Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:52:22.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Considerations Relating to an Interstellar Origin for Comets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

S.V.M. Clube  and
W.M. Napier
S.V.M. Clube
Affiliation:
Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh
W.M. Napier
Affiliation:
Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The idea that the Solar System possesses a primordial isotropic cloud of comets has been with us in quantitative form for about thirty years (Oort 1950). A considerable edifice has been built on this proposition (e.g. Weissmann 1982), which has proved durable despite indications that the cloud may in fact be significantly non-thermal and display Galactic alignments (Tyror 1957, Richter 1963, Oja 1975, Yabushita et al. 1979, Radzievsky 1981). However with the discovery in recent years of a system of massive molecular clouds in the Galactic disc, it has become apparent that the environment in which the Oort cloud has to survive is very different from that envisaged in 1950; a re-appraisal of the standard picture is therefore called for.

One corollary of the discovery of the molecular clouds is that the traditional objections to an interstellar comet cosmogony, such as the lack of observed hyperbolic comets and the difficulty of growing and capturing them, may no longer apply (see for example the recent review by Clube & Napier 1982a, hereinafter CN). Another consequence, reviewed here, is that tidal effects due to molecular clouds may be so large that the Oort cloud is frequently disrupted (CN; Napier & Staniucha 1982). In this situation frequent replenishment is implied and it is therefore necessary to discriminate between the primordial and the observed Oort cloud and to consider possible alternative sources for the latter. Such an enquiry would provide constraints on the as yet unsolved problem of comet formation.

Type
Joint Discussions
Information
Highlights of Astronomy , Volume 6 , 1983 , pp. 355 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1983

References

Alvarez, L.W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F. and Mickel, H.V.: 1980, Science 208, 1095.Google Scholar
Bailey, M.: 1982, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., in press.Google Scholar
Blitz, L.: 1981, in The Phases of the Interstellar Medium, (ed. Dickey, J.M.), NRAO, Virginia, p. 87.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.G.W.: 1973, Icarus 18, 407.Google Scholar
Clube, S.V.M.: 1978, Vistas Astr. 22, 77.Google Scholar
Clube, S.V.M.: 1982, in Workshop on Interstellar Comets, (eds. Clube, S.V.M. and Mclnnes, B.), Occ. Rept. R. Obs. Edin., No. 9, p. 6.Google Scholar
Clube, S.V.M. and Napier, W.M. : 1982a, Q. J. R. Astr. Soc, 23, 45.Google Scholar
Clube, S.V.M. and Napier, W.M.: 1982b, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 57, 251.Google Scholar
Druramond, J.D.: 1982, Icarus 49, 143.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J.M.: 1974, Astrophys. J. 189, L81.Google Scholar
Hills, J.G.: 1981, Astron. J. 86, 1730.Google Scholar
Humphries, C.M.: 1982, in Workshop on Interstellar Comets, (eds. Clube, S.V.M. and Mclnnes, B.) Occ. Rept. R. Obs. Edin., No. 9, p. 32.Google Scholar
Liszt, H.S., Delin, X. and Burton, W.B.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 249, 532.Google Scholar
Lyttleton, R.A.: 1953, The Comets and Their Origin, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCrea, W.H.: 1981, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, 375.Google Scholar
Napier, W.M. and Clube, S.V.M.: 1979, Nature 282, 455.Google Scholar
Napier, W.M. and Staniucha, M.: 1982, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 198, 723.Google Scholar
Neukum, G., Konig, B., Fechtig, H. and Storzer, D.: 1975, Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 6th, vol. 3, 2597.Google Scholar
Oja, H.: 1975, Astron. Astrophys. 43, 317.Google Scholar
Oort, J.H.: 1950, Bull. Astr. Inst. Neth. 11, 91.Google Scholar
Öpik, E.J.: 1961, Adv. Astr. Astrophys. 2, 219.Google Scholar
Öpik, E.J.: 1966, Mem. Liège 12, 523, Armagh Obs. Contrib. No. 53.Google Scholar
Papanastassiou, D.A. and Wasserburg, G.J.: 1981, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. 12B, 1027.Google Scholar
Radzievsky, V.V.: 1981, Soviet Astr. - A.J. 58, 1286.Google Scholar
Richter, N.B.: 1963, The Nature of Comets, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, E.M., Williams, J.G., Helin, E.F. and Wolfe, R.F.: 1979, in Asteroids, (ed. Gehrels, T.), University of Arizona Press, p. 253.Google Scholar
Smit, J. and Hertogen, J.: 1980, Nature 285, 198.Google Scholar
Solomon, P.M. and Sanders, D.B.: 1980, Proc. of the Third Gregynog Astrophysics Workshop on Giant Molecular Clouds (eds. Solomon, P.M. and Edmunds, M.G.), Pergamon Press, Oxford, p. 41.Google Scholar
Tyror, J.G.: 1957, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 117, 370.Google Scholar
Valtonen, M.J.: 1982, Turku-FTL-R28, Informo No. 64, (also submitted).Google Scholar
van den Bergh, S.: 1982, Preprints from the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory.Google Scholar
van Flandern, T.C.: 1978, Icarus 36, 51.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatsky, S.K.: 1967, Soviet Astr. - A.J. 11, 473.Google Scholar
Weissman, P.R.: 1982, in Comets, (ed. Wilkening, L.), University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Wetherill, G.W.: 1976, Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, 40, 1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wielen, R. : 1977, Astron. Astrophys. 60, 263.Google Scholar
Whipple, F.L.: 1950, Astrophys. J. 111, 375.Google Scholar
Yabushita, S., Hasegawa, I. and Kobayashi, K.: 1979, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 31, 801.Google Scholar