Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:31:52.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel’s Political Epistemology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2016

Jean-François Kervégan
Jean-François Kervégan*
Affiliation:
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne Institut Universitaire de FranceCentre de philosophie contemporaine de la Sorbonne (NoSoPhi)[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article proposes an interpretation of Hegel’s famous maxim in the Preface of the Grundlinien: ‘What is rational is actual, and what is actual is rational’, not (as usual) as a politically conservative normative statement, but as an epistemological statement concerning the way in which philosophical discourse relates to reality. My aim is to take seriously Hegel’s claim that the purpose of philosophy is not to prescribe to the social world what it has to be but to define the mode through which it may be known.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , May 2018 , pp. 45 - 60
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Translation: Oliver Feltham

References

Abbreviations

Works by Hegel unless otherwise indicated.Google Scholar
B: Briefe von und an Hegel, ed. J. Hoffmeister. Hamburg: Meiner, 1953.Google Scholar
E: Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wisenschaften (1827–30), W 8–10.Google Scholar
GW: Gesammelte Werke. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
GW 11: Wissenschaft der Logik, Band 1: Das Sein, erste Auflage (1812). Hamburg: Meiner, 1978.Google Scholar
KrV: Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Akademie Ausgabe, vol. III. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1968.Google Scholar
L: The Logic of Hegel, translated from the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences by W. Wallace. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
PR: Outlines of the Philosophy of Right, trans. T. M. Knox, rev. S. Houlgate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
RPh: Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (1820), W 7.Google Scholar
RPhH: Philosophie des Rechts. Die Vorlesung von 1819/20, ed. D. Henrich. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1983.Google Scholar
SL: The Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller. New York: Humanity Books, 1969.Google Scholar
VG: Die Vernunft in der Geschichte, ed. J. Hoffmeister. Hamburg: Meiner, 1955.Google Scholar
W: Werke in zwanzig Bänden, ed. E. Moldenhauer and K. M. Michel. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1970.Google Scholar
W 5: Wissenschaft der Logik, Band 1: Die Lehre vom Sein, zweite Auflage (1832).Google Scholar
W 6: Wissenschaft der Logik, Band 2: Die Lehre vom Wesen; Die Lehre vom Begriff.Google Scholar
W 7: Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (1820).Google Scholar
W 8: Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften (1827–30), I: Die Logik.Google Scholar
W 19: Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, Teil I: Griechische Philosophie. Kapitel 3: Platon und Aristoteles.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Haym, R. (1857), Hegel und seine Zeit. Berlin: Gaertner (reprint, Hildesheim: Olms, 1962).Google Scholar
Henrich, D. (1975), ‘Hegels Theorie des Zufalls’, in Hegel im Kontext. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2006), The Opening of Hegel’s Logic. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1989), Pure Theory of Law, trans. M. Knight. Gloucester MA: Smith.Google Scholar
Kiesewetter, H. (1995), Von Hegel zu Hitler, 2nd edn. Frankfurt: P. Lang.Google Scholar
Mabille, B. (1999), Hegel. L’épreuve de la contingence. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1945), The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Renault, E. (2004), ‘Connaître le présent’, in J.-F. Kervégan and G. Marmasse (eds.), Hegel penseur du droit. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Topitsch, E. (1981), Die Sozialphilosophie Hegels als Heilslehre und Herrschaftsideologie, 2nd edn. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar