Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:40:18.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Observational Clues on Binary Formation in the Galaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

David W. Latham*
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

New observations of binaries are beginning to provide new clues on the formation and evolution of binary and multiple systems in a variety of stellar populations in the Galaxy. New orbital determinations are shedding light on the frequency and orbital characteristics of binaries in the disk and the halo of our Galaxy, both in clusters and the field. These results support the view that the formation of binaries involving solar-mass stars is relatively independent of the stellar environment. Evolutionary effects can have a major influence for close binaries with periods up to at least ten days, with a strong dependence on the age of the population. Progress towards determining the frequency of low-mass companions and planetary systems is promising but still very limited.

Type
Joint Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1989

References

Abt, H. A. 1983. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys 21, 343.Google Scholar
Abt, H. A. 1987. Astrophys. J 317, 353.Google Scholar
Abt, H. A. and Levy, S. G. 1976. Astrophys. J. Suppl 30, 273.Google Scholar
Backman, D. 1988. Paper presented at the Toronto International SETI Conference.Google Scholar
Bond, H. E. 1970. Astrophys. J. Suppl 22, 117.Google Scholar
Bond, H. E. 1980. Astrophys. J. Suppl 44, 517.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. 1988. Paper presented at this Joint Discussion.Google Scholar
Carney, B. W. and Latham, D. W. 1987. Astron. J 93, 116.Google Scholar
Forrest, W.J., Skrutskie, M.F., and Shure, M. 1988. Astrophys. J. 33, L119Google Scholar
Fouts, G. and Sandage, A. 1986. Astron. J. 91, 1189.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. E. and Griffin, R. F. 1979. Astron. J. 84, 752.Google Scholar
Ianna, P. A., Rohde, J. R., and McCarthy, D. W. Jr. Astron. J. 95, 1226.Google Scholar
Latham, D. W., Mazeh, T., Stefanik, R. P., Mayor, M., and Burki, G. 1989. Nature, submitted.Google Scholar
Latham, D. W., Mazeh, T., Carney, B. W., McCrosky, R. E., Stefanik, R. P., and Davis, R. J. 1988. Astron. J 96, 567.Google Scholar
Marcy, G. W. and Moore, D. 1988. Preprint.Google Scholar
Mathieu, R. D. 1988. Paper presented at this Joint Discussion.Google Scholar
Mathieu, R. D. and Latham, D. W. 1986. Astron. J. 92, 1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, R. D., Stefanik, R. P., and Latham, D. W. In IAU Coll. No. 88, Stellar Radial Velocities, Philip, A. G. D. and Latham, D. W., eds., L. Davis Press, Schenectady, p. 385.Google Scholar
Mayor, M. and Mermilliod, J.-C. 1984. In IAU Symp. No. 105, Observational Tests of Stellar Evolution Theory, Maeder, A. and Renzini, A., eds., Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht, p. 411.Google Scholar
Mayor, M. 1988. Private communication.Google Scholar
McAlister, H. A., Hartkopf, W. I., Hutter, D. J., Shara, M. M., and Franz, O. G. 1987. Astron. J 92, 183.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. W., Probst, R.G., and Low, F. J. 1985. Astrophys. J. Lett. 290, L9.Google Scholar
McClure, R. D., Griffin, R. F., Fletcher, J. M., Harris, H.C., and Mayor, M. 1985. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 97, 740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morbey, C. L. and Griffin, R. F. 1987. Astrophys. J. 317, 343.Google Scholar
Perrier, C. and Mariotti, J.-M. 1987. Astrophys. J. Lett. 312, L27.Google Scholar
Philip, A. G. D. and Latham, D. W. 1985. IAU Coll. No. 88, Stellar Radial Velocities, L. Davis Press, Schenectady. See especially papers 24.Google Scholar
Pryor, C., Latham, D. W., and Hazen, M. L. 1988. Astron. J 96, 123.Google Scholar
Pryor, C., McClure, R. D., Hesser, J. E., and Fletcher, J. M. 1989 In Dynamics of Dense Stellar Systems, Merritt, D., ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, in press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, B. 1988. Paper presented at this Joint Discussion.Google Scholar