Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:08:29.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transformations of Transcendental Philosophy: Wolff, Kant, and Hegel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

Karin de Boer
Karin de Boer*
Affiliation:
University of Leuven, Email [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Kant's philosophy is generally known as transcendental philosophy or transcendental idealism, terms often thought to describe the inquiry into the subjective conditions of empirical knowledge carried out in the Critique of Pure Reason. On this conception of transcendental philosophy Kant is seen to pursue a project very different from both Wolffian metaphysics and Hegelian speculative science. This view is confirmed by scholars who compare Kant's conception of transcendental philosophy to the Scholastics' conception of ‘transcendentals’ such as unity, truth, and perfection. On their account, there remains a puzzling gap between, on the one hand, the scholastic conception of the most general determinations of all beings and, on the other hand, Kant's investigation into the conditions of possibility of experience.

In this article I want to challenge this common view of Kant's transcendental philosophy for two reasons. The first reason concerns the question of how the Critique of Pure Reason itself should be read. I take the view that in the first Critique Kant's primary aim is to determine the conditions of synthetic a priori knowledge rather than to identify the a priori conditions of empirical knowledge. Since metaphysics was traditionally considered to be the discipline that possessed a priori knowledge of things, this view makes good sense of Kant's presentation of the Critique of Pure Reason as a work intended to transform metaphysics into a science. In this article I hope to clarify the nature of this transformation by determining the elements which Kant's transcendental philosophy has in common with Wolff's ontology, as well as the respects in which Kant turns against Wolff. I thus hope to solve some of the riddles posed by Kant's use of the term ‘transcendental philosophy’ in the Critique of Pure Reason.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 32 , Special Issue 1-2: Special Issue on Kant and Hegel , 2011 , pp. 50 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2011

