Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:30:48.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Must it Be Abstract? Hegel, Pippin, and Clark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Martin Donougho
Martin Donougho*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of South Carolina, Columbia SC 29208
Get access

Abstract

By comparison with other parts of his philosophy, Hegel's Aesthetics has been slighted by Anglo-American philosophers. All the more welcome then are two recent essays by Robert Pippin, which promise to go well beyond received notions. With Hegel's Idealism, Pippin published what is by any measure one of the most original of recent treatments. Shortly thereafter came a penetrating study of the idea of the modern, which allotted a central role to artistic modernism, and since then he has published various essays actively engaging our post-Kantian legacy. Readers will therefore have heightened expectations of Pippin's turn to Hegel's aesthetics, or rather, as he himself signals, the philosophy of art — unlike some he clearly approves of the shift from Kantian questions of aesthetic taste to Romantic speculations on art, indeed on Art as cultural absolute.

They will hardly be disappointed. Yet in the event they will find themselves negotiating texts that are at once dense and elliptical, much of the argument being conducted via footnotes, its implications—what it commits the author to in theory and in practice — not evident straightaway. If Hegel's position (so far as one can speak of such a thing, when it is known largely from student notes made over a number of years) is complex, Pippin's turns out to be no less so. While I can hardly do justice to its intricacies, I do consider it both important and controversial, whether as interpretation of Hegel or as an approach to modernist abstraction.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 28 , Issue 1-2: number 55/56 , 2007 , pp. 87 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baynes, Kenneth (2002), ‘Freedom and Recognition in Hegel and Habermas’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 28:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belting, Hans (2001), The Invisible Masterpiece. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J.M. (1999), ‘Aporia of the Sensible: Art, Objecthood and Anthropomorphism’, in Heywood, Ian and Sandywell, Barry, eds., Interpreting Visual Culture: Explorations in the Hermeneutics of the Visual. New York: Routledge, 218–37.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J.M. (2006), Against Voluptuous Bodies: Late Modernism and the Meaning of Painting, Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brettell, Richard (1999), Modern Art 1851-1929: Capitalism and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carrier, David (1994), The Aesthete in the City: The Philosophy and Practice of American Abstract Painting in the 1980s. State College: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Cheetham, Mark (1991), The Rhetoric of Purity: Essentialist Theory and the Advent of Abstract Painting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, T.J. (1982), ‘Clement Greenberg's Theory of Art’, Critical Inquiry 9:139–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T.J. (1983), ‘Arguments About Modernism: A Reply to Michael Fried’, in The Politics of Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 239–48.Google Scholar
Clark, T.J. (1999), Farewell to an Idea: Episodes from a History of Modernism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, T.J. (2000), ‘Origin of the Present Crisis’, New Left Review 2:85–96.Google Scholar
Cooper, Harry (1998), ‘Mondrian, Hegel, Boogie’, October 84:119–42.10.2307/779211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Whitney (1994), ‘Das Optische und das Rhetorische in Paul de Mans «historischem Materialismus»’, Texte Zur Kunst 14:89–99.Google Scholar
Day, Gail (2000), ‘Persisting and Mediating: T.J.Clark and ‘the Pain of ‘the Unattainable Beyond’”, Art History 23:1:1–18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Man, Paul (1997), Aesthetic Ideology, Warminski, A., ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Donougho, Martin (2000), ‘Stages of the American Sublime’, MLN 115: 909–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donougho, Martin (2007), ‘Art and History: Hegel on the End, the Beginning, and the Future of Art’, in Houlgate, S., ed., Hegel and the Arts. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Doorman, Maarten (2003), Art in Progress: A Philosophical Response to the End of the Avantgarde. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, James (2002), Stories of Art, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elkins, James (2005), Master Narratives and their Discontents, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fer, Briony (1997), On Abstract Art, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ferry, Jean-Luc (1993), Homo Aestheticus: The Invention of Taste in the Democratic Age [originally 1990]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fried, Michael (1980), Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 10.1525/9780520322462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Michael (1982), ‘How Modernism Works: A Response to T.J. Clark’, Critical Inquiry 9:1: 217–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Michael (1998), Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fried, Michael (2005), ‘Barthes' punctum ’ Critical Inquiry 31: 539–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, H.S. (1997), Hegel's Ladder vol. 2: The Odyssey of Spirit. Indianapolis: Hackett Google Scholar
Harris, Jonathan (2005), Writing Back to Modern Art: After Greenberg, Fried, and Clark, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1975), Aesthetics, trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1979), Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1979), ‘Art and Philosophy Today: Reflections with Reference to Hegel’, originally 1966, in Amacher, R. E. and Lange, V. eds., New Perspectives in German Literature: A Collection of Essays, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 107–33.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (2001), Versuch über Kunst und Leben: Subjektivität—Weltverstehen—Kunst, Munich: Carl Hanser.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric (2001), ‘From Metaphor to Allegory’, in Cynthia, Davidson ed., Anything. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Michelson, Annette (1982), ‘De Stijl, Its Other Face: Abstraction and Cacaphony, or What Was the Matter with Hegel?’ October 22:3–26.10.2307/778361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert (1989), Hegel's Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert (1999), Modernism as a Philosophical Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert (2001), Henry James and Modern Moral Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert (2002), ‘What Was Abstract art? (From the Point of View of Hegel)’, Critical Inquiry 29:1–24; reprinted in Pippin 2005a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert (2005a), The Persistence of Subjectivity: On the Kantian Aftermath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert (2005b), ‘Authenticity in Painting: Remarks on Michael Fried's Art History’, Critical Inquiry 31: 575–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwabsky, Barry (2003) “Makeshiftness’. A Review of Michael Fried, Menzel's Realism' London Review of Books 25:8: 3–15.Google Scholar
Speight, Allen (2001), Hegel, Literature and the Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, Lindsay and Godzich, Wlad, eds. (1989), Reading de Man Reading. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Wallace (1997), Collected Poetry and Prose. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Werckmeister, O.K. (2002), ‘A Critique of T. J. Clark's Farewell to an Idea’, Critical Inquiry 28:855–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar