Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:05:40.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PARALLELS AND CONTRASTS IN GENDERED HISTORIES OF INDUSTRIAL LABOUR IN BURSA AND BOMBAY 1850–1910*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2016

HATICE YILDIZ
HATICE YILDIZ*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
*
Queens’ College, Silver St, Cambridge cb3 9et[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Textile manufacturing in India and the Ottoman Empire transformed fundamentally in the nineteenth century, when mass-produced goods imported from Europe permeated local markets. Faced with increasing competition from abroad, local producers changed their techniques, materials, designs, and target customers. At the same time, processing industries emerged in places with intense mercantile activity, introducing new meanings, relations, and patterns of work. This article investigates the role played by gender in the shaping of labour markets and class politics in two export-oriented industries that developed simultaneously: the silk-reeling industry in Bursa and the cotton-spinning industry in Bombay. It shows that the secondary economic value attributed to women's work, combined with rural connections of workers, brought down wages and subsidized capitalist profits in both sectors. Within the emerging industrial workforce, ideas about appropriate roles for women and men provided the vocabulary and constituted boundaries of class politics. Bringing gender into the debate of industrial development and class, the article reveals parallels and contrasts in two non-European settings that are rarely compared in the existing historiographies.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 443 - 470
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Dr Sujit Sivasundaram, Dr Andrew Arsan, Dr Natalia Mora Sitja, and the members of the world history reading group for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

1 Bayly, C. A., ‘Distorted development: the Ottoman Empire and British India, circa 1780–1916’, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 27 (2007), pp. 332–44Google Scholar.

2 Ibid., p. 335.

3 For a survey of new histories of labour in India, Ottoman Empire, and Brazil, see Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi, ed., Towards a new history of work (Delhi, 2014)Google Scholar.

4 Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan, ‘Questions of class: the general strikes in Bombay, 1928–1929’, Contributions to Indian Sociology, 33 (1999), pp. 205–36Google Scholar.

5 Sen, Samita, ‘Gender and class: women in Indian industry, 1890–1990’, Modern Asian Studies, 42 (2008), p. 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 According to Donald Quataert, one of the key aspects of the reorganization of the Ottoman manufacturing sector in the nineteenth century was the growing dependence on flexible and cheap female labour. Quataert, Donald, ‘Ottoman women, households and textile manufacturing, 1800–1914’, in Quataert, Donald, ed., Workers, peasants and economic change in the Ottoman Empire, 1730–1914 (Istanbul, 1993)Google Scholar.

7 For instance, Köksal, Duygu and Falierou, Anastasia, eds., A social history of late Ottoman women (Boston, MA, 2013), pp. 31–65 Google Scholar; Hadar, Gila, ‘Jewish tobacco workers in Salonika: gender and family in the context of social and ethnic strife’, in Schick, Irvin C. and Buturovic, Amila, eds., Women in the Ottoman Balkans: gender, culture and history (New York, NY, 2007)Google Scholar; Maskiell, Michelle, ‘Gender, kinship and rural work in colonial Punjab’, Journal of Women's History, 2 (1990), pp. 35–72 Google Scholar; Sen, Samita, Women and labour in late colonial India: the Bengal jute industry (Cambridge, 1999)Google Scholar.

8 Sen, ‘Gender and class’, p. 76.

9 See Forbes, Geraldine, Women in colonial India: essays on politics, medicine and historiography (New Delhi, 2005)Google Scholar; Zilfi, Madeline, ed., Women in the Ottoman Empire: Middle Eastern women in the early modern era (Leiden, 1997)Google Scholar.

10 Sen, ‘Gender and class’, p. 76.

11 Ibid.

12 A good example from the Ottoman Empire is fez production in late nineteenth-century Istanbul, where women knitted fezzes at home and delivered them to the factory for further processing. See M. Erdem Kabadayı, ‘Working from home: division of labour among female workers of Feshane in late nineteenth-century Istanbul’, in Köksal and Falierou, eds., A social history, p. 65.

13 Edwardes, S. M. and Campbell, James M., The gazetteer of Bombay city and island, i (Bombay, 1909), p. 205Google Scholar; Karpat, Kemal H., Ottoman population, 1830 –1914: demographic and social characteristics (Madison, WI, 1985), p. 163Google Scholar.

14 Edwardes and Campbell, The gazetteer, p. 488.

15 Donald Quataert, ‘The silk industry of Bursa’, in Quataert, ed., Workers, peasants and economic change, p. 108.

16 Report and proceedings of the commission appointed to consider the working of factories in the Bombay Presidency (Bombay, 1885)Google Scholar, British Library: IOR/V/26/670/86, p. 5.

17 For a discussion of the overlaps between the nineteenth-century reform measures and the issue of women's work in India, see Sen, ‘Gender and class’.

18 For a comprehensive examination of the dynamics of rural migration in Bombay, see: Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan, The origins of industrial capitalism in India: business strategies and the working classes in Bombay, 1900–1940 (Cambridge, 1994), p. 148Google Scholar. For an examination of famine refugees in Bombay, see Masselos, Jim, ‘Migration and urban identity: Bombay's famine refugees in the nineteenth century’, in Patel, Sujata and Thorner, Alice, eds., Bombay: mosaic of modern culture (Bombay, 1995), p. 25Google Scholar.

19 A. M. T. Jackson, chief inspector of factories to the collector of land revenue, customs and opium, 21 June 1893, London, British Library, Provincial report on the working of the Indian Factories Act in the Bombay Presidency for the year 1892, IOR/V/24/1627:1 –892–1910, p. 13.

20 The first Factory Commission Report of 1875 includes comments from managers, intermediaries, engineers, and mill owners that the mills had an ample supply of ‘ordinary’ or ‘unskilled’ labour. See Report of the commissioners appointed by the governor of Bombay in council to inquire into: the condition of the operatives in the Bombay factories, and the necessity or otherwise for the passing of a factory act (Bombay, 1875), London, British Library: IOR/V/26/670/85. For a detailed discussion of labour supply in Bombay's mills in the late nineteenth century, see Morris, Morris David, The emergence of an industrial labour force in India (Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, 1965)Google Scholar.

21 J. M. Campbell, collector of land revenue, customs and opium to the chief secretary to government, Provincial report, p. 5.

22 For a critique of this approach, see Sen, Women and labour, p. 2.

23 Report and proceedings, p. 5.

24 Rose, Sonya O., Limited livelihoods: gender and class in nineteenth-century England (London, 1992), p. 23Google Scholar.

25 For example, women and girls accounted for two-thirds of the workforce of the Cibali tobacco factory. See Nacar, Can, ‘The Regié monpoloy and tobacco workers in late Ottoman Istanbul’, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 34 (2014), p. 208Google Scholar.

26 Chandavarkar, Origins, p. 97.

27 Jackson, Provincial report, p. 14.

28 Haynes, Douglas E., Small town capitalism in Western India: artisans, merchants and the making of informal economy (Cambridge, 2012), p. 45Google Scholar.

29 Roy, Tirthankar, Traditional industry in the economy of colonial India (Cambridge, 1999), p. 207Google Scholar.

30 Forbes, Women in colonial India, p. 42.

31 See Billington, Mary Frances, Woman in India (London, 1895), p. 167Google Scholar.

32 Walsh, Judith E., Domesticity in colonial India: what women learned when men gave them advice (Oxford, 2004)Google Scholar.

33 Kumar, Radha, ‘Family and factory: women in the Bombay cotton textile industry, 1919–1939’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 20 (1983), p. 88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Chandavarkar, Origins, p. 100.

35 Ibid., p. 94.

36 Census of the Bombay Presidency, 1872, Part ii (Bombay, 1875), p. 171, as cited in Chandavarkar, Origins, p. 95.

37 Chandavarkar, Origins, p. 99.

38 Sen, Women and labour, p. 2.

39 Ibid., p. 17.

40 Masselos, ‘Migration and urban identity’.

41 Chandavarkar, Origins, p. 197.

42 Provincial report, p. 4.

43 Scott, Joan W., ‘Women in “the making of the English working class”’, in Gender and the politics of history (New York, NY, 1999), pp. 68–93 Google Scholar.

44 Rao, Nikhil, House, but no garden: apartment living in Bombay's suburbs, 1898–1964 (London, 2007)Google Scholar.

45 See Banerjee, Nirmala, ed., Indian women in a changing industrial scenario (New Delhi, 1991)Google Scholar.

46 Roy, Tirthankar, Rethinking economic change in India (London, 2005)Google Scholar.

47 Sen, ‘Gender and class’, p. 87.

48 Morris, Emergence, pp. 68–9. This inverse relationship between female employment and male wages has been widely documented elsewhere. See Goldin, Claudia and Sokoloff, Kenneth, ‘Women, children, and industrialization in the early republic: evidence from the manufacturing censuses’, Journal of Economic History, 42 (1982), pp. 741–74Google Scholar.

49 Report and proceedings, p. 11.

50 Sen, Women and labour, p. 7.

51 Perrot, Georges, Souvenirs d'un voyage en Asie Mineure (Paris, 1864)Google Scholar.

52 Quataert, ‘Ottoman women’, p. 82.

53 Idem, Ottoman manufacturing in the age of the industrial revolution (Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar; and Owen, Roger, The Middle East in the world economy, 1800–1914 (London, 1993)Google Scholar.

54 The Ministry of Finances to the governor of Hüdavendigar, 11 Nov. 1848 (13 Zilkade 1264), Istanbul, Ottoman Archives of the Prime Minister's Office (BOA), C ML, 215/8889.

55 Vice-Consul Maling, 5 Oct. 1872, London, The National Archives, ‘Report on factories and factory labour in the district of Brussa’, FO 83/415.

56 MacFarlane, Charles, Turkey and its destiny: the result of journeys made in 1847 and 1848 to examine into the state of that country, i (London, 1850), p. 145Google Scholar.

57 Delbeuf, Regis, 1906, as cited in Kaplanoğlu, Raif, Meşrutiyetten cumhuriyet'e Bursa (Istanbul, 2006), p. 56Google Scholar.

58 Vilayet-i Hüdavendigar to Istanbul, 13 Mar. 1865 (1 Mart 1281), Istanbul, BOA, MVL, 18/701.

59 Andon Pekmezoğlu to Vilayet-i Hüdavendigar, 7 Feb. 1854 (9 Cemaziyelevvel 1270), Istanbul, BOA, MKT.DV… 5/136.

60 Quataert, ‘Ottoman women’, p. 85.

61 Idem, ‘The silk industry’, p. 83.

62 Kaygalak, Sevilay, ‘Kır, kent ve kapitalizme geçiş: Bursa örneği’, Praksis, 17 (2007), pp. 15–30 Google Scholar.

63 For an examination of the formation of labour force in Mount Lebanon's silk industry, see Khater, Akram Fouad, ‘“House” to “goddess of the house”: gender, class, and silk in nineteenth-century Mount Lebanon’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 28 (1996), pp. 325–48Google Scholar.

64 Petition, 3 Sept. 1909 (17 Saban 1327), Istanbul, BOA, BEO, 272209/3630.

65 Quataert, ‘Ottoman women’, p. 85.

66 Şerafeddin Mağmumi, 1909: Bir Osmanlı doktorunun anıları: yüzyıl önce Anadolu ve Suriye, trans. Kayra, Cahit (Istanbul, 2008), p. 46Google Scholar. The health inspection had been called for controlling the spread of cholera in Western Anatolia.

67 Ibid.

68 Erder, Leila, ‘Factory districts in Bursa during the 1860's’, METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 1 (1975), pp. 85–99 Google Scholar.

69 Vilayet-i Hüdavendigar to the Ministry of Commerce, 25 Sept. 1853 (21 Zilhicce 1269), Istanbul, BOA, I MVL 00314, 013186.

70 Vice-Consul Maling, 5 Oct. 1872, London, The National Archives, ‘Report on factories and factory labour in the district of Brussa’, FO 83/415, p. 7.

71 Perrot, Souvenirs d'un voyage, p. 79.

72 Ibid.

73 Chandavarkar, Origins, p. 95, and Masselos, ‘Migration and urban identity’. David Hall-Matthews provides a detailed examination of famines and coping mechanisms of the peasantry in Bombay's Ahmednagar District. See Hall-Matthews, David, Peasants, famine and the state in colonial Western India (New York, NY, 2005)Google Scholar.

74 Edwardes, Stephen M., The rise of Bombay: a retrospect (Bombay, 1902), p. 304Google Scholar.

75 Ibid., p. 325.

76 Chandavarkar, Origins.

77 Report and proceedings, p. 5.

78 Jackson, Provincial report, pp. 12–14.

79 Chandavarkar, Origins, pp. 95–6.

80 Jackson, Provincial report, pp. 12–14.

81 Sakoo, female overseer of the reeling department in Colaba Mill, Report and proceedings, p. 142.

82 Akoo, female reeler in the Colaba Mill, Report and proceedings, p. 144.

83 Sakoo, Report and proceedings, p. 142.

84 H. W. J. Bagnell to secretary to government, 8 Aug. 1889, Bombay, Maharasthra State Archives, General Department 1890, vol. 43–4, 477, parts 1–2.

85 Ibid.

86 Ibid.

87 Rose, Limited livelihoods, p. 143.

88 John Hammet, engineer and manager of the New Great Eastern Mill, Report and proceedings, p. 65.

89 Sakoo, Report and proceedings, p. 142.

90 Petition, Dec. 1891, New Delhi, National Archives, Home Department judicial proceedings, 348 to 352, pp. 5–6.

91 N. N. Wadia, manager of the Maneckji Petit Mill, Report and proceedings, p. 76.

92 Sen, ‘Gender and class’, p. 81.

93 Kydd, J. C., A history of factory legislation in India (Calcutta, 1920), p. 68Google Scholar.

94 For instance, see Petition, 24 Oct. 1889, New Delhi, National Archives, Home Department judicial records year 1890, no. 43.

95 Aditya Sarkar, ‘Regulated labour, unruly workers: the making of industrial relations in late nineteenth-century Bombay’ (D.Phil. thesis, London, 2009), p. 256.

96 Sen, ‘Gender and class’, p. 84.

97 Petition, Dec. 1891, New Delhi, National Archives, Home Department judicial proceedings, 348 to 352, pp. 5–6.

98 Ibid.

99 Chandavarkar, ‘Questions of class’, p. 208.

100 Fernandes, Leela, Producing workers: the politics of gender, class and culture in the Calcutta jute mills (Philadelphia, PA, 1997)Google Scholar.

101 Perrot, Souvenirs d'un voyage, p. 80.

102 Ibid.

103 Delbeuf, Regis, Une excursion á Brousse et à Nicée (Constantinople, 1906)Google Scholar, as cited in Kaplanoğlu, Meşrutiyetten cumhuriyet'e, p. 56.

104 Vice-Consul Maling, ‘Report on factories and factory labour in the district of Brussa’.

105 MacFarlane, Turkey and its destiny, p. 145.

106 Perrot, Souvenirs d'un voyage, p. 76.

107 Mehmet Ziya, 1910: Bursa'dan Konya'ya seyahat, as cited in Kaplanoğlu, Meşrutiyetten cumhuriyet'e, p. 97.

108 de Rochebrune, A., 1913: Dilber Kethy'nin Bursa ve İstanbul hatıratı, trans. Sadık, Mahmut, ed. Yurdakul, İlhami (Istanbul, 2007), p. 100Google Scholar.

109 Quataert, ed., Workers, peasants and economic change, p. 111, and Erder, Leila, ‘Bursa ipek sanayiinde teknolojik gelişmeler, 1835–1865’, in Keyder, Nur, ed., Türkiye iktisat tarihi üzerine araştırmalar (Ankara, 1978), p. 116Google Scholar.

110 Vice-Consul Maling, ‘Report on factories and factory labour in the district of Brussa’.

111 Petition, 3 Sept. 1909 (17 Saban 1327), Istanbul, BOA, BEO, 272209/3630.

112 Hadar, ‘Jewish tobacco workers’.

113 Quataert, Ottoman manufacturing, p. 132.

114 Ibid., p. 125.

115 Ibid., p. 130.

116 The minutes of the general assembly of the Hüdavendigar Province, 1906–7, Bursa, Raif Kaplanoğlu Personal Collection.

117 Petition, 3 Sept. 1909 (17 Saban 1327), Istanbul, BOA, BEO, 272209/3630.

118 Ibid.

119 ‘Hayat ve hakikat’, İştirak, 2 Apr. 1909 (20 Mart 1325), pp. 23–6.

120 ‘Strike of mill women’, Times of India, 18 Jan. 1890, p. 5.

121 Appendix to the telegram, 18 Aug. 1910 (5 Agustos 1326), Istanbul, BOA, DH ID, 107/17, 6662–498.

122 ‘Bursa'da tatil-i eşgal’, Sabah, 20 Aug. 1910 (13 Şaban 1328), p. 3.

123 Van Os, ‘Bursa'da kadın işçilerin 1910 grevi’, Toplumsal Tarih, 7 (1997), pp. 7–10 Google Scholar.

124 Guha, Ranajit, ‘The prose of counter insurgency’, in Guha, Ranajit and Spivak, Gayatri C., eds., Selected subaltern studies (New York, NY, 1988), pp. 45–84 Google Scholar.

125 Recent studies show that female workers were usually excluded from the decision-making organs of the Ottoman labour unions, although they participated in union-led protests. See Hadar, ‘Jewish tobacco workers’.

126 Petition, 3 Sept. 1909 (17 Saban 1327), Istanbul, BOA, BEO, 272209/3630.

127 ‘Fabrika amelelerinin grevi: nihayet dediğimiz oldu’, Ertuğrul, 19 Aug. 1910 (6 Ağustos 1326), p. 1.

128 Van Os, ‘Bursa'da kadın işçilerin’, pp. 7–10.

129 Parthasarathi, Prasannan, ‘Comparison in global history’, in Berg, Maxine., ed., Writing the history of the global (Oxford, 2013), p. 73Google Scholar.

130 Ibid., p. 76.

131 Mohanty, Chandra T., ‘Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses’, Feminist Review, 30 (1988), pp. 61–88 Google Scholar.

132 See Scott, Joan W., ‘The problem of invisibility’, in Kleinberg, S. Jay, ed., Retrieving women's history: changing perceptions of the role of women in politics and society (New York, NY, 1998), pp. 5–29 Google Scholar; Cova, Anne, ‘The promises of comparative women's history’, in Cova, Anne, ed., Comparative women's history: new approaches (Columbia University Press, 2006), pp. 1–39 Google Scholar.