Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:29:52.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Economy and the Response to Socialism in Britain, 1870–1914

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

John W. Mason
John W. Mason
Affiliation:
Bournville College of Further Education, Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Political economy suffered a sharp decline in prestige and influence in Britain after 1870. The methods, doctrines and policies of the classical school were called into question by a younger generation of economists, eager to respond positively to the sudden appearance of the ‘ social problem’ in politics. The most dramatic break with the old school took place in the sphere of policy, where the link between laissez-faire and political economy was severed. Economists such as Jevons, Cairnes, Sidgwick, Toynbee and Marshall led the assault on the orthodox school.1 Unfortunately, the very success of their attack has conditioned historians to assume that they spoke for all their generation. Such was not the case. Below the level of the leading academic economists and liberal social reformers a strong current of opinion ran in the opposite direction; it feared the growth of socialism and looked to a re-juvenated ‘science’ of political economy as the only counterpoise to it.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 1980 , pp. 565 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Bastable, C. F., ‘A comparison between the position of economics in 1860 and 1894’ (1894)Google Scholar, repr. in Smyth, R. L. (ed.), Essays in economic method (London, 1962), 126–43Google Scholar; Coats, A. W., ‘The historicist reaction in English political economy, 1870–90’, Economica, xxi (1954), 143–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hutchison, T.W., A review of conomic doctrines, 1870–1929 (Oxford, 1953)Google Scholar and ‘Economists and economic policy in Britain after 1870’, History of Political Economy, 1 (1969), 231–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Jevons, W. S., The theory of political economy (London, 1871), p. 111.Google Scholar

3 See Webb, B., My apprenticeship (Penguin edn, London, 1971), pp. 191–6Google Scholar; Clarke, P., Liberals and social democrats (Cambridge, 1978), ch. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Webb, S., Socialism in England (London, 1890), pp. 12, 85.Google Scholar

5 Cunningham, W., ‘The progress of socialism in England’, Contemporary Review, xxxiv (1839), 252.Google Scholar

6 Webb, My apprenticeship, pp. 217–24.

7 Dicey, E., ‘The plea of a malcontent Liberal’, Fortnightly Review, xxxiv (1885), 467Google Scholar. See also Wemyss, Lord, Socialism at St tephens, 1869–1885 (London, 1885).Google Scholar

8 Perkin, H.,‘Individualism versus collectivism in nineteenth century Britain: a false antithesis’, Journal of British Studies (Fall, 1977), 105–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 H. S. Foxwell, introduction to Menger, A., The right to the whole produce ojlabour (London, 1889), p. vi.Google Scholar

10 Tullberg, R., ‘Marshall's tendency towards socialism’, History of Political Economy, vii (1975) 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 See Sidgwick, H., ‘The economic lessons of socialism’, Economic Journal, v (1895), 336–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Mill, J. S., ‘Chapters on socialism’, Fortnightly Review, xxxi (1879), 220 ff.Google Scholar

13 Ibid. pp. 513–30.

14 Toynbee, A., Lectures on the industrial revolution (London, 1884), p. 25.Google Scholar

15 Marshall, A., ‘The social possibilities of economic chivalry’ (1907), in Pigou, A. G., ed., Memorials of Alfred Marshall (London, 1925), pp. 323–46.Google Scholar

16 Jevons, W. S., The state in relation to labour (London, 1882), p. 17.Google Scholar

17 Sidgwick, H., The principles of political economy (London, 1887), pp. 518–44.Google Scholar

18 Goschen, J. G., ‘Ethics and economics’, (1893) repr. in Essays and addresses on economic questions (London, 1905), pp. 333–5.Google Scholar

19 Ibid. p. 341.

20 Nicholson, J. S., ‘A plea for orthodox political economy’, National Review, vi (1885), 553–63Google Scholar; ‘Political economy and journalism’, Eonomic Journal, iv (1894), 394–405Google Scholar; ‘Use and abuse of authority in economies’, Economic Journal, xiii (1903), 554–66.Google Scholar

21 Nicholson, J. S., Historical progress and ideal socialism (London, 1894).Google Scholar

22 .See Soldon, N., ‘Laissez-Faire as dogma: the Liberty and Property Defence League, 1882–1914’, in Brown, K. D., ed., Essays in anti-Labour history (London, 1974)Google Scholar; Bristow, E., ‘The Liberty and Property Defence League and individualism’, Historical Journal, xviii, 4 (1975), 761–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 Bramwell, Lord, Laissez faire (London, 1884).Google Scholar

24 Bramwell, Lord, ‘Presidential address to section F of the British Association in 1888’, Report (London, 1889), p. 749.Google Scholar

25 Ibid. p. 749.

21 On the P.R.A. see Bristow, ‘The Liberty and Property Defence League’, pp. 772–4.

27 No biography exists of Levy. For a portrait by a socialist see Bax, E. B., Reminiscences and reflections of a mid and late Victorian (London, 1918), pp. 229–30.Google Scholar

28 Levy, J. H., The outcome of individualism (London, 3rd edn, 1894), p. 6.Google Scholar

29 Levy, J. H., ‘Distribution asabranch of economies’, in Short studies in economic subjects (London, 1903). P. 6.Google Scholar

30 Levy, The outcome of individualism, p. 38.

31 Herbert, A., ‘The true line of deliverance’, in Mackay, T., ed., A pleafor liberty (London, 1891), p. 294.Google Scholar

32 Ibid. p. 318.

33 See Cannan, E., ‘The Malthusian anti-socialist argument’, Economic Review, 11 (1892), 71–87.Google Scholar

34 Pembroke, Lord, ‘An address to the Liberty and Property Defence League’, National Review, v (1885), 794–5.Google Scholar

35 Loch, C. S., A great ideal andits champion (London, 1923)Google Scholar; Mowat, C. L., The Charity Organisation Society (London, 1961).Google Scholar

36 Sec my article, ‘Thomas Mackay: the anti-socialist philosophy of the Charity Organisation Society’, in Brown, Essays in anti-Labour history, pp. 290–310.Google Scholar

37 Young, R. M., ‘Malthus and the idea of evolution’, Past and Present, XLIII (1969), 109–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38 For an account of the use of social Darwinian arguments to defend imperialism, see Semmel, B., Imperialism and social reform (London, 1960), chs. 1, 2.Google Scholar

39 See Peel, J. D. Y., Herbert Spencer: the evolution of a sociologist (London, 1971).Google Scholar

40 See Herbert, A., The right and wrong of compulsion by the state (London, 1896)Google Scholar; Donisthorpe, W., Individualism, a system of politics (London, 1889).Google Scholar

41 Cairnes, J. E., ‘Political economy and laissez-faire’ in Essays in political economy (London, 1873), pp. 232–64Google Scholar; Jevons, W. S., The theory of political economy.Google Scholar

42 See Leslie, T. E. C., Essays in moral and political philosophy (London, 1879).Google Scholar

43 Dictionary of national biography, xii (London, 1909), 872–3.Google Scholar

44 Dictionary of national biography, second supplement, xii (London, 1912), 540–1.Google Scholar

46 MacLeod, H. D., The principles of economical philosophy (London, 2nd edn, 1872), ivGoogle Scholar; the best summary of MacLeod's views is to be found in his article, ‘The science of onomics and its relation to free exchange and socialism’ in ackay, A policy of free exchange (London, 1894), pp. 1–46.Google Scholar

46 Mallet, L., ‘The law of value and the theory of the unearned income’, in Mallet, B., ed., Free exchange (London, 1891), p. 39.Google Scholar

47 Ibid. p. 40.

48 Ibid. p. 233.

49 See Bastiat, F., Harmonies of political economy (London, 1860).Google Scholar

50 Mallet, ‘The law of value’, p. 331.

51 MacLeod, H. D., ‘What is political economy?’, Contemporary Review, xxv (1875), 871–93.Google Scholar

52 Cairnes, J. E., ‘Bastiat’, Essays in Political Economy, p. 320.Google Scholar

53 For St Loe Strachey see his autobiography, The adventure of living (London, 1922).Google Scholar

54 Mackay wrote the following articles for the Quarterly Review: ‘The abuse of statistics’, Oct. 1894; ‘The methods of the new trade unionism’, Jan. 1895; ‘Old age pensions’, July 1895; ‘Democratic finance’, July 1896; ‘Trade unions in practice and theory’, April 1898; ‘Wages and savings of working men’, April 1899; ‘The revolt against orthodox economies’, Oct. 1901.

55 Mackay, T., ‘The revolt against orthodox economies’, Quarterly Review, no. 387 (1901), 353.Google Scholar

56 Mackay, T., ‘The interest of the working class in free exchange’, in his A policy of free exchange, p. 246Google Scholar; see also his article, ‘Peoples banks’, National Review, XXII (1893), 636–47.Google Scholar

57 See Fawcett, H., Manual political economy (London, 1863)Google Scholar; Cairnes, J. E., Some leading principles of political economy (London, 1874), ch. 5Google Scholar; Jevons, W. S., Methods of social reform (London, 1883), pp. 122–55.Google Scholar

58 ‘Editorial - a progmmme’, Economic Review, 1 (1891), 1–3Google Scholar; Mackay, T., ‘The joining of issues’, Economic Review, 1 (1891), 194–202.Google Scholar

59 See my article, ‘The duke of Argyll and the land question in late nineteenth century Britain’, Victorian Studies (Winter, 1978), pp. 149–70.Google Scholar

60 Duke of Argyll, , The reign of law (London, 1867), ch. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

61 Duke of Argyll, , The unseen foundations of society (London, 1893), p. xiv.Google Scholar

62 Ibid. p. 73.

63 Ibid. p. 75.

64 Ibid. p. 78.

65 For the twentieth-century discovery of the importance of the entrepreneur see Schumpeter, J., ‘The creative response in economic history’, Journal of Economic History, VII (1947), 149–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Evans, G. H., ‘The entrepreneur and economic theory: a historical and analytical approach’, American Economic Review, xxxix (1949), 336–48Google Scholar. See also the journal, Explorations in Entrepreneurial History.

66 Argyll, ‘The unseen foundations’, p. 96.

67 Ibid. pp. 387–94.

68 Ibid. p. 104.

69 Ibid. pp. 395 ff.

70 Ibid. p. 291.

71 Marshall, A., ‘On rent’, Economic Journal, 111 (1893), 86.Google Scholar

72 Argyll, , The unseen foundations, 441 ff.Google Scholar

73 See in particular the reviews of Sidney Ball in the Economic Review, 111 (1893), 270–8Google Scholar; Price, L. L. in the Economic Journal, 111 (1893), 264–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ross, E. A. in the Political Science Quarterly, viii (1893), 722–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

74 No biography exists of Mallock, but see his Memoirs of life and literature (London, 1920)Google Scholar. For secondary accounts see Tucker, A. V., ‘W. H. Mallock and late Victorian conservatism’, University of Toronto Quarterly, xxxi (1962), and D. J. Ford, ‘W. H. Mallock and socialism in England, 1880–1918’ in Brown, Essays in anti-Labour history.Google Scholar

75 For a recent glowing tribute to the New Republic see Ayer's, A. J. article in the Times Literary Supplement, 8 March 1974, p. 736.Google Scholar

76 Raymond Williams had called Mallock, ‘perhaps the most able conservative thinker of the last eighty years’. See Culture and society (London, 1961), pp. 166–9.Google Scholar

77 Mallock, W. H., ‘Conservatism and socialism’, Motional Review, 11 (1884), 702.Google Scholar

78 Mallock wrote four articles on Hyndman: ‘Wealth and the working classes’, Fortnightly Review, XLII (March, May, August, October 1887)Google Scholar; two articles on Shaw: ‘Fabian economies’, Fortnightly Review, LV (February, March 1894)Google Scholar; one article on Wells: ‘The new socialism’, Quarterly Review, P- 199 (Jan- 1904)Google Scholar; one article on MacDonald: ‘The intellectual bankruptcy of socialism’, National Review, LIX (Aug. 1912).Google Scholar

79 This basic idea was stated in Mallock's first book, Social equality: a short study in a missing science (London, 1882).Google Scholar

80 Ibid. pp. 221–9.

81 Mallock, W. H., Aristocracy and evolution (London, 1898), pp. 51 ff.Google Scholar

82 Mallock, W. H., The critical examination of socialism (London, 1908), p. 31.Google Scholar

83 Quoted in Hobson, J. A., ‘Mr Mallock as political economist), Contemporary Review, LXXIII (1898), 531.Google Scholar

84 Mallock, Social equality, p. 159.

85 Shaw, G. B., ‘On Mr Mallock's proposed trumpet performance’, Fortnightly Review, LV (1894), 470–93.Google Scholar

86 Ibid. p. 480.

87 Ibid. p. 477.

88 Mallock, W. H., ‘Wealth and the working classes’, Fortnightly Review, XLII (1887), 521.Google Scholar

89 Ibid. pp. 521–2.

90 Ibid. p. 523.

91 Hobson, ‘Mr Mallock as political economist’, p. 537.

92 Ibid. p. 523.

93 Strangely Thorstein Veblen was the only major critic to approve of Mallock's basic arguments; see his review of Aristocracy and evolution in the Journal of Political Economy, vi (1898), 430–5.Google Scholar

94 Keynes, J. M., The end of laissez faire (London, 1926), p. 30.Google Scholar

95 Mill, ‘Chapters on socialism, p. 515.

96 See Gordon, H. S., ‘The London economist and the high tide of laissez faire’, Journal of Political Economy, LXIII (1955), 461–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

97 Gordon, H. S., ‘The ideology of laissez faire’ in Coats, A. W., ed., The classical economists and economic policy (London, 1971), pp. 180–205.Google Scholar

98 See Hofstadter, R., Social Darwinism in American thought (Boston, 1944).Google Scholar

99 An estimate of the extent to which anti-socialist and anti-radical views in general pervaded the higher journalism can be found in my article ‘Monthly and quarterly reviews, 1865–1914’, in Boyce, G., Curran, J., and Wingate, P. (eds.), Newspaper history (London, 1978), pp. 281–93.Google Scholar