Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:34:43.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planetary Ephemerides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

R. L. Duncombe ,
P. K. Seidelmann  and
P. M. Janiczek
R. L. Duncombe
Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
P. K. Seidelmann
Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
P. M. Janiczek
Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At the present time the planetary ephemerides in the Astronomical Ephemeris and in the American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac (both hereinafter referred to as the AE), the Astronomical Ephemeris of the U.S.S.R. and most other national almanacs have the following basis: For Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars the general theories of Simon Newcomb (1898a), the ephemeris of Mars including the empirical corrections determined by Ross (1917); for the five outer planets, the numerical integration of Eckert et al. (1951); the Connaissance de Temps publishes ephemerides of Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars based on the theories of Leverrier (1858, 1859, 1861a, b); for Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune the ephemerides are based on Leverrier’s (1876a, b, 1877a, b) expressions as modified by Gaillot (1904,1910, 1913). The ephemeris of Pluto is based on the numerical integration of Eckert et al. In all of the above publications the ephemeris of the Moon is now based on the Improved Lunar Ephemeris which is derived from the theory of Brown (1919). Newcomb’s theories and the numerical integration of the orbits of the five outer planets all rest primarily on the system of astronomical constants and planetary masses adopted at the Paris conferences of 1896 and 1911 {Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 1912).

Type
Joint Discussions
Information
Highlights of Astronomy , Volume 3: Highlights of Astronomy. As presented at the XVth General Assembly of the IAU, 1973 , 1974 , pp. 223 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974

References

Brown, E. W.: 1919, Tables of the Motion of the Moon, New Haven.Google Scholar
Duncombe, R. L., Klepczynski, W. J., and Seidelmann, P. K.: 1973, Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics, Gordon and Breach, New York.Google Scholar
Eckert, W. J., Brouwer, D., and Clemence, G. M.: 1951, Astron. Papers Am. Ephem. XII.Google Scholar
Gaillot, A.: 1904, Mem. Obs. Paris 24, 172.Google Scholar
Gaillot, A.: 1910, Ann. Obs. Paris 28, A1.Google Scholar
Gaillot, A.: 1913, Ann. Obs. Paris 31, 105.Google Scholar
Kovalevsky, J.: 1971, Celes. Mech. 4, 213.Google Scholar
Leverrier, U.J.J.: 1858, Ann. Obs. Paris 4, 1.Google Scholar
Leverrier, U.J.J.: 1859, Ann. Obs. Paris 5, 1.Google Scholar
Leverrier, U.J.J.: 1861a, Ann. Obs. Paris 6, 1.Google Scholar
Leverrier, U.J.J.: 1861b, Ann. Obs. Paris 6, 185.Google Scholar
Leverrier, U.J.J.: 1876a, Ann. Obs. Paris 12, 1.Google Scholar
Leverrier, U.J.J.: 1876b, Ann. Obs. Paris 12, A1.Google Scholar
Leverrier, U.J.J.: 1877a, Ann. Obs. Paris 14, A1.Google Scholar
Leverrier, U.J.J.: 1877b, Ann. Obs. Paris 14, 1.Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1898a, Astron. Papers Am. Ephem. VI.Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1898b, Astron. Papers Am. Ephem. VII.Google Scholar
Ross, F. E.: 1912, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 72, 342.Google Scholar
Ross, F. E.: 1917, Astron. Papers Am. Ephem. IX, Part II.Google Scholar