Article contents
Conservative Political Thought in Britain in Response to the French Revolution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
In attempting to explain the stability of eighteenth-century Britain, and in particular the maintenance of political, social and economic supremacy by the landed aristocracy, scholars have begun to pay attention to the role of ideology and opinion. They see this not merely as providing an explanation of the way things were, but justifying and reinforcing them. The dominant ideological interpretation of society had emerged from the political and constitutional struggles of the seventeenth century, and in particular from the Glorious Revolution of 1688, an interpretation which might be denominated ‘Whig’, and which faced its most serious challenge at the very end of the eighteenth century from the French revolution. Despite the more tangible threat of French arms, the ruling classes in Britain did not underestimate the danger to social order from the arguments advanced by adherents of the rights-of-man doctrine propagated by the revolutionaries. If, in reply to these views, the status quo could be shown not only to be necessary and inevitable, but also right and good, that is to say correspondent with the true nature of man, then the morality of the existing practices and institutions of civil society would be proven. The problem at its most fundamental level was ethical, and it was a problem which conservatives attempted to solve in a variety of ways.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986
References
1 See Dickinson, H. T., Liberty and property: political ideology in eighteenth-century Britain (London, 1977), especially pp. 270–318Google Scholar; Christie, I. R., Stress and stability in late eighteenth-century Britain: reflections on the British avoidance of revolution (Oxford, 1984), pp. 156–82Google Scholar; Cannon, J, Aristocratic century: the peerage of eighteenth-century England (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 148–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 For the view that the term ‘Whig’ should not in the 1790s be wholly appropriated to Fox and his followers, but retain this broad signification, see Clark, J. C. D., ‘A general theory of party, opposition and government, 1688–1832’, The Historical Journal, XXIII (1980), 312–14Google Scholar; Derry, J., ‘Governing temperament under Pitt and Liverpool’, in Cannon, J. (ed.), The Whig ascendancy, colloquies on Hanoverian England (London, 1981), pp. 125–9Google Scholar; Christie, I. R., Wars and revolutions. Britain, 1760–1815 (London, 1982), p. 29Google Scholar.
3 For a brief survey of some of the major interpretations of Burke's thought, see Dreyer, F. A., Burke'spolitics: a study in Whig orthodoxy (Ontario, 1979), pp. 1–5Google Scholar.
4 Burke, Edmund, The works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke: a new edition (12 vols., London, 1808–1813), VI, 252–7Google Scholar.
5 William Pitt to Lady Chatham, 14 July 1789, P.R.O. 30/8/12. fos. 420–1; William Fraser to William Eden, 21 July 1789, B.L. Add. MS 34429, fos. 369–70; William Eden to Morton Eden, 30 July 1789, B.L. Add. MS 34429, fos. 395–7; Duke of Leeds to Duke of Dorset, 31 July 1789, B.L. Add MS 28064, fo. 190; Burke to Earl of Charlemont, 9 August 1789: Copeland, T. W. (ed.), The correspondence of Edmund Burke (10 vols., Cambridge, 1958–1978), VI, 10Google Scholar; William Eden to Pitt, 27 August 1789, P.R.O. 30/8/110, fos. 147–8.
6 Burke, , Works, V, 156Google Scholar.
7 See A controversial letter of a new kind to the Rev. Dr. Price, from a clergyman of the Church of England (London, 1790), pp. 32–3Google Scholar; Observations on Doctor Price's revolution sermon (London, 1790), n. pp. 7–9, pp. 14–30Google Scholar.
8 Burke, to Depont, Charles-Jean-François [11 1789], Correspondence of Burke, VI, 41–9Google Scholar.
9 Burke, , Works, VII, 9–20, 53–8, 61–2Google Scholar.
10 Pitt to Hugh Elliot, n.d. October 1790, P.R.O. 30/8/102, fos. 121–6.
11 Burke, , Works, VI, 148Google Scholar.
12 Baron Auckland to Morton Eden, 10 November 1792. B.L. Add. MS 34445, fos. 233–4.
13 Burke, to Edward, , Dalton, Count, 6 08 1793, Correspondence of Burke, VII, pp. 383–4Google Scholar; Burke, , Works, VIII, 145–91Google Scholar.
14 The Parliamentary Register (2nd series, 45 vols., London, 1781–1796), XXXVIII, 247Google Scholar.
15 Dickinson, , Liberty and property, p. 272Google Scholar.
16 Mackintosh, James, A discourse on the study of the law of nature and nations (London, 1799), pp. 36–7Google Scholar. Mackintosh (1765–1832) had defended the French revolution in his work Vindiciae Galliciae, published in April 1791, but by 1796 had joined its opponents.
17 [Green, John Richards], A plain address to the common sense of the people of England, containing an interesting abstract of Pain's life and writings. By John Gifford, Esq. (London, 1792), pp. 13–14Google Scholar
18 Stephen, L., History of English thought in the eighteenth century, (2 vols, new edn, London, 1962), II, 89, 105Google Scholar.
19 Paley, William, The principles of moral and political philosophy (London, 1785), pp. 8–17, 35–61, 72–4Google Scholar.
20 See Memorandum of Paley, n.d., P.R.O. 30/12/17/4, fos. 25–9, apparently written for Edward Law in defence of Warren Hastings, for whom Law was engaged as leading Counsel from 1788 to 1795.
21 Paley, , Moral and political philosophy, pp. 399–405Google Scholar.
22 Ibid., pp. 406–30.
23 Paine, Thomas, Rights of man: being an answer to Mr. Burke's attack on the French Revolution (London, 1791), pp. 50–4Google Scholar.
24 Ibid. pp. 43–50.
25 Paley, , Moral and political philosophy, pp. 441–8Google Scholar.
26 See also Ferguson, Adam, Principles of moral and political science; being chiefly a retrospect of lectures delivered in the College of Edinburgh (2 vols., Edinburgh, 1792), I, 11–25, 256–62Google Scholar.
27 Cooper, Samuel, The first principles of civil and ecclesiastical government, delineated, (in two parts,) in letters to Dr. Priestley, occasioned by his to Mr. Burke (Yarmouth, 1791), pp. 37–75Google Scholar. Cooper (1739–1800), curate of Great Yarmouth and rector of Morley and Yelverton, Norfolk, was educated at Magdalene College, Cambridge, which awarded him the degrees of B.A. in 1760, M.A. in 1763 and D.D. in 1777.
28 Hey, Richard, Happiness and rights: a dissertation upon several subjects relative to the rights of man and his happiness. Rights are means: happiness the end (York, 1792), pp. 127–40Google Scholar. Hey (1745–1835) was a fellow and tutor at Magdalene College, Cambridge, from 1782 to 1796.
29 Brown, William Lawrence, An essay on the natural equality of men; on the rights that result from it, and on the duties which it imposes (Edinburgh, 1793), pp. 93–4Google Scholar. Brown (1755–1830) was appointed professor of moral philosophy and ecclesiastical history at Utrecht in 1788, and became rector of the university in 1790. Having fled from Holland upon the French invasion in 1795, he was appointed professor of divinity in Marischal College, Aberdeen, and in the following year became principal of the university.
30 Hey, , Happiness and rights, pp. 194–201Google Scholar.
31 Ferguson, , Moral and political science, 11, 462–4Google Scholar.
32 Brown, , Essay on natural equality, pp. 9–19, 40–2Google Scholar.
33 Hey, , Happiness and rights, pp. 16–18, 21–4, 29–33, 43–4; 63–7, 105–13Google Scholar. See also Ferguson, , Moral and political science, 1, 262—3Google Scholar.
34 Tomline, G., Memoirs of the life of the Right Honourable William Pitt (2 vols., London, 1821), 1, 9Google Scholar.
35 For the different traditions within contract theory, see Gough, J. W., The social contract: a critical study of its development (2nd edn, Oxford, 1957), pp. 2–3Google Scholar.
36 [Smith, William Cusac], Rights of citizens; being an inquiry into some of the consequences of social union, and an examination of Mr. Paine's principles touching government (London, [1791]), pp. 80–5, 90Google Scholar. Cusac Smith (1766–1836) was called to the Irish bar in 1788, made king's counsel in 1795, appointed solicitor general of Ireland in 1800, and a baron of the exchequer in 1801. He succeeded his father as second baronet in 1808.
37 [Drummond, William], Philosophical sketches of the principles of society and government (London, 1795), pp. 1–8, 12–17, 36–44Google Scholar. Drummond (1770?–1828) was M.P. for St. Mawes 1795–6 and for Lostwithiel 1796–1806.
38 See Rights upon rights with observations upon observations (London, 1791), pp. 4–7Google Scholar; [John, John Saint], A letter from a magistrate to Mr. William Rose, of Whitehall, on Mr. Paine's rights of men (London, 1791), pp. 15–20Google Scholar.
39 [Holford, George Peter], Thoughts on the new and old principles of political obedience (London, 1793), pp. 14–20Google Scholar. Holford (1768?–1839) was educated at St. John's, Cambridge, called to the bar in 1791, and M.P. for various constituencies from 1803 to 1826.
40 Parsons, Lawrence, Thoughts on liberty and equality (London, 1793), pp. 25–8, 61–3Google Scholar. Parsons (1758–1841) was an Irish M.P. from 1782 to 1800, and a British M.P. from 1800 to 1807, when he succeeded as second earl of Rosse.
41 See for instance [Smith, Cusac], Rights of citizens, pp. 26–33, 36–40, 43–5Google Scholar.
42 Paley, E., (ed.), The works of William Paley, D.D. (7 vols., London, 1825), 1, 340Google Scholar.
43 Plowden, Francis, Church and state: being an enquiry into the origin nature and extent of ecclesiastical and civil authority, with reference to the British constitution (London, 1795), pp. 16–17Google Scholar. Plowden (1749–1829), who described himself as a Roman Catholic Whig, entered the Middle Temple in 1773 and practised as a conveyancer until the removal of disabilities on Roman Catholics, whereupon he was called to the bar in 1796.
44 Plowden, , Jura Anglorum. the rights of Englishmen (London, 1792), pp. 16–24, 32–4, 63–5Google Scholar. In consequence of this publication, the University of Oxford conferred on Plowden the honorary degree of D.C.L.
45 Remarks on the proceedings of the society who style themselves ‘The Friends of the People:’ and observations on the principles of government, as applicable to the British constitution. In two letters to a friend (London, 1792), pp. 84–9Google Scholar.
46 Tatham, Edward, Letters to the Right Honourable Edmund Burke on politics (Oxford, 1791), pp. 11–12, 51–2Google Scholar. Tatham (1749–1834) was elected sub-rector of Lincoln College, Oxford, in 1787 and rector in 1792.
47 Young, John, Essays on interesting subjects (2nd edn, Glasgow, 1794), pp. 6–8, 12–15Google Scholar. Young (1743–1806) was appointed minister to the seceding Presbyterian congregation at Hawick in 1767. He was awarded the honorary degree of D.D. by King's College, Aberdeen, on account of the Essays.
48 Gisborne, Thomas, The principles of moral philosophy investigated, and briefly applied to the constitution of civil society (London, 1795), pp. 71, 76–80, 84, 86Google Scholar. Gisborne (1758–1846), presented in 1783 to the perpetual curacy of Barton-under-Needwood, was a friend of many of the leading evangelicals, including William Wilberforce and Hannah More.
49 Plowden, , Jura Anglorum, pp. 38–42, 50–1, 67–70Google Scholar; Church and state, pp. 16, 20–31, 35–6, 40–50.
50 Scurlock, David, Thoughts on the influence of religion in civil government, and its tendency to promote and preserve the social liberty, and rights of man (London, 1792), pp. 38–41Google Scholar. Scurlock (1736 or 1737–1793) was educated at Jesus College, Oxford, being awarded the degrees of B.A. in 1758 and M.A. in 1761.
51 Tatham, , Letters on politics, p. 81Google Scholar.
52 Nares, Robert, Man's best right; a solemn appeal in the name of religion (London, 1793), pp. 12–17Google Scholar. Nares (1753–1829) was appointed chaplain to the duke of York in 1787, and assistant preacher at Lincoln's Inn 1788–1803. In 1793 he established the British Critic and edited the first forty-two numbers (May 1793 December 1813) with William Beloe.
53 Burke's, description of the social contract in Works, v, 183–5Google Scholar, summarizes the whole natural law position.
54 Ibid. VI, 205.
55 Ibid. VI, 201–2.
56 Ibid. VI, 205, 207–8.
57 Ibid. V, 122.
58 See for instance ibid. V, 106–9; Parsons, , Thoughts on liberty and equality, pp. 6–11, 18–22Google Scholar.
- 25
- Cited by