Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:33:17.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Origin and Early History of the Sun and the Planetary System in the Context of Stellar Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

G. H. Herbig*
Affiliation:
Lick Observatory, Board of Studies in Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A plausible scenario for the early history of the sun can be constructed by combining the results of stellar astronomy with lunar and meteoritic chronologies. The meteorites apparently contain material exposed to two nucleosynthetic events, one about 108 yr and another a few 106 yr before solidification. Following II. Reeves, these are associated with supernovae occurring in star clusters in molecular clouds that formed during passage through successive galactic arm shocks. The Orion Trapezium Cluster may be a modern example; its density is such that encounters between members would have been close enough and frequent enough to have had major effects upon their circumstellar ‘solar nebulae,’ as would recurrent FU Ori-like eruptions of the stars themselves. The lunar bombardment continued for 7 × 108 yr following formation of our sun. If this represented disk cleanup, disks must persist for that long, and hence circumstellar activity may still be in progress around some young stars in the solar vicinity. The observed time decay of axial rotation and surface activity in solar-type stars can be extended backwards, and indicates that the ultraviolet radiation of the young sun would have had major photochemical consequences upon the primitive earth.

Type
Invited Discourses
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1983

References

Begemann, F. 1980, Rep. Prog. Phys. 43, 1309.Google Scholar
Blitz, L. and Shu, F.H. 1980, Astrophys. J. 238, 148.Google Scholar
Boesgaard, A.M. and Simon, T. 1981, 2nd Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun (Smithsonian Astrophys. Obs., Spec. Report 392), 2, 161.Google Scholar
Boulanger, F., Stark, A.A. and Combes, F. 1981, Astr. Astrophys. 93, L1.Google Scholar
Canuto, V.M., Levine, J.S., Augustsson, T.R. and Imhoff, C. 1982, Nature 296, 816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, D.D. 1979, Space Sci. Rev. 24, 147.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. and Kuhi, L.V. 1979, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 41, 743.Google Scholar
Cohen, R.S., Cong, H., Dame, T.M. and Thaddeus, P. 1980, Astrophys. J. 239, L53.Google Scholar
Duncan, D.K. 1981, Astrophys. J. 248, 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, F.W. 1975, Stellar Motions in the Orion Nebula Cluster (Thesis, Univ. Florida).Google Scholar
Feigelson, E.D. 1982, Icarus, in press.Google Scholar
Herbig, G.H. 1954a, Publ. Astr. Soc. Pacific 66, 19.Google Scholar
Herbig, G.H. 1954b, Astr. J. 59, 342.Google Scholar
Herbig, G.H. 1982, Proc. N. Y. Acad. Sci., in press.Google Scholar
Kobrick, M. and Kaula, W.M. 1979, Moon and Planets 20, 61.Google Scholar
Mottmann, J. 1977, Icarus 31, 412.Google Scholar
Mundt, R. 1981, 2nd Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun (Smithsonian Astrophys. Obs., Spec. Report 392), 2, 18.Google Scholar
Reeves, H. 1978, Protostars and Planets (ed. Gehrels, T.), p. 399; this paper expands upon the original proposal of 1972. See also B. M. P. Trivedi: 1977, Astrophys. J. 215, 877.Google Scholar
Schramm, D.N. 1974, Ann. Rev. Astr. Astrophys. 12, 383.Google Scholar
Sekiya, M., Hayashi, C. and Nakazawa, K. 1981, Prog. Theor. Phys. 66, 1301.Google Scholar
Soderblom, D.R. 1982, Astrophys. J. Suppl., in press.Google Scholar
Stahler, S.W., Shu, F.H. and Taam, R.E. 1980, Astrophys. J. 241, 637.Google Scholar
Strand, K. 1958, Astrophys. J. 128, 14.Google Scholar
Wetherill, G.W. 1975, Proc. 6th Lunar Sci. Conf., p. 1539.Google Scholar
Wielen, R. 1971, Astr. Astrophys. 13, 309.Google Scholar
Woolfson, M.M. 1978, Origin of the Solar System (ed. Dermott, S. F.) pp. 179, 199; these are reviews which contain references to the original papers.Google Scholar