Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:20:40.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE CONGO OF EUROPE: THE BALKANS AND EMPIRE IN EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY BRITISH POLITICAL CULTURE*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2015

JAMES PERKINS
JAMES PERKINS*
Affiliation:
Birkbeck, University of London
*
Flat 3, 18 York Grove, London, se15 2ny[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores early twentieth-century British political and humanitarian engagement with the Balkans. It focuses on the Balkan Committee, a liberal pressure group that served as the main hub for British interest in the region in the decade before the First World War. Whilst drawing attention to the specific challenges presented by the Balkans to the British liberal mind, it is argued that the Balkan Committee was part of a wider movement of humanitarianism and political activism that encompassed both continental and colonial questions. The issues around which the committee campaigned are related to humanitarian protests against the use of forced labour in Africa, in particular the Congo Reform Association, as well as to the Persia Committee, formed in protest against the 1907 Anglo-Russian agreement. This approach highlights how ‘Europe’ and empire were interconnected agendas within an overarching liberal-internationalist worldview and reformist conscience, despite the different cultural lenses through which humanitarian questions in different parts of the globe were viewed. It is suggested that research into British interaction with the Balkans offers a fruitful means by which to integrate historical analysis of the continental and imperial aspects of Britain's external relations in the ‘age of empire’.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 565 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author wishes to thank David Feldman and Jan Rüger for their comments on earlier drafts of this article, and the article's anonymous reviewers for their helpful observations and suggestions.

References

1 Hobsbawm, E., The age of empire, 1875–1914 (orig. publ. 1987; London, 1994)Google Scholar.

2 West, R., Black lamb and grey falcon: a journey through Yugoslavia (orig. publ. 1942, 1993), p. 21Google Scholar.

3 As discussed in Rüger, J., ‘Britain, empire, Europe: re-reading Eric Hobsbawm’, Journal of Modern European History, 11 (2013), pp. 417–23, at pp. 420–1Google Scholar; Grant, K., Levine, P., and Trentmann, F., eds., Beyond sovereignty: Britain, empire and transnationalism, c. 1880–1950 (Basingstoke, 2007) p. 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mazower, M., ‘An international civilisation? Empire, internationalism and the crisis of the mid-twentieth century’, International Affairs, 82 (2006), pp. 553–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Weitz, E. D., ‘From Vienna to the Paris System: international politics and the entangled histories of human rights, forced deportations, and civilising mission’, American Historical Review, 113 (2008), pp. 1313–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Grant, K., ‘The British empire, international government, and human rights’, History Compass, 11 (2013), pp. 573–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Finn, M., After Chartism: class and nation in English radical politics, 1848–1874 (Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar; Parry, J., The politics of patriotism: English liberalism, national identity and Europe, 1830–1886 (Cambridge, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Taylor, M., The decline of British radicalism (Oxford, 1995)Google Scholar.

5 Parry, Politics of patriotism, pp. 25–6.

6 For discussions of this, see Price, R., ‘One big thing: Britain, its empire, and their imperial culture’, Journal of British Studies, 45 (2006), pp. 602–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Feldman, D., ‘The new imperial history’, Journal of Victorian Culture, 9 (2004), pp. 235–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Hyam, R., ‘The primacy of geopolitics: the dynamics of British imperial policy, 1763–1963’ (in reference to the work of the historian Wm Roger Louis), in King, R. D. and Kitson, R., eds., The statecraft of British imperialism: essays in honour of Wm. Roger Louis (London, 1999), p. 27Google Scholar.

8 Crook, T., Gill, R., and Taithe, B., ‘Liberal civilisation and its discontents: evil, barbarism, and empire’, in Crook, T., Gill, R., and Taithe, B., eds., Evil, barbarism and empire: Britain and abroad, c. 1830–2000 (Basingstoke, 2011), p. 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Mazower, ‘An international civilisation?’, p. 555.

10 Rodogno, D., Against massacre: humanitarian intervention in the Ottoman empire, 1815–1914 (Princeton, NJ, 2012), p. 176Google Scholar.

11 Important examples include Todorova, M., Imagining the Balkans (Oxford, 1997, and updated edn, 2009)Google Scholar; Goldsworthy, V., Inventing Ruritania: the imperialism of the imagination (New Haven, CT, 1998; and new edn London, 2012)Google Scholar; Hammond, A., The debated lands: British and American representations of the Balkans (Cardiff, 2007)Google Scholar; Bakić-Hayden, M. and Hayden, R., ‘Orientalist variations on the theme “Balkans”: symbolic geography in recent Yugoslav cultural politics’, Slavic Review, 51 (1992), pp. 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Hammond, A., ‘Typologies of the East: on distinguishing balkanism and orientalism’, Nineteenth-Century Contexts, 29 (2007), pp. 201–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Flemming, K., ‘Orientalism, the Balkans, and Balkan historiography’, American Historical Review, 105 (2000), pp. 13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Goldsworthy, Inventing Ruritania (new edn), p. 2.

14 Durham, M. E., The burden of the Balkans (London, 1905)Google Scholar.

15 Balkan Committee, Third annual report of the Executive Committee (London, 1907), pp. 5–7Google Scholar; B. Dackombe, ‘Single-issue extra-parliamentary groups and liberal internationalism, 1899–1920’ (Ph.D. thesis, Open University, 2008), p. 203 (appendix 1).

16 Noel Buxton papers, McGill University, Montreal, draft of an Autobiography (MS 951 c. 7/12); Fieldhouse, H. N., ‘Noel Buxton and A. J. P. Taylor's “The trouble makers”’’, in Gilbert, M., ed., A century of conflict, 1850–1950: essays for A. J. P. Taylor (London, 1966), p. 177Google Scholar.

17 Fieldhouse, ‘Noel Buxton’, p. 187.

18 Arthur Ponsonby papers, Bodleian Library, University of Oxford (MS Eng. hist. c.  657/137).

19 Noel Buxton papers, draft of an Autobiography, p. 147 (MS 951 c. 8/2).

20 Balkan Committee, Third annual report, p. 8.

21 Balkan Committee, Second report of the Executive Committee (London, 1906), p. 12Google Scholar; Gooch, G. P. and Temperley, H. W., British documents on the origins of the war, 1898–1914, v: The Near East: the Macedonian problem and the annexation of Bosnia, 1903–1909 (London, 1928), p. 205Google Scholar (Doc. No. 162, Sir Edward Grey to Sir N. O'Conor).

22 Michail, E., The British and the Balkans: framing images of foreign lands, 1900–1950 (London, 2011), pp. 33, 38Google Scholar.

23 British parliamentary debates, House of Commons, 25 Feb. 1908 (Hansard, vol. 184, cc 1663–708); speech by Lord Fitzmaurice, Times, 1 Feb. 1908, issue 38558, p. 10, col. E; resolutions passed at meetings associating Macedonia with the Congo in The National Archives (TNA, FO 371/536, file refs. 14909, 23366, and FO 371/341, file ref. 40853).

24 Rodogno, Against massacre, p. 176.

25 Report of a speech by Noel Buxton, Yorkshire Herald, 19 Feb. 1907: TNA, FO 371/341, file ref. 5862; N. Buxton, ‘Freedom and servitude in the Balkans’, Westminster Review, 159 (May 1903), pp. 481–90, at p. 489; Noel Buxton letter to A. G. Gardiner, 8 Oct. 1907 (A. G. Gardiner papers, London School of Economics (LSE) Library, London: Gardiner 1/5). On ‘Chinese slavery’ and the impact of the Victorian abolitionist tradition, Grant, K., A civilized savagery: Britain and the new slaveries in Africa, 1884–1926 (London, 2005), passimGoogle Scholar.

26 Draft letter from Noel Buxton to his wife (never sent), 20 Dec. 1914: Noel Buxton papers (MS 951 c. 8/8; emphasis in the original); James Bryce to Sir Fowell Buxton, 1 Jan. 1913: Noel Buxton papers (MS 951 c. 1/17).

27 H. Nevinson, ‘The rights of subject races’, Nation, 20 Apr. 1907, p. 293; report of speech by Prof. J. Westlake, Manchester Guardian, 19 Jan. 1907, p. 9.

28 N. Buxton and C. R. Buxton, ‘Public opinion and Macedonia’, Monthly Review (Dec. 1903), pp. 95–110, at p. 107.

29 Parry, Politics of patriotism, p. 14.

30 Rodogno, Against massacre, p. 177.

31 Address of the Stop the War Committee, 21 Jan. 1901, cited in S. Koss, The pro-Boers: the anatomy of an antiwar movement (Chicago, IL, 1973), p. 73.

32 Buxton and Buxton, ‘Public opinion and Macedonia’, pp. 95, 110.

33 Typescript of report of the dinner given by members of the Balkan Committee to Noel Buxton, 9 June 1909: H. N. Brailsford papers, People's History Museum, Manchester (HNB/4/11).

34 McCormick, R., ‘Noel Buxton, the Balkan Committee and reform in Macedonia, 1903–1914’, in Pappas, N., ed., Antiquity and modernity: a celebration of European history and heritage in the Olympic year, 2004 (Athens, 2004), p. 156Google Scholar.

35 Balkan Committee, Fourth annual report of the Executive Committee for year ending December 31- 1907 (London, 1908), p. 17Google Scholar; H. N. Brailsford, ‘Macedonia: a land of fear’, Manchester Guardian, 10 June 1903, p. 10.

36 C. F. G. Masterman, ‘The ruin of Macedonia’, Nation, 9 Nov. 1907, pp. 182–3, and subsequent correspondence: 16 Nov., p. 239, 23 Nov., pp. 274–5, 30 Nov., p. 305, 7 Dec., pp. 344–5, 14 Dec., p. 400, 21 Dec., p. 437.

37 Sylvest, C., British liberal internationalism, 1880–1930: making progress? (Manchester, 2009), pp. 3–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Economist, 16 Jan. 1909, cited in Weinroth, H., ‘Radicalism and nationalism’, in Morris, A. J. A., Edwardian radicalism, 1900–1914: some aspects of British radicalism (London, 1974), p. 225Google Scholar; Evans, J., Great Britain and the creation of Yugoslavia: negotiating Balkan nationality and identity (London, 2008), p. 70Google Scholar; Buxton, ‘Freedom and servitude in the Balkans’, p. 482.

39 Brailsford, H. N., Macedonia: its races and their future (London, 1906), pp. x, 30Google Scholar.

40 Wilson, P. W., ‘The general situation in Macedonia’, in the Balkan Committee, Macedonia 1903 (London, 1903), p. 10Google Scholar.

41 Nevinson, H. W., ‘Notes on the Balkans, with a table’, English Review, 1 (1908), p. 186Google Scholar; Brailsford, H. N., ‘The Renaissance of Turkey’, Albany Review, 3 (1908), pp. 685, 687Google Scholar.

42 Daily News, 17 July 1908, p. 4, 20 July 1908, p. 4, 25 July 1908, p. 4, 28 July 1908, p. 4. See also Buxton, C., Turkey in Revolution (London, 1909)Google Scholar.

43 H. N. Brailsford to Noel Buxton, 14 Aug. 1908: Noel Buxton papers (MS 951 c. 1/14), cited in Leventhal, F., The last dissenter: H. N. Brailsford and his world (Oxford, 1985), p. 99Google Scholar.

44 Mandler, P., ‘“Race” and “nation” in mid-Victorian thought’, in Collini, S., Whatmore, R., and Young, B., eds., History, religion, culture: British intellectual history, 1750–1950 (Cambridge, 2000), p. 235Google Scholar.

45 Manifesto of the Balkan Committee, Jan. 1912: Noel Buxton papers (MS 951 c. 24/2).

46 Typescript of an untitled and undated speech or article by Jebb on her experiences in Macedonia (p. 9): papers of Eglantyne Jebb, Women's Library, LSE Library, London (7EJB/C/04).

47 Seton-Watson, R. W., ‘New phases of the Balkan question’, Contemporary Review, 104 (1913), pp. 322–30, at p. 327Google Scholar; H. N. Brailsford, ‘The autonomy of Albania’, Nation, 28 Dec. 1912, pp. 566–7.

48 Nation, 4 July 1914. Franz Ferdinand had supposedly been sympathetic to the idea of reconstructing the Hapsburg empire on such ‘Trialist’ (i.e. German–Magyar–Slav) lines.

49 Huzzey, R., Freedom burning: anti-slavery and empire in Victorian Britain (Ithaca, NY, 2012), p. 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Gupta, P. S., Imperialism and the British labour movement (Basingstoke, 1975), p. 131Google Scholar.

51 Bonakdarian, M., Britain and the Iranian constitutional revolution of 1906–1911: foreign policy, imperialism, and dissent (Syracuse, NY, 2006), pp. 144–5Google Scholar.

52 Perris, G. H., Our foreign policy and Sir Edward Grey's failure (London, 1912)Google Scholar.

53 Bonakdarian, Britain and the Iranian constitutional revolution, p. 108; Murray, J. A., ‘Foreign policy debated: Sir Edward Grey and his critics, 1911–1912’, in Power, public opinion and diplomacy: essays in honour of Eber Malcolm Carroll by his former students (Durham, NC, 1959), p. 170Google Scholar.

54 Members of the Persia Committee taken from Bonakdarian, M., ‘The Persia Committee and the constitutional revolution in Iran’, British Society for Middle Eastern Studies, 18 (1991), pp. 186–207, at pp. 197, 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Brailsford, H. N., ‘Sir Edward Grey's foreign policy’, Independent Review, 10 (1906), pp. 256–71, at pp. 257, 271Google Scholar.

56 Daily News, 29 June 1908, p. 6; Brailsford, H. N., The fruits of our Russian alliance (London, 1912), p. 59Google Scholar.

57 Leventhal, The last dissenter; John, A., War, journalism and the shaping of the twentieth century: the life and times of Henry W. Nevinson (London, 2006)Google Scholar; Grant, K., ‘British sufragettes and the Russian method of the hunger strike’, Contemporary Studies in Society and History, 53 (2011), pp. 113–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 127.

58 Times, 5 Oct. 1909, cited in Grant, ‘British sufragettes’, p. 134.

59 Grant, ‘British sufragettes’, p. 127.

60 Press-cutting of an article by Brailsford, Daily News, 20 June 1907: Brailsford papers (HNB/49).

61 This is an observation made with regard to British engagement with the plight of the Ottoman Armenians – a cause with which several Balkan Committee members, notably Bryce, were also heavily involved: Laycock, J., Imagining Armenia: orientalism, ambiguity and intervention (Manchester, 2009), p. 222Google Scholar.

62 Bryce gave the 1902 Romanes lecture at Oxford on ‘The relations of the advanced and the backward races of mankind’. On Westlake's approach to international law and the status of ‘barbaric’ states, see Mazower, ‘An international civilisation?’, p. 555.

63 Mazower, M., No enchanted palace: the end of empire and the ideological origins of the United Nations (Princeton, NJ, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Bryce, J., Essays and addresses in war time (London, 1918), pp. 150–1Google Scholar; Brailsford, H. N., After the peace (London, 1920), p. 165Google Scholar, and Olives of endless age (London, 1928), p. 335Google Scholar.

65 Buxton, N., Europe and the Turks (2nd edn, London, 1912), p. 83Google Scholar.

66 Brailsford, H. N., ‘Macedonia: a possible solution’, Fortnightly Review, 74 (1903), pp. 638–46, at p. 641 (my italics)Google Scholar; Balkan Committee, Macedonian massacres – photos from Macedonia (London, 1907), pp. 8–9Google Scholar.

67 Bryce, J., ‘Introduction’, in Villari, L., ed., The Balkan question: the present condition of the Balkans and of European responsibilities by various writers (New York, NY, 1905), p. 13Google Scholar.

68 J. Bryce, ‘Neutral nations and the war’ (Aug. 1914), in Essays and addresses in war time, pp. 12–13, 14.

69 Buxton, C. R., ‘Europe unredeemed’, Albany Review, 2 (1908), pp. 373–82Google Scholar.

70 Readman, P., Land and nation in England: patriotism, national identity and the politics of the land, 1880–1914 (Woodbridge, 2008), passimGoogle Scholar.

71 Scott-James, R. A., ‘The Austrian occupation of Macedonia’, Fortnightly Review, 78 (1905), pp. 894–903, at pp. 902–3Google Scholar.

72 Scott-James, R. A., Modernism and romance (London, 1908), pp. 161–5Google Scholar.

73 ‘Preface’, in Masterman, C. F. G., ed., The heart of the empire: discussions of problems of modern city life in England (orig. publ. 1901; Brighton, 1973), p. 8Google Scholar; ‘The Austrian lead in the Balkans’, Nation, 15 Feb. 1908, p. 698; Buxton, N., With the Bulgarian staff (London, 1913), p. 76Google Scholar; H. N. Brailsford, ‘The Macedonian peasantry: the economics of revolt’, Manchester Guardian, 15 May 1903, p. 4; M. P. Suonpaa, ‘British perceptions of the Balkan Slavs: professional and popular categorizations before 1914’ (Ph.D. thesis, Hull, 2008), pp. 122–3, 132–4.

74 ‘A Diplomatist’ (Young), Nationalism and war in the Near East (Oxford, 1915)Google Scholar, pp. 3, 241.

75 N. Buxton and C. R. Buxton, ‘Epistle to the Bulgarians’ (Oct. 1914): Noel Buxton papers (MS 951 c. 14/5).

76 Todorova's Imagining the Balkans remains the key text in this respect, though Michail's recent study gives greater emphasis to positive representations (Michail, The British and the Balkans).

77 Stavrianos, L., The Balkans, 1815–1914 (New York, NY, 1963), p. 83Google Scholar.

78 Packer, I., Lloyd George, liberalism and the land: the land issue and party politics, 1906–1914 (Woodbridge, 2001), p. 178Google Scholar. Although there is rarely direct reference to Macedonia in their writings on the subject, many advocates of land reform policies were members of the Balkan Committee, including: Masterman, Hammond, W. A. Moore, G. K. Chesterton, Aneurin Williams, Herbert Samuel, and Charles Buxton.

79 Seton-Watson, R. W., The spirit of the Serb (London, 1915), pp. 13, 16, 19Google Scholar.

80 Oldershaw, L., ‘The fact of the matter’, in Oldershaw, L., ed., England: a nation (London, 1904), pp. 13, 257–8Google Scholar.

81 TNA, copies of resolutions passed at public meetings and forwarded to the Foreign Office in the autumn of 1907 (FO 371/342) and in the first quarter of 1908 (FO 371/536).

82 Lansdowne to Sir N. O'Connor, British ambassador in Constantinople, 24 Sept. 1903: Lansdowne papers, TNA, FO 800/143.

83 H. F. B. Lynch to Noel Buxton, 5 Mar. 1906: Noel Buxton papers (MS 951 c. 2/29).

84 Deatani, B. and Tomes, J., eds., Albania's greatest friend: Aubrey Herbert and the making of modern Albania, 1904–1928 (London, 2011), p. 74Google Scholar.

85 Bryce to Buxton, 25 July 1903 (Noel Buxton papers) cited in Fieldhouse, ‘Noel Buxton’, p. 182.

86 For indicative figures, see the Foreign Office memorandum ‘The Macedonian question and komitaji activity’ (based on figures obtained in 1912), cited in Rossos, A., ‘The British Foreign Office and Macedonian national identity, 1918–1941’, Slavic Review, 53 (1994), pp. 369–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 381: ‘Macedonian Slavs’ 1,150,000; Turks 400,000; Greeks 300,000; Vlachs 200,000; Albanians 120,000; Jews 100,000; Gypsies 10,000.

87 TNA, FO 371/151, file ref. 39819 (minute by Grey concerning report on ‘Bulgaria and the Macedonian problem’, received 23 Nov. 1906).

88 Scotsman, 14 Oct. 1912 (press-cutting in the Noel Buxton papers, MS 951, c. 24/2).

89 Durham, Burden of the Balkans, p. 4.

90 TNA, FO 371/377, press-cutting of Grey's response to the delegation led by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Times, 10 July 1907.

91 Margaret Keynes to Eglantyne Jebb, cited in Mulley, C., The woman who saved the children: a biography of Eglantyne Jebb, founder of Save the Children (Oxford, 2009), p. 145Google Scholar.

92 Hughes, L., ‘Dissident scribes: some lesser-known activism in and around Africa in the early-twentieth century’, Round Table, 99 (2010), pp. 249–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pavlakis, D., ‘The development of British overseas humanitarianism and the Congo reform campaign’, Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History, 11 (2010)Google Scholar, Project MUSE http://muse.jhu.edu/; Sliwinski, S., ‘The childhood of human rights: the Kodak on the Congo’, Journal of Visual Culture, 5 (2006), pp. 333–62, at p. 334CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Grant, A civilised savagery, passim.

93 Grant, K., ‘Christian critics of empire: missionaries, lantern lectures, and the Congo reform campaign in Britain’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 28 (2000), pp. 27–58, at pp. 36, 39Google Scholar; Cline, C., E. D. Morel, 1873–1924: the strategies of protest (Belfast, 1980), p. 32Google Scholar; Louis, Wm R. and Stengers, J., E. D. Morel's history of the Congo reform movement (Oxford, 1968), p. 204Google Scholar.

94 Grant, ‘Christian critics of empire’, pp. 40, 46–8; Sliwinski, ‘Childhood of human rights’, p. 347; Porter, B., Critics of empire: British radical attitudes to colonialism in Africa, 1895–1914 (London, 1968), pp. 268–70, 304 (note)Google Scholar.

95 Sliwinski, ‘Childhood of human rights’, p. 334.

96 Ibid., pp. 335, 344–8.

97 Grant, ‘Christian critics of empire’, p. 28.

98 Louis and Stengers, History of the Congo reform movement, p. 209; Pavlakis, ‘British overseas humanitarianism’; Grant, A civilised savagery, p. 83. On the issue of declining parliamentary support for foreign policy dissenters, see McLean, D., ‘English radicals, Russia, and the fate of Persia 1907–1913’, English Historical Review, 93 (1978), pp. 338–52, at p. 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

99 Memorandum by G. R. Clerk, 21 May 1909 (TNA, FO 367/165), cited in Louis and Stengers, History of the Congo reform movement, p. 210; Grey cited in Grant, ‘Christian critics of empire’, p. 53.

100 Vogel, R., ‘Noel Buxton: the “trouble-maker” and his papers’, Fontanus, 3 (1990), pp. 131–50Google Scholar, at pp. 138–9.

101 Porter, Critics of empire, p. 288.

102 Balkan Committee, Macedonian Massacres, pp. 5–6.

103 Reported in Daily News, 9 May 1908, p. 5.

104 Note issued by James Bryce (as president of the Balkan Committee), F. S. Stevenson (as chairman of the Byron Society), and Noel Buxton (as chairman of the Balkan Committee), dated 28 July 1905: Noel Buxton papers (MS 951 c. 25/2); H. W. Nevinson, ‘Macedonia’, in Oldershaw, ed., England: a nation, pp. 178–9.

105 Johnson, S., Pogroms, peasants, Jews: Britain and eastern Europe's ‘Jewish question’, 1867–1925 (Basingstoke, 2011)Google Scholar.

106 ‘A Macedonian policy’: letter to the editor, Speaker, 5 Sept. 1903, p. 526.

107 O'Connor to Grey, 4 Feb. 1908 (TNA, FO 371/581/4529), cited in McCormick, ‘The Balkan Committee and reform in Macedonia’, p. 156.

108 See Seton-Watson, C. and Seton-Watson, H., The making of a new Europe: R. W. Seton-Watson and the last years of Austria-Hungary (London, 1981)Google Scholar.

109 Seton-Watson, R. W., The rise of nationality in the Balkans (London, 1917)Google Scholar.

110 Brailsford, After the peace, pp. 53–5, 62; Zangwill, I., The principle of nationalities (London, 1917), p. 85Google Scholar.

111 Buxton, C. R. and Buxton, D., The world after the war (London, 1920), ch. 2Google Scholar.

112 Taylor, A. J. P., The trouble makers: dissent over foreign policy, 1792–1939 (orig. publ. 1957; Harmondsworth, 1985), p. 107Google Scholar.

113 Rüger, J., ‘Revisiting the Anglo-German antagonism’, Journal of Modern History, 83 (2011), p. 583CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

114 Undated press-cutting of a War and Peace review of Noel and Charles Buxton's The war and the Balkans (published 1915): Noel Buxton papers (MS 951 c. 24/4).