Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:30:34.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Fanatic magistrates’: religious and political conflict in three Kent boroughs, 1680–1684*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

Colin Lee
Colin Lee
Affiliation:
Pembroke College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines religious and political conflict in the Kent boroughs of Dover, Canterbury and Sandwich in the early 1680s. Section II describes the personal, political and religious divisions in Dover which lay behind a local campaign to persuade the crown to force the surrender of the town's charter. Section III charts the growth of concerted anglican opposition to the dissenting group which controlled the corporation of Canterbury. The activities of the dissenting mayor of Sandwich which aggravated political differences within the town are described in section IV. The final part of the article suggests some implications of the three case studies for understanding of English politics in the period. It argues that the government took action against the town charters principally in response to the demands of local loyalists, rather than as part of a policy of centralization. It concludes that anglican royalists within the towns were the principal agitators for, and beneficiaries of, the new charters.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 43 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sacret, J. H., ‘The restoration government and municipal corporations’, English Historical Review, XLV (1930), 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Western, J. R., Monarchy and revolution: the English state in the 1680s (London, 1972), pp. 110–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Forster, C. F., ‘Government in provincial England under the later Stuarts’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, XXXIII (1983), 44Google Scholar.

3 Pickavance, R. G., ‘The English government and the borough charters: a study of the tory reaction 1681–1685’, University of Oxford D.Phil, dissertation (1976), pp. 110–11, 139Google Scholar.

5 Mullett, M., ‘“To dwell together in unity”: the search for agreement in Preston politics, 1660–1690’, Transactions of the Historic Socitty of Lancashire and Cheshire, cxxv (1974), 74–5;Google Scholar, J-Miller, ‘The crown and the borough charters in the reign of Charles II’, English Historical Review, c (1985). 74Google Scholar.

6 Public Record Office (hereafter P.R.O.), PC 2/68, Privy Council Register 1679–80, pp. 439, 455–6; Kent Archives Office (hereafter K.A.O.), Papillon papers, U1015/O25/1.

7 K.A.O., U1015/O25/2. The office of jurat in the Cinque Ports was equivalent to that of alderman in other boroughs.

8 Whiteman, E. A. O., ed., The Compton census of 1676: a critical edition (London, 1986), p. 34Google Scholar; K.A.O., Dover MSS 198: Persons removed or voided in the Corporations of Kent, 1662.

9 P.R.O., PC 2/68, pp. 455–6; K.A.O., U1015/025/6; P.R.O., PC2/69, Privy Council Register 1680–83, p. 8; Calendar of StaU Papers Domestic (hereafter CSPD) 1679–80, pp. 519, 529.

10 K.A.O., U1015/O25/42.

11 K.A.O., U1015/O25/17.

12 British Library (hereafter B.L.), Add. MSS 28037, Proceedings of the Common Council of Dover, 1674–1768, fos. 14–14V, 17V-18, 20–20V.

13 See B.L., Egerton MSS 2115, Dover Sessions of the Peace, 1677–1692, fo. 254V for an account of a vicious assault by Jemmett.

14 B.L., Add. MSS 28037, fo. 12v.

15 K.A.O., U1015/O25/41.

16 B.L., Egerton MSS 2115, fo. 220V.

17 K.A.O., U1015/025/41.

18 B.L., Egerton MSS 2115, fos. 334V, 318V.

19 CSPD 1683–84, pp. 25–6.

20 K.A.O., U1015/O25/2; K.A.O., U1015/O24/3.

21 K.A.O., U1015/O25/4, 7, 8.

22 K.A.O., U1015/O25/41, 35, 12.

23 K.A.O., U1015/O25/8.

24 CSPD 1679–80, p. 574; CSPD 1680–81, pp. 2–3; B.L., Add. MSS 28037, fos. 25V-26, 27V, 28.

25 K.A.O., U1015/025/31, 45.

26 CSPD 1680–81, pp. 261–2.

27 P.R.O., State Papers Domestic, Charles II, SP 29/416, fo. 1731.

28 B.L., Egerton MSS 2115, fo. 344V.

29 CSPD 1680–81, p. 429.

30 B.L., Egerton MSS 2115, fos. 343–1; P.R.O., SP 29/416, fo. 1731.

31 CSPD 1680–81, p. 429.

32 CSPD 1680–81, p. 429; PRO., SP 29/416, fo. 173I; CSPD 1680–81, pp. 445–6.

33 CSPD 1680–81, pp. 445–6.

34 P.R.O., SP 29/416, fo. 1731.

35 CSPD 1680–81, p. 479.

36 Bodleian Library (hereafter Bodl. Lib.), Tanner MSS 35, fo. 54.

37 B.L., Egerton MSS 2115, fo. 326V.

38 K.A.O., Cinque Ports Brotherhood papers, CP/Bp 318.

39 For further evidence of such a dispute, see B.L., Egerton MSS 2115, fos. 339–8.

40 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 35, fo. 54; B.L., Egerton MSS 2115, fos. 329V-328.

41 B.L., Add. MSS 28037, fo. 28v.

42 CSPD 1682, p. 376.

43 K.A.O., U1015/O27/7; CSPD 1682, p. 418; P.R.O., PC 2/69, p. 551. Quo warranto proceedings were a legal examination of the authority by which a corporation held its charter. See Levin, J., The charter controversy in the city of London, 1660–1688, and its consequences (London,1969), p. 1Google Scholar; Holdsworth, W., A history of English law (14 vols., London, 1956), 1, 229–230Google Scholar.

44 P.R.O., PC 2/69, p. 559.

45 CSPD 1682, p. 543.

46 Papillon, A. F. W., Memoirs of Thomas Papillon ofLondon, merchant (Reading, 1887), pp. 188–9Google Scholar.

47 B.L., Egerton MSS 215, fo. 324.

48 Besse, J., A collection of the sufferings of the people called quaktrs… (1 vols., London, 1753), I, 297Google Scholar.

49 B.L., Add. MSS 28037, fo. 31.

50 CSPD 1683–84, P. 32.

51 Luttrell, N., A brief historical relation of state affairs from September 1678 to April 1714 (6 vols Oxford, 1857), i, 284; B.L., Add. MSS 28037, fos. 39, 39VGoogle Scholar.

52 , Papillon, Memoirs, pp. 192–3Google Scholar.

53 P.R.O., PC 2/70, Privy Council Register 1683–85, p. 119.

54 , Papillon, Memoirs, p. 193Google Scholar.

55 Jones, M. V., ‘The political history of the parliamentary boroughs of Kent, 1642–1662’, University of London Ph.D dissertation (1967), pp. 462–4;Google ScholarEveritt, A. M., The community of Kent and the great rebellion 1640–60 (Leicester, 1966), pp. 231–4Google Scholar.

56 Rhodes, A., ed., ‘Suspected persons in Kent’, Archaelogia Cantiana, xxin (1898), 71–72Google Scholar.

57 M. V.Jones, ‘The divine Durant: a seventeenth-century independent’, Archaelogia Cantiana, LXXXIII (1968). 194; CSPD i680–81, p. 505Google Scholar.

58 Turner, G. Lyon, ed., Original records of nonconformity under persecution and indulgence (3 Vols., London, 1911), 1, 13Google Scholar; Crippen, T. G., ed., ‘The Canterbury church book - extracts’, Transactions of the Congregational Historical Society, VII (1916–1918), 187Google Scholar.

59 CSPD 1680–81, p. 505; cf. Hurwich, J. J., ‘“A fanatick town”: the political influence of dissenters in Coventry, 1660–1720’, Midland History, IV (1977), 23, 31Google Scholar.

60 Anon., The case between the mayor and aldermen of Canterbury and Mr Serjeant Hardres recorder, humbly presented to the consideration ofthe honourable the knights, citizens and burgesses assembled (no place of publication given, undated, 1675?); Henning, B. D., ed., The history of parliament: the house of commons 1660–1690 (3 vols., London, 1983), II, 490–1Google Scholar.

61 B.L., Add. MSS 28037, fos. 15V, 1 jv; B.L., Egcrton MSS 2120, miscellaneous papers relating to Dover, fos. 30/-43.

62 CSPD 1682, pp. 337–8; Canterbury Cathedral Archives (hereafter C.C.A.), A/C 7, Canterbury Burghmote Minutes, 1672–84, fos. 115V, 118, 131V-132.

63 C.C.A., A/C 7, fos. 123–4.

64 CSPD 1679–80, p. 438; K.A.O., U1015/O25/33.

65 C.C.A., A/C 7, fos. 130V-159V.

66 C.C.A., A/C 7, fos. 126, 168.

67 CSPD 1682, p. 250.

68 B.L., Egerton MSS 2115, fos. 345V-344V.

69 C.C.A., A/C 7, fos. 176–176V.

70 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 35, fo. 44.

71 Crippen, ‘Canterbury church book’, pp. 263–4; Turner, , Original records, I, 13Google Scholar.

72 M. V.Jones, ‘Parliamentary boroughs’, p. 227; CSPD 1680–81, p. 479.

73 CSPD 1680–81, p. 433; P.R.O., SP 29/417, fo. 31.

74 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 33, fo. 179.

75 Duckett, G., ed., Penal laws and Test Act… (2 vols., London, 1882), 1, 364–5Google Scholar.

76 CSPD 1680–81, pp. 505–6; P.R.O., SP 29/417, fo. 31.

77 CSPD 1680–81, p. 420.

78 , Henning, House of commons, II, 490–1Google Scholar.

79 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 33, fo. 179.

80 Allen, D., ‘The role of die London trained bands in the exclusion crisis, 1678–81’, English Historical Review, LCXXVII (1972), 287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 CSPD 1680–81, pp. 200–1.

82 K.A.O., N/FQ2/I, Kent quaker sufferings book, 1655–1759, p. 35.

83 P.R.O., SP 29/417, fo. 30.

84 C.C.A., A/C 7, fo. 107.

85 C.C.A., A/C 7, fo. 179V.

86 C.C.A., FA/29, Canterbury city accounts 1680–90, fo. 78; C.C.A., A/C 7, fo. 185V.

87 K.A.O., N/FQ£/I, pp. 37–8; Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 33, fo. 170.

88 , Luttrell, A brief historical relation, I, 106–7, 128Google Scholar.

89 C.C.A., FA/29, fo. 76v.

90 CSPD 1682, p. 250.

91 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 33, fo. 170.

92 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 35, fo. 44.

93 C.C.A., A/C 7, fos. 182, 195, 219; C.C.A., FA/29, fos. 79, 170.

94 C.C.A., A/C 7, fos. 217–217v, 220–220V; CSPD 1683–84, pp. 261, 316; C.C.A., FA/29, fos. 170, 214.

95 Woodruff, C. Evelrigh, ‘Letters relating to the condition of the church in Kent during the primacy of archbishop Sancroft’, Archaelogta Candana, XXI (1895), 177–8;Google Scholarcf. , Whiteman, The Compum census, p. 21Google Scholar.

96 K.A.O., Dover MSS 198; K.A.O., Sa/ZB7, Sandwich papers, list of mayors and memorable events 1415–1694.

97 K.A.O., Sa/ZB7; K.A.O., Sandwich miscellaneous burghal papers, Sa/ZB2/135.

98 CSPD 1679–80, p. 479.

99 K.A.O., Sa/ZB2/145.

100 , Turner, Original records, I, 14Google Scholar.

101 M. V.Jones, ‘Parliamentary boroughs’, pp. 213, 235; K.A.O., Sa/AC 8, Sandwich year book 1642–1730, fo. 199.

102 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 126, fo. 117.

103 K.A.O., Sa/AC 8, fo. 228; K.A.O., Sandwich miscellaneous burghal papers, Sa/ZB3/38:8.

104 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 124, fo. 84.

105 K.A.O., Sa/ZB3/38:6.

106 P.R.O., SP 29/417, fo. 65.

107 P.R.O., SP 29/417, fo. 66.

108 CSPD 1680–81, p. 542; Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 126, fo. 117.

109 CSPD 1682, p. 101.

110 K.A.O., Sa/ZB3/38:2; CSPD 1680–81, p. 596.

111 CSPD 1680–81, p. 542.

112 K.A.O., Sa/ZB3 /38:3.

113 CSPD 1680–81, pp. 541–2; Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 126, fo. 117.

114 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 126, fo. 117; CSPD 1660–81, pp. 551, 596.

115 P.R.O., PC 2/69, p. 417.

116 B.L., Stowe MSS 746, Dering correspondence, vol. iv, 1678–90, fo. 49; , Henning, House of commons, III, 194–5; II, 208Google Scholar.

117 CSPD 1680–81, p. 604.

118 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 126, fo. 117.

119 CSPD 1680–81, p. 604.

120 P.R.O., PC 2/69, p. 423.

121 CSPD 1682, p. 101.

122 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 124, fo. 42: (this amusing account of Pomfrett's escape from custody and the attempt to recapture him is reprinted in Eveleigh Woodruff, ‘Letters relating to the condition of the church’, pp. 191–2); K.A.O., Sa/ZB3/38:g.

123 K.A.O., New Romney papers, court files 1681, NR/JBf/35.

124 K.A.O., Sa/ZB3 /38:1.

125 CSPD 1682, p. 574.

126 CSPD 1682, p. 203.

127 K.A.O., Sa/AC 8, fo. 231 v; K.A.O., Sandwich seal book 1674–1764, Sa/ACs 1; CSPD 1682, p. 215.

128 CSPD 1682, p. 217.

129 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 33, fos. 179, 184.

130 K.A.O., Sa/ZB3 /38:4, 5.

131 CSPD 1683–84, p. 88.

132 Rhodes, ‘Suspected persons in Kent’, 75; K.A.O., Sa/AC 8, fo. 154; B.L., Add. MSS 27462, Register of the company of mercers, etc. of Sandwich, fos. 9–45.

133 K.A.O., Sa/ZB3/38:5; K.A.O., Sa/AC 8, fo. 233.

134 B.L., Add. MSS 27462, fo. 43.

135 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 33, fo. 190.

136 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 33, fo. 190.

137 Bodl. Lib., Tanner MSS 126, fo. 116.

138 P.R.O., PC 2/69, p. 623; K.A.O., Sa/ZB2/i46; K.A.O., Sa/ZB3/38.

139 K.A.O., Sa/AC 8, fos. 234, 235.

140 K.A.O., Sa/ZB3/38:10.

141 CSPD 1683–44, p. 155.

142 K.A.O., Sa/AC 8, fos. 234–7.

143 CSPD 1683–84, p. 106; K.A.O., Sa/ZB7.

144 K.A.O., Sa/AC 8, fo. 237.

145 K.A.O., Sa/AC 8, fo. 239.

146 Pickavance, ‘Borough charters’, p. 139.

147 Miller, ‘The crown and the borough charters’, pp. 55–6, 74.

148 Seaward, P. C., The cavalier parliament and the reconstruction of the old regime 1661–1667 (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 151–7Google Scholar.

149 Bodl. lib., Tanner MSS 126, fos. 132–3.

150 K.A.O., Sa/AC 8, fo. 252.

151 Styles, P., ‘The corporation of Bewdley under the later Stuart’, in Studies in seventeenth-century West Midlands history (Kineton, 1978), pp. 53–6;Google ScholarHolmes, C., Seventeenth-century Lixcolnshirs (Lincoln, 1980) p. 248Google Scholar; Jenkins, P., The making of a ruling class: The Glamorgan gentry 1640–1790 (Cambridge, 1983), p. 130CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

152 Pickavance, ‘Borough charters’, p. 311.

153 B.L., Stowe MSS 746, fos. 9–20; K.A.O., U275 A3, Account book of Sir Edward Dering 1680–83, PP- 33. 38; B.L., Add. MSS 33923, transcript of the diary of Sir John Knatchbull, fo. 434V.

154 CSPD 1680–81, pp. 200–1, 433.

155 CSPD January-June 1683, p. 361.

156 CSPD January-June 1683, p. 384.

157 K.A.O., New Romney papers relating to the Cinque Ports militia, NR/CPm 47.

158 C.C.A., A/C 8, Canterbury burghmotc minutes 1684–95, fo. I.

159 C.C.A., A/C 8, fos. 46, 47.

160 B.L., Add. MSS 3351a, Sandwich letters and papers 1570–1729, fo. 112.

161 Collinson, P., ‘Cranbrook and the Fletchers: popular and unpopular religion in the Kentish’ in Godly people:p essays on English protestantism and Puritanism (London, 1983), p. 421Google Scholar.

162 K.A.O., N/FQZ/i, pp. 47–8.

163 CSPD 1683–84, pp. 387–8; K.A.O., N/FQZ/I, pp. 41–2.

164 C.C.A., A/C 8, fo. 12; Crippen, ‘Canterbury church book’, p. 187.

165 Jones, J. R., The first whigs: the politics of the exclusion crisis 1678–1683 (London, 1961), p. 6Google Scholar.

166 Pickavance, ‘Borough charters’, p. 9; , Western, Monarchy and revolution, pp. 46-IIIGoogle Scholar.