Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:29:07.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MEN AND THE 1970s BRITISH WOMEN'S LIBERATION MOVEMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2013

NICHOLAS OWEN
NICHOLAS OWEN*
Affiliation:
The Queen's College, Oxford
*
The Queen's College, Oxford, OX1 4AW[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the causes and consequences of the exclusion of men from the British Women's Liberation Movement in the 1970s. In common with many of the new social movements of the period, the Women's Liberation Movement was strongly committed to organizational autonomy and self-reliance, in the belief that the demands of oppressed groups should be formulated and presented directly by the oppressed themselves rather than made on their behalf by others, however sympathetic. Using contemporary archival sources, especially newsletters, conference papers, reports, and correspondence, the article explores the debates that surrounded this commitment, and the differing perspectives offered by socialist, radical, revolutionary, and other feminists. It describes the problems created by the presence of men on the edges of the Women's Liberation Movement in its early years, and the controversies that arose over their removal and the definition of women-only spaces. However, even absent men proved to be divisive, and the ‘problem of men’ persisted throughout the decade. The article also considers the responses of men to their exclusion, and their own self-organization in men's groups.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 801 - 826
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pichardo, Nelson A., ‘New social movements: a critical survey’, Annual Review of Sociology, 23 (1997), pp. 411–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Eley, Geoff, Forging democracy: the history of the left in Europe, 1850–2000 (Oxford, 2002)Google Scholar.

3 Deleuze, Gilles, ‘Intellectuals and power’, in Bouchard, Donald, ed., Language, counter-memory, practice: selected essays and interviews (Ithaca, NY, 1977), p. 209Google Scholar.

4 Weeks, Jeffrey, Coming out: homosexual politics in Britain from the eighteenth century to the present (London, 1990)Google Scholar.

5 Lent, Adam, British social movements since 1945 (Basingstoke, 2001), pp. 18–24, 110–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Campbell, Jane and Oliver, Michael, Disability politics: understanding our past, changing our future (London, 1996)Google Scholar.

7 John, Angela V. and Eustance, Claire, eds., The men's share: masculinities, male support and women's suffrage in Britain, 1890–1920 (London, 1997)Google Scholar.

8 Coote, Anna and Campbell, Beatrix, Sweet freedom: the struggle for women's liberation (London, 1982)Google Scholar; Bouchier, David, The feminist challenge: the movement for women's liberation in Britain and the USA (London, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rowbotham, Sheila, The past is before us: feminism in action since the 1960s (London, 1989)Google Scholar. New work includes Eve Setch, ‘The women's liberation movement in Britain, 1969–1979: organisation, creativity and debate’ (Ph.D. thesis, London, 2000), and ‘The face of metropolitan feminism: the London Women's Liberation Workshop, 1969–1979’, Twentieth Century British History, 13 (2002), pp. 171–90; Jeska Rees, ‘All the rage: revolutionary feminism in England, 1977–1983’ (Ph. D. thesis, Western Australia, 2007), and ‘A look back at anger: the women's liberation movement in 1978’, Women's History Review, 19 (2010), pp. 337–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Browne, Sarah, ‘“A veritable hotbed of feminism”: women's liberation in St Andrews, Scotland, c. 1968–c. 1979’, Twentieth Century British History, 23 (2011), pp. 1–24Google Scholar.

9 Marion Tarbuck, ‘Equal rights for all’, The Women's Library (WL), Anna Davin papers, 7ADA/01; transcript of the ‘Oxford Women's Weekend’ (1970), ‘Friday evening’, pp. 8–9, 26, ‘Sunday morning’, pp. 49–51, ‘Sunday afternoon’, pp. 18–21, the Feminist Library, London (FL); Observer, 1 Mar. 1970; Guardian, 2 Mar. 1970; New Statesman, 6 Mar. 1970.

10 Anon., ‘Women and men?’, Shrew, 3, 3 (Apr. 1971), p. 6.

11 Replies to questionnaire, WL, 5WRR/B/06; Sheila McNeil, ‘Pockets of resistance’, Sunday Times Magazine, 12 Sept. 1971, pp. 47–51; Guardian, 14 and 15 Jan. 1971; correspondence with Mary Stott, WL, Stott papers, 7CMS/06/01; Sebestyen, Amanda, ‘Tendencies in the movement: then and now’, in Pachaci, Reema et al. , eds., Feminist practice: notes from the tenth year (theoretically speaking!) (London, 1979), p. 21Google Scholar.

12 Bristol Women's Liberation Group, ‘Editorial’, Enough! (or not enough?), 1 [?early 1970], p. 1; Suzie Fleming, ‘Women's liberation’, Enough, 3 [?mid-1970], pp. 7–10.

13 Guardian, 14 Jan. 1971.

14 Stacey, Meg, ‘Older women and feminism: a note about my experience of the WLM’, Feminist Review, 31 (1989), pp. 140–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Rowbotham, Sheila, ‘The beginnings of women's liberation in Britain’, in Wandor, Michelene, ed., The body politic: writings from the women's liberation movement in Britain, 1969–1972 (London, 1972), pp. 91–102Google Scholar.

16 Rowbotham, Sheila, ‘Women's liberation and the new politics’, in Wandor, , ed., Body politic, pp. 3–30Google Scholar.

17 Ann Reeve, ‘The tyranny of structurelessness: a critique’, and Anon., ‘Some arguments against a structured movement’, Apr. 1974, WL, Sebestyen papers, 7SEB/A/01.

18 Juliet Mitchell, Woman's estate (Harmondsworth, 1971), p. 57.

19 Ibid.

20 Lin Chun, The British new left (Edinburgh, 1993), pp. 167–73.

21 Rowbotham, Sheila, ‘Problems of organisation and strategy’, in her Dreams and dilemmas: collected writings (London, 1983), pp. 59–60Google Scholar.

22 WL, Stott papers, 7CMS/06/01, passim.

23 Guardian, 5 Apr. 1970.

24 Anon., ‘Organising ourselves’, Shrew, 3, 2 (Mar. 1971), pp. 2–3.

25 Hilary Rawlings, ‘The female separatist’, Shrew (Feb. 1970), pp. 4–6.

26 Rowbotham, Sheila, Woman's consciousness, man's world (Harmondsworth, 1973), p. 38Google Scholar.

27 Andrews, Geoff, Endgames and new times: the final years of British communism, 1964–1991 (London, 2004), pp. 59–69, 148–9, 156Google Scholar.

28 Setch, ‘Women's liberation movement’, ch. 2.

29 Workshop manifesto, Shrew (Dec. 1970), p. 29.

30 Anon., ‘Women and men?’.

31 Anon., ‘Marched’, Women's Newspaper, 2, 28 Mar. 1971.

32 Anon., ‘Why Revolution?’, Shrew, 3, 1 (Feb. 1971), p. 15.

33 London Women's Liberation Workshop, Women's liberation: a beginning [?1970], WL, Mohin papers, 7LIM/01/04.

34 Segal, Lynne, Making trouble: life and politics (London, 2007), pp. 70, 74Google Scholar.

35 Anon., ‘Revolution: why’. Shrew, 3, 1 (Feb. 1971), p. 14.

36 Anon., ‘Charity begins at home’, Shrew, 3, 2 (Mar. 1971), p. 4.

37 Anon., ‘An existential statement of personal commitment’, Shrew (Nov./Dec. 1969), pp. 13–14; Anon., ‘If you get across to a man’, and ‘Something about being honest’, Shrew (Sept. 1970), pp. 10, 16; ‘MF’, ‘Encounter’, Shrew, 3, 6 (July 1971), pp. 14–16.

38 Anon., ‘Meeting the men’, Shrew, 3, 2 (Mar. 1971), p. 5.

39 Anon., ‘Growing up gracefully’, Shrew, 3, 7 (Aug. 1971), pp. 12–13.

40 Jan Williams, ‘Peckham Rye’, Shrew (Feb. 1970), pp. 7–8.

41 Reports from Skegness, Shrew, 3, 9 (Dec. 1971), pp. iii–iv; O'Sullivan, Sue, ‘Passionate beginnings: ideological politics 1969–1972’, Feminist Review, 11 (1982), pp. 70–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Dorothy Tennov, ‘Reflections on Skegness’, 19 Oct. 1971, WL, Mohin papers, 7LIM/01/02.

43 Notting Hill Group, ‘After two years’ [?1972], London School of Economics (LSE), McIntosh papers, 1/4.

44 Lancaster Socialist Women's Group, ‘Why socialist woman groups as opposed to bourgeois feminism’ [?1972], LSE, McIntosh papers, 1/4.

45 Anon., ‘Manchester’, Shrew, 4, 3 (June 1972), p. 3.

46 Anon., ‘Personal impressions’, Shrew, 4, 6 (Dec. 1972), p. 11.

47 Anon., ‘The man question’, in Radical Feminists, eds., Thoughts on feminism (London, 1972), pp. 4–6.

48 Anon., ‘Off each others [sic] backs!’, in Radical Feminists, eds., Thoughts on feminism, pp. 1–4.

49 Birmingham Women's Liberation Newsletter, Apr. 1973, p. 19; LWLW newsletters, 12 Feb. 1975, 26 Feb. 1975; 1976 conference news sheet, WL, Sebestyen papers, 7SEB/A/01; Sheffield Women's Newsletter, Apr. 1976, unpaginated.

50 Rowbotham, Past is before us, pp. 113–14.

51 LWLW newsletter 57 (new series) [?1974], Feminist Archive South, University of Bristol (FAS).

52 Guardian, 26 Feb. 1970.

53 Scarlet Women, 5 [?1977], p. 2; Catcall, 9 (1979), p. 3.

54 ‘Which way for WIRES?’ [?1976]; WIRES, 23 Nov. 1976, 21 Mar. 1977, 9 Mar. 1978, 1 Apr. 1979, FL.

55 LWLW newsletters, 10 and 31 Oct., 21 Nov. 1973, with attachments, FAS.

56 Sebestyen, ‘Tendencies’, 22; LWLW newsletters, 1974, passim, FAS.

57 Alison Fell and Sue O'Sullivan, ‘The workshop – a continuing saga’, and Alexander, Sally and O'Sullivan, Sue, ‘Sisterhood under stress’, Red Rag, 8 (Feb. 1975), pp. 16–17, 18–20Google Scholar.

58 Wanda Maciuszko et al., ‘On leaving the International Marxist Group’ [?Sept. 1973], and London Group, ‘Why there is a need for a separate not autonomous women's movement’, LSE, McIntosh papers, 1/8; Celia Pugh and Linda Smith, ‘The autonomy of the women's movement’, undated, WL, Sebestyen papers, 7SEB/A/05.

59 Fick, Irene et al. , ‘What's next for liberation? Three views’, Link 14 (Summer 1976), pp. 8–9, 12Google Scholar.

60 Report of conference on the structure and organisation in the women's movement, 20 Apr. 1974, LSE, McIntosh papers, 1/11.

61 Chris Blyth, ‘Men and the movement’, Sheffield Women's Newsletter, Feb. 1976, unpaginated.

62 Bryan, Beverley et al. , The heart of the race (London, 1985), pp. 148–52, 173–4Google Scholar.

63 Anon., ‘New questions raised in organising the conference’, Sept. 1973, WL, 5WRR/B/01; Anon., ‘Colchester equal pay conference’, 4 May 1974, LSE, McIntosh papers, 1/11.

64 Wilson, Elizabeth with Weir, Angela, Hidden agendas: theory, politics, and experience in the women's movement (London, 1986), p. 100Google Scholar; Anon., ‘Demo’, Brothers Against Sexism, 3 (Spring 1974), p. 16.

65 LWLW newsletters, 18 Feb. 1973, 6 May 1973, 20 Feb. 1974.

66 LWLW newsletters, 12 Mar. 1975, 19 Mar. 1975.

67 LWLW newsletters 122 [?Nov. 1975], and attached papers, 14 and 21 Jan., 27 Oct., 10 Nov. 1976, 19 Jan., 9 Mar. 1977, FAS; Lancaster Women's Centre Newsletter, Feb. 1976, unpaginated, FL; WIRES, 23 Jan., 7 and 23 Feb., 17 Mar. 1976, 3 Mar. 1977; resolutions for 1976 conference, WL, 5WRR/B/02; Spare Rib, 46 (May 1976), p. 4.

68 Malos, Ellen, ed., The politics of housework (London, 1980)Google Scholar.

69 Priscilla Allen et al., ‘In defence of feminism’ (1973), LSE, McIntosh papers, 1/4, and later version (1975), FAS.

70 Malos, Politics of housework.

71 Hoggart, Lesley, Feminist campaigns for birth control and abortion rights in Britain (Lewiston, NY, 2003)Google Scholar.

72 Henderson, Roberta, ‘Feminism is not for burning’, Catcall, 2 (Apr. 1976), pp. 13–14Google Scholar.

73 Spare Rib, 89 (Dec. 1979), pp. 20–5.

74 Malos, Ellen and Rickford, Frankie, ‘Closed encounters’, Red Rag, 13 [?1978], pp. 9–11Google Scholar.

75 Setch, ‘Women's liberation movement’, pp. 199, 201.

76 ‘The National Women's Aid Conference, 7–8 May 1977’, Women's Report, 5, 4 (May–June 1977), p. 19.

77 Chester, Gail, ‘Open letter’, in Pachaci, et al. , eds., Feminist practice, p. 29Google Scholar.

78 Sebestyen, Amanda, ‘The left groups’, Catcall, 3 (July 1976), pp. 1–4Google Scholar.

79 LWLW newsletters, 8 and 15 Aug. 1971, FAS.

80 Miriam Glucksmann et al., ‘Sexual politics and the autonomy of the women's movement’ (1973), LSE, McIntosh papers, 1/8.

81 Birmingham Women's Liberation Newsletter, Dec. 1973, pp. 30–1, and Jan. 1974, p. 21; Clancy Sigal, ‘Married to the cause’, New Statesman, 19 Mar. 2010.

82 Tolson, Andrew, The limits of masculinity (London, 1977)Google Scholar; Rowan, John, The horned god: feminism and men as wounding and healing (London, 1987)Google Scholar; Cooper, Mick, Searching for the antisexist man: a history of the men's movement (Sheffield, 1991)Google Scholar.

83 ‘Islington Men's Group, 1974’, WL, Rowbotham papers, 7SHR/E/04.

84 Mitchell, Woman's estate, pp. 56–7.

85 John Rowan, ‘Patriarchy: what it is and why some men question it’, 5 Sept. 1977, WL, Rowbotham papers, 7SHR/E/02.

86 Report of first British conference of Men Against Sexism (June 1973), Brothers, 1 [?1974], pp. 3–6; ‘Manchester Men Against Sexism’, undated, WL, Rowbotham papers, 7SHR/E/01; Lynne Segal, Slow motion: changing masculinities, changing men (3rd edn, Basingstoke, 2007), p. 236.

87 Leon, Dave, ‘MAS group’, Men Against Sexism (Oct. 1973), p. 1Google Scholar.

88 ‘Islington Men's Group, 1974’.

89 ‘The Birmingham Group’, and Walton, John, ‘First thoughts on men's liberation’, Brothers, 1 [?1974], pp. 7–8, 24–7Google Scholar; Goldrick-Jones, Amanda, Dismantling the master's house: men who believe in feminism (Westport, CT, 2002), pp. 158–65Google Scholar.

90 Walton, John, ‘Sexism and our attitudes to the women's movement’, Men Against Sexism or the Pig's Last Grunt (Spring 1975), pp. 30–4Google Scholar.

91 Segal, Slow motion, 239.

92 Penny Remfry, ‘Report from the socialist feminist workshop’, WL, Sebestyen papers, 7SEB/A/01.

93 New Society, 15 May 1975, pp. 398–9.

94 ‘Islington Men's Group, 1974’; Segal, Slow motion, p. 235.

95 Anon., ‘Where do we go from here?’, Brothers Against Sexism, 3 (Spring 1974), p. 3.

96 Walton, John, ‘Lib or sexism’, Brothers Against Sexism, 3 (Spring 1974), pp. 12–15Google Scholar; idem, ‘Do men need liberation?’, Men Against Sexism [?late 1974], pp. 5–8; ; and idem, ‘It's not all jam’, Camden Men's Group, Men's News, 5 Feb. 1977, WL, Rowbotham papers, 7SHR/E/01.

97 Anon, ‘Looking at women’, Men Against Sexism (Oct. 1973), pp. 8–11.

98 Friedman, Scarlet and Sarah, Elizabeth, eds., On the problem of men: two feminist conferences (London, 1982), p. 232Google Scholar; Hester, Marianne, ‘Anti-sexist men: a case of cloak and dagger chauvinism’, Women's Studies International Forum, 7 (1984), pp. 33–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

99 Islington Men's Group, ‘The story so far …’ [?1975], WL, Rowbotham papers, 7SHR/E/04.

100 Armistead, Nigel, Please can I stop being a tree soon? How a group of men looked after 200 children at the 1977 WLM conference crèche [London, ?1980]Google Scholar.

101 Anon., ‘The mens [sic] movement’, Brothers Against Sexism, 3 (Spring 1974), p. 4; Cambridge Men's Group, ‘Men and change’, in David Porter, ed., Between men and feminism (London, 1992), p. 38.

102 Amanda, Sebestyen, letter, Achilles Heel, 3 [?1979], p. 7Google Scholar; Guardian, 15 and 22 Mar. 1979; aspen joycechild wommin, ‘Working with women / working with men’, Catcall, 10 (July 1979), pp. 16–17; Long, Pauline and Coghill, Mary, Is it worthwhile working in a mixed group? (London, 1977)Google Scholar; Alderson, Lynn, ‘Working with men’, and anon., ‘Notes from Sophie’, Anarcha-Feminist Newsletter, 5 [?1977], pp. 6–8Google Scholar.

103 Revolutionary/Radical Feminist Newsletter (RRFN) 1 [?1978], pp. 13–15.

104 Hanmer, Jalna et al. , ‘Sex class’, Scarlet Women, 5 [?1977], pp. 8–10Google Scholar.

105 Maria, , ‘The myth of men's oppression’, WIRES, 34, 24 June 1977, p. 19Google Scholar; Jeffreys, Sheila, ‘A revolutionary feminist view’, WIRES, 50, 22 May 1978, pp. 17–18Google Scholar.

106 London Revolutionary Feminists, ‘Revolutionary feminism: statements from the 1st year’ [?1978], LSE, McIntosh papers 1/20.

107 Jeffreys, Sheila, ‘The need for revolutionary feminism’, Scarlet Women, 5 [?1977], pp. 10–12Google Scholar.

108 Anon., ‘Notes taken at a meeting for women who have decided men are the enemy…’, and ‘Men-hating as an honourable and viable political act’, RRFN, 1 [?1978], pp. 7–10; Sheila Jeffreys et al., ‘Some plans men have for our future’, WL, 6WIM/P/02/06.

109 ‘Revolutionary feminism: statements from the 1st year’.

110 Smith, Annie, ‘Anti-sexist men: auxiliaries or enemies?’, RRFN, 6 (Spring 1981), pp. 1–2Google Scholar, and reply in RRFN, 7 (Summer 1981), p. 1.

111 Friedman and Sarah, Problem of men, p. 133.

112 Rickford, Frankie, ‘War and peace and revolutionary feminism’, Red Rag [?1979], pp. 28–9Google Scholar; Betsy Ettore, ‘Workshop on the differences between autonomy and separatism’, undated, LSE, McIntosh papers, 1/19.

113 Eberhardt, Eva et al. , ‘Amen: patriarchy and feminist politics’, Red Rag (Aug. 1980), pp. 7–11Google Scholar.

114 Campbell, Beatrix, ‘A feminist sexual politics: now you see it, now you don't’, Feminist Review, 5 (1980), pp. 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

115 Campbell, Beatrix, ‘Sweets from a stranger’, Red Rag, 13 [?1978], pp. 27–9Google Scholar; Kathleen Jones, letters, WIRES, 57, 5 Oct. 1978, p. 15, and WIRES, 59, 9 Nov. 1978, p. 17.

116 McNeill, Sandra, letter, WIRES, 50, 22 May 1978, pp. 21–2Google Scholar.

117 Anon., Love your enemy? The debate between heterosexual feminism and political lesbianism (London, 1981).

118 McNeill to Jeffreys, undated, WL, Mohin papers, 7LIM/01/03.

119 Friedman and Sarah, Problem of men, p. 242.

120 Lorna Mitchell, ‘Radical feminism: a subjective view’, WL, Mohin papers, 7LIM/01/03.

121 Friedman and Sarah, Problem of men, p, 131; Sebestyen, Amanda, ‘Thinking about men’, Spare Rib, 94 (May 1980), pp. 23–4Google Scholar; Brown, Reva, ‘Feminist mothers & sons’, Catcall, 16 (May 1984), pp. 26–7Google Scholar.

122 Rees, ‘All the rage’, pp. 212–14, 224–35.

123 Matriarchy Study Group, Politics of matriarchy (London, 1978), pp. 21–8.

124 Eberhardt et al., ‘Amen: patriarchy and feminist politics’.

125 Sebestyen, Amanda, ‘Britain: the politics of survival’, in Morgan, Robin, ed., Sisterhood is global: the international women's movement anthology (New York, NY, 1984), p. 97Google Scholar.

126 ‘Anti-sexist commitments for men (1980) – draught [sic] 3’, Anti-Sexist Men's Newsletter, 9 (1980), pp. 18–19.

127 Morrison, Paul, ‘Our common ground’, Anti-Sexist Men's Newsletter, 10 (1980)Google Scholar, unpaginated.

128 Anti-Sexist Men's Newsletter, 18 (Summer 1983), passim.

129 ‘Notes from the collective’, Achilles Heel, 3 [?1979], pp. 3–5, and ‘Letters’, 4 (1980), p. 6.

130 Friedman and Sarah, Problem of men, p. 174.

131 Packwood, Marlene, ‘Some notes from a cynical feminist’, Catcall, 12 (Apr. 1981), pp. 12–17Google Scholar.

132 Hamer, Katherine, letter, WIRES, 58, 23 Oct. 1978, p. 21Google Scholar.

133 Dale Spender, ‘No matter what … theoretical issues in contemporary feminism’, in Joy Holland, ed., Feminist action i (London, 1984).

134 Lovenduski, Joni and Randall, Vicky, Contemporary feminist politics: women and power in Britain (Oxford, 1993)Google Scholar.

135 Critchley, Simon, Infinitely demanding: ethics of resistance, politics of resistance (London, 2007), p. 89Google Scholar.