Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:33:18.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ROBERT MALTHUS, ROUSSEAUIST

Part of: Malthusian Moments Special Issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2019

CHRISTOPHER BROOKE Open the ORCID record for CHRISTOPHER BROOKE [Opens in a new window]
CHRISTOPHER BROOKE*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
*
Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, cb3 9dt[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the argument of the Essay on population originated in a family disagreement between Malthus and his father Daniel, who idolized Rousseau, and the Essay itself attacks Condorcet and Godwin, both of whom drew on Rousseau's ideas about human perfectibility, Malthus's project can plausibly be seen as an extension of the social theory set out above all in Rousseau's Discourse on the origin of inequality. Malthus was animated by some of Rousseau's characteristic concerns, and he deployed recognizable versions of some of Rousseau's distinctive arguments, in particular relating to the natural sociability and natural condition of humankind, conjectural history, and political economy, especially with respect to the question of balanced growth. His arguments about ‘decent pride’, furthermore, that were emphasized in later editions of the Essay map neatly onto what has been called ‘uninflamed amour-propre’ in the Rousseau literature. When we treat the social question as a nineteenth-century question, or when we locate its origins in the post-Revolutionary political controversies of the 1790s, we risk losing sight of the way in which what was being discussed were variations on mid-eighteenth-century themes.

Type
Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 63 , Special Issue 1: Malthusian Moments , February 2020 , pp. 15 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Karl Marx, Preface to A contribution to the critique of political economy (1859), in Marx Engels collected works (50 vols., London, 1975–2004), xxix, pp. 261ff.

2 Jones, Gareth Stedman, An end to poverty? A historical debate (London, 2004)Google Scholar, ch. 1, Conclusion.

3 See iv.6 and iv.9 of, for example,Malthus, T. R., An essay on the principle of population (6th edn, London, 1826)Google Scholar, ii, pp. 318–27, 357–60.

4 Larry Frohman, review of Stedman Jones, An end to poverty?, H-German, H-Net Reviews (June 2008), www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=14641 (accessed 31 Aug. 2017).

5 But on this label, cf. Levy, David M., How the dismal science got its name (Ann Arbor, MI, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 On which, see Butterfield, Herbert, The Whig interpretation of history (London, 1931)Google Scholar, or, more entertainingly, Sellar, W. C. and Yeatman, R. J., 1066 and all that (London, 1930)Google Scholar.

7 [Malthus, T. R.], An essay on the principle of population (1st edn, London, 1798)Google Scholar, p. i; Malthus, , Principles of political economy (2nd edn, London, 1836)Google Scholar, pp. xxxviii–xxxix.

8 Allan Ramsay, Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1766), oil on canvas, NG 820, Scottish National Portrait Gallery, Edinburgh.

9 See Trousson, Raymond and Eigeldinger, Frédéric S., eds., Jean-Jacques Rousseau au jour le jour (Paris, 1998), pp. 299–300Google Scholar.

10 Keynes, J. M., Essays in biography (new edn, London, 1951)Google Scholar, p. 84.

11 Leigh, R. A., ed., Correspondance complète de Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Geneva, 1965–98)Google Scholar, #6013 (6 Aug. 1767), #6156 (14 Dec. 1767), #6184 (Jan. 1768), and #6218 (24 Jan. 1768).

12 Bashford, Alison and Chaplin, Joyce E., The new worlds of Thomas Robert Malthus: rereading the principle of population (Princeton, NJ, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, p. 56; James, Patricia, Population Malthus: his life and times (London, 1979)Google Scholar, p. 78.

13 Donald Winch, Carlyle Lecture #5, ‘Malthus, Godwin, and Condorcet: inequality and post-economic society’ (7 Nov. 1995), p. 10. Available through the St Andrews Institute of Intellectual History Donald Winch Archive: http://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/intellectualhistory/islandora/object/intellectual-history%3A36 (accessed 31 Aug. 2017).

14 Peacock, Thomas Love, Melincourt (3 vols., London, 1817)Google Scholar, on which, see Mayhew, Robert J., Malthus: the life and legacies of an untimely prophet (Cambridge, MA, 2014), pp. 97–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 It is also, bracketing Godwin, who is a theorist of a post-economic condition, a debate among Smithians, but this theme is better treated in the literature, so I focus here on Rousseau.

16 [Malthus], Essay on population (1798), p. 14.

17 For extensive description of eighteenth-century French views on population, see Spengler, Joseph J., French predecessors of Malthus: a study in eighteenth-century wage and population theory (Durham, NC, 1942)Google Scholar.

18 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, ‘The social contract’, iii.9, in The social contract and other later political writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor (Cambridge, 1997)Google Scholar, p. 105.

19 Godwin, William, An enquiry concerning political justice (2 vols., London, 1793)Google Scholar, i, pp. 146–9, 159–61, ii, pp. 436–8, 503–7. See also i, p. 360, where Godwin calls Rousseau ‘the most benevolent of all these philosophers’.

20 His copy of Emile, for example, is now in the library of Jesus College, Cambridge. See http://collan-newton.lib.cam.ac.uk/vwebv/holdingsInfo?bibId=740439 (accessed 31 Aug. 2017).

21 See, for example, Dart, Gregory, Rousseau, Robespierre and English romanticism (Cambridge, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Charles Dickens, ‘The noble savage’, Household Words (11 June 1853), pp. 337–9, discussed in Levy, How the dismal science got its name, pp. 168–9.

23 Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Brooke, Christopher (London, 2017)Google Scholar, ch. 13, pp. 100–5.

24 Diderot, Denis, ‘Hobbisme’, article for the Encyclopédie, viii (Paris, 1765)Google Scholar, trans. in Diderot, , Political writings, ed. Mason, John Hope and Wokler, Robert (Cambridge, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, p. 27.

25 Bashford and Chaplin, New worlds, p. 128.

26 Hobbes, Leviathan, p. 102.

27 Rousseau, The social contract, i.4, p. 46.

28 Rousseau, ‘The state of war’, in ibid., p. 166.

29 Hobbes, Leviathan, p. 103.

30 Rousseau, Discourse on the origin and foundations of inequality among men, in The discourses and other early political writings, ed. Gourevitch, p. 127. See also Tuck, Richard, ‘Rousseau and Hobbes: the Hobbesianism of Rousseau’, in Rosenblatt, Helena and Schweigert, Paul, eds., Thinking with Rousseau: from Machiavelli to Schmitt (Cambridge, 2017), pp. 29–36Google Scholar.

31 For the ‘jurisconsults’, see Rousseau, ‘The state of war’, p. 162.

32 [Malthus], Essay on population (1798), pp. 176–7.

33 ‘The heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's: but the earth hath he given to the children of men.’

34 For example, Paine, Thomas, Agrarian justice (Paris, 1797)Google Scholar, p. 29.

35 [Malthus], Essay on population (1798), p. 177.

36 See, for example, Neuhouser, Frederick, Rousseau's theodicy of self-love: evil, rationality, and the drive for recognition (Oxford, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Waterman, A. M. C., Revolution, economics and religion: Christian political economy, 1798–1833 (Cambridge, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 [Malthus], Essay on population (1798), p. 357; Rousseau, Discourse on inequality, pp. 142–3.

38 [Malthus], Essay on population (1798), p. 364; Rousseau, Discourse on inequality, p. 162.

39 For Rousseau's admiration for Fénelon, see Saint-Pierre, Bernadin de, La vie et les ouvrages de Jean-Jacques Rousseau, ed. Souriau, Maurice (Paris, 1907)Google Scholar, p. 108. Malthus is known to have acquired a number of Fénelon's books in the 1790s: see Waterman, Revolution, economics and religion, p. 26.

40 Fénelon, François de, Telemachus, ed. Riley, Patrick (Cambridge, 1994), pp. 109–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rousseau, Discourse on inequality, p. 167.

41 [Malthus], Essay on population (1798), pp. 181–2. Cf. Fénelon, Telemachus, esp. pp. 165–8. The great discontinuity concerns marriage, which is an integral part of Fénelon's utopia, but not – in a concession to Godwin – of Malthus's.

42 [Malthus], Essay on population (1798), p. 190.

43 Waterman, Revolution, economics and religion, for example pp. 63–4.

44 The exposition of Rousseau that follows is indebted to the work of the late István Hont, shaped in general by the argument of his 2009 Carlyle Lectures, posthumously published as Sonenscher, Michael and Kapossy, Béla, eds., Politics in commercial society: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith (Cambridge, MA, 2015)Google Scholar, and in particular by a 2011 paper, ‘Luxury and the route to revolution in Rousseau's Second discourse’. That paper remains unpublished, but Hont can be viewed presenting its argument in March 2012 in Lausanne at www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOniStEYo2c (accessed 31 Aug. 2017).

45 For a view of Montesquieu along these lines, see, especially, Sonenscher, Michael, Before the deluge: public debt, inequality, and the intellectual origins of the French Revolution (Princeton, NJ, 2007)Google Scholar, ch. 2.

46 Rousseau, Discourse on inequality, p. 202.

47 Ibid., pp. 184–5.

48 These are Spengler's words in French predecessors of Malthus, p. 67, describing Herbert, C.-J., Essai sur la police générale des grains, sur leurs prix & sur les effets de l'agriculture (Berlin, 1755)Google Scholar, for example pp. 1–2, 310, 359–61.

49 See, in particular, Semmel, Bernard, ‘Malthus: “Physiocracy” and the commercial system’, Economic History Review, new series, 17 (1965), pp. 522–35Google Scholar.

50 See Hollander, Samuel, The economics of Thomas Robert Malthus (Toronto, ON, 1997), pp. 403–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Stedman Jones, An end to poverty?, p. 70.

52 [Malthus], Essay on population (1798), pp. 303–4.

53 Ibid., p. 307.

54 Ibid., p. 309.

55 Ibid., pp. 309–10.

56 Ibid., pp. 149–50; see Winch, Carlyle Lecture #5, pp. 18–19.

57 Rousseau, Discourse on inequality, p. 132.

58 Malthus, , An essay on the principle of population (2nd edn, London, 1803)Google Scholar, p. 11.

59 Malthus refused to countenance the use of contraceptive technologies, on which see Levy, David M., ‘Malthusianism or Christianity: the invisibility of successful radicalism’, Historical Reflections / Réflexions Historiques, 25 (1999), pp. 61–93Google Scholar. Those who came after Malthus – such as Francis Place or John Stuart Mill – who endorsed artificial methods of birth control are usually labelled ‘neo-Malthusians’. (Condorcet had earlier hinted somewhat obliquely that artificial contraception would turn out to be the answer to the population question.) Jeremy Bentham's response to reading Malthus was to recommend a lot more homosexual sex, so that individuals could enjoy the pleasures of sex (utility) without risking overpopulation (disutility), though he did not publish this opinion during his lifetime. (‘Vice, then, is the thing to be encouraged: Moral Restraint the thing to be discouraged.’) See Bentham, , Of sexual irregularities, and other writings on sexual morality, ed. Schofield, Philip, Pease-Watkin, Catherine, and Quinn, Michael (Oxford, 2014), pp. 79–83Google Scholar.

60 Rousseau, The social contract, p. 41.

61 On which see Winch, Carlyle Lecture #5, p. 11.

62 [Malthus], Essay on population (1798), p. 10.

63 Malthus, Essay on population (1803), p. 546.

64 Ibid., p. 557.

65 Malthus, , An essay on the principle of population (3rd edn, London, 1806)Google Scholar, ii, p. 423.

66 O'Flaherty, Niall, ‘Malthus and the “end of poverty”’, in Mayhew, Robert J., ed., New perspectives on Malthus (Cambridge, 2016)Google Scholar, p. 87.

67 Ibid., pp. 90–1.

68 Smith, Adam, An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, ed. Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S. (Oxford, 1975)Google Scholar, V.ii.k, ii, p. 870.

69 Burke, Edmund, A letter from Mr Burke to a member of the National Assembly (2nd edn, London, 1791), pp. 40–1Google Scholar.

70 Malthus, Principles of political economy, pp. 375–6.

71 Ibid., pp. 376–7.

72 Ibid., p. 377.

73 Ibid.

74 Ibid., p. 378.

75 Ibid., pp. 381–2.

76 Foucault, Michel, ‘Nietzsche, genealogy, history’, in Foucault, Language, counter-memory, practice: selected essays and interviews, ed. Bouchard, D. F. (Ithaca, NY, 1977)Google Scholar, p. 139.

77 See, for example, Skinner, Quentin, ‘The limits of historical explanations’, Philosophy, 41 (1966), pp. 199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Skinner, Quentin, ‘Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas’, History and Theory, 8 (1969), pp. 3–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 Stephen Burt, ‘All possible humanities dissertations considered as single tweets’, The New Yorker, 10 June 2015, www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/all-possible-humanities-dissertations-considered-as-single-tweets (accessed 31 Aug. 2017).

79 Keith Tribe, The economy of the word (Oxford, 2015), pp. 42–3.

80 See, for example, John Stuart Mill, ‘On the definition of political economy; and on the method of investigation proper to it’ (1836), which appears in his Essays on some unsettled questions of political economy (1844), reprinted in Mill, , Essays on economics and society, ed. Robson, J. M., i (Toronto, ON, 1967)Google Scholar, p. 321. Those documents that arise out of Malthus's teaching – for example the so-called Inverarity MSS held at Cambridge (Marshall c. 35) or even the Principles of political economy – also support an ‘eighteenth-century’ interpretation.

81 Ricardo, David, ‘Notes on Malthus's Principles of political economy’, in Sraffa, Piero, ed., The works and correspondence of David Ricardo, ii (Cambridge, 1951)Google Scholar, p. 387.