Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:17:41.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Kind of an Idealist (If Any) Is Hegel?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2016

Markus Gabriel
Markus Gabriel*
Affiliation:
University of Bonn, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, I first explore Hegel’s own distinctions between various types of idealism, most of which he explicitly rejects. I discuss his notions of subjective, transcendental and absolute idealism and present the outlines of his criticisms of the first two as well as the motivation behind his commitment to a version of absolute idealism. In particular, I argue that the latter does not share the defining features of what is now commonly called ‘idealism’, as Hegel neither denies the existence of an external world nor even holds that we can only somehow indirectly infer the truth of propositions about the external world from the structure of some given mental material. I give a basic account of what Hegel’s concept of ‘the absolute idea’ is about, which lies behind his absolute idealism. In this context, I maintain that it is crucial for our understanding of Hegel and of his potential relevance for contemporary metaphysics and epistemology that the absolute idea is precisely not a mental or ‘spiritual’ (geistig) entity. Rather, it amounts to a set of methodological assumptions designed to guarantee the overall intelligibility of what there is, regardless of its actual natural, social or more broadly normative structure.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , October 2016 , pp. 181 - 208
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allais, L. (2015), Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and His Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962), How to do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. (2005), Hegel. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. B. (2002), Tales of the Mighty Dead. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. B. (2014), ‘Some Hegelian Ideas of Note for Contemporary Analytic Philosophy’, Hegel Bulletin 35:1: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, S. (1999), The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, W. (1988), Hegel’s Theory of Mental Activity. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dunham, J., Grant, I. H. and Watson, S. (2014), Idealism: The History of a Philosophy. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. (1989), Hegel and Skepticism. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, P. W. (2005), All or Nothing. Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fulda, H. F., Horstmann, R.-P. and Theunissen, M. (eds.) (1980), Kritische Darstellung der Metaphysik. Eine Diskussion über Hegels ‘Logik’. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2006), Das Absolute und die Welt in Schellings Freiheitsschrift. Bonn: Bonn University Press.Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2007), ‘Die metaphysische Wahrheit des Skeptizismus bei Schelling und Hegel’, Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 5: 126–156.Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2009), Skeptizismus und Idealismus in der Antike. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2011), Transcendental Ontology: Essays in German Idealism. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2013), ‘Aarhus Lectures: Schelling and Contemporary Philosophy—First Lecture: Schelling on Why There is Something Rather than Nothing in the Original Version (Urfassung) of the Philosophy of Revelation ’, SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 14:1: 70–101.Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2014a), ‘Aarhus Lectures—Second Lecture: Schelling’s Ontology in the “Freedom Essay”’, SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 15:1: 75–98.Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2014b), An den Grenzen der Erkenntnistheorie. Die notwendige Endlichkeit des objektiven Wissens als Lektion des Skeptizismus. 2., verbesserte und um ein Nachwort erweiterte Auflage. Freiburg: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2015a), ‘Aarhus Lectures—Third Lecture: The Prospects of Schelling’s Critique of Hegel’, SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 16:1: 114–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2015b), ‘Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling’, in M. Forster and K. Gjesdal (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of German Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2015c), Fields of Sense: A New Realist Ontology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, M. and Žižek, S. (2009), Mythology, Madness and Laughter: Subjectivity in German Idealism. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halbig, C. (2002), Objektives Denken: Erkenntnistheorie und Philosophy of Mind in Hegels System. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Halbig, C. (2005), ‘The Philosopher as Polyphemus? Philosophy & Common sense in Hegel and Jacobi’, Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism 3: 261–282.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1892), Lectures on the History of Philosophy, 3 vols., trans. E. S. Haldane. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1953), Briefe von und an Hegel, ed. J. Hoffmeister, Band II: 1813–1822. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970–71), Werke in zwanzig Bände, ed. E. Moldenhauer and K. M. Michel. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010), Science of Logic, trans. and ed. G. di Giovanni. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1969), Briefwechsel. Akademieausgabe Vol. 12. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1999a), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. and ed. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1999b), Correspondence, trans. and ed. A. Zweig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, A. F. (2014), Die Evolution des logischen Raums: Aufsätze zu Hegels Nichtstandard-Metaphysik. Tübingen: Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreines, J. (2006), ‘Hegel’s Metaphysics: Changing the Debate’, Philosophy Compass 1:5: 466–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreines, J. (2008), ‘Metaphysics Without Pre-Critical Monism: Hegel On Lower-Level Natural Kinds And The Structure Of Reality’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 57: 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreines, J. (2015), Reason in the World: Hegel’s Metaphysics and Its Philosophical Appeal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreis, G. (2015), Negative Dialektik des Unendlichen. Kant, Hegel, Cantor . Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. (2007), Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. (1996), Mind and World, with a New Introduction by the Author. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2009), Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (2012), Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostritsch, S. (2014), Hegels Rechtsphilosophie als Metaethik. Münster: Mentis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (1989), Hegel’s Idealism. The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (2008), Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (2015), ‘Finite and Absolute Idealism: The Transcendental and Metaphysical Hegel’, in S. Gardner and M. Grist (eds.), The Transcendental Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Redding, P. (2007), Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, S. (2012), Hegel’s Critique of Kant. From Dichotomy to Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, R. (2009), Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Inwagen, P. (2009), Metaphysics. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (1992), Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar