Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:09:46.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Problem of Habitual Body and Memory in Hegel and Merleau-Ponty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2017

Elisa Magrì
Elisa Magrì*
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, I shall focus on the relation between habitual body and memory in Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit and Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. Both Hegel and Merleau-Ponty defend a view of the self that is centred on the role of habituality as embodied activity situated in a context. However, both philosophers avoid committing to what Edward Casey has defined habitual body memory, i.e., an active immanence of the past in the body that informs present bodily actions in an efficacious, orienting and regular manner. I shall explore the reasons why neither Hegel nor Merleau-Ponty develops an explicit account of habitual body memory. This will shed light not only on Hegel’s account of lived experience, but also on Hegel and Merleau-Ponty’s common concern with the habitual body.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 38 , Special Issue 1: Hegel and Phenomenology , May 2017 , pp. 24 - 44
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, J. A. (2004), Hegel’s Theory of Imagination. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1991), Matter and Memory, trans. N. M. Paul and W. S. Palmer. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Carbone, M. (2004), ‘Ad Limina Philosophiae: Merleau-Ponty and the “Introduction” to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit ’, in M. Carbone (ed.), The Thinking of the Sensible. Merleau-Ponty’s A-Philosophy. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Casey, E. (1987), Remembering. A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Casey, E. (2013), ‘Habitual Body and Memory in Merleau-Ponty’, in T. Sparrow and A. Hutchinson (ed.), A History of Habit. From Aristotle to Bourdieu. Lanham MD: Lexington Books. [Reprint of E. Casey (1985), ‘Habitual Body and Memory in Merleau-Ponty’, in J. N. Mohanty, Phenomenology and the Human Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer. This latter was originally published in Man and World 17 (1984): 279–97.]Google Scholar
Cooper, B. (1975), ‘Hegelian Elements in Merleau-Ponty’s La structure du comportement ’, International Philosophical Quarterly 15: 411–423.Google Scholar
deVries, W. (1988), Hegel’s Theory of Mental Activity. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
de Waehlens, A. (1967), Une philosophie de l’ambiguité: l’existentialisme de Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Louvain: Publications universitaires.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, A. (2001), Hegel and Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, A. (2006), ‘Logic, Thinking and Language’, in R. Bubner and G. Hindrichs (eds.), Von der Logik zur Sprache: Stuttgarter Hegel-Kongress 2005. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Forman, D. (2010), ‘Second Nature and Spirit: Hegel on the Role of Habit in the Appearance of Perceptual Consciousness’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 48:4: 325–352.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2012), ‘The phenomenology of body memory’, in S. C. Koch, T. Fuchs and M. Summa (eds.), Body Memory, Metaphor and Movement. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (1986), ‘Body Image and Body Schema. A Conceptual Clarification’, The Journal of Mind and Behavior 7:4: 541–554.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. and Zahavi, D. (2008), The Phenomenological Mind. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geraets, T. F. (1971), Vers une nouvelle philosophie transcendentale. La genèse de la philosophie de Merleau-Ponty jusqu’à la ‘Phénoménologie de la perception ’. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Jensen, R. T. (2009), ‘Motor Intentionality and the Case of Scheider’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8:3: 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, S. (2015), ‘McDowell, Hegel, and Habits’, Hegel Bulletin 36: 148–201.Google Scholar
Lumsden, S. (2013), ‘Between Nature and Spirit: Hegel’s Account of Habit’, in D. S. Stern (ed.), Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Magrì, E. (2016), ‘The Place of Habit in Hegel’s Psychology’, in S. Hermann-Sinai and L. Ziglioli (eds.), Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964), Sense and Nonsense, trans. H. L. Dreyfus and P. A. Dreyfus. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2010), Child Psychology and Pedagogy. The Sorbonne Lectures 1949–1952, trans. T. Welsh. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Montero, B. (2010), ‘Does Bodily Awareness Interfere with Highly Skilled Movement?’, Inquiry 53:2: 105–122.Google Scholar
Mooney, T. (2011), ‘Plasticity, Motor Intentionality and Concrete Movement in Merleau-Ponty’, Continental Philosophy Review 44: 359–381.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A. (2013), ‘‘Anthropology, Geist, and the Soul–Body Relation: The Systematic Beginning of Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit’, in D. S. Stern (ed.), Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Peters, J. (2016), ‘On Naturalism in Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24: 111–131.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2012), Hegel’s Naturalism. Mind, Nature and the Final Ends of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, V. and Sanguinetti, F. (eds.) (2013), Hegel on Recollection. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Romdenh-Romluc, K. (2013), ‘Habit and Attention’, in R. T. Jensen and D. Moran (eds.), The Phenomenology of Embodied Subjectivity. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Russon, J. (2004), Reading Hegel’s Phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Russon, J. (2010), ‘Dialectic, Difference, and the Other: the Hegelianizing of French Phenomenology’, in L. Lawlor (ed.), Phenomenology. Responses and Developments, vol. 4, The History of Continental Philosophy (ed. A. D. Schrift). Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Schear, J. K. (ed.) (2013), Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World. The McDowell–Dreyfus Debate. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, M. (2011), ‘Is Habit a “Fossilized Residue of Spiritual Activity”? Ravaisson, Bergson, Merleau-Ponty’, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 42:1: 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, A. ( forthcoming), ‘Hegel and Twentieth-Century French Philosophy’, in D. Moyar (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Storey, D. (2009), ‘Spirit and/or Flesh: Merleau-Ponty’s Encounter with Hegel’, PhaenEx. Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture 4:1: 59–83.Google Scholar
Testa, I. (2013), ‘Hegel’s Naturalism or Soul and Body in the Encyclopedia ’, in D. S. Stern (ed.), Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Vanzago, L. (2001), Modi del tempo: simultaneità, processualità e relazionalità fra Whitehead e Merleau-Ponty. Milan/Udine: Mimesis.Google Scholar
Winfield, R. D. (2015), The Intelligent Mind. On the Genesis and Constitution of Discursive Thought. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar