Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:56:48.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Normative Authority of Social Practices: A Critical Theoretical Reading of Hegel’s Introduction to the Philosophy of Right

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2017

Erick Lima
Erick Lima*
Affiliation:
University of Brasilia, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

What follows is an attempt to interpret Hegel’s Introduction to the Philosophy of Right in a way that explores the thesis of reason’s social character in light of the recent debate on Hegel’s theory of practical normativity. The discussion aims to highlight Hegel’s commitment to a ‘reconstructive’ version of the ‘immanent transcendence’ motive of Critical Theory and, more generally, to a programmatic critique of ‘deficient’ rationality and its effects on practice.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , August 2020 , pp. 271 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. and Horkheimer, M. (2002), Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments. Redwood CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1994), Hegel. Three Studies. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (2004), Negative Dialectics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. (1995), Recovering Ethical Life: Jürgen Habermas and Future of Critical Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. (2004), ‘Negative Dialectic as Fate: Adorno and Hegel’, in T. Huhn (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Adorno. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2002), Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1974), Arbeit und Interaktion. Bemerkungen zu Hegels Jenenser “Philosophie des Geites”, in G. Göhler (ed.), Frühe politische Systeme. Frankfurt: Ullstein.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1990), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2003), Truth and Justification. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2009), Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. (2010), The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel’s Social Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2012), The I in We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2015), Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (1996), Hegel´s Phenomenology. The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2005), Die Verwirklichung der Freiheit: Der Idealismus als Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2008), Hegel´s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. (2014), ‘Reconstructivism: On Honneth’s Hegelianism’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 40:8: 725–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, P. (2007), Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. Cambridge University Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theunissen, M. (1982), ‘Die verdrängte Intersubjektivität in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts’, in D. Henrich and R. Horstmann (eds.), Hegels Philosophie des Rechts. Die Theorie der Rechtsformen und ihre Logik. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar