Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:16:50.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TOUR DIARIES AND ITINERANT GOVERNANCE IN THE EASTERN HIMALAYAS, 1909–1962*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2017

BÉRÉNICE GUYOT-RÉCHARD
BÉRÉNICE GUYOT-RÉCHARD*
Affiliation:
King's College London
*
History Department, King's College London, The Strand, London, wc2r 2ls[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between the early twentieth century and the 1960s, the Indian state began to incorporate the easternmost Himalayas. This article illuminates this state-making process by examining its material and communicative culture, embodied in tour diaries. These diaries were not private reflections written during one's spare time but the compulsory output of administrative tours. Often followed by more reflective notes, their perceived insights were used to determine local or general policy changes. Drawing on a literature that sees paperwork as constitutive of bureaucracy, this article argues that tour diaries exemplified and buttressed a certain form of frontier governance, marked by itinerancy and personalization well into independence. In their historical development, their language and materiality, their administrative usage, tour diaries embodied more than anything else the contingent, spatially uneven, and fractured nature of Indian state-making in the Himalayas, revealing the importance of process geographies anchored in paperwork circulation for its sustenance. Transmitted whole or extracted into policy files, diaries tied wandering officers together in a distinctive community of practice, policies, and ideas – preserving the fiction of the frontier state as a coherent whole in uncertain circumstances. As much as through maps, regulations, and routes, the frontier was made through writing.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 1023 - 1046
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I thank the two anonymous reviewers and Sujit Sivasundaram for their advice. My gratitude also goes to Manjeet Baruah and Lipokmar Dzuvichu – who sparked the idea for this article – and to Christoph Bergmann, Tim Chamberlain, Mark Condos, Derek Elliott, Lisa Elliott, Vincent Hiribarren, Aditya Kiran Kakati, Elisabeth Leake, and Emma Martin for their feedback and suggestions. Finally, I acknowledge the support of the Gates Cambridge Trust and Cambridge University (through Emmanuel College, the Cambridge Humanities Research Grant Scheme, the Frederick Williamson Memorial Fund, and the Smut Memorial Fund) in funding the research for this article.

References

1 The North-East Frontier Agency was created in 1954. NEFA is still the most well-known Indian term for the eastern Himalayas before the advent of Arunachal Pradesh.

2 Ludden, David, ‘The process of empire: frontiers and borderlands’, in Bayly, Chris and Bang, Peter Fibiger, eds., Tributary empires in global history (Delhi, 2011), pp. 132–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Kafka, Ben, ‘Paperwork: the state of the discipline’, Book History, 12 (2009), pp. 340–53, at p. 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Shneiderman, Sara, ‘Are the central Himalayas in Zomia? Some scholarly and political considerations across time and space’, Journal of Global History, 5 (2010), pp. 289–312, at p. 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Lefebvre, Henri, La production de l'espace (Paris, 1974)Google Scholar. On process geographies, see Appadurai, Arjun, ‘Grassroots globalization and the research imagination’, Public Culture, 12 (2000), pp. 1–10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also Patterson-Giersch, Christian, ‘Across Zomia with merchants, monks, and musk: process geographies, trade networks, and the Inner-East–Southeast Asian borderlands’, Journal of Global History, 5 (2010), pp. 215–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 See for instance van Schendel, Willem, ‘Geographies of knowing, geographies of ignorance: jumping scale in Southeast Asia’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20 (2002), pp. 647–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scott, James, The art of not being governed: an anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia (New Haven, CT, 2009)Google ScholarPubMed; Anand, Dibyesh, ‘China and India: postcolonial informal empires in the emerging global order’, Rethinking Marxism, 24 (2012), pp. 68–86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shneiderman, Sara, ‘Himalayan border citizens: sovereignty and mobility in the Nepal–Tibetan autonomous region of China border zone’, Political Geography, 35 (2013), pp. 25–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 See for instance the special issue on ‘Charting Himalayan histories’, in Himalaya, 35 (2015).

8 Guyot-Réchard, Bérénice, Shadow States: India, China and the Himalayas, 1910–1962 (Cambridge, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Weber, Max, Economy and society (Berkeley, CA, 1978), p. 225Google Scholar.

10 Cohn, Bernard, Colonialism and its forms of knowledge: the British in India (Princeton, NJ, 1996), p. 5Google Scholar.

11 Hull, Matthew, ‘Documents and bureaucracy’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 41 (2012), pp. 251–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kafka, ‘Paperwork’.

12 Hull, Matthew, Government of paper: the materiality of bureaucracy in urban Pakistan (Berkeley, CA, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Raman, Bhavani, ‘The duplicity of paper: counterfeit, discretion, and bureaucratic authority in early colonial Madras’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 54 (2012), pp. 229–50, at p. 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Ogborn, Miles, Indian ink: script and print in the making of the English East India Company (Chicago, IL, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Raman, Bhavani, Document Raj: writing and scribes in early colonial south India (Chicago, IL, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Appadurai, Arjun, The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective (Cambridge, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Hull, Government of paper.

18 E.g. Lea, Cyril, On trek in Kordofan: the diaries of a British district officer in the Sudan, 1931–1933, ed. Daly, M. W. (Oxford, 1994)Google Scholar; Freed, Libbie, ‘Networks of (colonial) power: roads in French Central Africa after World War I’, History and Technology, 26 (2010), pp. 203–23, at p. 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lefebvre, Camille, Frontières de sable, frontières de papier: histoire de territoires et de frontières, du jihad de Sokoto à la colonisation française du Niger, XIXe–XXe siècles (Paris, 2015)Google Scholar.

19 Hopkins, Ben, The making of modern Afghanistan (Basingstoke, 2008), pp. 56–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Edney, Matthew, Mapping an empire: the geographical construction of British India, 1765–1843 (Chicago, IL, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zou, David Vumlallian and Kumar, M. Satish, ‘Mapping a colonial borderland: objectifying the geo-body of India's Northeast’, Journal of Asian Studies, 70 (2011), pp. 141–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Bayly, Chris, Empire and information: intelligence gathering and social communication in India, 1780–1870 (Cambridge, 1996)Google Scholar; Misra, Sanghamitra, ‘The nature of colonial intervention in the Naga Hills, 1840–1880’, Economic and Political Weekly, 33 (1998), pp. 3273–9Google Scholar.

22 Pachuau, Joy and Van Schendel, Willem, The camera as witness: a social history of Mizoram, northeast India (Cambridge, 2015), pp. 154–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Another example are the semi-official trek journals written in the Gold Coast.

24 Candau, Francisco Cevallos, ed., Coded encounters: writing, gender, and ethnicity in colonial Latin America (Amherst, MA, 1994)Google Scholar, Introduction, p. 11. See also Harper, Marjory, ‘“Personal contact is worth a ton of text-books”: educational tours of the empire, 1926–1939’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 32 (2004), pp. 48–76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Guwahati, Department of Historical and Antiquarian Studies, Capt. Francis Jenkins – journals of a tour in Upper Assam, 1838, vol. 18, no. 112.

26 Pachuau, Joy, Being Mizo: identity and belonging in Northeast India (Oxford, 2014), pp. 93–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Misra, ‘The nature of colonial intervention’.

28 van Schendel, Willem, ‘The dangers of belonging: tribes, indigenous peoples and homelands in South Asia’, in Rycroft, Daniel and Dasgupta, Sangeeta, eds., The politics of belonging in India: becoming Adivasi (London, 2011), pp. 19–43 Google Scholar.

29 E.g. Chatterjee, Indrani, ‘Adivasis, tribes and other neologisms for erasing precolonial pasts: an example from Northeast India’, IESHR, 53 (2016), pp. 9–40 Google Scholar; Kar, Boddhisattva, ‘Nomadic capital and speculative tribes: a culture of contracts in the Northeastern Frontier of British India’, IESHR, 53 (2016), pp. 41–67 Google Scholar.

30 Reid, Robert, History of the frontier areas bordering on Assam, 1883–1941 (Delhi, 1983), p. 215Google Scholar.

31 See bundle no. 1 (1909–38) in the ‘Tour diaries’ section of the Arunachal Pradesh State Archives (APSA).

32 Guwahati, APSA (1912), report on the Miri country and the operations of the Miri Mission.

33 London, British Library (BL), IOR (1920–6), future control of North-East Frontier IOR/L/PS/12/3113 (Botham, 20 Dec. 1923).

34 Dunbar, George, Frontiers (Delhi, 1984 (c. 1932)), pp. 144–70Google Scholar.

35 Galbraith, John S., ‘The “turbulent frontier” as a factor in British expansion’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 2 (1960), pp. 150–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1943), Towang, 48/43-AD; New Delhi, National Archives of India (NAI), External Affairs Proceedings (1943), measures taken to stabilize the MacMahon Line, 63/X/43.

37 BL (1943–7), miscellaneous papers relating to the North-East Frontier of India, MSS Eur D1191.

38 London, School of Oriental and African Studies, Fürer-Haimendorf papers (1945), diary of Fürer-Haimendorf's first tour to the Apa Tani Valley, 1944–5, PP MS 19, box 3.

39 BL, MSS Eur D1191, tour diary of B. H. Routledge, PO Sadiya Dec. 1945 – Dec. 1946.

40 NAI, External Affairs Proceedings, 63/X/43 (PO Sikkim to foreign secretary, ‘Vindication of the McMahon Line in the Towang area’).

41 BL, MSS Eur D1191, ‘Blueprint for Sadiya: a post-war reconstruction plan for Sadiya Frontier Tract’ (1945), fo. 2.

42 Ludden, ‘The process of empire’.

43 Kafka, ‘Paperwork’, p. 342. Kafka takes this expression from Gardey, Delphine, Ecrire, calculer, classer: comment une révolution de papier a transformé les sociétés contemporaines, 1800–1940 (Paris, 2008)Google Scholar.

44 Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1951), rescue of marooned personnel at Nizamghat; Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1956), distribution of photographs to the divisions, R-123/56; Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1954), purchase of tools and implements for excavation work in NEFA R/71/1954; Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1962), demarcation of divisional boundaries P-42/62; Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1955), opening of post offices during 2nd Plan, P8/55.

45 A sixth division, Tuensang, was part of NEFA until 1957, when it merged with Assam's Naga Hills District prior to the formation of Nagaland.

46 NAI, External Affairs Proceedings, 63/X/43 (PO Sikkim to foreign secretary, 16 June 1943).

47 Guyot-Réchard, Shadow states, chs. 3–4.

48 Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1954), detailed information regarding foot journeys during tours, P/83/54.

49 Hull, Matthew, ‘The file: agency, authority, and autography in an Islamabad bureaucracy’, Language & Communication, 23 (2003), pp. 287–314, at p. 292CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 E.g. New Delhi, NAI, External Affairs Proceedings (1947), meeting in Dec. 1945 – Jan. 1946 between APO Lohit and Rima Dzongpon, 61-NEF/47.

51 E.g. Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1951), tour diary of PO Tirap, P-59/51.

52 Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1950), tour diary of PO Se-La, GA-11/50 (extract from tour diary and marginal note by Jairamdas Daulatram), fo. 21.

53 Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1953), food relief for the Community Project area, CP-30/53 (extract from tour diary of T. Haralu), fos. 1–2.

54 New Delhi, Nehru Memorial Museum and Library (NMML), Elwin papers (1963), regulation and control of shops and encouraging the sale of local craft goods in them, 1955–63, S.No.116 (note, 14 Dec. 1955), fos. 24–5.

55 APSA, 48/43-AD.

56 For instance, APSA, GA/11/50.

57 Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1943), tour diaries of the PO Tirap, EX/225/43.

58 Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1952), tour diary of Tibetan Assistant Tawang, P-184/52.

59 Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1952), tour diary of PO Sela, P-29/52 (governor's order). See Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1951), tour diary of T. Haralu, P-150/51 for a diary deemed ‘good & useful’.

60 New Delhi, NMML, Elwin papers (n.d.), the policy of the Govt of India for the administration of NEFA, S.No.166, pp. 1–2.

61 NMML, Elwin papers, S.No.166, pp. 52–5.

62 APSA, P-150/51.

63 Rama, Angel, The lettered city (Durham, NC, 1996)Google Scholar.

64 On documents and the generation of sociality, see Hull, ‘Documents and bureaucracy’, pp. 259–60.

65 Delhi, NMML, Elwin papers (1959), correspondence with K. L. Mehta, S.No.7 (Elwin to Mehta, 28 Feb. and 4 July 1958).

66 New Delhi, NAI, External Affairs Proceedings (1961), problems arising from the location of the army in the interior, 12(2)-NEFA/61 (note, 20 May 1961).

67 E.g. Adeboye, Olufunke, ‘Reading the diary of Akinpelu Obisesan in colonial Africa’, African Studies Review, 51 (2008), pp. 75–97 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Ferrell, Robert, ed., Inside the Nixon administration: the secret diary of Arthur Burns, 1969–1974 (Lawrence, KS, 2010)Google Scholar.

69 On the importance of syntax, grammar, and lexicon, see Hull, ‘The file’, pp. 302–7.

70 For a taste of tour diaries’ variety, see Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1954), tour diary of APO II Pasighat; APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1956), tour diary of L. K. Mahapatra, Research Associate Kameng; Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1954), tour diary of R. N. Haldipur, P58/54.

71 Weber, Economy and society, p. 975.

72 Hull, Government of paper.

73 APSA 1954, tour diary of Haldipur for May–June 1954, fo. 2. Musings notwithstanding, the diaries of R. N. Haldipur, APO in Tuensang at the start of the Naga conflict, are noticeable for the length of their entries, which move from an assessment of the Naga National Council's activities and popularity to descriptions of Naga clans, from explanations of Naga theology to thick descriptions of local architecture, from popular complaints to reflections on the good and bad aspects of state expansion. Some of Haldipur's diaries were considered important enough to be copied in full to the External Affairs Ministry.

74 Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1946), tour diaries of P. L. S. James, Aug. 1945 – Dec. 1946.

75 APSA, GA/11/50.

76 New Delhi, NAI, External Affairs Proceedings (1945), tour notes and fortnightly reports on Assam tribal areas for 1945, 6/6-P/45 (Mainprice note, 13 July).

77 APSA, GA/11/50.

78 Delhi, NMML, Elwin papers (1954–7), report by Elwin on tour in the Wancho sub-division of Tirap, S.No.138, p. 67.

79 NMML, Elwin papers, S.No.166, p. 54.

80 Itanagar, APSA, NEFA Secretariat (1955), enumeration of population in NEFA areas, R/13/55.

81 NMML, Elwin papers, S.No.166, p. 53.

82 Hull, ‘The file’, pp. 295–6.

83 Meghalaya Administrative Training Institute, ‘Chapter XXI – tours of officers’, Compendium of circulars by personnel and AR, www.mati.gov.in/compendium.html (accessed 23 Mar. 2016).