923 (London, 1955)Google Scholar; Buckland, P., ‘The Southern Irish Unionists, the Irish Question and British polities’, Irish Historical Studies, XV (1966)Google Scholar; , Murphy ‘Faction’, History, LXXI (1986)Google Scholar; , Ramsden, Age (1978)Google Scholar.
6 , Pugh, Making (1982), pp. 106–7Google Scholar; , Murphy, ‘Faction’, 227Google Scholar.
7 Jalland, The Liberals and Ireland.
8 Jalland, The Liberals and Ireland; Midleton papers P.R.O. 30/67/56/3305 Sankey to Midleton, 23 Jul. 1932.
9 B.L.P. 34/2/39 Law to Sir H. Craik, 16 Mar. 1914.
10 Jenkins, R., Asquith (London, 1964), p. 275Google Scholar.
11 B.L.P. 27/1/28 Long to Law, 8 Aug. 1912.
12 B.L.P. 33/6/78 Law to Lansdowne, 11 Oct. 1913.
13 Cooke, A. and Vincent, J., The governing passion: cabinet government and party politics in Britain 1885–6 (Brighton, 1974), pp. 74–7Google Scholar.
14 W.L.P. 62403 Long to Balfour, 13 Jan. 1910.
15 B.L.P. 30/3/ioa I. Malcolm to Law, 7 Oct. 1913.
16 Kendle, J., Ireland and the federal solution (1989)Google Scholar.
17 Smith, F. E., Memorandum, p. 4Google Scholar in B.L.P. 30/2/15 Carson to Law, 20 Sept. 1913.
18 Steel–Maitland papers (S.M.P.) 153/6/47 M. Frewen to Steel–Maitland, 25 Sept. 1911.
19 E. Carson to Lady Londonderry, 16 Aug. 1912 in Hyde, H.Montgomery, Carson (London, 1953), p. 316Google Scholar.
20 Campbell, J., F. E. Smith: first earl of Birkmhead (London, 1983), p. 224Google Scholar.
21 Jalland, P, ‘U.K. devolution 1910: political panacea or tactical diversion?’, English Historical Review, XCIV (1979), 757–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 S.M.P. 153/6/47 M. Frewen to Steel–Maitland, 25 Sept. 1911.
23 B.L.P. 33/5/20 Law to Dicey, 26 Mar. 1913.
24 B.L.P. 29/2/45 Dicey to Law, 28 Mar. 1913.
25 B.L.P. 33/4/67 Law to Mackay-Wilson, 16 Nov. 1912.
26 B.L.P. 33/6/84 Law to J. P. Croal, 18 Oct. 1913.
27 B.L.P. 33.4.48 Law to duke of Sutherland, 2 Jul. 1912.
28 Buckland, P., Irish Unionism, II. Ulster Unionism and the origins of Northern Ireland (Dublin, 1973)Google Scholar; Stewart, A. T. Q., The Ulster crisis (London, 1967)Google Scholar.
29 B.L.P. 27/1/10 G. Ramsey to Law, 2 Aug. 1912.
30 Parliamentary Debates, 5th Series, vol. XLVI Bonar Law, 1 Jan. 1913, col. 467.
31 B.L.P. 31/1/14 H. Cecil to Law, 8 Dec. 1913.
32 Stewart, A. T. Q., The Ulster crisis (London, 1967), P. 54Google Scholar.
33 Bonar Law's speech at Blenheim 29 Jul. 1912 in The Times, 30 Jul. 1912.
34 B.L.P. 24/3/48J. Lonsdale to Law, 17 Nov. 1911.
35 S.M.P. 153/6/47 M. Frewen to Steel–Maitland, 25 Sept. 1911.
36 Churchill, W., speech at Dundee, 2 10 1913 in , Stewart, The Ulster crisis, p. 49Google Scholar.
37 B.L.P. 27/1/47 F. S. Oliver to Law, 20 Aug. 1912.
38 B.L.P. 33/5/20 Law to Dicey, 26 Mar. 1913.
39 Londonderry papers (L.P.) 1.1.86 Carson to Lady Londonderry, 27 Mar. 1912.
40 B.L.P. 33/4/65 Law to Stamfordham, 16 Nov. 1912.
41 Jackson, A., The Ulster Unionist party: Irish Unionists in the house of commons 1884–1913 (Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar, ch 7.
42 B.L.P. 30/2/27 Lansdowne to Law, 26 Sept. 1913.
43 B.L.P. 33.5.61 Law to Lansdowne, 27 Sept. 1913.
44 B.L.P. 30/2/27 Lansdowne to Law, 26 Sept. 1913.
46 B.L.P. 33/5/59 Law to Lansdowne, 24 Sept. 1912.
47 B.L.P. 30/3/23 Carson to Lansdowne, 9 Oct. 1913.
47 B.L.P. 33.6.98 Law to Balfour, 18 Nov. 1913.
48 B.L.P. 24/3/50 Strachey to Law, 17 Nov. 1911.
49 B.L.P. 33/5/59 Law to Lansdowne, 24 Sept. 1913.
50 B.L.P. 27/2/25 H. Cecil to Law, 30 Sept. 1912.
51 Arthur Balfour papers (A.B.P.) 49693 Law to Balfour, 6 May 1914 (165).
52 B.L.P. 27/1/13 M. Frewen to Lord Dunraven, 3 Aug. 1912.
53 Ramsden, , Age, p. 85Google Scholar.
54 Bentley, M., Politics without democracy 1815–1914: perception and preoccupation in British government (London, 1984), p. 14Google Scholar.
55 A.B.P. 49693 Law to Balfour, 30 Jan. 1914 (141–5).
56 Milner papers (M.P.) MS Dep 40 Milner to Glazebrook, 14 Jun. 1913 (7–8).
57 B.L.P. 30/3/23 Carson to Lansdowne, 9 Oct. 1913.
58 B.L.P. 33/6/84 Law to J. P. Croal, 18 Oct. 1913.
59 F. E. Smith, Memorandum, in B.L.P. 30/2/15 Carson to Law, 20 Sept. 1913.
60 A.B.P. 49693 Law to Balfour, 8 Oct. 1913 (65–70).
61 Beaverbrook papers (B.P.) BBK series C, Goulding to Aitken, 22 May 1914.
62 B.L.P. 30/2/26 Steel-Maitland to Law, 25 Sept. 1913.
63 Gollin, A., Balfour's burden: Arthur Balfour and imperial preference (London, 1965)Google Scholar; Sykes, A., Tariff reform in British politics 1903–1913 (Oxford, 1979)Google Scholar.
64 Redmond, J., speech in the house of commons, 1 Jan. 1914, in Hyde, Montgomery, Carson (London, 1953) p. 327Google Scholar.
65 A.B.P. 49693 Balfour to Law, 8 Nov. 1913 (111–24).
66 Parliamentary debates, 5th Series, vol. LIX Redmond 2 03. 1914, col. 929Google Scholar.
67 B.L.P. 33.5.57 Carson to Law, 18 Sept. 1913.
68 B.L.P. 30/3/28 Balfour to Law, 13 Oct. 1913.
69 Asquith papers (A.P.) MSS 36 Redmond to Asquith, 28 Apr. 1914 (47–49).
70 B.L.P. 33/6/84 Law to J. P. Croal, 18 Oct. 1913.
71 Ibid.
72 Bonar Law's speech at the Albert Hall, 26 Jan. 1912 in The Times, 27 Jan 1912.
73 B.L.P. 34/2/69 Law to H. Lygon, 5 May 1914.
74 W.L.P. 62404 Law to Long, 21 Nov. 1913 (38).
75 W.L.P. 62403 Long to Lansdowne, 29 May 1914 (176).
76 , Frewen to Law in Jalland, The Liberals and Ireland, p. 69Google Scholar.
77 B.L.P. 30/3/23 Lansdowne to Carson, 11 Oct. 1913.
78 , Murphy, ‘Faction’, History, LXXI (1986)Google Scholar; Buckland, P., ‘The Southern Irish Unionists’, Irisk Historical Studies (1966)Google Scholar.
79 Smith, F. E., Memorandum, in B.L.P. 30/2/15 Carson to Law, 20 Sept. 1913Google Scholar.
80 B.L.P. 33/6/80 ‘Notes on the conversation with the P.M.’ by Law, 15 Oct. 1913.
81 Stewart, The Ulster crisis;SirFergusson, J., The Curragh incident (London, 1963)Google Scholar.
82 B.L.P. 34/1/25 Law to Lansdowne, 30 Jan. 1914.
83 , Ramsden, Age, p. 86Google Scholar.
84 Ramsden, Age, ch 3, ‘Revival under Law’.
- 8
- Cited by