References

Allison, H. (2004), Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, originally published in 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelelli, I. (1972), ‘On the Origins of Kant's “Transcendental”’, Kant-Studien 63(1): 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, K. (2003), ‘The Critique of Metaphysics: Kant and Traditional Ontology’, in Interpreting Kant's Critiques. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 110–156, originally published in 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, K. (1985), ‘Hegel's Critique of Kant's Theoretical Philosophy’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research XLVI/1, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bärthlein, K. (1976), ‘Von der “Transzendentalphilosophie” der Alten zu der Kants’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 58: 353–392.Google Scholar
Baum, M. (1986), Deduktion und Beweis in Kants Transzendentalphilosophie. Untersuchungen zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Königstein: Atheneum Verlag.Google Scholar
Baum, M. (1993), ‘Metaphysik und Kritik in Kants theoretischer Philosophie’, in Held, K. and Henningfeld, J. (eds), Kategorien der Existenz: Festschrift für Wolfgang Janke. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann: 13–30.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, A. G. (2011), Metaphysica/Metaphysik [1739]. Ed. and trans. by Gawlick, G. and Kreimendahl, L.. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Benoist, J. (1996), ‘Sur une prétendue ontologie kantienne: Kant et la néo-scolastique’, in Ramond, C. (ed.), Kant et la pensée moderne: alternatives critiques. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Bouton, C. (1996), ‘Ontologie et logique dans l'interprétation hégélienne de Christian Wolff’, Les études philosophiques 1–2: 241–260.Google Scholar
Courtine, J. F. (1990), Suarez et le système de la métaphysique. Paris: PUF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, K. (2001), ‘Peripetien der Ontologie — Wolff, Kant, Hegel’, in Bubner, R. and Mesch, W. (eds), Die Weltgeschichte — das Weltgericht? Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta: 176–207.Google Scholar
De Boer, K. (2010a), ‘Pure Reason's Enlightenment: Transcendental Reflection in Kant's First Critique’, Kant Yearbook 2: 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, K. (2010b), On Hegel: The Sway of the Negative. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, K. (2011), ‘Kant, Hegel, and the System of Pure Reason’, in Ficara, E. (ed.), Die Begründung der Philosophie im Deutschen Idealismus. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar
Demange, D. (2009), ‘Métaphysique et théorie de la représentation. La question des origines du transcendentalisme revisitée’, Revue philosophique de Louvain 107(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, J. P. (1997), ‘Between Transcendental and Transcendent: The Missing Link?’, Review of Metaphysics 50: 783–815.Google Scholar
Fulda, H. F. (1988), ‘Ontologie nach Kant und Hegel’, in Henrich, D. and Horstmann, R. P. (eds), Metaphysik nach Kant? Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta: 45–80.Google Scholar
Fulda, H. F. (1999), ‘Die Ontologie und ihr Schicksal in der Philosophie Hegels. Kantkritik in Fortsetzung kantischer Gedanken’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 53: 465–483.Google Scholar
Grondin, J. (1989), Kant et le problème de la philosophie: l'a priori. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. (1987), Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1986), Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie III [1805–1831], Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Ed. by Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K. M.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, H. as (1995) Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Vol. 3. Lincoln/London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse I, Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Ed. Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K. M.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Trans. Wallace, W. as Hegel's Logic (1975). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1986), Wissenschaft der Logik (2 vols.) [1812–16, 1831], Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Ed. Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K. M.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Trans. Miller, A. V. as (1997) Hegel's Science of Logic. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Hinske, N. (1968), ‘Die historischen Vorlagen der Kantischen Transzendentalphilosophie’, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte XII: 86–113.Google Scholar
Hinske, N. (1970), Kants Weg zur Transzendentalphilosophie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Hinske, N. (1973), ‘Kants Begriff des Transzendentalen und die Problematik seiner Begriffsgeschichte’, Kant-Studien 64(1): 56–62.Google Scholar
Hinske, N. (1998), ‘Transzendental — 18 Jh.’, in Ritter, J. and Gründer, K. (eds), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Band X. Basel: Schwabe Verlag, 1376–1388.Google Scholar
Honnefelder, L. (1990), Scientia transcendens. Die formale Bestimmung der Seiendheit und Realität in der Metaphysik des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Honnefelder, L. (1995), ‘Die “Transzendentalphilosophie der Alten”: Zur mittelalterlichen Vorgeschichte von Kants Begriff der Transzendentalphilosophie’, Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress, Part I. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press: 394–407.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1992), ‘The Employment in Natural Philosophy of Metaphysics combined with Geometry, of which Sample I Contains the Physical Monadology’ [1756], in Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, trans. Walford, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I., Kritik der reinen Vernunft [1781/1789]. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Trans. Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W. as (1999) Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. I have sometimes modified the translation.Google Scholar
Kant, I., Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können [1783]. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Trans. Hatfield, G. as (1997) Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I., Reflektionen zur Metaphysik, cited after the edition of the Akademie der Wissenschaften, AA 17 and 18.Google Scholar
Kant, I., Vorlesungen zur Metaphysik, cited after the edition of the Akademie der Wissenschaften, AA 28–29. Partly translated by Ameriks, K. and Naragon, S. as (2001) Lectures on Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knittermeyer, H. (1953/1954), ‘Von der klassischen zur kritischen Transzendentalphilosophie’, Kant-Studien 45(1–4): 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krouglov, A. N. (2004), ‘Der Begriff transzendental bei J. N. Tetens. Historischer Kontext und Hintergründe’, in Aufklärung. Interdisziplinäres Jahrbuch zur Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts und seiner Wirkungsgeschichte 16: 35–75.Google Scholar
Mabille, B. (2004), Hegel, Heidegger et la métaphysique. Recherches pour une constitution. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Mora, J. F., (1963), ‘On the Early History of Ontology’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24: 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinder, T. (1986), ‘Kants Begriff der transzendentalen Erkenntnis. Zur Interpretation der Definition des Begriffs “transzendental” in der Einleitung zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft’, Kant-Studien 77: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. (1989), Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, T. (1979), ‘The Logic of Hegel's Logic ’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 17(4): 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, J. and Gründer, K. (eds) (1998), ‘Transzendental; Transzendentalphilosophie’, in Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Band X. Basel: Schwabe Verlag, 1358–1387.Google Scholar
Sala, G. B. (1988), ‘Die transzendentale Logik Kants und die Ontologie der Deutschen Schulphilosophie,’ Philosophisches Jahrbuch 95: 18–53.Google Scholar
Schnepf, R. (2007), ‘Metaphysik und Metaphysikkritik in Kants Transzendentalphilosophie’, in Stolzenberg, J. (ed.), Kant in der Gegenwart. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 71–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, R. (2009), Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1966), The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Tetens, J. N., Über die allgemeine speculativische Philosophie. Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwicklung, Band I [1775]. Berlin: Reuther und Reichard, 1913.Google Scholar
Vollrath, E. (1962), ‘Die Gliederung der Metaphysik in eine metaphysica generalis und eine metaphysica specialis’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 16(2), 258–284.Google Scholar
Tonelli, G. (1994), Kant's Critique of Pure Reason within the Tradition of Modern Logic: A Commentary on its History. Ed. Chandler, D. H.. Hildesheim etc.: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Wolff, C., Vernünftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt [1720], Gesammelte Werke I/2. Ed. Corr, C. A.. Hildesheim etc.: Georg Olms Verlag, 1983.Google Scholar
Wolff, C., Discursus Praeliminaris de Philosophia in Genere. Einleitende Abhandlung über Philosophie im allgemeinen [1728]. Trans. and ed. Gawlick, G. and Kreimendahl, L.. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1996.Google Scholar
Wolff, C., Philosophia prima sive ontologia / Erste Philosophie oder Ontologie [1729] §§ 1–78. Trans. and ed. Effertz, D.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar
Wolff, C., Cosmologia Generalis [1731], Gesammelte Werke II/4. Ed. École, J.. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 1964.Google Scholar
Wolff, C., Ausführliche Nachricht von seinen eigenen Schriften, die er in Deutscher Sprache herausgegeben [1733], Gesammelte Werke I/9. Ed. Arndt, H. W.. Hildesheim etc.: Georg Olms Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar
Zöller, G. (2001): ‘“Die Seele des Systems”: Systembegriff und Begriffssystem in Kants Transzendentalphilosophie,’ in Fulda, H. F. and Stolzenberg, J. (eds): Architektonik und System in der Philosophie Kants. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag: 54–72.Google Scholar