Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T09:02:56.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel on the Category of Quantity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2014

Stephen Houlgate
Stephen Houlgate*
Affiliation:
The University of [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , May 2014 , pp. 16 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bulmer-Thomas, I. (1983), ‘Plato's Theory of Number’, The Classical Quarterly 33(2), 375-384.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. W. (1996), Real Process: How Logic and Chemistry Combine in Hegel's Philosophy of Nature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. W. (2006), The Logic of Hegel's Logic. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. (1987), Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970a), Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (1830). Erster Teil: Die Wissenschaft der Logik. Mit den mündlichen Zusätzen, ed. E. Moldenhauer and K.M. Michel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970b), La théorie de la mesure, trans. and with commentary by A. Doz. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991), The Encyclopaedia Logic (with the Zusätze), trans. T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, and H. S. Harris. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1999a), Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1999b), Wissenschaft der Logik. Das Sein (1812), ed. H.-J. Gawoll. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1999c), Wissenschaft der Logik. Die Lehre vom Wesen (1813), ed. H.-J. Gawoll. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2008), Wissenschaft der Logik. Die Lehre vom Sein (1832), ed. H.-J. Gawoll. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2006), The Opening of Hegel's Logic. From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2008), ‘Hegel's Logic’, in F.C. Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 111-134.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1900ff), Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Königlich Preußische [later Deutsche] Akademie der Wissenschaften, 29 vols. Berlin: Georg Reimer, later Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1990), Kritik der reinen Vernunft, ed. R. Schmidt. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1997), Critique of Pure Reason, ed. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2005), Notes and Fragments, ed. P. Guyer, trans. C. Bowman, P. Guyer and F. Rauscher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. (1998), Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason, trans. C. T. Wolfe, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, R. D. (2012), Hegel's Science of Logic. A Critical Rethinking in Thirty Lectures. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. (1986), ‘Hegel und Cauchy. Eine Untersuchung zur Philosophie und Geschichte der Mathematik’, in R.-P. Horstmann and M. J. Petry (eds.), Hegels Philosophie der Natur. Beziehungen zwischen empirischer und spekulativer Naturerkenntnis. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. 197-263.Google Scholar