Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:42:34.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Messiah and the bourgeoisie: Venizelos and politics in Greece, 1909–1912*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

Mark Mazower
Mark Mazower
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mercurial rise of Venizelos, the most prominent Greek statesman of this century, has been a hotly debated issue of modern Greek history. The tendency until recently has been to explain his success in terms of social changes, and to see the rise of the Liberal party as the triumph of modernizing bourgeois forces in early twentieth-century Greece. This article, however, compares Venizelos both with the generation of politicians which preceded him, and with his leading contemporary, Gounaris. It argues that Venizelos's enormous popularity hinged upon his response to the nationalist, quasi-messianicfervour which gripped Greece after its humiliating defeat by Turkey in 1897. Parliamentary government came to be seen as passive and elitist, political parties as causes of national decline. Using his rhetorical skills and the press, Venizelos presented himself as the agent of national regeneration. His attitude towards class politics, and to the very idea of political parties, was complex and ambivalent. Hence, his rise should be interpreted, not in terms of a simple Marxist or whiggish schema, as the product of Greece's bourgeois revolution, but as the expression of a new more confident nationalism, which reinforced the personality-centred quality of Greek politics.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 885 - 904
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Stefanou, S. (ed.), Eieflheriou Vemzelou politikai ypotkikm (Athens, 1965)Google Scholar, introduction.

2 Our knowledge of Venizelos has profited enormously from the remarkable expansion of historical research in Greece over the last decade. Essential recent studies are: Veremis, T. and Dimitrakopoulos, O. (ed.), Meletimata gyro ape ton Vtnizelo kai tin epochi tou (Athens, 1984)Google Scholar; Mavrogordatos, G. and Chadziiosif, C. (cds.), Venizelismos kai astikos eksynchronismos (Irakleion, 1988)Google Scholar; Veremis, T. and Goulimis, G. (cds.), Eletherrios Voniztlos: komonia, oikonomia, politiki stin epochi tou (Athens, 1989)Google Scholar; ELIA, Symposio yia ton Eleftherio Venizelo: praktika (Athens, 1988)Google Scholar.

3 Karanikola, G. D., Nothes tkloges stin Ellada (Athens, 1973), pp. 432–3Google Scholar.

4 The best study of the elections of 1910-12 is to be found in I. Nikolakopoulos and N. Oikonomou, ‘To eklogiko vaptisma tou venizelismou. Ekloges 1910-1912’, in ELIA, Symposio, PP. 45–73Google Scholar.

5 There is no adequate biography of Alastos, Venizelos. D., Venizelos (London, 1942)Google Scholar is the best overall account. Venizelos's diplomacy is examined in a detailed work by Petsalis-Diomidis, N., Greece at the Paris Peace Conference (1919) (Thessaloniki, 1978)Google Scholar; the contentious issue of Greece's entry into the war is brilliantly covered by Leon, G., Greece and Ou peat powers, 1914-1917 (Thessaloniki, 1974)Google Scholar. A more personal source is Delta, P., O Eleftherios Venizelos (Athens, 1978)Google Scholar. Indispensable, though to be used with care, are the collections of speeches and writings collected and edited by Venizelos's former private secretary, S. Stefanou.

6 Papacosma, V., The military in Greek politics: the 1909 coup d'etat (Kent State U.P., 1977)Google Scholar; Koryzis, C., I politiki zoi eis tin Ellada, 1821–1910 (Athens, 1974), p. 216Google Scholar; Veremis, T., ‘The officer corps in Greece, 1912–1936‘, Byzantine and Modem Greek Studies, II (1976), 113–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar, gives valuable insights into the changing sociology and mentality of the military.

7 Ventiris, G., I Ellada ton 1910–1920 (2 vols., Athens, 1931), I, 18–29Google Scholar; Tsoukalas, K., Exartisi kai anaparagogi: o koitunukos robs ton ekpaideotikon michanismon stin Ellada (1830-1922) (Athens, 1977)Google Scholar; Dertilis, G., Koinonikos metaschimatismos kai stratiotiki epemvasi, 1880-1909 (Athens, 1977)Google Scholar; Skliros, G., Ta synchrona provlimata tou ellinismou (Alexandria, 1919) pp. 118–20Google Scholar; Svoronos, N., ‘The main problems of the period 1940-1950 in modern Greek history’ in latrides, J. (ed.), Greece in the 1940s: a notion in crisis (Hanover, N.H. and London, 1981)Google Scholar; Kordatos, G., Eisagogi eis tin istorian tis ellimikis kefalaiokratias (Athens, 1979 edn)Google Scholar; see also, Koryzis, C., I politiki zoi eis tin Ellada 1811-1910 (Athens, 1974), pp. 170–2Google Scholar; Frangoudaki, A., ‘Apo ton 190 ston 200 aiona: to ethniko zitima, i monarchia kai i dynami ton ideon’, Ta istorika, 1, 2 (12 1984), 396–404Google Scholar.

9 Mavrogordatos, G., Stillborn republic: social coalitions and party strategus in Greece: 1933-1936 (Berkeley, 1983), pp. 121–7Google Scholar; cf. Diamantopoulos, T., O Venizelismos (Athens, 1985), pp. 78–86Google Scholar. The concept of a ‘state bourgeoisie’ is analysed in an important work by Mouzclis, N., Politics in the semi-periphery: early parliamentarism and latt industrialisation in the Balkans and Latin America (London, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Cited in Koryzis, , I politiki zoi as tin Ellada, 1821-1910, p. 21Google Scholar.

10 The indigenous vocabulary of social stratification is explored in Salamone, S. D., In the shadow of the holy mountain (New York, 1987)Google Scholar; Aschenbrenner, S., Life in a changing Greek village (Dubuque, Iowa, 1986)Google Scholar; Sanders, I. T., Rainbow in the rock: the people of rural Greece (Cambridge, Mass., 1962), PP. 275–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Hirschon, R, Heirs to the Greek catastrophe (Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar is a rare treatment by a social anthropologist of an urban community in Greece; see also Mouzelis, N. ‘The relevance of the concept of class to the history of modern Greek society’ in Dimcn, M. and Friedl, E. (eds.), Regional variation in modern Greece and Cyprus: toward a perspective on the ethnography of Greece (New York, 1976), pp. 395–410Google Scholar, and ibid. pp. 444-65. On religion and the general intellectual climate at the end of the nineteenth century, see the study by Vitti, M., I ideologiki leitourgia tis ellinikis ithografias (Athens, 1974)Google Scholar. Local studies of the development of socialism point to a striking symbiosis of Orthodox imagery and anti-capitalist rhetoric, which remains largely uncharted at a national level. See, for example, Koliou, N., Oi rizes ton ergatikou kinimatos kai 0 ‘Ergatis’ ton Volou (Athens, 1988), pp. 29–31Google Scholar.

11 Leontidou, L., Poleis tis Siofns (Athens, 1989), pp. 63, 73–4Google Scholar; Liakos, A., ‘Problems on [sic] the formation of the Greek working class’, Eludes Balkaniques, II (1988), 43–54Google Scholar; Starr, J., ‘The Socialist Federation of Salonika’, Jewish Social Studies, VII (1945), 323–35Google Scholar; cf. the acerbic judgement on union organization in Greece in A. Benaroya, I proti stadiodromia lou ellmikou proletariatou (reprinted Athens, 1975), p. 111; Koryzis, , Politiki zoi, p. 178Google Scholar; Moskof, K., Eisagogika stin istorîa ton kitamatos tis ergatikis taxis (Thessaloniki, 1979), pp. 176, 196–7Google Scholar.

12 Agriantoni, C., I aparchts tis ellinikis ekuiomichaniseos (Athens, 1986)Google Scholar; Papayiannaki, L., Oi ellinikoi siderodromoi (Athens, 1982)Google Scholar; Kostis, K. and Tsokopoulos, V., Oi trapezes stin Ellada: 1898-1928 (Athens, 1988)Google Scholar; Pizanias, P., Oikonomiki istoria tis ellinikis stafidas: 1851-1912 (Athens, 1988)Google Scholar are the most useful examples from the recent flowering of economic history in Greece to shed light on the poor performance of the economy at the turn of the century; Leontidou, L., Poleis tis Siopis (Athens, 1989)Google Scholar is an excellent study which, however, raises many of the analytical problems noted above, esp. pp. 50-65. On the stagnant 1900s in Athens itself, see Loukakis, P., ‘Athina 1830-1940: Istorikes faseis paviosis tou ypersynkentrotismou tis’ in Neoelliniki poli: othomamikes klironomies kai elliniko kratos, 2 vols. (Athens, 1984), 1, 85–96Google Scholar.

13 The debate is set out by Doyle, William in The origins of the French revolution (Oxford, 1988), pp. 7–41Google Scholar. An old Marxist critique is provided by Soboul, A., Understanding the French revolution (London, 1988)Google Scholar; a new one by Palmer, Bryan in Descent into discourse: the relation ef language and the writing of social history (Philadelphia, 1990), pp. 87–106Google Scholar. Despite their strictures, I have found Hunt's, LynnPolitics, culture and class in the French revolution (London, 1986)Google Scholar thought-provoking.

14 Andreopouloe, G. J., ‘Liberalism and the formation of the nation-state’, Journal of Modern Grttk Studies, VII, 2 (10 1989), 193–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 See Childen, T., ‘The social language of politics in Germany’, American Historical Review (06, 1990), esp. pp. 347-58Google Scholar; Mavrogordatos, , Stillborn republic, pp. 2-5, 55–9Google Scholar; Weber, M., Economy and society, 2 vols. (Berkeley, Calif., 1978), 1, 241–71Google Scholar; Bendix, R., ‘Reflections on charismatic leadership’ in Bendix, (ed.), State and society: a reader in comparative political sociology (Boston, 1968), pp. 616–29Google Scholar.

16 Tuckerman, C., The Grtiks of today (New York, 1878), p. 120Google Scholar; for a recent appraisal of the ‘Great Idea’ in terms of domestic political strategy, see Kitromilides, P., ‘Imagined communities and the origins of the national question in the Balkans’, European History Quarterly, XIX, 2 (1989), 23–67Google Scholar.

17 Aspreas, G., Politiki istoria tis neoteras Ellados, 1821-1865, II: 1865-1900 (Athens, 1923), 272–87Google Scholar; Rallis, G., Gtorgios Theotokis: 0 politikos tou nutrou (Athens, n.d.), pp. 194–203Google Scholar; Koliopoulos, J., Brigands with a cause (Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar.

18 Aspreas, , Politiki istoria, II, 266–92Google Scholar.

19 On Deliyiannis, see Miller, W., Greek life in town and country (London, 1905), pp. 27–8, 42-4Google Scholar; Moskof, , Eisagogika stin istoria tou kimmatos tis ergatikis taxis, pp. 235–7Google Scholar; on the impact of the Macedonian struggle on politics in Athens, J. Koliopoulos, Brigands with a cause: brigandage and irredenhsm in modern Greece, 1821-1912 (Oxford, 1987), pp. 215–39Google Scholar.

20 Delveroudi, E.-A., ‘I kalliergeia tou patriotikou aisthimatos sti theatriki paragogi ton archon tou aoou aiona’ in Mavrogordatos, G. and Chadziiosif, Ch. (eds.), Venizelisnos kai astikos eksynchronismos (Irakleion, 1988), pp. 287–315Google Scholar; also useful is Vitti, M., Jideologiki leitourgia tis ellinikis ithografias (Athens, 1974)Google Scholar.

21 Aspreas, G., Politiki istoria tu neottras Ellados, III (Athens, n.d.), 14Google Scholar.

22 Rallis, , Theotokis, p. 266Google Scholar.

23 Schorske, C., ‘Politics in a new key: an Austrian trio’ in Fin-de-siéde Vimma: polities and culture (Cambridge, 1981), pp. 116–80Google Scholar.

24 Chronopoulos, D., Dimitrios Gounaris (Athens, n.d.), p. 18Google Scholar.

25 On the debate over ‘parties of ideas’ in Greece, see Mavrogordatos, , Stillborn republic, pp. 64–7Google Scholar.

26 Chronopoulos, , Gounaris, p. 32Google Scholar.

27 It is now accepted that Venizelos too, unlike many of his followers, was generally in favour of constitutional monarchy – a position very close to Gounaris's; cf. Papacosma, V., ‘The Republicanism of Elcftherios Venizelos: ideology or tactics?’, Byzantine and Modern Gretk Studies, VII (1981), 168–202Google Scholar. The parliamentary representation of Venizelist and anti-Venizelist camps is examined in Diamantopoulos, T., O Ventzelismes, 1 (Athens, 1985), 78–86Google Scholar, who argues that both camps saw a substantial turnover of personnel. Gounaris attracted more members of the old ‘leading families’; however, by 1915 he too was leading a basically new cohort of deputies rather than the remnants of the pre-1909 ancien régime.

28 Chronopoulos, , Gounaris, p. 113Google Scholar.

29 Chronopoulos, , Gounaris, pp. 68–9Google Scholar.

30 Chronopoulos, , Gounaris, p. 32Google Scholar; for a vivid description of the everyday cult of ‘great men’, see Palamas's account of his childhood exposure to a ‘Roman salad’ of contemporary ‘gods’, ‘Bismarck’ (1916), in Palamas, K., Apanta, IV (Athens, n.d.), 538–40Google Scholar.

31 Cited in Maraslis, A. A., Istoria tis Patras (Patras, 1983), pp. 286–8Google Scholar.

32 An important source, which is more wide-ranging than its tide suggests, on the subject of German cultural and intellectual influences in Greek life is Veloudis, G., Germanogracia: deutsche Einfliésse anf die neugriechische Lieratur (1730-1944), 2 vols. (Amsterdam, 1983)Google Scholar; on the dissemination of Darwinism, see ibid. 1, 260-1; the earliest article on Nietzsche in Greek appeared in 1895, ibid. 1, 262-5, 335; on Palamas, see Palamas, K., The twelve lays ofthe gypsy (translated and introduced by Thomson, G.) (London, 1969), pp. 10–11Google Scholar; Chormouzios, A., O Palamas kai i epochi ton, 1 (Athens, 1944), 21Google Scholar.

33 Stefanou, S. (ed.), Ta keimna tou EiefiJuriou Vtnizelou, I: 1909-1914 (Athens, 1981), 417Google Scholar.

34 Asprcas, , Politiki istoria, III, 100Google Scholar; Papacosma, , Military in Gtttk politics, pp. 42, 203Google Scholar.

35 Papacosma, , Military in Greek politics, pp. 77–83Google Scholar.

36 Karanikola, , Nollus ekloges, p. 424Google Scholar; Stefanou, S. (ed.) Ta ktimena tou Eleftheriou Venizdou, 1 (Athens, 1981), 229Google Scholar; Koliopoulos, , Brigands with a cause, pp. 293–326Google Scholar.

37 Koryzis, , Politiki zoi, p. 217Google Scholar.

38 Karanikola, , Nolhts ekloges, p. 422Google Scholar; Koryzis, , Politiki zoi, p. 217Google Scholar.

39 Ventiris, , Ellas ton 1910-1920, 1, 36Google Scholar; Nikolakopoulos, I. and Oikonomou, N., ‘To ekiogiko vaptisma tou Venizelismou, 1910-1912’ in ELIA, Symposis yia ton Eleftherio Venizelo praktika (Athens, 1988), pp. 45–73Google Scholar.

40 Ventiris, , Ellas tou 1910-1910, 1, 51Google Scholar; cf. Box, P. H., Three master-builders and another (London, 1925), p. 7Google Scholar; Miller, , Greek life, p. 31Google Scholar; on Papanastosiou, see Kyrtsis, A.-A. ‘O A. Papanastasiou kai oi theories koinonikis metarrythmisis ton archon tou aoou aiona’, Ta istorika, XX (12 1988), 339–52Google Scholar; Psalidopoulos, M., ‘O Alexandras Papanastasiou os oikonomologos’ in Mavrogordatos, G. and Chadziiosif, C. (eds.), Vetdzelismos kai astikos eksytukromsmos (Iraklcion, 1988), pp. 329–44Google Scholar.

41 Koryzis, , Politiki zoi, p. 212Google Scholar.

41 The classic statement is Campbell, J. K., Honour, family and patronage: a study of institutions and moral taints in a Greek mountain community (Oxford, 1964), pp. 263–321Google Scholar; also Bourdieu, P., ‘The sentiment of honour in Kabyle society’ in Peristiany, J. G. (ed.), Honour and shamt: the values of Mediterantm society (London, 1965), pp. 191–242Google Scholar; Blok, A., ‘Rams and billy-goats: a key to the Mediterranean code of honor’, Man, XVI (1981), 427–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Herzfeld, M., Anthropology through the looking-glass (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 11–12Google Scholar.

43 Box, , Three master-builders, p. 195Google Scholar; Stefanou, S. (ed.), Ta keimena tou Elefiheriou Venizelou, 1: 1909-1914 (Athens, 1981), 142–8Google Scholar; on Theotokis's terminology cf. ibid. p. 417.

44 Papandreou, G., Politika keimena (Athens, n.d.), p. 44Google Scholar; for Venizelos on the importance of optimism, cf. the comments collected in Stefanou, S. (ed.), Eleftherion Venicelou politikai ypothikai (Athens, 1965), pp. 16–19Google Scholar; the nationalists' stress on optimism pre-dated the humiliation of 1897, cf. Vitti, M., I ideologiki leitourgia Us ellinikis ithografias (Athens, 1974), pp. 54, 83Google Scholar.

44 Stcfanou, (ed.), Ta keimtna, 1, 156Google Scholar.

44 Stefanou, (ed.), Ta ktimena, 1, 361–2Google Scholar; Ventiris, , Ellas torn 1910-1920, 1, 49Google Scholar.

47 Miller, , Greek life, pp. 112–24Google Scholar; Martin cited in Tsoukalas, K., Koinoniki anaptyxi kai kratos (Athens, 1981), p. 146Google Scholar.

48 Nikolakopoulos, and Oikonomou, , ‘Eklogiko vaptisma’, pp. 67–6Google Scholar. For the debate over the relationship between urbanization and the rise of nationalism see Deutsch, K., Nationalism andsocial communication: an inquiry into thefoundations of nationality (Cambridge, Mass., 1953)Google Scholar; cf. Gellner, E., Notions and nationalism (Oxford, 1983)Google Scholar; Hobsbawm, E. J., Nations and nationalism since 1780: programme, myth, reality (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 80–131Google Scholar.

49 Stefanou, (ed.), Ta ktimena, 1, 157-8, 226–30Google Scholar.

50 Stefanou, (ed.), Politikai ypotkikai, pp. 161–71Google Scholar; Peitharchia, 29 Dec. 1929, 23 Feb. 1930.

51 Ventiris, , Ellas tou 1910-1920, I, 75Google Scholar; Peitharchia, 12 Jan. 1930; C. Chadziiosif, ‘I Venizelogenis antipolitcfsi sto Vcnizclo kai i politiki anasyntaxi sto mesopolcnto’, in Mavrogordatos, and Chadziiosif, (eds.), Veniielos kai astikos eksymchronismos, pp. 439–58Google Scholar.

52 Ventiris, , Ellas tou 1910-1920, I, 73–4Google Scholar; Chronopoulos, , Gounaris, pp. 64–5, 118Google Scholar describes attitudes towards Gounaris in 1911-12; L. Hunt, ‘The new political class’ in Politics, culture and class in the French revolution, ch. 5.

53 See my Greece and the inter-war economic crisis (Oxford, 1991), ch. 11Google Scholar.

54 See Martin, P. F., Greece of the twentieth eenhay (London, 1913), pp. 53–60Google Scholar.

55 Papandreou, , Politika keimna, pp. 70–4Google Scholar.

56 Papandreou, , Politika keinuna, p. 84Google Scholar; vital on the nationalist background, and the gradual weakening of its original liberal component are Avgoustinos, G., Consciousness and history: nationalist critits of Grtek socitty, 1897-1914 (New York, 1977)Google Scholar, and Kitromilides, P., ‘The dialectic of intolerance: ideological dimensions of ethnic conflict’, Journal of the Hellenic Diaspora, VI, 4 (Winter, 1979). 5–31Google Scholar

57 Kanellopoulos, P. in Ellvaki Font, 25 03 1936Google Scholar, cited in Stefanou, (ed.), Ta keinuna, I, 54Google Scholar.