Article contents
British Idealism: Its Political and Social Thought*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 June 2015
Abstract
British Idealism is often identified with the three best known British Idealists: T.H. Green, F.H. Bradley and B. Bosanquet. However, the full range of British Idealists includes also E. Caird, D.G. Ritchie, J.S. Mackenzie, H. Jones, J.H. Muirhead, W. Wallace, A.S. Pringle-Pattison, R.B. Haldane, R.L. Nettleship and J. Watson. Shortage of space does not allow a satisfactory discussion of the nature of British Idealist thought, nor is it the aim of this article. What follows intends to be introductory only. It brings to the fore the concept of reconciliation as the idea that gives unity to British Idealism, explains the role of Idealist thought in nineteenth century British social thought, and reveals the contribution of British Idealism to substantive social and political thought. This introductory account is coupled with a bibliographical essay to illustrate the range of concerns Idealist thought embraces.
British Idealism is sometimes described as an intellectual ‘movement’ not as a result of any comprehensive study of the idealists and their views so much as on the strength of its supposed role in providing intellectual support for the ‘collectivism’ or increasing state intervention that is claimed to have dominated British politics in the late nineteenth century. Indeed, the intellectual interest in British Idealism has generally followed on the belief that Idealism was the major force behind the politics of collectivism.
Although British Idealists did constitute a group, this group did not and, indeed, could not have had the effect on British politics that is usually suggested. British Idealism could not have lent itself exclusively to one line of policy.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 2 , Issue 1: number 3 , Spring/Summer 1981 , pp. 16 - 31
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 1981
Footnotes
I would like to thank Dr. M.S. Freeden and A.M. Sharakiya (my husband) for their useful comments.
References
** Some scholars may wonder why I have not included J. Caird, J.B. Baillie, H.H. Joachim, J.M.E. McTaggart and J.A. Smith. Although they were Idealists, they either did not write on social and political matters, or did not have much to say on these questions.
- 1
- Cited by