Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:04:03.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bentham versus Pitt: Jeremy Bentham and British Foreign Policy 1789*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Stephen Conway
Stephen Conway
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The successes and failures of British foreign policy from the end of the American war of independence until the outbreak of the conflict with revolutionary France will be familiar, at least in outline, to many students of late-eighteenth-century history. In 1783 Britain was widely regarded as having been reduced to the status of a second-rank power. British ministers, and especially Pitt the Younger and his first foreign secretary, the marquess of Carmarthen, sought a European alliance to end their country's isolation and vulnerability. The Anglo-French commercial treaty of 1786, the product of French rather than British pressure, was of little help in this respect, as it never developed beyond a limited trade agreement. Negotiations for similar reciprocal commercial concessions with other powers all proved fruitless. In 1787 and 1788, however, political and military arrangements were concluded with the Dutch and the Prussians after Prussian troops – with British encouragement and support – had intervened in the United Provinces to secure the position of the house of Orange and to crush the pro-French ‘Patriot’ party. Fortified by this new British – Prussian – Dutch connexion, or Triple Alliance as it was called, Pitt's government was able to exert considerable influence in Europe and farther afield. In 1788, when the Swedes attacked Russia, which was already at war with the Turks, Denmark, in accordance with its treaty obligations to Russia, invaded Sweden. The British and Prussians threatened the Danes and forced them to withdraw. A few months later, in April 1789, renewed Anglo-Prussian pressure compelled Denmark to maintain a strict neutrality in the continuing Russo-Swedish conflict. In 1790 the British were just as successful in a confrontation with Spain over the Nootka Sound in North America. Only when the government backed down during the dispute with Russia over possession of the Turkish fortress of Ochakov on the Black Sea coast, were the limits of British power fully exposed.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 1987 , pp. 791 - 809
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bentham's attack on Pitt has been noticed by several Bentham specialists. See particularly, Schwarzenberger, Georg, ‘Bentham's contribution to international law and organization’, Keeton, George W. and Schwarzenberger, Georg (eds.), Jeremy Bentham and the law: a symposium (London, 1948), pp. 173–4Google Scholar; Stark, Werner (ed.), Jeremy Bentham's economic writings (3 vols., London, 1952–1954), I, 38–48Google Scholar; Mack, Mary, Jeremy Bentham: an odyssey of ideas 1748–1792 (London, 1962), pp. 398–400Google Scholar; Burns, J. H., ‘Bentham and the French Revolution’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series xvi (1966), 101Google Scholar.

2 ‘Protest International’, marginals, Bentham MSS UC xxv. no, University College London. Bentham's marginal notes were written on paper divided into columns and contain either summaries of text that he had already written or indications of what he intended to write.

3 British Library shelf no. CT 57(2). A fragmentary draft for the first Anti-Machiavel, dating from early June 1789 (Bentham MSS UC clxix. 163) mentions the ‘harmless reveries of Sir John Dalrymple’. By this Bentham almost certainly meant Dalrymple's Queries, which had been published by April 1789 (see the contributions on the Prussian Alliance in The Public Advertiser in April 1789 – apparently by Dalrymple himself-announcing the appearance of the Queries). Bentham had therefore probably read the Queries by early June 1789. But his annotations seem to be of a later date. On page 49 of his copy he made reference to his own ‘Plan for perpetual peace’, which, as I shall try to show, grew out of his criticism of Pitt's foreign policy.

4 An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (The collected works of Jeremy Bentham (London, 1970), p. 296Google Scholar.

5 Janis, M. W., ‘Jeremy Bentham and the fashioning of “International Law”’, American Journal of International Law, LXXVIII (1984), 406–7Google Scholar.

6 The correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, vol. III, ed. Christie, Ian R. (London, 1971), p. 126Google Scholar (henceforth Correspondence, III).

7 ‘Projet forme entre-gens’, Bentham MSS UC xxxiii. 81–2; ‘Vue général d'un corps complet de Législation’, Traités de législation civile et pénale, ed. Dumont, P. E. L. (2 vols., Paris, 1802), I, 328–31Google Scholar.

8 Bentham MSS UC xxv. 1–6.

9 Eloge du roi de Prusse. Par tauteur de Cessai general de tactique (London, 1787)Google Scholar. For Bentham's, reading of this work see his memorandum ‘Librivisendi at Berlin’, 17 12 1787, Correspondence, III, 611Google Scholar.

10 ‘Guibert’, Bentham MSS UC xxv. 66–7.

11 ‘Prefat’, Bentham MSS UC xxvii. 141. Frederick's work was originally published as Examen du prince de Machiavel, avec des notes historiques et politiques (The Hague, 1740)Google Scholar. It appeared shortly before Frederick's troops marched into Austrian Silesia; a piece of Realpolitik worthy of Machiavelli himself.

12 Bentham MSS UC XXVII 106, 114 See also his draft of an unsent letter, probably dating from late 1776, The correspondence ofJeremy Bentham, vol I, ed Spngge, T L S (London, 1968), p 366Google Scholar (henceforth Correspondence, 1), and further drafts at Bentham MSS UC clxix 27–35

13 Anderson, M S, ‘Samuel Bentham in Russia, 1779–1791’, American Slavic and East European Review, xv (1956), 157–72Google Scholar, Christie, Ian R, ‘Samuel Bentham and the Russian Dnieper flotilla 1787–1788’, The Slavonic and East European Review, L (1972), 173–97Google Scholar

14 Fitzmaunce, Edmond George Petty, Fitzmaunce, Baron, Life of William earl of Shelbume, afterwards first marquess of Lansdowne (2 vols, London, 1912), II, 307Google Scholar, Norns, John, Shelbume and reform (London, 1963), p 281Google Scholar

15 Lansdowne to Bentham, 20 Jan 1789, The correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, vol lv, ed Milne, A T (London, 1981), p 23Google Scholar (henceforth Correspondence, iv)

16 Ibid. p. 44.

17 Ibid. p. 76. Lansdowne's own intervention was a long time coming. On 13 Dec. 1790 he reviewed foreign policy in the Lords and condemned the abandonment of a pacific approach since the death of Frederick the Great. See Parliamentary History, xxviii, 941–2.

18 Correspondence, iv, 74.

19 Bentham to Lansdowne, 17 June 1789, ibid. p. 73.

20 Stark, , Jeremy Bentham's economic writings, I, 38–9Google Scholar.

21 Indeed, his attitude always remained somewhat ambivalent. Later indications of Bentham's desire to gain social acceptance at the highest levels are scattered throughout his letters to his secretary John Herbert Koe. In Sept. 1817, for instance, he was most concerned that Ford Abbey (his country seat, then in Devon, now in Dorset) should be well stocked with silver cutlery in preparation for a visit by Sir Samuel and Lady Romilly. ‘Whe n the quality are gone’, Bentham wrote, ‘the silver shall be honestly returned’. Bentham to Koe, 6 Sept. 1817, Koe MSS, in the possession of Mrs B. Hyde-Smith, Wilbraham Temple, Great Wilbraham, Cambridgeshire.

22 Correspondence, iv, 83.

23 Ibid. p. 74.

24 Ibid. pp. 145–611.

25 Bentham, to Bentham, Samuel, 22 02. 1776, Correspondence, I, 297Google Scholar.

26 Correspondence, IV, I45–6n.

27 ProfessorBurns, (‘Bentham and the French Revolution’, p. 95Google Scholar) mentions another instance when Bentham was ‘stubbornly diffident’.

28 Bentham, to Lansdowne, , 24 08 1790, Correspondence, iv, 145–70Google Scholar.

29 See the notes by Pitt on foreign affairs, n.d. (1791?), Chatham papers, P.R.O. 30/8/195, fos. 49–53.

30 I hope on another occasion to be able to examine the influence that Bentham's writings on international matters might have exerted on nineteenth-century liberal opinion.

31 Bowring, John (ed.), The works of Jeremy Bentham (II vols., Edinburgh, 1838–1843), x, 206–7Google Scholar. Bentham became convinced that Partizan was in fact George III. See ibid. pp. 211–12; Bentham to Lord William Bentinck, Jan. 1828, Bentham papers, B.L. Add. MS 33546, fo. 186.

32 Bentham, to Morellet, , 18 06 1789, Correspondence, IV, 76Google Scholar.

33 Bowring, , The works of Jeremy Bentham, x, 207–11Google Scholar, where it is incorrectly described as the third Anti-Machiavel.

34 For a subsequent development of this argument, see Bentham's, Emancipate your colonies (London, 1830)Google Scholar, first printed in 1793 as Jeremy Bentham to the national convention of France (Bowring, , The works of Jeremy Bentham, IV, 407–18)Google Scholar

35 Bowring, , The works of Jeremy Bentham, X, 201–5Google Scholar, incorrectly described as the first.

36 Ibid. 205–6, where it is called the second.

37 British Library shelf no. CT 57(2), p. 9.

38 Ibid. p. 10.

39 Ibid. pp. 37, 49.

40 For the dating of these annotations, and Bentham's earlier reading of the Queries see above n. 3.

41 ‘Internat. Prot.’, marginals, Bentham, MSS UC xxv. IIIGoogle Scholar.

42 Ibid. 108. Bentham, cited the Mirabeau's, comte de recently published Historie secrète de la cour de Berlin (Paris and London, 1789)Google Scholar as evidence on this point.

43 ‘Cabinet no Secresy’, Bentham, MSS UC xxv. 62Google Scholar.

44 Ibid. pp. 62–3.

45 Ibid. p. 63.

46 ‘Internat. Prot.’, marginals, Bentham, MSS UC xxv. 107Google Scholar. For the tory and jacobite background of his father's family see Bowring, , The works of Jeremy Bentham, x, 2Google Scholar and ‘JB and George III’, 23 08 1830, Bentham, Google Scholar papers, B.L., Add. MS 33550, fo. 386.

47 ‘Internat. Prot.’, marginals, Bentham, MSS UC xxv. 107Google Scholar. Some of this material is quoted in Mack, , Jeremy Bentham, p. 399Google Scholar.

48 For a modern account of this episode see Blanning, T. C. W., ‘“That Horrid Electorate” or “Ma Patrie Germanique”? George III, Hanover, and the Fürstenbund of 1785’, Historical Journal, xx (1977), 311–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 ‘Internat. Prot.’, marginals, Bentham, MSS UC xxv. 106Google Scholar.

50 Ibid. p. 106.

51 Ibid. p. 106. Bentham seems to have obtained his information partly from standard sources such as The Annual Register (see ‘Internat. Pacif. and Eman.’, marginals, ‘Libri desiderate’, Bentham, MSS UC xxv. 123)Google Scholar and partly from Bowdler's, ThomasLetters written from Holland (London, 1788)Google Scholar and Ellis's, GeorgeHistory of the late revolution in the Dutch republic (London, 1789)Google Scholar. A note giving instructions for these two books to be bound together is at Bentham MSS UC clxix. 168.

52 ‘Internat. Prot.’, marginals, Bentham, MSS UC xxv. 109Google Scholar. For his later criticisms of standing armies see Plan of parliamentary reform in the form of a catechism (London, 1817Google Scholar; Bowring, , The works of Jeremy Bentham, III, 443–5Google Scholar) and the notes at Bentham MSS UC cxi. 148 (30 Nov. 1818).

53 ‘Internat. Prot.’, marginals, Bentham MSS UC xxv. 110.

54 Ibid. p. 106.

55 Ibid. p. 109.

56 Ibid. p. 106.

57 Ibid. p. 109.

58 The changes in the title of the proposed pamphlet give some impression of the development of his ideas. At various times it was to be called: ‘A protest against Machiavelism or considerations on the conduct of the British cabinet toward foreign states’ (Bentham MSS UC xxv. 123); ‘International principles and measures’, ‘New principles and measures respecting distant dependencies and foreign politics’ (ibid. p. 134); ‘Mischief of foreign dependencies and alliances plan for peace and economy’ (ibid. p. 106).

59 Bowring, , The work of Jeremy Bentham, II, 546–60Google Scholar. Parts of the ‘Plan’ were reproduced in Benthamiana: or, select extracts from the works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Burton, John Hill (Edinburgh, 1843), pp. 35–40Google Scholar, 41–3, and the whole essay reprinted directly from Bowring in 1927 and 1939.

60 The Herald of Peace, Oct. 1848, p. 172; Reports of the peace congresses at Brussels, Paris, Frankfort, London, and Edinburgh (London, 1861), 3rd session of the Brussels Congress, p. 28Google Scholar.

61 Hobhouse, L. T., Democracy and reaction (London, 1904), pp. 140, 172, 174–5Google Scholar, 211–12; Clarke, Peter, Liberals and social democrats (Cambridge, 1981), p. 73Google Scholar.

62 Howard, Michael, War and the liberal conscience (Oxford, 1981), p. 33Google Scholar.

63 Plan for an universal and perpetual peace by Jeremy Bentham 1786–1789 (Peace classics, VI, London, 1939). P. 8Google Scholar.

64 Howard, , War and the liberal conscience, p. 33Google Scholar; Hinsley, F. H., Power and the pursuit of peace (Cambridge, 1963), p. 82Google Scholar &n. Best, Geoffrey, Humanity in warfare (London, 1983), pp. 38Google Scholar, 40, has also considered Bentham as part of the ‘Later enlightenment consensus’, although he was referring principally to Bentham's writings which show his desire to limit the effects of war, rather than to his attempt to stop it occurring altogether See Traites de legislation, 1, 331, 338 (Bowring, , The works of Jeremy Benlham, III, 201Google Scholar, 202)

65 Bentham, MSS UC lXXXVII 47, 130Google Scholar

66 Bowring, , The works of Jeremy Bentham, II, 546nGoogle Scholar

67 Stark, , Jeremy Bentham's economic writings, I, 212–13Google Scholar

68 Extrait du projet de paix perpetuelle de Monsieur l'Abbe de Saint-Pierre (Amsterdam, 1761)Google Scholar For Bentham's reference to Saint-Pierre's Projet see ‘Economy as to Office/Constit Code/Rudiments’, 13 May, 1822, Bentham MSS UC XXXVIII 3

69 ‘War’, marginals, Bentham MSS UC xxv 133

70 Hinsley, , Power and the pursuit of peace p 82Google Scholar

71 ‘War’, marginals, Bentham MSS UC xxv 133

72 Stark, , Jeremy Bentham's economic writings, I, 213Google Scholar.

73 ‘Internat. Pacif. and Emancip.’, marginals, Bentham MSS UC cix. 1.

74 Ferguson, Adam, An essay on the history of civil society (Edinburgh, 1767: Edinburgh 1966 edn), pp. 20–5, 98Google Scholar.

75 Home, Henry, Kames, Lord, Sketches of the history of man (2 vols., Edinburgh, 1774), I, 426–38Google Scholar (‘Sketch IV. War and peace compared’).

76 Observations regarding the present state of the Russian empire (London, 1787), p. 17Google Scholar, cited in Anderson, M. S., ‘Eighteenth-century theories of the balance of power’, Studies in diplomatic history: essays in memory of David Bayne Horn, ed. Hatton, Ragnhild and Anderson, M. S. (London, 1970), P. 195Google Scholar.

77 The letters of Valens (London, 1777), pp. 142–3Google Scholar. A copy with annotations by Bentham – some written in the 1770s judging by the hand – is at British Library shelf no. 08138 dd. 50(7).

78 ‘Internat. Prot.’, marginals, Bentham MSS UC xxv. 106.

79 For an earlier reference to this introductory essay see ‘Indirect legislation’, Bentham MSS UC lxxxvii. 96.

80 Robertson, William, The history of the reign of the emperor Charles V (3 vols., London, 1769), I, 9Google Scholar.

81 ‘Internat. Pacif. and Emancip.’, marginals, Bentham MSS UC xxv. 120.

82 Cf. Hart, H. L. A., ‘The demystification of the law’, Essays on Bentham (Oxford, 1982), pp. 21–39Google Scholar.

83 The second Anti-Machiavel letter, for instance, was designed to show ‘the causes of the Unjust and UselessWar into which the Ministry are endeavouring to plunge us’ (Bowring, , The works of Jeremy Bentham, X, 201)Google Scholar.

84 Correspondence, IV, 44.

85 Ibid. p. 76.

86 Bentham alluded to the ‘Quebec business’ in his marginals. See ‘Internat. Prot.’, Bentham MSS UC XXV. III.

87 Howard, p. 33.

88 Bentham, to Morellet, , 18 06 1789, Correspondence, IV, 75Google Scholar.

89 Bowring, , The works of Jeremy Bentham, II, 550 &nGoogle Scholar.

90 Bentham, to Morellet, , 18 06 1789, Correspondence, IV, 76Google Scholar.

91 ‘Internat. Pacif. and Emancip.’, marginals, Bentham MSS UC XXV. 123.

92 Ehrman, John, The British government and commercial negotiations with Europe 1783–1793 (Cambridge, 1962)Google Scholar.

93 ‘International’, marginals, Bentham MSS UC XXV. 114.

94 ‘Internat. Pacif. and Emancip.’, marginals, Bentham MSS UC XXV. 120.

95 Bowring, , The works of Jeremy Bentham, II, 547Google Scholar.

96 Ibid p 554 See also Parliamentary History, XXVIII, 133–8