Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:29:58.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in Pluto’s Atmosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

J. L. Elliot
J. L. Elliot*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 Dept. of Physics, MIT and Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Pluto’s tenuous atmosphere was probed in 1988 with a stellar occultation observed from the Kuiper Airborne Observatory (KAO, Elliot et al. 1989) and a variety of ground-based sites (Millis et al. 1993). These data, subsequent theoretical modeling (e.g. Strobel et al. 1996), and spectroscopic observations (Owen et al. 1993; Young et al. 1997), gave us the following post-occultation picture of Pluto’s atmosphere (Yelle & Elliot 1997; Elliot, Person, & Qu 2003b): N2 is the dominant constituent of the atmosphere, which also contains small amounts of CH4 and CO. These molecules are in vapor-pressure equilibrium with their surface ices, and this process acts as a thermostat to keep the N2 ice at ~38 K around the body. The temperature of the 1-3 μbar pressure region probed by the occultation was ~100 K. The KAO light curve dropped abruptly, however, just below half-light. This abrupt drop could be due to one of two potential properties of Pluto’s atmosphere: extinction, or a steep thermal gradient. Each of these explanations has strengths and weaknesses (Yelle & Elliot 1997; Elliot, et al. 2003b).

Type
II. Special Scientific Sessions
Information
Highlights of Astronomy , Volume 13 , 2005 , pp. 906 - 907
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Pacific 2005

References

Buie, M. W., et al. 2002, Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc, 34, 877 Google Scholar
Dunham, E. W., Elliot, J. L., & Taylor, B. W. 2000, Proc. S.P.I.E., 4014, 76 Google Scholar
Elliot, J. L., et al. 2003a, Nature, 424, 165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, J. L., Dunham, E. W., Bosh, A. S., Slivan, S. M., Young, L. A., Wasserman, L. H., & Millis, R. L. 1989, Icarus, 77, 148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, J. L., Person, M. J., & Qu, S. 2003b, Astron. J., 126, 1041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, C. J., & Paige, D. A. 1996, Icarus, 120, 247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, S. W., & Elliot, J. L. 2000, Astron. J., 119, 1999 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millis, R. L., et al. 1993, Icarus, 105, 282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, T. C., et al. 1993, Science, 261, 745 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicardy, B., et al. 2003, Nature, 424, 168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, S. A., & Spencer, J. 2003, Earth, Moon, and Planets, (in press)Google Scholar
Strobel, D. F., Zhu, X., Summers, M. E., & Stevens, M. H. 1996, Icarus, 120, 266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yelle, R. V., & Elliot, J. L. 1997, in Pluto, and Charon, , eds. Stern, S. A., & Tholen, D. J. (Tucson, AZ: Univ. of Arizona Press), 347 Google Scholar
Young, L. A., Elliot, J. L., Tokunaga, A., de Bergh, C., & Owen, T. 1997, Icarus, 127, 258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar