Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:16:55.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hot Subluminous Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

Jesse L. Greenstein*
Affiliation:
Hale Observatories, California Institute of Technology, Carnegie Institution of Washington

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Extensive mass loss is observed for hot subluminous stars, through P Cygni lines in the ultraviolet. This persists in some sub-dwarf 0 stars, but is generally not observed in white dwarfs. The ultraviolet provides determination of effective temperatures. Among nine sdO’s, the maximum temperature reported is definitely below 60, 000 K; an object at 100, 000 K would be distinguishable. The sdO’s show a wide variety of line strengths, notably in N V, C IV and Si TV, as well as He II. One halo sdB is reported as rich in peculiar elements; it shows anomalous N V for its temperature. The comparison of effective temperatures of white dwarfs observed from space and from the ground gives excellent agreement. The hottest white dwarfs are near 60, 000 K, although one (helium-rich) reaches 80, 000 K. Another helium-rich close binary probably has an accretion disk; it is the only white dwarf to show the expanding shell of N V, C IV, Si IV characteristic of some subdwarfs. Two magnetic white dwarfs have been observed; one has strong unidentifiable features and the smallest known radius.

Type
Ultraviolet Astronomy-New Results from Recent Space Experiments
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

Angel, J.R.P: 1979, IAU Colloquium Rochester (in press).Google Scholar
Bohlin, R.C., Holm, A.V., Savage, B.D., Snijders, M.A.J., and Sparks, W.M.: 1979, Photometric Calibration of the IUE: Low Dispersion, Astron.Astrophys. (in press) NASA X-68179-19.Google Scholar
Bowyer, S.: 1979, IAU Colloquium Rochester (in press).Google Scholar
Conti, P.S., and Van der Hucht, K.A.: 1979, Proc. Symp. The First Year of IUE (London).Google Scholar
Darius, J., and Whitelock, P.A.: 1978, Nature 275, 428.Google Scholar
Greenstein, J.L., and Oke, J.B.: 1979, Astrophys. J. Letters 229, L141.Google Scholar
Greenstein, J.L., and Sargent, A.I.: 1974, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 28, 157.Google Scholar
Hack, M.: 1979, Astron.Astrophys. 73, L4.Google Scholar
Kudritzki, R.P.: 1976, Astron.Astrophys. 52, 11.Google Scholar
Kudritzki, R.P., and Simon, K.P.: 1978, Astron. Astrophys. 70, 653.Google Scholar
Lesh, J.R.: 1978, Astrophys. J. 219, 947.Google Scholar
Lesh, J.R., and Wesselius, P.R.: 1979, Astron.Astrophys. (in press).Google Scholar
Malina, R.J.: 1979, preprint.Google Scholar
Parsons, S.B., Henize, K.G., Wray, J.D., Benedict, G.F., and Laget, M.: 1976, Astrophys. J. Letters 206, L71.Google Scholar
Simon, K.P., Gruschinske, J., Hamann, W.R., Hunger, K., and Kudritzki, R.P.: 1979, Proc. Symp. The First Year of IUE (London).Google Scholar
Underbill, A.B.: 1979, High Resolution Spectrometry (Hack, M. ed. Trieste), p. 137.Google Scholar
Wesselium, P.R., and Koester, D.: 1979, Astron.Astrophys. (in press).Google Scholar
Willis, A.J., and Wilson, R.: 1978, Mon.Not.R.A.S. 182, 559.Google Scholar
Willis, A.J., Wilson, R., Macchetto, F., Beekmans, F., Van der Hucht, K.A., and Stickland, D.J.: 1979, Proc. Symp. The First Year of IUE (London).Google Scholar
Wolf, B., and Appenzeller, I.: 1979, Astron.Astrophys. (in press).Google Scholar
Wray, J.D., Parsons, S.B., and Henize, K.G.: 1979, Astrophy. J. Letters, (in press).Google Scholar