Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:18:51.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liz Disley. Hegel, Love and Forgiveness: Positive Recognition in German Idealism. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2015. ISBN 978-1-848-93520-4 (hbk). Pp. 178. £95/$150.

Review products

Liz Disley. Hegel, Love and Forgiveness: Positive Recognition in German Idealism. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2015. ISBN 978-1-848-93520-4 (hbk). Pp. 178. £95/$150.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2016

Gavin Rae
Gavin Rae*
Affiliation:
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 39 , Special Issue 2: Hegel and Twentieth-Century French Philosophy , October 2018 , pp. 360 - 365
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Heter, T. S. (2008), Sartre’s Ethics of Engagement: Authenticity and Civic Virtue. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mirvish, A. (2002), ‘Sartre on Friendship: Promoting Difference while Preserving Commitment’, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 33:3: 260–272.Google Scholar
Nicolacopoulos, T. and Vassilacopoulos, G. (1999), Hegel and the Logical Structure of Love. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Rae, G. (2011), Realizing Freedom: Hegel, Sartre, and the Alienation of Human Being. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rae, G. (2012), ‘Sartre on Authentic and Inauthentic Love’, Existential Analysis: Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis 23:1: 75–88.Google Scholar