Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T02:52:46.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel on Judgements and Posits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2016

Christian Martin
Christian Martin*
Affiliation:
LMU, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Hegel draws a distinction between ‘judgements’ (Urteile) and ‘posits’ (Sätze). Judgements serve to explicate a unified subject matter, while posits do not. Because different forms of judgement are marked by specific combinations of logical constants with certain types of predicates, statements combining logical constants with predicates not ‘suited’ for each other cannot express judgements, but only posits. Current accounts of Hegel’s concept of judgement tend either to ignore or reject his conception of posits. This article shows that Hegel’s exclusion of a vast variety of well-formed statements from the realm of judgements contains a valuable insight rather than a flaw. It demonstrates that certain statements, even if correct, cannot contribute to the explication of a non-arbitrarily unified subject matter. Doing justice to Hegel’s notion of posit thus serves to motivate his general conception of judgement as well as his classification of particular types of judgement.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , May 2016 , pp. 53 - 80
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, J. L. (1970), Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. (2004), ‘Über Wahrheit und Identität’, in C. Halbig, M. Quante and L. Siep (eds.), Hegels Erbe. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2002), Tales of the Mighty Dead. Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2009), Reason in Philosophy. Animating Ideas. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. W. (2011), ‘Conceiving’, in M. Baur and S. Houlgate (eds.), A Companion to Hegel. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1953), The Foundations of Arithmetic, trans. J. L. Austin. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1960), Philosophical Writings, ed. P. T. Geach and M. Black. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1971), Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1987), Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1990), Kleine Schriften. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Graeser, A. (1990), ‘Hegel über die Rede vom Absoluten. Teil I: Urteil, Satz und spekulativer Gehalt’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 44: 175–193.Google Scholar
Halbig, C. (2003), ‘Ist Hegels Wahrheitsbegriff geschichtlich?’, in B. Merker (ed.), Subjektivität und Anerkennung. Paderborn: Mentis.Google Scholar
Hanna, R. (1986), ‘From an Ontological Point of View: Hegel’s Critique of Common Logic’, The Review of Metaphysics 44: 305–338.Google Scholar
Hartmann, K. (1999), Hegels Logik. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1981), Wissenschaft der Logik. Zweiter Band: Die subjektive Logik. Gesammelte Werke Band 12. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1992a), Enzyklopädie der Philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (1830). Gesammelte Werke Band 20. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1992b), Vorlesungen über Logik und Metaphysik (1817). Nachschrift von Franz Good. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010a), The Science of Logic, trans. G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010b), Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline. Part I: Science of Logic, trans. and ed. K. Brinkmann and D. O. Dahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. (1987), Hegel im Kontext. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hösle, V. (1988), Hegels System: Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität, Vols. I–II. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2006), The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, M. (1992), A Hegel Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1911), Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Zweite Auflage 1787. Akademieausgabe Band III. Berlin: Georg Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1923), Logik. Physische Geographie. Pädagogik. Akademieausgabe Band IX. Berlin/Leipzig: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1992), Lectures on Logic, trans. and ed. J. M. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knappik, F. (2013), Im Reich der Freiheit. Hegels Theorie autonomer Vernunft. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kruck, G. and Schick, F. (1996), ‘Identität im prädikativen Urteil? Überlegungen zu einem alten Streit am Fall des “positiven Urteils” in Hegels “Wissenschaft der Logik”’, in Jahrbuch für Philosophie des Forschungsinstituts für Philosophie Hannover 8: 175–96.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. (2005), Kant on the Human Standpoint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. G. (2012), Ontologie der Selbstbestimmung. Eine operationale Rekonstruktion von Hegels ‘Wissenschaft der Logik’. Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck.Google Scholar
Martin, C. G. (2014), ‘Die Idee als Einheit von Subjektivität und Objektivität’, in F. Schick, A. F. Koch, K. Vieweg and C. Wirsing (eds.), Hegel—200 Jahre Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (1989), Hegel’s Idealism. The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (2007), ‘Brandom’s Hegel’, in E. Hammer (ed.), German Idealism. Contemporary Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Redding, P. (2007), Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rödl, S. (2007), ‘Eliminating Externality’, International Yearbook of German Idealism 5: 176–388.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1912), ‘Review of: Hegel’s Doctrine of Formal Logic: Being a Translation of the First Section of the Subjective Logic. By G. W. F. Hegel. Translated by H. S. Macran, Oxford 1912’, in B. Russell, Logical and Philosophical Papers 1909-13. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schick, F. (2002), ‘Die Urteilslehre’, in A. F. Koch and F. Schick (eds.), G. W. F. Hegel. Die Wissenschaft der Logik. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Stekeler-Weithofer, P. (1992), Hegels analytische Philosophie. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Stern, R. (2009), Hegelian Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winfield, R. (2006), From Concept to Objectivity: Thinking through Hegel’s Subjective Logic. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. (1995), Die Vollständigkeit der Kantischen Urteilstafel. Mit einem Essay über Freges Begriffsschrift. Frankfurt: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, M. (2012), ‘Science of Logic’, in A. De Laurentiis and J. Edwards (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Hegel. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wohlfahrt, G. (1981), Der spekulative Satz. Bemerkungen zum Begriff der Spekulation bei Hegel. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar