For reasons of space only the first half of the article on T.M. Knox appears in this issue, of the Bulletin. The second half, dealing with his translating activities and Hegelian scholarship, will appear in the Spring/Summer 1901 issue.

The author wishes to thank warmly Mr. Andrew M. Knox and the many contemporaries, friends and colleagues of T.M. Knox for the valuable information they have kindly given him. He is also much obliged to Mr. Robert Smart, the Keeper of the Muniments at St. Andrews University Library, for his unfailing help in consulting the Knox papers in the Library, and for the kind loan of material for the Knox exhibition in September 1980. Mr. Andrew Knox's loan of his brother's photographs for the exhibition was also much appreciated. Thanks are due to Pembroke College, Oxford for a research qrant towards preparing this study.

The Hegel Archive was established in 1958 by Land Nordrhein-Westphalia as the workplace for the historical-critical edition of Hegel's works, originally commissioned by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Since 1968-69, when the Archive moved from Bonn to Bochum, it has been connected with the Ruhr University. The main task of the Archive is to provide all the requirements for the edition of Hegel's collective works and to secure the continuity of planning, methodological reflection and steady execution of the editorial enterprise. For that purpose the Archive has assembled a complete (according to the present state of our knowledge) collection of works published by Hegel, his manuscripts and transcripts of his lectures, many of them in the original but most, as working material, in photocopies. Besides this collection the Archive is steadily developing a specialized Hegel library which comprises all the literature which Hegel himself possessed or knew as well as the steadily rising tide of literature on Hegel. Beyond that the Hegel Archive aims at contributing to the coordination of Hegel research, which is becoming less and less easy to survey. This happens in the first place through the annual Hegel-Studien which provide a survey of newly published Hegel literature by means of reports, reviews of books on Hegel and short summaries of essays. Beside bibliographical reports the Hegel-Studien contain contributions to historical–philosophical and systematic-philosophical Hegel research. The Beihefte (supplements) of the Hegel-Studien publish longer documents, monographs and reports of conferences organized by the International Hegel Society. To guests from abroad – on the average ten to fifteen researchers from various continents – the Hegel Archive offers a place of work.

The following two articles commemorate the distinguished British Hegelian philosopher and scholar, who died last year. The first is the text of the Address given on 6 October 1979 at the Memorial Service for G.R.G. Mure in the Chapel of Merton College, Oxford (the College where he was first Tutor in Philosophy and Fellow, and then Warden). The author, Lord Trend, was a pupil of Mure at Merton and ended a distinguished career in the civil service as the Secretary to the British Cabinet. He is now Rector of Lincoln College, Oxford.

The second article was specially written for the Bulletin by W.H. Walsh, who succeeded Mure as Tutor in Philosophy at Merton. W.H. Walsh has kindly agreed to prepare a bibliography of Mure's writings for the Autumn/Winter issue of the Bulletin.

I had left Oxford a good many years before Geoffrey Mure became the Warden of Merton; and he had retired before I returned to the University. During his Wardenship I was able to see much less of him, and of the College, than I would have wished; and I am far less qualified than many others to speak of the debt which Merton owes him for the sixteen years in which he presided over its fortunes. I know that the debt was very great, no less great than the pride which he himself felt in discharging the Warden's office; but I must leave it to others, at other times and in other ways, to bear witness in detail to the nature, and the scope, of the many services which he, and his wife Molly, rendered this House. I want now simply to try to pay a tribute, of love, admiration and gratitude, to the man himself, a man to whom I, in common with so many others, owe so much, a man from whom I learned, genuinely learned, as from nobody else in my life. Inevitably, this must be largely a matter of personal recollection. But everybody will have brought his own memories of Geoffrey to this memorial service; and, if my words help to quicken those memories into fresh life, perhaps the picture which we shall construct between us will be the memorial which he himself would have most wished to have.