Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:57:06.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Freethinking’ and ‘Freedom of Thought’ in eighteenth-century Britain*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Peter N. Miller
Peter N. Miller
Affiliation:
Clare Hall, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In early modern Europe, religious heterodoxy and intellectual inquiry posed serious challenges to the authority of centralizing forces both secular and ecclesiastical. At the same time, however, these dangerous developments had been driven by those individuals whom eighteenth-century writers had adopted as ‘culture heroes’ for an age increasingly self-conscious of its own enlightened status. In Britain, the newly established order defended itself against the scepticism and moral determinism of ‘freethinkers’ by upholding a religious and moral order based on liberty. But ‘freethinkers’ such as Anthony Collins were themselves the inheritors of, and propagandists for, the seventeenth-century revolution in science which underpinned the ideology being wielded against them. Their challenge elicited from Edmund Law an argument which co-opted their epistemology to ground the familiar metaphysics of liberty associated with the Newtonian position of Samuel Clarke. Where ‘freethinking’ had been perceived as a dangerous solvent of the social order, ‘freedom of thought’, within limits that were themselves a leading subject of debate in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century Britain, could be upheld as consistent with the demands of political society.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 599 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See among others Clark, Jonathan, English society, 1688–1832 (Cambridge, 1985)Google Scholar; Pocock, J. G. A., Virtue, commerce and history (Cambridge, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schaffer, Simon, Newtonian cosmology and the steady state (unpubd Ph.D., Cambridge, 1980)Google Scholar; Jacob, Margaret, The Newtonians and the English revolution (Ithaca, 1976)Google Scholar; Tuck's, Richard 1991 Carlyle Lectures, Sorry comforters: political thought and the international order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford, forthcoming)Google Scholar.

2 See Tuck, Richard, ‘Hobbes and Descartes’, Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes, eds. Rogers, G. A. J. and Ryan, Alan (Oxford, 1988), pp. 11–42Google Scholar.

3 Adam, Antoine, Les Libertins au XVIIe siècle, ed. and intro (Paris, 1964), p. 7Google Scholar.

4 While these remained distinct attributes of the freethinker, Vittor Ivo Comparato has shown how they could be linked, to great effect, by opponents. The members of the Neapolitan Accademia degli Investiganti (1663–70) believed that their attempt to distinguish more sharply between the realms of science and faith was simply continuing the work of Gassendi and Galileo. The Holy Office, however, after a long investigation, accused younger members of ‘libertine practices, defending sexual liberty, denying miracles, the immortality of the soul, and the divinity of Christ’ (‘II Pensiero Politico dei Libertini’, in Storia delle idee politiche, economiche e sociali, ed.Firpo, Luigi (Torino, 1980), IV, 150)Google Scholar.

5 Spink, J. S., French free thought from Gassendi to Voltaire (London, 1960), p.4Google Scholar.See ‘freethinker’, Oxford English Dictionary, 20 vols. (Oxford, 1989), VI, 168Google Scholar; Champion, Justin, The pillars of priestcraft shaken (Cambridge, 1992)Google Scholar and Kors, Alan Charles, Atheism in France, 1650–1729. Volume 1: The orthodox sources of disbelief (Princeton, 1990)Google Scholar.

7 Jacob, Margaret, The radical enlightenment: pantheists, freemasons and republicans (London, 1981)Google Scholar; ‘Living as a Freethinker’, paper delivered at the Forum, Le Moyne on Religion and Literature, 09 1991Google Scholar; Living the Enlightenment (Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar.

8 Pintard, Rene, Le libertinage érudit dans la première moitié' du XVIIe siècle (Paris, 1943)Google Scholar. The sceptical stoic and epicurean background is well outlined by Adam, Antoine, Le Mouvement philosophique dans la première moitié du XVIIIe sièle (Paris, 1967), pp. 85–91Google Scholar, and Zuber, Roger, ‘Libertinage et humanisme: une rencontre difficile’, XVIIe Siècle, CXXII (1980), 173Google Scholar. For a full bibliography, see Bianchi, Lorenzo, Tradizione Libertina e critica storica da Naudé a Bayle (Milano, 1988), pp. 11–12, n. 2–3,Google Scholar and Il Pensiero Politico, XXII (1989)Google Scholar. Most scholarly interest has, of late, focused on the atheist aspect of libertinism (see Betts, C. J., Early deism in France: from the so-called ‘déistes’ of Lyon (1564) to Voltaire's ‘Lettres philosophiques’ (The Hague, Boston, Lancaster, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kors, Atheism in France, 1650–1729, vol. 1; Berman, David, A history of atheism in Britain: from Hobbes to Russell (London, New York, Sydney, 1988))Google Scholar though Tuck's, RichardPhilosophy and government 1580–1715, vol. I (Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar will redress this imbalance by focusing on the moral and political implications of this intellectual posture.

9 The Tatler, ed. Bond, Donald F. (Oxford, 1987), no. 12, p. 104Google Scholar.

10 See The Guardian, no. 55, 1, p. 342; no. 93, II, p. 62; no. 130, II, p. 250.

11 The Tatler, no. 135, pp. 279–81.

12 Champion, , The pillars of priestcraft shaken, p. 20Google Scholar.

13 Jacob, , The Newtonians and the English revolution, p. 208Google Scholar.

14 A letter fabricated by Steele and produced in The Guardian (no. 9) expressed amusement at precisely Collins's defence of both freedom of thought and necessity. ‘One would think Menshould blush to find themselves entangled in a greater Contradiction than any The Discourse ridicules’ (The Guardian (London, 1713), I, p. 58)Google Scholar.

15 See Schofield, Robert E., ‘An evolutionary taxonomy of eighteenth-century Newtonianisms’, Studies in Eighleenth-Century Culture, VII (1978), 175–92Google Scholar; Elkana, Yehuda, ‘Newtonianism in the eighteenth century’ British Journal of the Philosophy of Science XXII (1971), 297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Cited in Gascoigne's, JohnCambridge in the age of Enlightenment (Cambridge, 1989), p. 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Clarke's response to criticism of his 1704 lectures makes plain the absolute discontinuity he believed to exist between his work and that of John Locke. Most of this particular criticism, he writes, is ‘an indecent and unreasonable railing against the learned Mr. Lock; from whom I neither cited any one Passage, nor (that I know of) borrowed any Argument from him…’ (A discourse concerning the unchangeable obligations of natural religion (London, 1706), p. [A4r])Google Scholar. On Clarke see Gay, John, ‘Matter and freedom in the thought of Samuel Clarke’, Journal of the History of Ideas, XXIV (1963) 85–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ferguson, James P., The philosophy of Dr. Samuel Clarke and its critics (New York, 1974)Google Scholar; Stewart, Larry, ‘Samuel Clarke, Newtonianism and the factions of post-revolutionary England’, Journal of the History of Ideas, XLII (1981), 53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Clarke, , A demonstration of the being and attributes of God (London, 1705), p. 12Google Scholar.

19 Ibid. pp. 149–50.

20 Ibid. p. 126.

21 Ibid. pp. 71, 25–6 and 144.

22 Ibid. pp.101, 107, 127.

23 , Clarke, Discourse, p. 92Google Scholar.

24 , Clarke, Demonstration p. 159Google Scholar. For an extended discussion, see pp. 171–9.

25 ‘So it is very unreasonable and blame-worthy in practise, that any Intelligent Creatures, whom God has made so far like unto himself, as to endue them with those excellent Faculties of Reason and Will, whereby they are inabled to distinguish Good from Evil, and to chuse the one and refuse the other; should either negligently suffer themselves to be imposed upon and deceived in matters of Good and Evil, Right and Wrong, or wilfully and perversely allow themselves to be over-ruled by absurd Passions and corrupt or partial Affections, to Act contrary to what they Know is Fit to be done’ (, Clarke, Discourse, p. 62)Google Scholar.

26 Ibid. p. 5.

27 Ibid. pp. 147–8.

28 , Clarke, Demonstration, p. 3Google Scholar.

29 A collection of papers which passed between the late learned Mr. Leibnitz and Dr. Clarke in the years 1715 and 1716 (London, 1717), p. 37Google Scholar. For anothe r attack on , Hobbes, see Demonstration, p. 204Google Scholar.

30 , Clarke, Remarks on a book, entituled, ‘A philosophical enquiry concerning human liberty’ (London, 1717) P. 30Google Scholar.

31 , Clarke, Demonstration, p. 218Google Scholar.

32 Ibid. p. 254.

33 Collins, Anthony, A philosophical inquiry concerning human liberty (London, 1717, 2nd edn), p. ivGoogle Scholar.

34 Locke, , Essay, II. ix. I, p. 143 and II. viii. 8, p. 134Google Scholar.

35 Ibid. II. i. 3–4, p. 105; II. ii. 2, p. 119; II. i. 20, p. 116; II. i. 23–4, pp. 116–17.

36 Ibid. I. iii. 3, p. 67.

37 Ibid. II. v. 2, pp. 128–9. Also, II. xxi. 31, pp. 250–1.

38 Ibid. II. xx. 2, p. 229. Also, II. xxi. 36, p. 254; II. xxi. 42, pp. 258–9; II. xxi. 43, p. 259.

39 An additional aspect of this ‘personalization’ of morality is its relativizauon. Pleasure, and therefore Good, can only be evaluated in comparison with other perceptions. Thus, when a source of ‘uneasiness’ is juxtaposed to a still greater one, the first becomes a relative ‘happiness’ (Locke, , Essay, II. xxi. 42, p. 259)Google Scholar.

40 Ibid. II. xxviii. 10, p. 353. Also, I. iii. 10, p. 72; II. xxviii. 11, p. 354.

41 Ibid. II. xxi. 8, p. 237.

42 Ibid. II. xxi. 29, p. 249.

43 Ibid.II. xxi. 19, p. 243.

44 In the same paragraph, Locke continues, ‘This in an Agent capable of Volition, when the beginning or continuation of any Action is contrary to that preference of his Mind, is called Compulsion; when the hind'ring or stopping any Action is contrary to his Volition, it is called Restraint’ (Locke, , Essay, II. ii. 13, p. 240)Google Scholar. For further instances of liberty founded on the capacity of the mind to choose, see, II. xxi. 5, p. 236; II. xxi. 9–11, pp. 238–9 and II. xxi. 21, p. 244.

45 Ibid. II. xxi. 47–8, pp. 263–4; II. xxi. 71, p. 283. For Locke, , the assertion that actions are determined by ‘the last result of our own Minds’ denies the possibility of liberty (II. xxi. 48, p. 264)Google Scholar. Also, n. xxi. 50, p. 265.

46 Ibid. II. xxi. 52, pp. 266–7.

47 Ibid. I. iv. 24, pp. 101–2. Also I. iv. 23, p. 101.

48 Collins, Anthony, A discourse of free-tkinking, occasion'd by the rise and growth of a sect call'd FREE-THINKERS (London, 1713), p.5Google Scholar.

49 Ibid. p. 6; also, p. 33.

50 Ibid. pp. 7–8.

51 Ibid. pp. 121–2.

52 Barbeyrac, Jean, An historical and critical account of the science of morality, and the progress it has made in the world, from the earliest times down to the publication of this work, tr. Carew, in Pufendorf, , Law of Nature, tr. Kennet (London, 1749), p.9Google Scholar. For Barbeyrac and the modern natural law school, see Tuck, , ‘The “modern” theory of natural law’, in The languages of political thought in early modern Europe ed. Pagden, Anthony (Cambridge, 1987), pp. 99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Jackson, , A vindication of humane liberty: in answer to a dissertation on liberty and necessity; written by A.C., esq. (London, 1730), p.24Google Scholar.

54 Jackson, , A defense of human liberty, in answer to the principal arguments which have been alledged against it; and particularly to Cato's letters on that subject (London, 1730, 2nd edn), p. 2Google Scholar.

55 Jackson, , A defense of human liberty… (London, 1730, 2nd edn), sig. A2VGoogle Scholar. Jackson, also published A vindication of humane liberty (London, 1730)Google Scholar, explicitly attacking Collins's Philosophical inquiry.

56 Law, ‘Dedication’, King, William, Essay on the Origin of Evil, tr. and annotated Law, Edmund (Cambridge, 1739, 3rd edn), sig. AIV–rGoogle Scholar.

57 , Law, ‘Preface’, Evil, p. xviGoogle Scholar.

58 Ibid. p. vii.

59 Ibid. p. xxi.

60 , Law, Evil, p. 19 n. 4Google Scholar.

61 Ibid. pp. 47–9 n. 10.

62 Ibid. p. 303 n. 52.

63 Cartwright's, first book was entitled American independence: the interest and glory of Great Britain… (London, 1774)Google Scholar.

64 See Law, , Evil, p. 151 n. 25 and p. 402 n. 67Google Scholar.

65 Ibid. p. 287 n. P.

66 Ibid. p. 257 n. 45.

67 Law, , An enquiry into the ideas of space, time, immensity & eternity (Cambridge, 1734), p.5; also, p. 9Google Scholar.

68 Law, , Evil, p. 50 n. 10Google Scholar.

69 Essay, II. xxi. 36, p. 254; II. xxi. 42, pp. 258–9.

70 Law, , Evil, pp.305–6 n. 52Google Scholar.

71 King, , Evil, p. 57Google Scholar.

72 Law, , Evil, p. 230 n. 42Google Scholar.

73 Ibid p. 232 n. 42.

74 Ibid. p. 234 n. 43.

75 Ibid. p. 283 n. 51.

76 Ibid. p. 335 n. S.

77 Ibid.pp. 244–5 n. 45.

78 Ibid. p. 261 n. 48.

79 Ibid. pp. 253–6 n. 45.

80 Ibid. p. 347 n. 58.

81 Ibid. p. 262 n. 48.

82 , King, Evil, p. 358Google Scholar.

83 Ibid. p. 360.

84 , Law, On morality and religion, in Evil, pp. xliii–xlivGoogle Scholar.

85 Gay, John, A dissertation concerning the principle and criterion of virtue and the origins of the passions, in Evil, p. xxixGoogle Scholar.

86 Gay, , Preliminary dissertation, Evil p. xxxvGoogle Scholar.

87 Ibid. p. xliii.

88 Law, , Evil, p. 138 n. GGoogle Scholar. Also, Law, , The nature and obligations of man, as a sensible and rational being, in Evil (1758), p. lvGoogle Scholar.

89 Law, , Considerations on the theory of religion (Cambridge, 1765, 3rd edn), p. 233Google Scholar.

90 Law, , Religion, p. 18 n. DGoogle Scholar.

91 Ibid. p. 228.

92 Law, , Considerations on the propriety of requiring a subscription to articles of faith (Cambridge, 1774), p. 5Google Scholar. For more information on rational dissent see Barlow, Richard B., Citizenship and conscience (Philadelphia, 1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gascoigne, John, ‘Anglican latitudinarianism and political radicalism in the late eighteenth century’, History, LXXI (1986), 22–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fitzpatrick, Martin, ‘Heretical religion and radical political ideas in late eighteenth-century England’, in The transformation of political culture: England and Germany in the late eighteenth century, ed. Helmuth, Eckhart (Oxford, 1990), pp. 339–74Google Scholar and Bradley, James E., Religion, revolution and English radicalism: non-conformity in eighteenth-century politics and society (Cambridge, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

93 , Law, Subscription, p. 18Google Scholar. For Law's view of progress see Spadafora, David, The idea of progress in eighteenth-century Britain (New Haven and London, 1990)Google Scholar, but note that he generally fails to distinguish between latitudinarian and millenarian protestant visions.

94 Law, , Subscription, p. 32Google Scholar.