Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T05:44:05.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

OSO-8 X-Ray Polarimeter and Bragg Crystal Spectrometer Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

R. Novick
Affiliation:
Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, U.S.A.
H.L. Kestenbaum
Affiliation:
Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, U.S.A.
K.S. Long
Affiliation:
Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, U.S.A.
E.H. Silver
Affiliation:
Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, U.S.A.
M.C. Weisskopf
Affiliation:
Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, U.S.A.
R.S. Wolff
Affiliation:
Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, U.S.A.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The OSO-8 satellite contains a focusing mosaic graphite crystal X-ray polarimeter that is oriented along the spin axis of the wheel section of the satellite. The polarimeter operates at 2.6 and 5.2 keV. Polarization in a source appears as a modulation of the counting rate at twice the satellite spin frequency. The amplitude and phase of the modulation are simply related to the polarization and position angle, respectively. Two independent polarimeters are employed, and their axes are offset by 128°. Focusing is achieved by mounting the crystals on a parabolic sector, which reduces the background without reducing the sensitivity. The low background that results from the focusing not only improves the statistical quality of the data but also substantially reduces the danger that an asymmetry in the charged particle background may produce a spurious polarization result. This is particularly important in the case of weak sources. The instrument has been described in detail elsewhere (Novick 1975); here we will briefly discuss the results obtained on the Crab Nebula, Cyg X-l, and Cyg X-2.

Type
Joint Dicussions
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1977

References

Angel, J. R. P.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 158, 219.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S.: 1946, Astrophys. J. 103, 351; see also: 1960, Radiative Transfer (New York, Dover Publications).Google Scholar
Kestenbaum, H. L., Cohen, G. G., Long, K. S. Novick, R., Silver, E. H., Weisskopf, M. C., and Wolff, R. S.: 1976a, Astrophys. J., to be published December 15.Google Scholar
Kestenbaum, R. S: 1976b, Astrophys. J. Letters 208, L27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightman, A. P., and Shapiro, S. L.: 1975, Astrophys. J. Letters 198, L73.Google Scholar
Lightman, S. L.: 1976, Astrophys. J. 203, 701.Google Scholar
Novick, R.: 1975, Space Sai. Rev. 18, 389.Google Scholar
Novick, R., Weisskopf, M. C., Berthelsdorf, R., Linke, R., and Wolff, R. S.: 1972, Astrophys. J. Letters 174, LI.Google Scholar
Oort, J. H., and Walraven, Th.: 1956, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 12,285.Google Scholar
Weisskopf, M. C., Cohen, G. G., Kestenbaum, H. L., Long, K. S., Novick, R., and Wolff, R. S.: 1976, Astrophys. J. Letters 208, L125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar