Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:16:36.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminism and Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit: ‘Lordship and Bondage’ and ‘Ethical Action’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

J. M. Fritzman  and
Jeffrey A. Gauthier
J. M. Fritzman
Affiliation:
Lewis & Clark College, [email protected]
Jeffrey A. Gauthier
Affiliation:
University of Portland, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In quest of an authoritative text for determining the relationship between Hegel and feminism, nearly all writers on the subject have turned to his interpretation of Antigone in chapter six of the Phenomenology of Spirit. There are at least two compelling reasons for this. In the first place, as the comprehensive introduction to Hegel's writings, the Phenomenology of Spirit is the obvious place to begin in exploring Hegel's arguments on the subject (compare Forster 1998: 13-14). Because the description of gender relations in the world of ancient Greece in chapter six is Hegel's only extended discussion on the topic, this obviously recommends that discussion as a starting point for study. In the second place, Hegel refers back to the division of gender roles in that chapter in some of his discussions concerning gender and women in subsequent ethical writings, most notably in the Elements of the Philosophy of Right. This would suggest that Hegel himself took the discussion there as authoritative on matters of gender.

Despite general agreement that Hegel's account of Antigone in the Phenomenology of Spirit is significant, scholars differ on how best to interpret that significance. Kelly Oliver argues that Hegel's restriction of women to traditional family roles in chapter six prevents them from participating in later stages of the dialectic, a fact that ‘undermines Hegel's entire project in the Phenomenology’ (Oliver 1996: 69). Patricia Jagentowicz Mills claims that ‘Hegel's interpretation of Sophocles’ play Antigone is central to an understanding of woman's role in the Hegelian system' (Mills 1996: 59), but goes on to argue that Hegel uses a distortion of the play ‘to represent woman in the family in transhistorical terms’ (Mills 1996: 78).

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 30 , Issue 1-2: number 59/60 , 2009 , pp. 42 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, J. (2000), Antigone's Claim: Kinship Between Life and Death. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Changfoot, N. (2002), ‘Hegel's Antigone: A Response to the Feminist Critique’, The Owl of Minerva 33:2: 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, A. B. (2003), ‘The Task and Method of Hegel's Phenomenology ’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 47/48: 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crites, S. (2001), ‘Notes on Hegel's Ladder ’, The Owl of Minerva 33:1: 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMarte, I. C. and Fritzman, J. M. (2007), ‘Diderot's Uncle, Hegel; Or Rameau's Nephew as a Branch of The Phenomenology of Spirit’, 1650-1850 14: 177–220.Google Scholar
di Giovanni, G. (2000), ‘Factual Necessity: On H. S. Harris and Weltgeist ’, The Owl of Minerva 31:2: 131–53.10.5840/owl200031212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, S. (1987), ‘Hegel and Feminism’ in Lamb, David (ed.), Hegel and Modern Philosophy. London: Croom Helm. 30–55.Google Scholar
Forster, M. (1993), ‘Hegel's Dialectical Method’ in Beiser, Frederick C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press. 130–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. N. (1998), Hegel's Idea of a Phenomenology of Spirit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, J. A. (1997), Hegel and Feminist Social Criticism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Geller, J. (1992), ‘Hegel's Self-Conscious Woman’, Modern Language Quarterly 53:2: 173–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, S. S. (1996), ‘Desire and Necessity in Lordship and Bondage’ in Johannessen, Kjell S. and Nordenstam, Tore (eds.), Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Culture: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Wittgenstein Symposium. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky. 334–40.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1952), Phänomenologie des Geistes, ed. Hoffmeister, Johannes. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1956), Philosophy of History, trans. Sibree, J.. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1968), Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Weltgeschichte, ed. Lasson, G.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970), Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts in Moldenhauer, Eva and Karl, Google Scholar
Michel, (eds.), vol. 7 of Werke in zwanzig Banden. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1970.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991), Elements of the Philosophy of Right, trans. Nisbet, H. B.. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, S. (2006–2007), ‘Restoring Antigone to Ethical Life: Nature and Sexual Difference in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit’, The Owl of Minerva 38:1–2: 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, K. (2003), Hegel and Feminist Philosophy. Maiden, MA.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Irigaray, L. (1985), Speculum of the Other Woman, trans. Gill, G. C.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kain, P. J. (2002), ‘Hegel, Antigone, and Women’, The Owl of Minerva 33:2: 157–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojève, A. (1986), Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lecture on the Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Nichols, James H. Jr. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lukács, G. (1976), The Young Hegel: Studies in the Relations between Dialectics and Economics, trans. Livingstone, Rodney. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, R. A. (2001), ‘Mutual Recognition and the Dialectic of Master and Slave: Reading Hegel against Kojève’, International Philosophical Quarterly 41:1: 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, D. (1992), Hegel, Marx, and the English State. San Francisco: Westview.Google Scholar
Mills, P. J. (1979), ‘Hegel and “The Woman Question”: Recognition and Intersubjectivity’ in Clark, Lorenne M. G. and Lange, Lydia (eds.), The Sexism of Social and Political Theory: Woman and Reproduction from Plato to Nietzsche. Buffalo: University of Toronto Press. 74–97.Google Scholar
Mills, P. J. (1996), ‘Hegel's Antigone’ in Mills, Patricia Jagentowicz (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Hegel. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. 59–88.Google Scholar
Mills, P. J. (2002), ‘“Hegel's Antigone” Redux: Woman in Four Parts’, The Owl of Minerva 33:2:205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, K. (1996), ‘Antigone's Ghost: Undoing Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit ’, Hypatia 11:1:67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawen, H. M. (1992), ‘A Response to “Why Feminists Should Take the Phenomenology of Spirit Seriously’”, The Owl of Minerva 24:1: 63–68.Google Scholar
Ravven, H. M. (1996), ‘Has Hegel Anything to Say to Feminists?’ in Mills, Patricia Jagentowicz (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Hegel. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. 225–52.Google Scholar
Riley, P. (1981), ‘Introduction to the Reading of Alexandre Kojève’, Political Theory 9:1: 5–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, R. (1983), In the Spirit of Hegel: A Study ofG.W.F. Hegel's ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swindle, S. (1992), ‘Why Feminists Should Take the Phenomenology of Spirit Seriously’, The Owl of Minerva 24:1: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1975), Hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verene, D. P. (1985), Hegel's Recollection: A Study of Images in the Phenomenology of Spirit. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Willett, C. (1990), ‘Hegel, Antigone, and the Possibility of Ecstatic Dialogue’, Philosophy and Literature 14:2: 268–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar