Article contents
EXCLUSIVITY AND COSMOPOLITANISM: MULTI-ETHNIC CIVIL SOCIETY IN INTERWAR HONG KONG
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 May 2020
Abstract
While recent work has shown that interwar Asian civic associational culture was becoming more plural than previously understood, scholars focus mostly on transnational networks and neglect local associations co-existing in the colonial urban space. We also know little about how internationalist and liberal ideals interacted with notions of racial and national exclusion prevalent in the wider society. To overcome this, this article examines local organizations alongside transnational networks in interwar Hong Kong to understand fully how global trends in the interwar period affected colonial civic culture. Drawing on Freemasonry, Rotary, the League of Fellowship, and the Kowloon Residents’ Association, I discuss the aspirations of multi-racial urbanites in interwar Hong Kong and their limits. I argue that, while internationalism and colonial hierarchies allowed solidarity to be forged amongst multi-racial urbanites and encouraged their civic engagements, racism embedded in the society, rising nationalism, and constitutional constraints put limitations on their aspirations.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020
Footnotes
This article was made possible through the generous support of the Hong Kong History Project at the University of Bristol. I wish to thank Su Lin Lewis, Robert Bickers, and James Fellows for their advice and support. I am also thankful to the anonymous reviewers whose constructive comments benefited this article greatly.
References
1 Harper, Tim and Amrith, Sunil, ‘Introduction’, in Harper, Tim and Amrith, Sunil, eds., Sites of Asian interactions: ideas, network and mobility (Cambridge, 2014), pp. 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lewis, Su Lin, Cities in motion: urban life and cosmopolitanism in Southeast Asia, 1920–1940 (Cambridge, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Lewis, Su Lin, ‘Rotary International's “acid test”: multi-ethnic associational life in 1930s Southeast Asia’, Journal of Global History, 2 (2012), pp. 302–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lees, Lynn Hollen, Planting empire, cultivating subjects: British Malaya, 1786–1941 (Cambridge, 2017), ch. 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar, ‘Urban civil society’.
3 Arsan, Andrew, Lewis, Su Lin, and Richard, Anne-Isabelle, ‘Editorial – the roots of global civil society and the interwar moment’, Journal of Global History, 2 (2012), pp. 157–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 164.
4 William James Carrie, ‘Report on the census of the colony of Hong Kong of 1931’, Hong Kong, Census Department, 1931. Note that the Portuguese in Hong Kong, now termed ‘Macanese’, were mostly Portuguese Eurasians. See Yap, Felicia, ‘Eurasians in British Asia during the Second World War’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 4 (2011), pp. 485–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 487.
5 Carroll, John M., ‘The Peak: residential segregation in colonial Hong Kong’, in Goodman, Bryna and Goodman, David S. G., eds., Twentieth-century colonialism and China: localities, the everyday and the world (London, 2012), pp. 81–91Google Scholar.
6 Carroll, John M., Edge of empires: Chinese elites and British colonials in Hong Kong (Cambridge, MA, 2005), pp. 13–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 ‘Chinese and the Jockey Club’, South China Morning Post (SCMP), 15 Mar. 1919.
8 Miners, Norman, The government and politics of Hong Kong (Hong Kong, 1975), pp. 175–89Google Scholar.
9 The 1911 census recorded 124 merchants, 38 doctors, dentists, and medical students, 18 bankers, 36 brokers, 22 architects, 4 surveyors, and 189 professionals in ‘legal, literary, educational, and religious’ industries of the ‘British, American, European and Portuguese population’. P. P. J. Wodehouse, ‘Report on the census of the colony for 1911’, p. 47, in Hong Kong Sessional Papers, University of Hong King Libraries.
10 The 1931 census recorded 559 in ‘Professions’ and 855 in ‘Commerce & Finance’. The latter may include clerks and assistants, who were generally not regarded as part of the business and professional class. It also excluded the Portuguese, who were not regarded as Europeans for their Eurasian heritage, and included only ‘Europeans and USA Citizens’. Carrie, ‘Census of 1931’.
11 Arsan, Lewis, and Richard, ‘The roots of global civil society’, p. 158.
12 ‘A list of contributing members of the Victoria Lodge, No. 1026, 1925’, ‘Return of grand lodge certificates issued to member of the University Lodge No. 3666’, ‘A list of contributing members of the University Lodge, No. 3666, 1924’, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, United Grand Lodge of England (LMF).
13 ‘Rotary Club’, SCMP, 22 Dec. 1930.
14 ‘Editorial’, SCMP, 8 Nov. 1930.
15 Arsan, Andrew, ‘“This age is the age of associations”: committees, petitions, and the roots of interwar Middle Eastern internationalism’, Journal of Global History, 2 (2012), pp. 166–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 ‘League of Fellowship’, Hongkong Telegraph, 29 Nov. 1921.
17 ‘League of Fellowship and Service’, SCMP, 19 Oct. 1921.
18 ‘League of Fellowship’, SCMP, 29 Nov. 1921.
19 ‘Wound up’, China Mail, 22 Jan. 1925.
20 Wallis, Jill, Valiant for peace: a history of the Fellowship of Reconciliation, 1914–1989 (London, 1991)Google Scholar.
21 On American Protestant pacifism, see Appelbaum, Patricia, Kingdom to commune: Protestant pacifist culture between World War I and the Vietnam era (Chapel Hill, NC, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 ‘World reconstruction’, SCMP, 6 Oct. 1921; ‘World reconstruction’, SCMP, 8 Oct. 1921; ‘World reconstruction’, SCMP, 10 Oct. 1921; ‘The real world’, 12 Oct. 1921. For more on the Conference, see Goldstein, Erik and Maurer, John, eds., The Washington Conference, 1921–1922: naval rivalry, East Asian stability and the road to Pearl Harbor (Portland, OR, 1994)Google Scholar.
23 ‘League of Fellowship’, Hongkong Telegraph, 29 Nov. 1921.
24 YMCA Hong Kong centenary celebration, 1901–2002 (Hong Kong, 2001).
25 Law Yau Sang, ‘A Chinaman and the policy of the YMCA’, SCMP, 14 Oct. 1905.
26 ‘Racial disabilities in Hongkong’, SCMP, 13 Dec. 1921.
27 Nicholl, David Shelley, The golden wheel: the story of Rotary 1905 to the present (Estover, 1984)Google Scholar.
28 ‘Pacific Rotary’, China Mail, 2 Oct. 1928; ‘Keeping well in Shanghai’, SCMP, 22 Apr. 1925; ‘To the Rotarians’ Convention’, SCMP, 7 June 1927; ‘Editorial’, SCMP, 8 Nov. 1930; ‘The sphere of Rotary’, China Mail, 29 Feb. 1928; ‘Editorial’, China Mail, 8 May 1926.
29 ‘Rotary Cubs’, SCMP, 14 July 1927; ‘Editorial’, China Mail, 8 May 1926.
30 Resident, ‘A Rotary Club’, SCMP, 8 Feb. 1928.
31 ‘Editorial’, SCMP, 8 Nov. 1930.
32 ‘Rotary starts in Hongkong’, Hong Kong Telegraph, 9 Dec. 1930.
33 Old Hand, ‘Correspondence: racecourse facilities’, SCMP, 25 Oct. 1922; Civis, ‘European Reservation’, SCMP, 24 Apr. 1923.
34 ‘Wound up’, China Mail, 22 Jan. 1925.
35 Civis, ‘European Reservation’, SCMP, 24 Apr. 1923.
36 ‘Boai hui xuhui [博愛會敘會 League of Fellowship Meeting]’, Chinese Daily [華字日報], 14 Dec. 1921; ‘Racial disabilities and the Peak Reservation’, Hongkong Daily Press (HKDP), 13 Dec. 1921; ‘Racial disabilities in Hongkong’, SCMP, 13 Dec. 1921.
37 Examples include the Peak District (Residence) Ordinance, 1918, and Cheung Chau (Residence) Ordinance, 1919.
38 ‘Racial disabilities in Hongkong’, SCMP, 13 Dec. 1921.
39 ‘Racial disabilities and the Peak Reservation’, HKDP, 13 Dec. 1921.
40 ‘Wound up’, China Mail, 22 Jan. 1925.
41 Lewis, ‘Rotary International's “acid test”’.
42 Lees, Planting empire, p. 219.
43 Laqua, Daniel, ed., Internationalism reconfigured: transnational ideas and movements between the world wars (London, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
44 Harland-Jacobs, Jessica, Builders of empire: Freemasons and British imperialism, 1717–1927 (Chapel Hill, NC, 2007), p. 261Google Scholar.
45 Goff, Brendan, ‘Philanthropy and the “perfect democracy” of Rotary International’, in Hammack, David C. and Heydemann, Steven, eds., Globalization, philanthropy, and civil society: projecting institutional logics abroad (Bloomington, IN, 2009), pp. 47–70Google Scholar.
46 Briton, ‘Rotary and politics’, SCMP, 6 Oct. 1938.
47 ‘Hong Kong and refugees’, HKDP, 15 Sept. 1937; ‘Rotary Club’, SCMP, 26 Sept. 1937; ‘Red Cross work in China described by Dr. Grey at Rotary Tiffin’, HKDP, 21 Sept. 1938; ‘China war zones’, SCMP, 26 July 1939.
48 ‘Miss Freda Utley gives stirring address before Rotary meeting’, HKDP, 5 Oct. 1938.
49 ‘Royal Empire Society’, HKDP, 13 Jan. 1937.
50 Kushner, Tony, The battle of Britishness: migrant journeys, 1685 to the present (Manchester, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
51 de Grazia, Victoria, Irresistible empire: America's advance through twentieth-century Europe (Cambridge, MA, 2005), ch. 1Google Scholar.
52 ‘British empire’, SCMP, 19 May 1937.
53 ‘Empire Day address to Rotarians’, HKDP, 25 May 1938.
54 Harland-Jacobs, Builders of empire, pp. 3–4.
55 Fozdar, Vahid, ‘“That grand primeval and fundamental religion”: the transformation of Freemasonry into a British imperial cult’, Journal of World History, 22 (2011), pp. 493–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
56 LMF, ‘Minutes of the fifty-seventh annual meeting of the District Grand Lodge of Hongkong and South China’, 12 Jan. 1933, p. 15.
57 LMF, ‘Minutes of the 53rd annual meeting on the District Grand Lodge of Hongkong and South China’, 3 Jan. 1929, p. 11.
58 Ibid.
59 Keong, Neil Khor Jin, ‘Imperial cosmopolitan Malaya: a study of realist fiction in the Straits Chinese Magazine’, Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1 (2008), pp. 27–47Google Scholar; Christie, Clive J., A modern history of Southeast Asia: decolonization, nationalism and separatism (London, 1996), pp. 27–51Google Scholar. Also Amrith, Sunil S., ‘Empires, diasporas, and cultural circulation’, in Thompson, Andrew S., ed., Writing imperial histories (Manchester, 2013), pp. 216–39Google Scholar.
60 See Bickers, Robert, Out of China: how the Chinese ended the era of Western domination (London, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
61 Carroll, John M., A concise history of Hong Kong (Lanham, MD, 2007), pp. 353–74Google Scholar.
62 Carroll, Edge of empires, pp. 131–58.
63 Wahrman, Dror, Imagining the middle class: the political representation of class in Britain, c. 1780–1840 (Cambridge, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Watenpaugh, Keith David, Being modern in the Middle East: revolution, nationalism, colonialism, and the Arab middle class (Princeton, NJ, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
64 ‘Kowloon Residents’ Association’, HKDP, 2 Dec. 1919.
65 Bickers, Robert, ‘Loose ties that bound: British empire, colonial authority and Hong Kong’, in Yep, Ray, ed., Negotiating autonomy in Greater China: Hong Kong and its sovereign before and after 1997 (Copenhagen, 2013), pp. 29–54Google Scholar.
66 Carroll, A concise history of Hong Kong, p. 292.
67 ‘Kowloon Residents Association’, SCMP, 21 Jan. 1920.
68 ‘Kowloon residents’, Hongkong Telegraph, 2 Dec. 1919.
69 ‘Jiulong jumin xiehui xu hui [Kowloon Residents’ Association Meeting 九龍居民協會敘會]’, Chinese Mail [香港華字日報], 24 Mar. 1922.
70 ‘Kowloon Residents’ Association’, Hongkong Telegraph, 23 Feb. 1926.
71 ‘A communal “Oliver Twist”’, SCMP, 21 Feb. 1928; ‘Kowloon Residents’ Association’, HKDP, 10 Mar. 1931.
72 Report of the general committee of the Kowloon Residents’ Association for the year ended 31st December 1931 (Hong Kong, 1932), pp. 78–82.
73 Lyn-wah Dennis Lu, ‘Kadoorie Hill: the garden city of Kowloon’ (M.Sc. dissertation, Hong Kong, 2007).
74 Report of the KRA, 1931; ‘Kowloon Residents’ Association’, HKDP, 13 Feb. 1923.
75 Lewis, ‘Rotary International's “acid test”’.
76 ‘Kowloon Residents Association’, SCMP, 21 Jan. 1920.
77 ‘The new Kowloon’, SCMP, 24 Jan. 1920.
78 ‘Kowloon Residents’ Association’, HKDP 13 Feb. 1923.
79 ‘Kowloon Residents’ Association’, SCMP, 10 Feb. 1925.
80 ‘Kowloon Residents’ Association’, SCMP, 10 Mar. 1938.
81 ‘Rent Commission’, SCMP, 18 Apr. 1938.
82 Yik Man Tsang, Xianggang zui zaoqi zhengdang ji minzhudoushi: Gexinhui ji gongminxiehui [香港最早期政黨及民主鬥士:革新會及公民協會 Earliest political parties and democracy fighters: Reform Club and the Hong Kong Civic Association] (Hong Kong, 2019).
83 Sweetings, Anthony, Education in Hong Kong, pre-1841 to 1941: fact and opinion (Hong Kong, 1990), p. 347Google Scholar.
84 Stuart Braga, ‘Making impressions: the adaptation of a Portuguese family in Hong Kong, 1700–1950’ (Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University, 2012), pp. 284–5.
85 ‘Kowloon Residents’ Association’, China Mail, 5 Oct. 1920.
86 ‘The urban council’, SCMP, 30 Dec. 1935, 2.
87 Tsang, Steve, A modern history of Hong Kong (London, 2004), pp. 145–60Google Scholar. Also see Tsang, Steve, Democracy shelved: Great Britain, China, and attempts at constitutional reform in Hong Kong, 1945–1952 (Oxford, 1988)Google Scholar.
88 Carroll, A concise history of Hong Kong, p. 710.
89 See Louro, Michaele L., Comrades against imperialism: Nehru, India, and interwar internationalism (Cambridge, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stolte, Carolien M., ‘Social and political movements: experiments in anti-imperialist mobilization’, in Antunes, Cátia and Fatah-Black, Karwan, eds., Explorations in history and globalization (London, 2016), pp. 94–110Google Scholar; Goebel, Michael, Anti-imperial metropolis: interwar Paris and the seeds of third-world nationalism (Cambridge, 2017)Google Scholar.
90 See Colombijn, Freek, ‘The colonial municipal council in Padang (Sumatra) as political arena’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2 (1995), pp. 263–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
91 Obtained from obituaries and news articles in the Hong Kong presses, these figures (especially those of Rotarians) are likely to be underestimated, for they excluded Masons who died outside Hong Kong, while Rotarians’ names were rarely reported in news about the Rotary Club.
92 Ure, Gavin, Governors, politics and the Colonial Office: public policy in Hong Kong, 1918–1958 (Hong Kong, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
93 ‘Five key demands, not one less’, SCMP, 4 Sept. 2019.
- 1
- Cited by