Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:19:26.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel and Husserl on the Emergence of the I out of Subjectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

Alfredo Ferrarin
Alfredo Ferrarin*
Affiliation:
University of Pisa, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Modern philosophy tends to conflate subjectivity and ego (I-think, cogito, and the like). One lesson we can draw from Hegel is that the I emerges out of a natural and habitual state in the form of a return to itself through an opposition between self and world. In turn, Husserl has an interesting take on the anonymity of an ego-less subjectivity submerged in an affective and initially passive life out of which an ego-pole first constitutes itself. In both, a latent, functioning subjectivity which forms an unconscious ground is to be kept distinct from the several activities of a wakeful and self-conscious mind. I wish to compare and contrast Hegel and Husserl on this theme. The primary texts for my examination will be Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit and the Philosophy of Subjective Spirit in the Encyclopaedia, and Husserl’s Ideas I, Ideas II, Cartesian Meditations and Experience and Judgment.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 38 , Special Issue 1: Hegel and Phenomenology , May 2017 , pp. 7 - 23
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altobrando, A. (2010), Husserl e il problema della monade. Turin: Trauben.Google Scholar
Beguin, A. (1939), L’âme romantique et le rêve. Paris: Corti.Google Scholar
Bernet, R. (1994), La vie du sujet. Recherches sur l’interprétation de Husserl dans la phénoménologie . Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Bernet, R. (2003), ‘Unconscious Consciousness in Husserl and Freud’, in D. Welton (ed.), The New Husserl. A Critical Reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bloechl, J. (2006), ‘Egoity without Ego’, in A. Ferrarin (ed.), Passive Synthesis and Life-World. Pisa: Ets.Google Scholar
de Waelhens, A. (1959), ‘Réflexions sur une problématique husserlienne de l’inconscient. Husserl et Hegel’, in L. van Breda and J. Taminiaux (eds.), Edmund Husserl 1859–1959. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, A. (1994), ‘Husserl on the Ego and its Eidos (Cartesian Meditations, IV)’, The Journal of the History of Philosophy 32:4: 119–133.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, A. (2001), Hegel and Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, A. (2015a), ‘From the World to Philosophy, and Back’, in J. Bloechl and N. de Warren (eds.), Phenomenology in a New Key: Between Analysis and History. Essays in Honor of Richard Cobb-Stevens. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, A. (2015b), The Powers of Pure Reason. Kant and the Cosmic Concept of Philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, A. (2016), Il pensare e l’io. Hegel e la critica di Kant. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Hyppolite, J. (1971), ‘Phénoménologie de Hegel et psychanalyse’ [1957], repr. in Figures de la pensée philosophique. Écrits 1931–1968, vol. 1. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Lohmar, D. (unpublished manuscript), A History of the Ego.Google Scholar
Manca, D. ( forthcoming), Husserl e le metamorfosi della soggettività inconscia.Google Scholar
Marbach, E. (1974), Das Problem des Ich in der Phänomenologie Husserls. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Mishara, A. (1990), ‘Husserl and Freud: Time, Memory and the Unconscious’, Husserl Studies 7:1: 29–58.Google Scholar
Moran, D. (2012), Husserl’s Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, D. (2014), ‘The Ego as Substrate of Habitualities: Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology of the Habitual Self’, Phenomenology and Mind 6: 27–47.Google Scholar
Pugliese, A. (2009), Unicità e relazione. Intersoggettività, genesi e io puro in Husserl. Milan/Udine: Mimesis.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (1999), Self-Awareness and Alterity. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar